>> I'm upgrading from FOP v0.20 to v1.0. My fixed sized tables are
coming out a different sized than before. I'm confused about why.
>>
>>
>> In the code below, I have a table-row with height=100px. The
table-cells have 20px of padding. I end up using 140px of height,
>> not
100px as I reque
Le 01/11/2011 03:29, Todd Hivnor a écrit :
> I'm upgrading from FOP v0.20 to v1.0. My fixed sized tables are coming out a
> different sized than before. I'm confused about why.
>
>
> In the code below, I have a table-row with height=100px. The table-cells have
> 20px of padding. I end up usi
I'm upgrading from FOP v0.20 to v1.0. My fixed sized tables are coming out a
different sized than before. I'm confused about why.
In the code below, I have a table-row with height=100px. The table-cells have
20px of padding. I end up using 140px of height, not 100px as I requested with
It se
regularly scheduled program!
Christ van Willegen
On Nov 11, 2009, at 9:05 AM, Christ van Willegen wrote:
Hello,
this is my first posting to the list, so please bear with me...
I've prepared a short .fo file that shows a table layout problem
(better: several table layout problems..
Hello,
this is my first posting to the list, so please bear with me...
I've prepared a short .fo file that shows a table layout problem
(better: several table layout problems...) that I'm having.
I'm developing an application for a public transport organisation. One
of the
Hi Nancy,
nancy_b wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I still can't understand what causes the following warning messages to
> appear when I compile PDF docs using XSLTROC and FOP 0.94 in Debian Linux.
>
> WARNING: table-layout="fixed" and column-width unspecified => f
Hi folks,
I still can't understand what causes the following warning messages to
appear when I compile PDF docs using XSLTROC and FOP 0.94 in Debian Linux.
WARNING: table-layout="fixed" and column-width unspecified => falling back
to proportional-column-width(1)
Apr 2
Hello Nancy,
nancy_b wrote:
>
> For some reason, FOP complains about my tables:
> WARNING: table-layout="fixed" and column-width unspecified => falling back
> to proportional-column-width(1)
> Jul 24, 2007 1:47:14 PM org.apache.fop.fo.flow.TableColumn bind
> WA
> nancy_b wrote:
> > WARNING: table-layout="fixed" and column-width unspecified => falling back
> > to proportional-column-width(1)
nancy_b yahoo.com> writes:
> I need some customization that says:
>
> if table-layout=fixed, use proportional column w
sl somexsl.xsl -foout somefo.fo
>
>
> HTH!
>
> Cheers
>
> Andreas
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
--
View this message
On Jul 24, 2007, at 18:24, Patrick Paul wrote:
Minor correction to Patrick's response here:
Read the paragraph at
http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/0.20.5/running.html#check-input
IIC, the right link to check is:
http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/0.93/running.html#check-input
.
HTH,
Patrick
nancy_b wrote:
> For some reason fop does not specify where in the text it found this problem,
> so I don't have a snippet for that.
> I need some customization that says:
>
> if table-layout=fixed, use proportional column width...
>
>
> nancy_b wrote
For some reason fop does not specify where in the text it found this problem,
so I don't have a snippet for that.
I need some customization that says:
if table-layout=fixed, use proportional column width...
nancy_b wrote:
>
> Last shot for today :-)
>
> For some reason, FO
> proportional-column-width(
>
> )
>
>
>
>
>
> But it did not help. Please advise!
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Nancy
>
>
> Patrick Paul wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Since you are using the fixed table-layout FO
:
>
> Hi,
>
> Since you are using the fixed table-layout FOP expects you to specify
> the width of each column using the column-width property. Here FOP is
> warning you that some columns have an unspecified width (or maybe they
> are set to "auto" which essentially
Hi,
Since you are using the fixed table-layout FOP expects you to specify
the width of each column using the column-width property. Here FOP is
warning you that some columns have an unspecified width (or maybe they
are set to "auto" which essentially gives the same warning message),
th
Last shot for today :-)
For some reason, FOP complains about my tables:
WARNING: table-layout="fixed" and column-width unspecified => falling back
to proportional-column-width(1)
Jul 24, 2007 1:47:14 PM org.apache.fop.fo.flow.TableColumn bind
WARNING: table-layout="fixed
On each fo:table element, of course. Yes, you indicated something about
a "table-layout" XSLT parameter you specify on the command-line, but we
don't see if you actually use this parameter in your stylesheet. The FO
snippet you showed us earlier had no indicator that you'r
-- Bill
"J.Pietschmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 04/24/2006 04:47:57 PM:
> Bill Greene wrote:
> > I am puzzled as to why FOP seems to think that I have specified a
> > "table-layout" of "auto".
>
> That's because you didn&#
Bill Greene wrote:
I am puzzled as to why FOP seems to think that I have specified a
"table-layout" of "auto".
That's because you didn't specify a table-layout property
on the table, therefore the default kicks in which happens
to be "auto". You can ign
k that I have specified a
"table-layout" of "auto".
Here is a fragment of the .FO file about which FOP complained. Further
down
the page is my invocation of FOP and some of the output I saw.
Around the reported error locus of line 88 and column 627 (!), I found
this
(excerpted
of FOP you are using.
Secondly, neither version of FOP supports HTML like automatic table layout
i.e. column width determination based on column content.
To achieve what you want you need to specify column widths and table
widths. In particular under every element for each column in your table
speci
Jason,
firstly you didn't say which version of FOP you are using.
Secondly, neither version of FOP supports HTML like automatic table layout
i.e. column width determination based on column content.
To achieve what you want you need to specify column widths and table
widths. In particular
Hi all
I am reproducing a rather complicated layout which requires a number of
nested tables:
Basically the page looks something like this (a header with 2 columns,
followed by a table with 4 columns, 2 columns spanning 2 rows, and one
cell spanning 2 columns):
---
OK. I will do that.
The list is truly a fine resource.
- Original Message -
From: "Jay Bryant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2006 9:18 PM
Subject: Re: table-layout
Hi, Tracey,
The best way is to ask specific questions.
Many folks on the list
From: "Tracey Zellmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2006 6:18 PM
Subject: Re: table-layout
> Thanks That worked perfectly as well.
>
> Now that I seem to at least have FOP working, I want to make better use of
> its facilities. How can I get a hand
AIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2006 6:04 PM
Subject: Re: table-layout
On Monday 27 February 2006 02:59, Tracey Zellmann wrote:
Excellent! That worked like a charm.
Another small question, if you or someone else has a moment.
I am using some spanned cells, but, at least for
On Monday 27 February 2006 02:59, Tracey Zellmann wrote:
> Excellent! That worked like a charm.
>
> Another small question, if you or someone else has a moment.
>
> I am using some spanned cells, but, at least for now, none of my
> table cells have any borders.
>
> I am getting a warning with a TOD
Tracey Zellmann wrote:
I am using fop 0.91.
I am getting a warning that fo:table, table-layout="auto" is currently
not supported by FOP.
I do not currently have any table-layout specified.
Which defaults the value to "auto"[1], hence the warning. To stop the
warni
cells
What am I supposed to
do?
- Original Message -
From: "Andreas L Delmelle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org>
Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2006 1:30
PM
Subject: Re: table-layout
> On Feb 26, 2006, at 18:36, Tracey Zellmann wrote:>
On Feb 26, 2006, at 18:36, Tracey Zellmann wrote:
Hi Tracey,
I am using fop 0.91.
I am getting a warning that fo:table, table-layout="auto" is
currently not supported by FOP.
My table looks the way I want it to, but I wonder what I should be
doing to avoid that warning.
I ha
I am using fop 0.91.
I am getting a warning that fo:table,
table-layout="auto" is currently not supported by FOP.
My table looks the way I want it to, but I wonder
what I should be doing to avoid that warning.
I have a multi-column table where the width of the
table is spec
stian
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 25, 2005 5:04 PM
To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Subject: Invalid table layout: cant fill gap at row 0, column 2
I am getting an exception when trying to render pdf from my .fo The error
Your defining a table with three columns and your first row has 2 columns
(cells) and the second has 1. = invalid table layout.
- Start Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Subject: Invalid table layout: cant fill gap at row 0, column 2
> I
I am getting an exception when trying to render pdf from my .fo
The error I am getting is:
Invalid table layout: cant fill gap at row 0, column 2
it seems to point to this table
FOP only supports table-layout="fixed". If you don't mind adding some code
to your XSL file, there's a work-around. The trick is to discover all the
things a fixed-layout table needs to know before creating the necessary FO
elements. Here's how:
Here's a stylesh
Unfortunately, our compliance page may not be clear enough about this
but it is the primary source for information what FOP supports and what
not:
http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/compliance.html
To avoid any misinterpretations of the compliance page: No, FOP does
not support table-layout="
Hello,
I have a question concerning FOP support of the
table-layout="auto". Does
FOP support this property?
I use FOP 0.20.5 to convert dynamically created xml file to
PDF. I don`t know in advance how much columns will be in the
xml table, and how wide columns will be. I use this p
38 matches
Mail list logo
