gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31570
page break and keep together do not work well together
Summary: page break and keep together do not work well together
Product: Fop
Version: 0.20.5
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
Se
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18038
duplicated links on page break, in table with keep-together each row
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-16 13:59 ---
Created an attachment (id=5356)
Screen capture of Adobe Acrobat showing the duplicate
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18038
duplicated links on page break, in table with keep-together each row
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-16 13:35 ---
Created an attachment (id=5354)
XSLFO that reproduces the p
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18038
duplicated links on page break, in table with keep-together each row
Summary: duplicated links on page break, in table with keep-
together each row
Product: Fop
Version: 0.20.5
Platform: PC
OS/Version: W
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17830
FOP0.20.5rc and keep-together=>retrieve-marker doesn't work correctly
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17830
FOP0.20.5rc and keep-together=>retrieve-marker doesn't work correctly
Summary: FOP0.20.5rc and keep-together=>retrieve-marker doesn't
work correctly
Product: Fop
Version: 0.20.5
Platform: PC
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3044
keep-together not functioning
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Addi
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7449
Large table row with keep-together=always runs FOP infinitely
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RE
Steiner, Priska wrote:
> there is a snippet of my .xsl.
Note that Oleg asked for a relevant *FO* snippet. Posting parts
of XSLT code is often insufficient for tracking down problems.
However, you are lucky, in your special case:
>
>
>font-weight="bol
Regards
P.Steiner
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Oleg Tkachenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 16. Oktober 2002 11:47
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: AW: can I hack a keep-together?
Steiner, Priska wro
Steiner, Priska wrote:
> I to, had problems with the "keep-together". I tried it with blind tables,
> but it
> seemed not to work with Fop 0.20.4.
h'm, afaik it works for me, post small snippet of your fo.
--
Oleg Tkachenko
eXperanto team
Multico
Hy
I to, had problems with the "keep-together". I tried it with blind tables,
but it
seemed not to work with Fop 0.20.4.
I thought, it was a new bug since Fop 0.20.3.
With Fop 0.20.2 it had worked within tables.
Is it so ?
Regards
P.Steiner
-Ursprüngliche Nachrich
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am exploring the possibility of modifying the code to allow support for
> keep-together. I'm pressed for time; so a hack will work. I would
> appreciate any input on if this is possible and how long it would take?
Search the source for "keep-
Hello,
I am exploring the possibility of modifying the code to allow support for
keep-together. I'm pressed for time; so a hack will work. I would
appreciate any input on if this is possible and how long it would take?
Thank You,
Shaifali Prakash
C&HT / Media & Entertainment
> "J.Pietschmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Try passivetex. You have to install a full TEX package, apart from
> this it is quite excellent.
Doesn't it also have problems with keep-* attributes?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EM
Mete Kural wrote:
> Is there any estimate on when the "keep-together"
> property will be implemented?
No.
> The FOP Project is great although as you know it's
> still being developed. While I wait for FOP to be
> developed, what other free XSL-FO formatters can
Hello FOP committers,
Is there any estimate on when the "keep-together"
property will be implemented?
The FOP Project is great although as you know it's
still being developed. While I wait for FOP to be
developed, what other free XSL-FO formatters can I use
to generate PDFs? I&#x
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3044
keep-together not functioning
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Additional Comment
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3044
keep-together not functioning
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Addi
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3044
keep-together not functioning
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Addi
David B. Bitton wrote:
> Can someone give me a 100 words or less on keep-together? What I'm most
> confused is using 1 through 9 as apposed to always. I think my
> keep-together problem would be solved with this, but I'm not sure how to use
> it. Tx :)
I don't thi
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7449
Large table row with keep-together=always runs FOP infinitely
Summary: Large table row with keep-together=always runs FOP
infinitely
Product: Fop
Version: 0.20.3
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
I have been away for a while, and haven't been able to read all the mails
from the mailinglist. Since my return i answered some questions, but not to
much...
therefore this might been said before, but that i missed it.
I saw there is a new release of FOP (fop-0.20.3rc2-src.tar.gz). I'm using
th
Hi Suhail,
Actually to keep two different FO together, you need to use
keep-with-next or keep-with-previous. The keep-together property means
to keep an entire FO in the same page or column (if possible). For
example, if you put keep-together on an fo:block, FOP should try to keep
the whole
to keep together
Hi,
As keep-together is not supported in
FOP as of now how can i ensure that a table
and a preceding block appear together on the
same page..
Please pass on any ideas u have..
Thanks in advance,
Suhail
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
Hi,
As keep-together is not supported in
FOP as of now how can i ensure that a table
and a preceding block appear together on the
same page..
Please pass on any ideas u have..
Thanks in advance,
Suhail
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
=3044
*** shadow/3044 Wed Aug 8 08:26:09 2001
--- shadow/3044.tmp.5558Wed Aug 8 08:26:09 2001
***
*** 0
--- 1,128
+ ++
+ | keep-together not functioning
> Subject: Re: Keep-together (and the other keep-*'s)
> It's not against spec in my book either, but it's currently not
> implemented in FOP, for table-row or for anything else.
> The problem with all that keep-* stuff is that it's not that easy to do.
> Actu
gotten around to it.
Karen
Petr Andrs wrote:
>
> Im XSL FO spec in article "6.7.9 fo:table-row" keep-together, keep-with-
> previous and keep-with-next properties are listed in "The following
> properties apply to this formatting object:". So why is keep-together
> o
Im XSL FO spec in article "6.7.9 fo:table-row" keep-together, keep-with-
previous and keep-with-next properties are listed in "The following
properties apply to this formatting object:". So why is keep-together
on table-row considered against spec?
pa
On 17 Jul 2001, at
At 09:36 AM 7/17/01 +0100, Alex McLintock wrote:
> --- Struan Judd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> If so might I request a small departure from the XSL:FO spec, if it is
>> straight-forward to implement. Please allow keep-together on fo:table-row.
>>
>
>I don&#
--- Struan Judd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If so might I request a small departure from the XSL:FO spec, if it is
> straight-forward to implement. Please allow keep-together on fo:table-row.
>
I don't think deviations from the XSL:FO spec are either wise or going to
implement. Please allow keep-together on fo:table-row.
TTFN
Struan Judd <*> "And so it begins ..." ICQ: 4498196
http://neongraal.sf.org.nz
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Voicemail and Fax: +1 (201
Hi there,
Is there a chance, that the "keep-together"-property will be realised in
a (nearly)future release ???
When I use this property, it causes no error, but it also will not work
properly...
Is there another way to the same functionality about other properties ?
t
Falk,
keep-together is not supported presently..
Try keep-with-previous or
keep-with-next..
That may help.
Raju Dave
- Original Message --
"Falk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
To:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From:"Falk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hello,i
have the following table:by using keep together the table
should not be broken at the end of thepage.FOP 0.17 doesn't give
any error messages.But the table is split at the end of the page.How can
I prevent the table from breaking ?Thanks a
lot.Falk
quot;always" in the parent block
but the blocks are still splitting across pages. I have also tried adding the
"keep-together" attribute to each of the list blocks, but they still split
across pages.
Is there a way to use the keep-together.within-page attribute to keep a block
and it&
Hello,
i have the following table:
by using keep together the table should not be broken at the end of the
page.
FOP 0.17 doesn't give any error messages.
But the table is split at the end of the page.
How can I prevent the table from breaking ?
Thanks a lot.
Hi,
3. You should be able to use keep-with-previous or keep-with-next on all
table-row objects to prevent breaking. keep-together on the table itself
isn't yet implemented.
4. Table-cell borders are implemented, although only the
border-collapse=separate style is fully supported. When bo
Hi,
I have some questions from my colleagues. (If more information is
needed, I can go back to them and get it.)
1. To what extend does the initial-page-number work?
2. How do I center a table horizontally on the page? (All tables are
flush left now.)
3. How do I keep a table from being broken
40 matches
Mail list logo
