Hi Michael,
Am 01.05.2008 um 05:11 schrieb Michael FIG:
Would you be able to share something like a diff or wdiff of the paper
so that we could see what has changed?
it's really what you'd call a maintenance update. If you have read the
first version, this one won't give you anything new; i
Hi,
Michael Haupt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> just a brief notice that my COLA tutorial ("Implementing Brainfuck in
> COLA") is available in an updated version. The update does not bring
> anything fundamentally new, just enhancements, mostly in terms of
> accuracy.
Would you be able to share
Dear all,
just a brief notice that my COLA tutorial ("Implementing Brainfuck in
COLA") is available in an updated version. The update does not bring
anything fundamentally new, just enhancements, mostly in terms of
accuracy.
http://www.swa.hpi.uni-potsdam.de/tutorials/cola/index.html
Bes
The community may find it of interest to know we toyed with this word/
idea some time ago
Kim
On Nov 28, 2007, at 7:12 AM, Steven H. Rogers wrote:
On Wed, November 28, 2007 06:50, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ZEN meaning Zero Engine Noise?
That might work ;), but this definition from the J
That's got my vote for the time being...
-- Kim
On Nov 28, 2007, at 9:41 AM, Joshua Gargus wrote:
That's not bad.
How about simply OLA, since minimalism is such a big part of the
whole adventure?
Josh
On Nov 28, 2007, at 5:30 AM, Steven H. Rogers wrote:
Stéphane Conversy wrote:
btw,
That's not bad.
How about simply OLA, since minimalism is such a big part of the whole
adventure?
Josh
On Nov 28, 2007, at 5:30 AM, Steven H. Rogers wrote:
Stéphane Conversy wrote:
btw, I vote for ZOLA for two reasons: 1. http://acronyms.thefreedictionary.com/zola
. "Zola is not availab
On Wed, November 28, 2007 06:50, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ZEN meaning Zero Engine Noise?
>
That might work ;), but this definition from the Jargon File is more what
I had in mind:
zen vt. To figure out something by meditation or by a sudden flash of
enlightenment. Originally applied to bug
ZEN meaning Zero Engine Noise?
..
Zitat von "Steven H. Rogers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Stéphane Conversy wrote:
> > btw, I vote for ZOLA for two reasons:
> > 1. http://acronyms.thefreedictionary.com/zola. "Zola is not available
> > in the list of acronyms." (whci hmeans it IS available)
> > 2.
Stéphane Conversy wrote:
btw, I vote for ZOLA for two reasons:
1. http://acronyms.thefreedictionary.com/zola. "Zola is not available
in the list of acronyms." (whci hmeans it IS available)
2. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%89mile_Zola: "...but I affirm,
with intense conviction, the Truth is
ok.
By looking at the examples, I see that all the tools are launched
using a command line. Can I infer that so far, dynamic 'compiling' is
still not possible, though envisionned ?
Which leads to the question: is it one of the goals to make *OLA
embedable someday in a squeak-like environmen
Many thanks for taking time to answer to the previous questions.
Introducing the new ones:
In function/, there is jolt/, jolt-burg/, jolt-vpu/. AFAI, jolt-vpu
is a first attempt, and is moribund. I don't know the relationship
between jolt and jolt-burg. However, a
$ find . -name Makefile |
On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 10:08:04AM -0800, Ian Piumarta wrote:
> On Nov 23, 2007, at 12:22 AM, St?phane Conversy wrote:
>
>> I still don't fully understand the goal of fonc/idst (or COLA ? or LOLA ?)
>
> Think of it as 'factory tooling'. If you have a lathe and a milling
> machine you can build la
Ian Piumarta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> I hate the special case handling of text layout --
> everything should be made of relationships between and constraints
> acting on boxes and springs, like in TeX (and maybe we should even be
> using Knuth's algorithms directly).
Possibly
On Nov 25, 2007, at 4:18 PM, Dan Amelang wrote:
The
canvas stuff was created initially to support some jolt+javascript
work that needed graphical capabilities. I wouldn't try to infer
anything profound from its existence/implementation.
Other than it's an indication of the direction in which t
On Nov 23, 2007, at 2:39 AM, Stéphane Conversy wrote:
For example, there is a lot of canvas examples in the function
directory, none in the object directory.
Why is that ? can't I program OO graphical stuff with LOLA ?
The object/ and function/ directories include incompatible object
libr
On Nov 23, 2007, at 12:22 AM, Stéphane Conversy wrote:
I still don't fully understand the goal of fonc/idst (or COLA ? or
LOLA ?)
Think of it as 'factory tooling'. If you have a lathe and a milling
machine you can build lathes and milling machines easily; without
them, building the same
On Nov 23, 2007 2:39 AM, Stéphane Conversy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...
> for example, there is a lot of canvas examples in the function directory,
> none in the object directory.
> Why is that ? can't I program OO graphical stuff with LOLA ?
You can. The fact that the canvas stuff was done i
Le 23 nov. 07 à 09:22, Stéphane Conversy a écrit :
I try to express it differently:
For me, fonc/idst is a general project about language, run-time,
dynamic everything etc, including peg, which is a new way to
implement languages. It seems to me that your tutorial only
adresses the prob
Le 22 nov. 07 à 23:40, Michael Haupt a écrit :
Hi Stéphane,
Am 22.11.2007 um 20:13 schrieb Stéphane Conversy:
The trick is dirty because I have to bind a variable to the
result of a rule evaluation and then re-bind it to something
entirely different. That's not what I consider clean code.
Le 22 nov. 07 à 18:25, Michael Haupt a écrit :
The trick is dirty because I have to bind a variable to the result
of a rule evaluation and then re-bind it to something entirely
different. That's not what I consider clean code.
I still don't understand why you had to do that.
I really
Dear all,
there's a small tutorial I wrote on the principles applied when
implementing programming languages using COLA and its PEG
implementation. The language chosen for the tutorial is, rather for
its simplicity than for its name, brainfuck.
http://www.swa.hpi.uni-potsdam.de/tutorials/
21 matches
Mail list logo
