cvs commit: xml-fop/conf fop.xconf

2002-12-14 Thread olegt
olegt 2002/12/14 07:35:28 Modified:conf fop.xconf Log: Fixed well-formedness. Revision ChangesPath 1.3 +1 -1 xml-fop/conf/fop.xconf Index: fop.xconf === RCS file:

cvs commit: xml-fop/src/documentation README

2002-12-14 Thread vmote
vmote 2002/12/14 10:11:24 Modified:src/documentation README Log: Add clarifications from Jeff Turner Christian Geisert regarding publication process. Revision ChangesPath 1.3 +17 -7 xml-fop/src/documentation/README Index: README

Re: Sun XSL Formatter

2002-12-14 Thread Peter S. Housel
Arved Sandstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Well, Java or C or C++ or Haskell, it would have been nice to have a clue. We have an ASF tradition of developing communities...this kind of stuff that Sun and IBM does is getting old. Don't open-source it; sell it. I will argue against its adoption

RE: Sun XSL Formatter

2002-12-14 Thread Victor Mote
Peter S. Housel wrote: Looks like they want to donate it to Gnome, not Apache. AFAIR, the BSD license is pretty incompatible with the Apache license. One of the reasons that the xmlroff announcement doesn't change my commitment to FOP is that, for my interests anyway, the Apache license is

RE: Sun XSL Formatter

2002-12-14 Thread Arved Sandstrom
-Original Message- From: Peter S. Housel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: December 14, 2002 2:21 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Sun XSL Formatter Arved Sandstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Well, Java or C or C++ or Haskell, it would have been nice to have a clue. We

RE: Sun XSL Formatter

2002-12-14 Thread Arved Sandstrom
-Original Message- From: Victor Mote [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: December 14, 2002 3:01 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Sun XSL Formatter Peter S. Housel wrote: Looks like they want to donate it to Gnome, not Apache. AFAIR, the BSD license is pretty incompatible

RE: Sun XSL Formatter

2002-12-14 Thread Rhett Aultman
Response Below: -Original Message- From: Arved Sandstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sat 12/14/2002 2:08 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: RE: Sun XSL Formatter Victor, I

RE: Sun XSL Formatter

2002-12-14 Thread Arved Sandstrom
-Original Message- From: Victor Mote [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: December 14, 2002 3:40 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Sun XSL Formatter Arved Sandstrom wrote: But can I point out that C is about as portable as it gets? Maybe someone on this list has time to throw

Re: Sun XSL Formatter

2002-12-14 Thread Peter B. West
Peter S. Housel wrote: Arved Sandstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Well, Java or C or C++ or Haskell, it would have been nice to have a clue. We have an ASF tradition of developing communities...this kind of stuff that Sun and IBM does is getting old. Don't open-source it; sell it. I will

RE: Sun XSL Formatter

2002-12-14 Thread Rhett Aultman
Response below. -Original Message- From: Arved Sandstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sat 12/14/2002 3:47 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: RE: Sun XSL Formatter Sure, in a narrow