f the page.
What is the right way to do this?
Thanks!
Roger,
Roger Roelofs Phone 616 574-0480 x246
Datacomp Appraisal ServicesFax 616 574-0486
3215 Eaglecrest Drive, NE Suite 100 email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Grand Rapids, MI 49525-4593 web www.datac
Thanks,
I had discovered that very message about an hour ago. Somehow I missed
it on my first journey through the archives.
On Friday, February 7, 2003, at 03:24 PM, J.Pietschmann wrote:
Roger Roelofs wrote:
I'm new to fop, so I may have missed this somewhere, but I'm having
trouble
PDF output ---
Dwelling Condition
0 Other Bldgs No
0 Garage Yes
Dwelling Condition < this line is new as of today.
---
Thanks
Roger,
Roger Roelofs Phone 616 574-0480 x246
Datacomp Appraisal Services
I know this has been covered, I've been wandering the archives, but it
hasn't sunk in yet.
I have a xsl doc with the following basic structure. Instead of
starting a new page for each iteration of this template, it resets to
the top of the page and writes over the top of the previous content.
Thanks! In future I'll build test cases for questions to the list. Is
there a way to get fop to save the .fo file it generates during the
xslt transform?
On Tuesday, February 18, 2003, at 04:29 PM, J.Pietschmann wrote:
Roger Roelofs wrote:
It's probably me...but since I installed
Oleg,
Thanks. My problem was that I need a double border around the page and
I had used absolutely positioned block-containers to get it. Once I
removed them the pagination worked just great.
On Wednesday, Feb 19, 2003, at 04:35 America/Detroit, Oleg Tkachenko
wrote:
Roger Roelofs wrote:
I
Oleg,
That's what I did. It worked great. It took a while to get the
concept that it is ok for regions to overlap.
On Thursday, Feb 20, 2003, at 02:40 America/Detroit, Oleg Tkachenko
wrote:
Roger Roelofs wrote:
Thanks. My problem was that I need a double border around the page
and
David,
We are doing this by fop'ing to pdf and using ghostscript to convert to
tiff. It works very well, and you have lots of tiff encoding choices.
On Tuesday, March 4, 2003, at 12:45 PM, David Blevins wrote:
Thanks for the reply Oleg,
Multithreaded access isn't a requirement, so we are in the