Re: PropertySets - target-locks on SDK 1.4

2004-01-05 Thread Clay Leeds
I was going to ask that too... Web Maestro Clay On Jan 5, 2004, at 5:43 PM, John Austin wrote: On Mon, 2004-01-05 at 21:11, Glen Mazza wrote: It's probably not *yet* time to set 1.4 as the JDK to code against for 1.0, but it probably wouldn't be much of a disaster if we did so either. Does a targ

Re: PropertySets - target-locks on SDK 1.4

2004-01-05 Thread John Austin
On Mon, 2004-01-05 at 21:11, Glen Mazza wrote: > It's probably not *yet* time to set 1.4 as the JDK to > code against for 1.0, but it probably wouldn't be much > of a disaster if we did so either. Does a target-lock commitment like this require a vote ? John Austin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

cvs commit: xml-fop/src/java/org/apache/fop/datatypes CompoundDatatype.java CondLength.java Keep.java LengthPair.java LengthRange.java Space.java

2004-01-05 Thread gmazza
gmazza 2004/01/05 16:49:40 Modified:src/codegen properties.xsl src/java/org/apache/fop/datatypes CompoundDatatype.java CondLength.java Keep.java LengthPair.java LengthRange.java Space.java Log: More String->Int conversio

Re: PropertySets

2004-01-05 Thread Glen Mazza
It's probably not *yet* time to set 1.4 as the JDK to code against for 1.0, but it probably wouldn't be much of a disaster if we did so either. By the time 1.0 is release-ready, 90% will either be on 1.4 or will be upgrading to 1.4 along with the upgrade of FOP 0.20.x to 1.0. The remaining 10% ca

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25900] - [PATCH] dotted/dashed borders in PDF Renderer

2004-01-05 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: PropertySets

2004-01-05 Thread Peter B. West
Chris Bowditch wrote: Glen, Ive just noticed that the PropertySets class uses methods on java.util.bitset that only exist since JDK 1.4. Namely: cardinality nextBitSet So you can no longer build with 1.3 Chris Chris, Thanks for pointing this out. I had not noticed when I was using the functi

Re: Regression caused by the string->int conversion

2004-01-05 Thread Glen Mazza
Fixed. Thanks. Glen --- Finn Bock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: __ Do you Yahoo!? New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing. http://photos.yahoo.com/

cvs commit: xml-fop/src/java/org/apache/fop/fo Property.java

2004-01-05 Thread gmazza
gmazza 2004/01/05 14:13:19 Modified:src/java/org/apache/fop/fo Property.java Log: Switch from strings->ints in Property.setSubprop() (from Finn Bock). Revision ChangesPath 1.10 +4 -3 xml-fop/src/java/org/apache/fop/fo/Property.java Index: Property.java

cvs commit: xml-fop/src/java/org/apache/fop/fo PropertyList.java

2004-01-05 Thread gmazza
gmazza 2004/01/05 14:02:47 Modified:src/java/org/apache/fop/fo PropertyList.java Log: COMPOUND_MASK/PROPERTY_MASK bug fixed in PropertyList.java (patch by Finn Bock). Revision ChangesPath 1.21 +1 -1 xml-fop/src/java/org/apache/fop/fo/PropertyList.java Inde

RE: Draft discussion of Federation proposal

2004-01-05 Thread Glen Mazza
--- Thomas DeWeese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > A combined user-list might be a good starter... > > I think a combined user-list would be a > disaster. In general I > think the people who need to know about SVG get told > about Batik and > the people who need to know about XSL-FO get told >

Error in junit tests (was: [Bug 25828] - [PATCH] fop.sh/bat should use java.endorsed.dirs)

2004-01-05 Thread Simon Pepping
On Fri, Jan 02, 2004 at 10:59:54PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25828 > > [PATCH] fop.sh/bat should use java.endorsed.dirs > > --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-01-02 22:59 --- > > I found today that the JUnit t

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25900] - [PATCH] dotted/dashed borders in PDF Renderer

2004-01-05 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: Row and Colspan

2004-01-05 Thread Andreas L. Delmelle
> -Original Message- > From: Chris Bowditch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Are you asking if they should be created at the same time the > FO tree is built? > Not exactly. I'm referring to the grouping into CommonBorderAndPadding / CommonMargin etc. There is also a group of TableProperties

RE: More on row and column span (was: RE: (Changing Vote) etc.)

2004-01-05 Thread Andreas L. Delmelle
> -Original Message- > From: Chris Bowditch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > it would be easy to determine col number in Table.addChild. This number > could then be replaced in TableColumn.doSetup only if Column Number has > actually been specified in the FO. I'm not sure I would be keen on >

Re: Row and Colspan

2004-01-05 Thread Chris Bowditch
Andreas L. Delmelle wrote: Another, property-related question (not specifically for you, Chris, but *if* you have an idea...): Is it the intention that the 'Table Properties' are in someway moulded into a class (like now the Common*Properties are), or is the way I see them defined/used now in the

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25900] - [PATCH] dotted/dashed borders in PDF Renderer

2004-01-05 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25900] - [PATCH] dotted/dashed borders in PDF Renderer

2004-01-05 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: Row and Colspan

2004-01-05 Thread Andreas L. Delmelle
> -Original Message- > From: Chris Bowditch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Hi Andreas, > > i hope you dont mind a little feedback on this. > Hi Chris, Not at all! Thanx for the fine input. I'll definitely get a lot closer to what I'm (and FOP is) after. (Support for the number-columns-span

RE: Draft discussion of Federation proposal

2004-01-05 Thread Andreas L. Delmelle
> -Original Message- > From: Thomas DeWeese [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > I think a combined user-list would be a disaster. In general I > think the people who need to know about SVG get told about Batik and > the people who need to know about XSL-FO get told about FOP if they > w

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25900] - [PATCH] dotted/dashed borders in PDF Renderer

2004-01-05 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25900] - [PATCH] dotted/dashed borders in PDF Renderer

2004-01-05 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: Draft discussion of Federation proposal

2004-01-05 Thread Thomas DeWeese
Hi Andreas, Jeremias, Jeremias Maerki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Concerning the proposed TLPs I'm wondering if FOP and Batik shouldn't go together somehow. Both projects deal with XML to graphics conversions. FOP currently has 2 Batik Transcoder implementations (additional output formats for Bati

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25900] - [PATCH] dotted/dashed borders in PDF Renderer

2004-01-05 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25900] - [PATCH] dotted/dashed borders in PDF Renderer

2004-01-05 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25900] - [PATCH] dotted/dashed borders in PDF Renderer

2004-01-05 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25900] - [PATCH] dotted/dashed borders in PDF Renderer

2004-01-05 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25900] - [PATCH] dotted/dashed borders in PDF Renderer

2004-01-05 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Regression caused by the string->int conversion

2004-01-05 Thread Finn Bock
--- PropertyList.java 5 Jan 2004 00:44:59 - 1.19 +++ PropertyList.java 5 Jan 2004 01:31:09 - 1.20 @@ -184,20 +184,11 @@ */ public Property getExplicitOrShorthand(int propId) { /* Handle request for one part of a compound property */ -Str

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25900] - [PATCH] dotted/dashed borders in PDF Renderer

2004-01-05 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25900] - [PATCH] dotted/dashed borders in PDF Renderer

2004-01-05 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25900] New: - [PATCH] dotted/dashed borders in PDF Renderer

2004-01-05 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

PropertySets

2004-01-05 Thread Chris Bowditch
Glen, Ive just noticed that the PropertySets class uses methods on java.util.bitset that only exist since JDK 1.4. Namely: cardinality nextBitSet So you can no longer build with 1.3 Chris

Re: More on row and column span (was: RE: (Changing Vote) etc.)

2004-01-05 Thread Chris Bowditch
Andreas L. Delmelle wrote: -Original Message- From: Andreas L. Delmelle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I guess the riddle I'm still trying to solve is: How do I access the LM's for the subsequent rows at this point? AFAICT, I have overlooked (at least) the following note in the spec (6.7.1 Ta

Re: More on row and column span (was: RE: (Changing Vote) etc.)

2004-01-05 Thread Chris Bowditch
Andreas L. Delmelle wrote: Another detail overlooked is the column-number property, ... Which is, for the moment quite ... unimplemented (--should've checked this sooner :) ), so that explains why the spec isn't being followed when setting the default value to 0. This makes me think that much of

Re: (Changing Vote) Re: [VOTE] Andreas L. Delmelle for committer

2004-01-05 Thread Chris Bowditch
Andreas L. Delmelle wrote: Hi Andreas, i hope you dont mind a little feedback on this. Well, this is as far as I got (--actually, now I think at least column-span is solved fully. Then again, so I did the first time ;) In ascending order of importance: 1. In a number of methods in fop.layoutm