On 25.02.23 22:55, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
but
should we really keep the option, if we don't even test basics and if it
was more a specific debug dump, from the looks?
It is always possible to add test cases if testing is required,
but I don't think this is necessary. We also do not
On Sun, 31 Oct 2021 21:25:44 +0100
Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
> On Sun, 31 Oct 2021 20:46:07 +0100
> Harald Anlauf wrote:
>
> > Am 30.10.21 um 23:51 schrieb Bernhard Reutner-Fischer via Fortran:
> > >>> The only caller is translate_all_program_units.
> > >>> Since we free only module
Dear all,
while checking f951 for memory leaks on testcases that appeared
relevant during work on pr108924, I found that the conversion
warning triggered by do_subscript_6.f90 uses a code path that
forgot to mpfr_clear a used variable.
The attached obvious patch fixes this - verified by
Le 25/02/2023 à 18:20, Harald Anlauf a écrit :
Hi Mikael,
Am 25.02.23 um 17:35 schrieb Mikael Morin:
Hello,
Harald found a testcase with memory still leaking despite my previous
patch for PR108923.
That patch was fixing a leak caused by absence of memory release, the
attached patch fixes a
Hi Mikael,
Am 25.02.23 um 17:35 schrieb Mikael Morin:
Hello,
Harald found a testcase with memory still leaking despite my previous
patch for PR108923.
That patch was fixing a leak caused by absence of memory release, the
attached patch fixes a leak caused by pointer overwrite.
I haven't
Hello,
Harald found a testcase with memory still leaking despite my previous
patch for PR108923.
That patch was fixing a leak caused by absence of memory release, the
attached patch fixes a leak caused by pointer overwrite.
I haven't investigated why sort_actual is called several times(
Hi Tobias!
On 2023-02-23T17:42:08+0100, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> (Side note: this patch has been committed to OG12 as
> http://gcc.gnu.org/g:55a18d47442 )
I see og12 commit 55a18d4744258e3909568e425f9f473c49f9d13f
"Fortran/OpenMP: Fix mapping of array descriptors and deferred-length strings"
