Re: cvs commit: xml-fop/src/org/apache/fop/render/ps ASCII85OutputStream.java ASCIIHexOutputStream.java Finalizable.java FlateEncodeOutputStream.java PSRenderer.java ASCII85EncodeFilter.java ASCIIHexEncodeFilter.java Filter.java FilterThread.javaFlateEncodeFilter.java

2002-06-12 Thread Jeremias Maerki
I forgot to add the following changes to the log: - Changed the positioning of text elements (I'm using more absolute positioning instead of relative becaus it leads to suboptimal results. We need to analyze the cause in more detail.) - Make SVG work from instream-foreign-object AND

Re: SVG/SVG inclusion issue ?

2002-06-12 Thread Dominique Broeglin
On Tue, 2002-06-11 at 22:35, J.Pietschmann wrote: No. Batik, the SVG rasterizer, either cannot find the referenced file or it cannot decode its format. Point 1: file:b.svg is, technically, an invalid URL. FOP tries to cope with it, but Batik has it's of logic. Use b.svg or a full path

RE: Redesign Goals and XSmiles

2002-06-12 Thread Mikko Honkala
Hello FOP :) Sorry for the delay, but I've just noticed the thread on FOP X-Smiles now. I've forwarded this message to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list as well. I'm glad that the FOP community is interested in the X-Smiles project. We've been using FOP as part of the browser for ages, I think

LazyFont.getAscender error

2002-06-12 Thread Jochen . Maes
Hiya guyzzz/gurlzz... I have a problem Again, this is on a different puter... first i thought it was because i didn't have the same fontpaths... but it doesn't seem to be that... someone who understands it? the statement at FopTransformer.process is driver.render(res); 2002/06/12 11:10:24

PDF-files generated with FOP rejected by RIP engines

2002-06-12 Thread claes . bergsten
Hi I have a problem with PDFs generated by FOP. I am generating PDFs that are supposed to be sent directly to a printer via a RIP engine. FOP seems to embed the entire image into the PDF resulting in a huge (size) PDF (depending of image file of course). All RIP engines I have tried rejects FOPs

release candidate (was: Re: cvs commit: xml-fop/src/org/apache/fop/render/ps...)

2002-06-12 Thread Christian Geisert
Jeremias Maerki schrieb: I forgot to add the following changes to the log: - Changed the positioning of text elements (I'm using more absolute positioning instead of relative becaus it leads to suboptimal results. We need to analyze the cause in more detail.) - Make SVG work from

[GUMP] Build Failure - xml-fop

2002-06-12 Thread Sam Ruby
This email is autogenerated from the output from: http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/gump/2002-06-12/xml-fop.html Buildfile: build.xml init-avail: init-filters-xalan2: [copy] Copying 1

Re: PDF-files generated with FOP rejected by RIP engines

2002-06-12 Thread Christian Geisert
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Hi I have a problem with PDFs generated by FOP. I am generating PDFs that are supposed to be sent directly to a printer via a RIP engine. FOP seems to embed the entire image into the PDF resulting in a huge (size) PDF (depending of image file of course). All RIP

Re: LazyFont.getAscender error

2002-06-12 Thread Oleg Tkachenko
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a problem Again, this is on a different puter... first i thought it was because i didn't have the same fontpaths... but it doesn't seem to be that... someone who understands it? the statement at FopTransformer.process is driver.render(res); 2002/06/12

Re: PDF-files generated with FOP rejected by RIP engines

2002-06-12 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Hi Claes Still tracking that ugly problem, I see. I think Christian's idea might be worth tracking down. It could be that you simply have a setting in Distiller that scales images down. But these are not really the problem. The reason that it works after the distiller could really be the fact

cvs commit: xml-fop/docs/xml-docs/data track.svg

2002-06-12 Thread keiron
keiron 2002/06/12 07:12:19 Added: docs/xml-docs/data track.svg Log: svg for creating status branch image Revision ChangesPath 1.1 xml-fop/docs/xml-docs/data/track.svg Index: track.svg

cvs commit: xml-fop/docs/xml-docs/fop status.xml readme.xml

2002-06-12 Thread keiron
keiron 2002/06/12 07:14:32 Modified:docs/xml-docs fop.xml docs/xml-docs/fop readme.xml Added: docs/xml-docs/fop status.xml Log: moved status to another page with some more info Revision ChangesPath 1.16 +1 -0

Re: LazyFont.getAscender error

2002-06-12 Thread Jochen . Maes
ok thanks true, forgot the file:/// specification in the metric specs :D thanks Jochen Maes ICT Development KBC Securities (kbcsecurities.com) Havenlaan 12 Avenue du Port SIF 8683 B-1080 Brussels Belgium Tel: +32 2 429 96 81

cvs commit: xml-fop/src/org/apache/fop/image ImageFactory.java

2002-06-12 Thread keiron
keiron 2002/06/12 08:18:56 Modified:src/org/apache/fop/image ImageFactory.java Log: added exception to log err message Revision ChangesPath 1.6 +2 -2 xml-fop/src/org/apache/fop/image/ImageFactory.java Index: ImageFactory.java

cvs commit: xml-fop/docs/xml-docs/fop relnotes.xml

2002-06-12 Thread chrisg
chrisg 2002/06/12 12:54:05 Modified:docs/xml-docs/fop relnotes.xml Log: Added release notes for FOP 0.20.4 Revision ChangesPath 1.3 +30 -3 xml-fop/docs/xml-docs/fop/relnotes.xml Index: relnotes.xml

cvs commit: xml-fop build.xml

2002-06-12 Thread chrisg
chrisg 2002/06/12 13:10:24 Modified:.Tag: fop-0_20_2-maintain build.xml Log: updated version numer for 0.20.4 release candidate removed 'lib/' from manifest classpath Revision ChangesPath No revision No revision

Re: Fop and JDK1.2

2002-06-12 Thread Peter B. West
Can anyone answer the questions below? Hopefully, before the release. I think we need to discuss these issues in more depth. We have people using FOP in production, and, in spite of the fact that everyone is aware that FOP is pre-beta, and that everything about it is subject to change, we

Image Cache issue - Latest Release after 0.20.3

2002-06-12 Thread Athalye, Rishi
Hi, We are using fop 0.20.3 and it appears to be working fine for our purpose except for 1 major point. Caching of Images. Here's what I am doing :- Based on the program logic, I am creating multiple PDF documents applying the same XSL but different XML data feeds. If I am not mistaken, in an

Fwd: Re: Fop and JDK1.2

2002-06-12 Thread Ralph LaChance
Apropos of the many threads discussing 1.3 vs 1.2 code dependencies particularly as it relates to the awt renderer TT fonts, and I might add printing, I repeat my question (below) about ~how not to~ use TT fonts. Plus this: I work from the premise that most users of fop will prefer ~not~ to

Re: Image Cache issue - Latest Release after 0.20.3

2002-06-12 Thread Michael Gratton
Hi Rishi, Athalye, Rishi wrote: We are using fop 0.20.3 and it appears to be working fine for our purpose except for 1 major point. Caching of Images. Yep, I was going to have a look at improving this, but haven't had the time lately. I did read about some people coming up with a