[Fonts]Chinese fonts display problems

2001-12-14 Thread Tommy Wong
Dear Sir, I wonder if you can help answering my question or point me to some related resources. We have developed some applications on Linux Redhat 7.1. Now we want it to be in Chinese version. All we did is replacing the menu text in XHPDP and .menu_text.dat in to Chinese. And specific some

Re: [Fonts]Removing core support from Xft

2001-12-14 Thread Bradley T Hughes
On Friday 14 December 2001 04:30, Keith Packard wrote: Over the last year, we've learned a lot about how client side fonts change the X environment. The initial focus was to simplify the Render extension protocol and avoid future problems by eliminating font information. This has been

[Fonts]Re: [Render] Removing core support from Xft

2001-12-14 Thread rjh
On 13 Dec, Keith Packard wrote: Server-side fonts were added to Xft to support legacy X servers without the Render extension. I suggest that instead of using server-side fonts, Xft should rasterize glyphs with FreeType and draw with the Render extension where available and using the core

Re: [Fonts]Removing core support from Xft

2001-12-14 Thread Brian Stell
Keith Packard wrote: ... Server-side fonts were added to Xft to support legacy X servers without the Render extension. I suggest that instead of using server-side fonts, Xft should rasterize glyphs with FreeType and draw with the Render extension where available and using the core

[Fonts]Re: [Render] Removing core support from Xft

2001-12-14 Thread Steve Swales
Since render is not yet a standard extension, and making this change would disable Xft on all commercial X servers aside from XFree86, I would caution against it at this time. My 2cents. -steve X-Authentication-Warning: engmail2.Eng.Sun.COM: noaccess owned process doing -bs

Re: [Fonts]Re: [Render] Re: Removing core support from Xft

2001-12-14 Thread Markus Kuhn
Steve Swales wrote on 2001-12-14 19:56 UTC: I suggest that instead of using server-side fonts, Xft should rasterize glyphs with FreeType and draw with the Render extension where available and using the core protocol for legacy servers without Render support. But every glyph would

[Fonts]Re: Removing core support from Xft

2001-12-14 Thread Markus Kuhn
Steve Swales wrote on 2001-12-14 18:17 UTC: Since render is not yet a standard extension, and making this change would disable Xft on all commercial X servers aside from XFree86, I would caution against it at this time. I think, Keith addressed that objection already in his original

[Fonts]Re: [Render] Re: Removing core support from Xft

2001-12-14 Thread Steve Swales
Markus Kuhn Wrote: Steve Swales wrote on 2001-12-14 18:17 UTC: Since render is not yet a standard extension, and making this change would disable Xft on all commercial X servers aside from XFree86, I would caution against it at this time. I think, Keith addressed that objection already in

[Fonts]Re: [Render] Removing core support from Xft

2001-12-14 Thread Keith Packard
Around 10 o'clock on Dec 14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Excellent idea. Can we also coordinate with the major applications groups to reach a consensus on font management? The underlying font management goal should be to reach the same ease of use that is presently achieved in the Windows

[Fonts]Re: [Render] Removing core support from Xft

2001-12-14 Thread Keith Packard
Around 10 o'clock on Dec 14, Steve Swales wrote: Since render is not yet a standard extension, and making this change would disable Xft on all commercial X servers aside from XFree86, I would caution against it at this time. The idea is to provide a core-protocol fallback where the Render

[Fonts]Re: [Render] Removing core support from Xft

2001-12-14 Thread Liam Quin
Certainly using client-side font rendering is what almost all commercial word processors, page layout and drawing programs have always had to do with X, because of the need for access to printer metrics. Actually it turned out to be necessary with NeWS too, in most cases, because NeWS didn't