Re: Strange FOP error

2006-10-09 Thread Jeremias Maerki
That's really strange. Did you delete avalon-framework-4.2.0.jar in the lib directory? For me and many others calling FOP using fop.bat from the root directory of a FOP 0.92beta installation on Windows just works. Maybe you changed something in your installation. I'd extract a fresh copy of FOP

Re: Glyphs in TrueType font file not found by FOP

2006-10-09 Thread Jeremias Maerki
For FOP, what you need is not a glyph index but a Unicode character index. 1509 in hex is 05E5 which in Unicode is HEBREW LETTER FINAL TSADI, so I don't think you've got the right index if you want to create Arabic text. On 09.10.2006 03:00:18 kev martin wrote: Using FOP 0.92. I have created

Re: fop in a servlet in 0.91beta very different from 0.20.5

2006-10-09 Thread Roberto Nunnari
Hello list. Jeremias Maerki wrote: On 10.02.2006 20:14:06 Roberto Nunnari wrote: Hello Jeremias. Yes. You're right. There was a problem with the FO document.. in effect it was the same as the one I had a week ago caused by the title element. Anyways, I managed to move from 0.20.5 to

Re: fop in a servlet in 0.91beta very different from 0.20.5

2006-10-09 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Better late than never. :-) Thanks so much for your feedback! It's always good to hear stuff like that. On 09.10.2006 09:37:13 Roberto Nunnari wrote: Hello list. Jeremias Maerki wrote: On 10.02.2006 20:14:06 Roberto Nunnari wrote: Hello Jeremias. Yes. You're right. There was a

Barcodes in fop 0.92 - Batik

2006-10-09 Thread Richard King
Thanks for that. I appreciate it and the jar looks good. Downloaded and updated my jar ... unfortunately now have a new problem! Running the fop.bat or via java I get a FATAL. The message of concern I believe is: The attribute width of the element rect is required Checked the version of

Re: Barcodes in fop 0.92 - Batik

2006-10-09 Thread Glen Mazza
Richard King wrote: Thanks for that. I appreciate it and the jar looks good. Downloaded and updated my jar ... unfortunately now have a new problem! Running the fop.bat or via java I get a FATAL. The message of concern I believe is: The attribute width of the element rect is required

RE: Barcodes in fop 0.92 - Batik

2006-10-09 Thread Richard King
Heya, What I'm doing is trying to implement a barcode via barcode4j. I am running the following: xsl:variable name=barcode-cfg barcode ean-13/ /barcode /xsl:variable fo:blockA normal

Fop from PHP/Java...

2006-10-09 Thread Luis Ferro
I managed to make a piece of source that seams to work... but something is amiss because tomcat is freeing the thread too soon and the file is still in processing: java_require(C:\\Program Files\\fop-0.92beta\\build\\fop.jar;C:\\Program

Re: Barcodes in fop 0.92 - Batik

2006-10-09 Thread Glen Mazza
Richard King wrote: Heya, What I'm doing is trying to implement a barcode via barcode4j. Oh! This is a Jeremias question then. My knowledge of barcodes is limited to finding them on products so I can use the self-serve checkout at the grocery store. I did not realize that the rect/ was

Re: Fop from PHP/Java...

2006-10-09 Thread Luis Ferro
Ok... This was a very simple problem... Tomcat runned out of memory... after adding more memory in the pools... it runned to completion. Thanx for beign aware ;) LF -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Fop-from-PHP-Java...-tf2411567.html#a6722546 Sent from the FOP - Users

Re: Barcodes in fop 0.92 - Batik

2006-10-09 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Please see http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/faq.html#svg-attribute-required You probably added Xalan 2.7.0 only to your classpath but not to your bootclasspath which is needed since J2SE 1.4 if you want to replace the default JAXP implementation (endorsed standards override mechanism). You don't

Re: Glyphs in TrueType font file not found by FOP

2006-10-09 Thread john farrow
I think you misunderstand the arial.xml file. Most of the glpyhs in the font are not in the section of the arial.xml file which has glyph indices. The font has ~1600 glpyhs, the arial.xml file only has index data for ~500 of them. - Original Message - From: kev martin