Bob,
IIRC, you are putting a 900px file into a 25pt area. FOP should shrink it to
fit, but I suspect it still has issues doing this with large jpgs. Other image
types (gif etc) work better.
Cheers,
Roland
From: bob swanson [mailto:bobswans...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, 13 May 2013 12:51 PM
To: f
As far as an XML parser is concerned you have 3 nodes within the “para”
element; two separate text nodes with the PI in between them.
Your XSL would need to string both text nodes together instead of just showing
the first one.
I’m a bit rusty on this sorry, but there should be a couple of ways t
Shruti,
I vaguely recall that marker formats are controlled where you set them, not
where you retrieve them.
Regards,
Roland
-Original Message-
From: shrutin [mailto:shru...@mastek.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 30 September 2009 3:18 PM
To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Subject: Horizontal
Jeff,
From experience:
Don't use transparency in gif's.
Don't use oversized jpeg's & expect scaling down to work in PCL, it doesn't.
I convert all images to non-transparent gif & they work in both PCL and
PDF. PCL versions of the image are lower quality & slightly shrunken,
but workable.
BMP
Ulrich,
We found fop 0.20.5 required these fonts on some RH versions, even in
headless mode:
xorg-x11-deprecated-lib
The fop errors we saw were different, but still misleading.
I don't think java 1.6 was around when that version of FOP was written
either FWIW.
Regards,
*Roland *
Ulrich M
I'll second this. I also see difference in either text sizes or field
width causing line wrapping in several places in PCL but not PDF with
the same file. The workaround is to allow a fudge factor in the
field/table row/table height sizes, but this can cause text overlapping
or large blank area
http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/0.94/pdfencryption.html
Regards,
*Roland*
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
We are using Pdf encryption of FOP 0.20 and we are getting following error.
Please guide us on the same
java.lang.IllegalStateException: Cannot find any provider supporting RC4
at o
GNU Classpath (used by
GCJ, Kaffee etc.).
On 10.04.2008 03:46:28 Roland Neilands wrote:
Hello foppers,
We've just put a watermark on our documents & it works fine on two PC's
using FOP 0.20.5, 0.93 & 0.94.
It's completely ignored on two linux servers (tested with sam
Hello foppers,
We've just put a watermark on our documents & it works fine on two PC's
using FOP 0.20.5, 0.93 & 0.94.
It's completely ignored on two linux servers (tested with same 3 fop
versions). The rest of the document renders fine, just no watermark,
except for 20.5 which fails with an
Just a thought but you could put it into a BLOB in a DB & apply your
security to accessing that.
Alternatively encrypt the filesystem pdf for reading & provide the
password separately.
Regards,
Roland
Woodhouse, Graeme wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Thanks for your help - as a bit of a test I tried t
Trevor,
This is something you provide contingency in XSL-FO for, not something
you need to do manually on every page.
Search the list archives for fo:marker & fo:retrieve marker & look for
same in the examples directory.
Anyone care to update the FAQ for this? I can provide better wording.
R
PCL 6 (aka PCL XL) is
a completely different printer language compared to PCL 5. We'd have to
develop a completely new renderer. Do you have a budget for this? ;-)
What does that mean: "better, but still not adequate"? Does it print
correctly on those printers or not? What's the
I suggest PCL6 support.
A late response I know, but this just came up recently & I can't work
around it.
PCL 5 support is being dropped from some new printers it seems:
http://h2.www2.hp.com/bc/docs/support/SupportManual/c00878487/c00878487.pdf
This has happened a couple of times recently,
Jenkins, Mark wrote:
Guys,
When is PDF encryption necessary?
...
Is it just to add restrictions on how the document can or cannot be
manipulated(print, edit,etc.)?
Yes, that's it.
Cheers,
Roland
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
-q command line option or if embedded maybe logging levels in faq
Regards,
Roland
This e-mail is solely for the use of the intended recipient and may contain
information which is confidential or privileged. Unauthorised use of its
contents is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in e
Ian,
Ian Burrell wrote:
On 3/13/07, Roland Neilands <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is a basic XML parsing question, not particular to FOP:
Use the XML prolog "standalone" attribute to prevent the DTD lookup.
eg:
Is there any way to set the fop config or pass command-li
Ian,
This is a basic XML parsing question, not particular to FOP:
Use the XML prolog "standalone" attribute to prevent the DTD lookup.
eg:
Regards,
Roland
Ian Burrell wrote:
We are getting intermittent failures making PDF from XSL-FO with SVG
images. I think the problem is caused by network
Check the FAQ:
http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/0.93/running.html#memory
Regards,
Roland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello All,
I am trying to convert a huge XML document(approx about 110 pages
long, 777KB) into a pdf document using an FO transformation. But it
gives me the following error
Rick,
I don't think you need to cd, just run it with it's absolute path name
or add the dir it's in to your %PATH%.
A bit of code from the one I use, the comments may help you (XP is NT).
I commented them because my fop.bat is not in the FOP install directory:
set LOCAL_FOP_HOME=C:\fop\fop-0
Roland Neilands wrote:
J.Pietschmann wrote:
Roland Neilands wrote:
Sorry, my mistake. 20.5 wants height/width on the block container.
...
content-width="3cm"
FOP 0.20.5 doesn't support content-heigth/width either. Height
and width work.
I know, it ignores them
J.Pietschmann wrote:
Roland Neilands wrote:
Sorry, my mistake. 20.5 wants height/width on the block container.
...
FOP 0.20.5 doesn't support content-heigth/width either. Height
and width work.
I know, it ignores them though. That's why that bit of code worked in
bot
also. I could not get it to work.
Should I file a bug to this respect.
Regards,
Suresh Koya
*/Roland Neilands <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>/* wrote:
Suresh,
What you've done is correct, but not supported by the old version
of FOP
- try the beta release, or use height &am
Suresh,
What you've done is correct, but not supported by the old version of FOP
- try the beta release, or use height & width attributes as well. Search
this list's archives for more details, this has come up a few times.
Regards,
Roland
Suresh Koya wrote:
Hi,
I am using FOP 0.20.5. I wa
I've seen this too. I just turned off transparency in the gif in an
image editor and it worked fine.
Cheers,
Roland
Zmitko, Jan wrote:
Hallo Together,
I´ve an problem with printing my PDF generated by FOP 0.20.5. The generated
PDF looks corectly, however if I print these on my printer, the co
Jelka,
1. Set the "LOCAL_FOP_HOME" in your fop.bat file value to the fop
install dir, eg: C:\FopTrunk
Cheers,
Roland
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
On 31.01.2006 10:54:55 jelka.kosir wrote:
Yes, when I change "org.apache.fop.apps.Fop" to "org.apache.fop.cli.Main"
all works fine except 2 things:
Patrick,
Your examples are too basic, missing all of the page structure information.
Have a look at the .fo examples in your fop install directory.
Cheers,
Roland
Patrick Proctor wrote:
I have the same problem, and I think it may be a bug. I have used FOP
examples from O'Reilly and W3C and I
Paul,
It can be changed but the default is, eg:
C:\Program Files\Java\jre1.5.0_04\
JDK install path is slightly different, but it's unlikely you'd have that.
Cheers,
Roland
Paul Tremblay wrote:
On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 10:58:26AM +0100, Dirk Bromberg wrote:
From: Dirk Bromberg <[EMAIL PRO
Thom,
Opening your .fo in IE: Line 3 Char 125. An invalid character was found
in text context.
Did you save as utf-8? Looks like ansi to me. UTF-8 is the default for
XML, but not for most text editors. The encoding attribute must match
the file (eg encoding="ISO-8859-1" works for this file).
tly at the area tree that 0.90 generates, the result
is correct.
On 15.12.2005 23:47:31 Roland Neilands wrote:
Jeremias,
Try the large block in 20.5 - it fits with no overflow. There seems to
be extra space between lines in .90
Cheers,
Roland
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
On 12.12.2005 07:19
Jeremias,
Try the large block in 20.5 - it fits with no overflow. There seems to
be extra space between lines in .90
Cheers,
Roland
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
On 12.12.2005 07:19:31 Roland Neilands wrote:
5. There seems to be extra space inserted between lines now. This breaks
existing
Jeremias,
Thanks, see below.
Cheers,
Roland
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Roland,
that's exactly the kind of stuff I wanted to hear. Thank you very much.
Some comments inline...
On 09.12.2005 00:57:47 Roland Neilands wrote:
Jeremias,
I haven't test it thoroughly yet, but you ask
Jeremias,
7. It seems to have the old bug of leaving zero sized files around after
errors
Cheers,
Roland
Roland Neilands wrote:
Jeremias,
I haven't test it thoroughly yet, but you asked, so but here's what
I've seen:
1. Images are not scaled & overrun block-conta
Yes that helps, on the external-graphic. Well that makes .90 quite
acceptable for some documents then.
Cheers,
Roland
Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
On Dec 9, 2005, at 00:57, Roland Neilands wrote:
Roland,
Concerning 1)
1. Images are not scaled & overrun block-container height & widt
Jeremias,
I haven't test it thoroughly yet, but you asked, so but here's what I've
seen:
1. Images are not scaled & overrun block-container height & width. The
images seem washed-out & pixelated (gif). This is a stopper, I was
hoping it would work better than 20.5.
position="absolute">
parameter to the FOP command line yourself.
On 16.11.2005 03:04:22 Roland Neilands wrote:
Does anyone know if it's possible to check the value of FOP command line
arguments within XSL, specifically the chosen output format?
eg I have one stylesheet which may produce PDF and/or PCL from the sa
Hi,
Does anyone know if it's possible to check the value of FOP command line
arguments within XSL, specifically the chosen output format?
eg I have one stylesheet which may produce PDF and/or PCL from the same
XML file depending on local setup.
PCL is mainly for non-PS printers & faxes, so I wo
Cheers,
Roland
bharathi kongara wrote:
Yeah, now I'm using columns like in the following
template. But my problem is, only my first row needs 3
columns, all other rows need jus one column, is there
a way to specify that so that it can select
dynamically, becuase if I specify 1 column - first
Bharathi,
Sounds like you will need 3 columns, not 3 rows. Note there is an
example directory in the fop-install.
Cheers,
Roland
bharathi kongara wrote:
Hi
I've the following table - I want to put the
QuestionNo, QuestionText, and QuestionScore on the
same line in the resulting output.
Louis,
I beleive it is not implemented in FOP.
Use fo:marker instead for this instead, there are plenty of examples in
the list archive and your fop/examples directory, sorry don't have time
to dig them up right now.
Cheers,
Roland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a layout such that:
Ashley,
To stop editing you can use this:
http://xml.apache.org/fop/pdfencryption.html
To wrap at 80 chars there are several solutions, but it really depends on your
situation: as Jay suggested you might be trying to do
something XSL-FO does automatically & better.
For a preformatted text file
o constrain the
> size in FOP.
> But it was too long ago when I set this up.
> I have now added a large comment to the relevant XSLT code.
>
> Anyway - thanks to all those who responded.
>
>
> Mike
>
> Roland Neilands wrote:
>
> >Mike,
> >
> >
>
Mike,
> However - my main question still remains:
>
> Why - when an image is displayed 'correctly' - does making the
> block-container BIGGER make the image vanish?
> Does anyone else have any experience of this?
Yes, if the block-container no longer fits wholly within static-content for
example
David,
A couple of notes from experience:
Don't use transparency in GIF's (goes black).
Don't use JPG for PCL output (can crash FOP).
Don't scale images containing text (pixelates: use a factor of 2 if necessary).
Cheers,
Roland
> -Original Message-
> From: David 'Dox' Shevitz [mailto:[E
Jack,
Stylus Studio seems on par with XMLSpy in most things and supports Saxon
(v6.something or v8.1.1)
http://www.stylusstudio.com/
I still prefer text editors personally, but the IDE's have their uses.
Cheers,
Roland
> -Original Message-
> From: Rymasz Jacky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
44 matches
Mail list logo
