Hi,
The attached patch will get FOP documentation building cleanly with the
imminent Forrest 0.5 release. There are two changes:
- It creates a new file, src/documentation/sitemap-0.5.xmap, which is a
0.5-specific version of FOP's overridden sitemap. This means the site
can continue to b
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 12:59:07PM +0200, Steven Noels wrote:
> Jeff Turner wrote:
>
> >I'd be interested to know if any other users experience this problem, and
> >also why Cocoon needs a recompiled FOP jar in the first place.
>
> Me too, as I'm experien
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 03:36:30PM -0700, Victor Mote wrote:
> I made some decent progress today on getting my head into the trunk code,
> and to document some of what I have learned. I am still confused by the
> "Development" and "Redesign" tabs. At first, I thought that maybe
> "Development" was
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 01:56:04AM +1000, Peter B. West wrote:
>
>
> Victor Mote wrote:
> >
> >
> >My understanding is as follows:
> >1. The "refresh" button on the http://forrestbot.cocoondev.org site will
> >take the contents at cvs.apache.org/cvs/xml-fop as input, and generate the
> >web site.
On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 10:04:58PM -0700, Victor Mote wrote:
> Peter B. West wrote:
>
> > That should be, "...still has to be committed." The 6-hourly script
> > will presumably update from the website CVS.
> >
> > Peter B. West wrote:
> > > Victor,
> > >
> > > I'll make and commit the changes th
On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 08:03:42PM +1100, Jeff Turner wrote:
...
> Instead of modifying Forrest, if you copy the *.js files from resources/*
> to content/*, so you have:
>
> [xml-fop ~/src/documentation/content]$ find . -name "codedisplay.js"
> ./design/alt.design/
On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 05:30:47PM +1000, Peter B. West wrote:
> Victor,
>
> There's a slight problem here. My files can only be built successfully
> with a mod to forrest.build.xml that copies the contents of
> resources/scripts into context. If forrestbot is building off CVS with
> a slight
On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 10:31:23PM +1000, Peter B. West wrote:
> Jeff,
>
> I'm running forrest locally. I assume that there is no attempt by a
> locally run forrest to talk to forrestbot.cocoondev.org.
Nope
> Which would mean that the forrestbot has failed at the same place that
> I have. wou
On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 09:16:52PM +1000, Peter B. West wrote:
> This was run against a clean checkout with a recent cvs update. When I
> run against my previous tree, also just cvs updated, the forrest build
> proceeds. I'll try to find out why.
At:
http://forrestbot.cocoondev.org/logs/work.
On Sat, Jan 11, 2003 at 05:43:37PM +0100, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> Hi Jeff
>
> I've applied your patches locally. Thanks. Everything's ok with the
> first one, but with the second one I'm having problems (not your fault!):
> - I had to add adjust the inline DTD of skinconf.xml to include the role
Hi,
Running 'forrest validate' on CVS head, I get:
validate-xdocs:
/home/jeff/apache/xml/xml-fop/src/documentation/content/xdocs/design/alt.design/properties/enumerated-values.xml:211:63:
Element type "code." must be declared.
/home/jeff/apache/xml/xml-fop/src/documentation/content/xdocs/design/a
On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 01:15:56AM +1000, Peter B. West wrote:
> Fopdevs,
>
> In trying to set up the alt-design documentation, I was initially
> hacking the forrest ant scritp to access pre-formed html. There is a
> vigorous discussion going on on forrest-dev about formal mechanism for
> this
7;validate' target using built-in DTDs is a good
idea, I created a patch to add this to FOP:
http://cvs.apache.org/~jefft/tmp/fop-validate.zip
The patch adds about 900k to xml-fop.
Appended is the patch README.
--Jeff
On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 04:54:03PM +0100, Keiron Liddle wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-12-12 at 16:16, Jeff Turner wrote:
> > Yes. There is nothing wrong with FOP grabbing the latest DTDs from
> > Forrest and including them locally. That is effectively what users of
> > Forrest bi
On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 11:48:16PM +1000, Peter B. West wrote:
> Victor Mote wrote:
> >Peter B. West wrote:
...
> >>These can (probably will) get out of sync. The dtd should be the one
> >>used when the document was last modified, shouldn't it? It seems to me
> >>there is a case for including the
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 03:15:33PM +0100, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
...
[On why http://forrestbot.cocoondev.org/sites/xml-fop/ wasn't updating]
...
> [java] Exception in thread "main" java.lang.InternalError: Can't
> connect to X11 window server using ':0.0' as the value of the DISPLAY
> va
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 12:59:03PM -0700, Victor Mote wrote:
> Peter B. West wrote:
>
> > I'm still floundering around here, but when I found 'catalog' in
> > .../documentation/resources/schema, and the dtd in .../schema/dtd, I
> > began to see a ray of light. It seems to me that such a setup sho
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 11:24:34PM +1000, Peter B. West wrote:
> Jeff Turner wrote:
> >
> >Forrest is in the same boat as FOP when it comes to site updates. AFAIK,
> >there are no docs, but the process is:
> >
> > - Committers commit generated docs to xml-site/ta
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 11:17:25AM -0700, Victor Mote wrote:
...
> > > > See http://forrestbot.cocoondev.org/site/xml-fop
...
> OK, I see now that I misunderstood your "Sorry, yes" answer to Keiron. If
> http://forrestbot.cocoondev.org/site/xml-fop should be reflecting changes no
> more than an hou
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 10:24:28AM -0700, Victor Mote wrote:
> Jeff Turner wrote:
>
> > See http://forrestbot.cocoondev.org/site/xml-fop
> >
> > Updated every hour with the latest Forrest and FOP source.
>
> I am really not yet following what is going on here. I
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 05:26:48PM +0100, Keiron Liddle wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 11:56, Jeff Turner wrote:
> > See http://forrestbot.cocoondev.org/site/xml-fop
> >
> > Updated every hour with the latest Forrest and FOP source.
>
> You mean: and FOP that come
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 09:45:06PM -0700, Victor Mote wrote:
> Keiron and Nicola Ken (and anyone else who is interested):
>
> I have the process of building the fop web site mostly scripted at
> /home/vmote/script/build-fop-website.bsh. I have a couple of
> problems/questions, which I will interje
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 03:57:48PM +0100, Keiron Liddle wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-12-02 at 15:49, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> > Keiron,
> >
> > is that really necessary? If proper UTF-8 encoding would be used (as
> > declared implicitly), these cryptic character references would not be
> > necessary, rig
23 matches
Mail list logo
