Re: [fossil-dev] annotate_page() crashes fossil ui if run from subdirectory

2018-01-21 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Richard Hipp on Sun, 21 Jan 2018 18:49:51 -0500: > Andy's original problem was two separate bugs. This is yet a third. > They should all be fixed now, by separate check-ins. I can confirm that the 2 I mentioned are fixed. Thanks, Andy -- TAI64 timestamp: 40005a655367 _

Re: [fossil-dev] annotate_page() crashes fossil ui if run from subdirectory

2018-01-21 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Stephan Beal on Sun, 21 Jan 2018 23:03:44 +0100: > Anyone notice that the Comment and Original Comment are identical in > the Overview section, but that the yellow highlighted entry shows a > modified comment? That doesn't seem right. I hadn't noticed, however, perhaps the timelin

Re: [fossil-dev] annotate_page() crashes fossil ui if run from subdirectory

2018-01-21 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said "Andy Bradford" on 20 Jan 2018 21:05:25 -0700: > http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/41f35ca4ec617891 It looks like this commit also broke the command line. It used to be possible to use ``fossil annotate'' from a relative path in the wo

[fossil-dev] annotate_page() crashes fossil ui if run from subdirectory

2018-01-20 Thread Andy Bradford
Hello, The bug is that if you run ``fossil ui'' from within a subdirectory of a working checkout, then try to annotate source files fossil crashes with SIGSEGV and dumps core. I haven't had the time to fix this so I'm reporting it now in the event that I don't get around to fixing it. As far a

Re: [fossil-dev] Adding pledge() calls to Fossil

2018-01-20 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Richard Hipp on Mon, 15 Jan 2018 11:27:20 -0500: > I will accept check-ins to a branch that invoke the fossil_pledge(X,Y) > utility function. I've added a new branch called pledge-additions with additional pledge() restrictions for the status command. We can continue to pledgify other

Re: [fossil-dev] Adding pledge() calls to Fossil

2018-01-15 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Richard Hipp on Mon, 15 Jan 2018 11:27:20 -0500: > I will accept check-ins to a branch that invoke the fossil_pledge(X,Y) > utility function. The fossil_pledge(X,Y) function is a macro that > evaluates to a no-op except when compiled with -DFOSSIL_HAVE_PLEDGE. > If the FOSSIL_HAVE

Re: [fossil-dev] Autoreconfigure

2017-10-11 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Warren Young on Wed, 11 Oct 2017 14:09:02 -0600: > My change on line 70 of Makefile is a GNU make conditional. I'm > guessing you're using BSD make or some other non-GNU make, which > doesn't grok that syntax. Yes, it is BSD make (on OpenBSD). BSD make does have condition

Re: [fossil-dev] Autoreconfigure

2017-10-11 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Warren Young on Tue, 10 Oct 2017 19:38:52 -0600: >http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/timeline?r=wy-autoreconfig I see that this change has been merged, however, now it has problems on trunk which I don't have time to delve into at the moment. I'll look at it later if it doesn't get

Re: [fossil-dev] fossil annotate broken?

2017-09-26 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said "Andy Bradford" on 26 Sep 2017 14:11:59 -0600: > Am I missing something? It looks like ``fossil bisect'' identifies this commit as having introduced changed behavior: http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/d9ef474a1a319217 However, I noticed

[fossil-dev] fossil annotate broken?

2017-09-26 Thread Andy Bradford
Hello, I'm seeing some strange behavior with this fossil version: This is fossil version 2.4 [398a90c006] 2017-09-26 14:47:20 UTC Specifically, I'm trying to annotate db.c in the Fossil respository: http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/annotate?filename=src/db.c&checkin=ce1bc4fb09fbeed6 Line 2

Re: [fossil-dev] The "ssh://" vulnerability

2017-08-12 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Richard Hipp on Fri, 11 Aug 2017 11:41:09 -0400: > I don't feel a particular need to rush out a new release containing > this fix. But I am open to arguments to the contrary, if you feel > differently. I think at a certain point, users of any software have to take their own

Re: [fossil-dev] A difficult "diff" case

2017-06-12 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Richard Hipp on Mon, 12 Jun 2017 05:02:15 +0200: > Do you still have that pair of files, and can you share them? I might still have them. I'll see if I can find them and report back. Regarding the extraordinarily long lines, I'm not sure what is considered extraordinary, bu

Re: [fossil-dev] A difficult "diff" case

2017-06-11 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Richard Hipp on Sun, 11 Jun 2017 22:58:00 +0200: > I added an experimental option to Fossil's diff-er, the --yy option, > that runs slower but does a better job. It still need improvement > though. You can compare as follows: I had a similar problem where I needed an accurate si

Re: [fossil-dev] Retirement from free-time programming

2017-06-03 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Stephan Beal on Sat, 03 Jun 2017 05:02:57 +0200: > My continued respect and appreciation go out to all of you who have > helped me, in one way or another, to work on software over the years. > To you i wish Happy Hacking! You're code contributions will be missed. Thank you for your

[fossil-dev] assert vs return 0 in file_simplify_name()?

2017-05-25 Thread Andy Bradford
Hello, While looking at a recent bug reported on the fossil-users list, I realized that file_simplify_name() has a problem: http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/artifact?ln=802+841&name=c77e7c7383f414c6 Specifically, it doesn't check that z is not NULL. This later results in a segfault (li

Re: [fossil-dev] New documentation for file GLOB syntax and usage

2017-04-14 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Ross Berteig on Fri, 14 Apr 2017 16:09:18 -0700: > I'm also considering an extension to the glob_create() function to add > support for comments in lists of GLOBs. If I have a program that generates files that begin with # that I want to ignore, would this be accomplished if suppo

Re: [fossil-dev] Acquire the "fossil-scm.com" domain?

2017-04-04 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Richard Hipp on Tue, 04 Apr 2017 09:33:40 -0400: > I'm inclined to ignore their offer, as adding fossil-scm.com is > just one more DNS entry to maintain. But I am open to acquiring > fossil-scm.com (and pointing it to exactly the same webserver as > fossil-scm.org) if

Re: [fossil-dev] Fossil 2.0 Beta

2017-03-03 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Richard Hipp on Wed, 01 Mar 2017 17:35:56 -0500: > All other SHA1 hashes remain the same. If you doubt that assertion, > you can test it by running "fossil test-integrity" or "fossil all > test-integrity". On a side note, it appears that test-integrity is slightly slower than

Re: [fossil-dev] [fossil-users] Proposed roadmap for Fossil 2.0

2017-02-28 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Roy Keene on Tue, 28 Feb 2017 11:13:01 -0600: >e. If a collision is submitted (e.g., same SHA1, different SHA256) >the artifact (by SHA1) is considered compromised and shunned from >the repository (or something) Why would this constitute a collision? Wouldn't a collision

Re: [fossil-dev] [fossil-users] Proposed roadmap for Fossil 2.0

2017-02-27 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Richard Hipp on Mon, 27 Feb 2017 21:50:43 -0500: > (9) There are no changes to the file formats, other than relaxing the > size constraint on artifact hashes - allowing hash to be greater than > or equal to 40 characters rather than requiring it to be exactly 40 > characters. The F

Re: [fossil-dev] Markdown Renderer

2017-02-13 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Kevin Martin on Mon, 13 Feb 2017 07:57:46 +: > I am guessing I am not building it right? But I do know the file is > being recompiled because if I introduce an error in the file it fails > to build. Try running ``make clean'' and then build again? Andy -- TAI64 timestamp: 4000

[fossil-dev] Repeated condition in report.c mistake?

2017-01-09 Thread Andy Bradford
Hello, While looking at the code to understand a recently added feature, I found what appears to be a bug: http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/artifact?name=25ce5d1f89690ab3&ln=921 I highly doubt that $ was intended to be looked for twice; if not what was the intended 3rd character suppo

Re: [fossil-dev] Time for the 1.37 release?

2017-01-03 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Richard Hipp on Mon, 02 Jan 2017 14:14:59 -0500: > SQLite version 3.16.0 is now checked into Fossil. Perhaps this would > be a good time to do another release of Fossil. I think so. It would be good to run through some tests first as there are some important bug fixes that came int

Re: [fossil-dev] SQLITE_CONSTRAINT: abort at 41

2016-12-28 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Zakero on Thu, 22 Dec 2016 16:07:52 +0400: > A few weeks ago, Andy asked me to try to reproduce > this problem with older versions of fossil. The check-in > "41c2220934de8cb8d90126d5083df3e95e961b8c" is where the problem first > appears. This also mirro

Re: [fossil-dev] SQLITE_CONSTRAINT: abort at 41

2016-11-11 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Zakero on Sun, 16 Oct 2016 18:45:41 -0500: > Ran into an interesting problem yesterday when merging branches: > > SQLITE_CONSTRAINT: abort at 41 in [INSERT INTO > vfile(vid,chnged,deleted,rid,mrid,isexe,islink,pathname) SELECT > 21178,3,0,rid,mrid,isexe,islink,pathname FROM vfile WHERE

Re: [fossil-dev] Cached "blame"

2016-10-28 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Richard Hipp on Tue, 18 Oct 2016 15:48:57 -0400: > it is reported that Hg has developed a blame-cache mechanism that > makes "blame" and "annotate" about 10x faster. If anybody wants to > look into this and see if something similar could be done for Fossil, > that would be grea

Re: [fossil-dev] [fossil-users] Fossil check-in [a4bb89ba081e29c5]...

2016-10-27 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said "Andy Bradford" on 27 Oct 2016 21:42:34 -0600: > I always run ``make distclean'' not ``make distclean'' but since you > suggest it, here's the difference on my system: Minor correction, I always run ``make clean'' not ``make distc

Re: [fossil-dev] [fossil-users] Fossil check-in [a4bb89ba081e29c5]...

2016-10-27 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said "Joe Mistachkin" on Thu, 27 Oct 2016 17:22:26 -0700: > I was unable to reproduce the stated linker error even without this > change. Given that the generated header files all seem to wrap > references to "fusefs_cmd" in #if blocks, I'm not sure how it's > possible unles

Re: [fossil-dev] Please review

2016-10-27 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Baruch Burstein on Thu, 27 Oct 2016 18:01:54 +0300: > Please review https://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/8ae790623c14ac5c. Very nice fix! Thanks, Andy -- TAI64 timestamp: 400058125848 ___ fossil-dev mailing list fossil-dev@maili

Re: [fossil-dev] Did we just hit the 10000 check-ins mark?

2016-10-27 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Baruch Burstein on Thu, 27 Oct 2016 16:05:01 +0300: > I am having trouble figuring out how to get the exact number Either of these will show that information: fossil info fossil dbstat Andy -- TAI64 timestamp: 4000581207df ___ fossil-

Re: [fossil-dev] Fwd: The results of your email commands

2016-10-17 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Stephan Beal on Tue, 18 Oct 2016 08:00:05 +0200: > Fyi, the "too many bounces" problem is now apparently hitting gmail > users. What would be really helpful is a copy of one of the bounces that was received by the MLM. Andy -- TAI64 timestamp: 40005805c0ef

Re: [fossil-dev] SQLITE_CONSTRAINT: abort at 41

2016-10-16 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Zakero on Sun, 16 Oct 2016 18:45:41 -0500: > SQLITE_CONSTRAINT: abort at 41 in [INSERT INTO > vfile(vid,chnged,deleted,rid,mrid,isexe,islink,pathname) SELECT > 21178,3,0,rid,mrid,isexe,islink,pathname FROM vfile WHERE id=4735]: UNIQUE > constraint failed: vfile.pathname, vfile. > fossil

Re: [fossil-dev] Time to release version 1.36?

2016-10-15 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said "Joe Mistachkin" on Sat, 15 Oct 2016 17:46:54 -0700: > stash-fixes I've gone ahead and merged this. Thanks for updating the test case. Andy -- TAI64 timestamp: 40005802d678 ___ fossil-dev mailing list fossil-dev@mailinglists.sqli

Re: [fossil-dev] Time to release version 1.36?

2016-10-14 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Ross Berteig on Fri, 14 Oct 2016 12:14:03 -0700: > Something made the Windows Firewall fussier, and I had to reassure it > during both test suite runs that yes, it was ok to let fossil.exe do > something. The prompt came a long ways in to the suite, but I didn't > check the prot fil

Re: [fossil-dev] Time to release version 1.36?

2016-10-14 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said "Andy Bradford" on 14 Oct 2016 10:14:20 -0600: > I'm not sure what the unversioned failures are at this point. The unversioned test failures were caused by the fact that I already had a fossil server running on port 8080. This obviously didn't work out b

Re: [fossil-dev] Time to release version 1.36?

2016-10-14 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Richard Hipp on Fri, 14 Oct 2016 10:47:24 -0400: > The final SQLite 3.15.0 is not checked into the Fossil trunk. Is it an > appropriate time to release version 1.36 of Fossil? I get the following test results on OpenBSD 5.8: * Final results: 14 errors out of 34413 tests * Consi

[fossil-dev] fossil timeline to return an error?

2016-09-30 Thread Andy Bradford
Hello, Currently, ``fossil timeline'' will return an empty set when providing options that don't really make sense: $ fossil timeline src/timeline.c +++ no more data (0) +++ I believe an error here would be more appropriate: $ ./fossil timeline src/timeline.c unknown check-in or invalid date:

[fossil-dev] fossil diff --changes on diff-show-changes branch

2016-09-29 Thread Andy Bradford
Hello, I recently had the need to view a diff of a specific check-in from the command line and found that while using --to and --from can accomplish it, it's a bit tedious. Please provide feedback on the changes now introduced in the diff-show-changes branch: http://www.fossil-sc

Re: [fossil-dev] Branches in need of review and/or merging (prior to the next release?)...

2016-09-27 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Ross Berteig on Mon, 26 Sep 2016 13:56:22 -0700: > The branch may have been good before the merge from trunk, but it is a > mess right now. It needs cleanup and likely merging from something > closer to the tip of trunk. Indeed, at the time I sent the email, it worked. It l

Re: [fossil-dev] Branches in need of review and/or merging (prior to the next release?)...

2016-09-24 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said "Joe Mistachkin" on Thu, 22 Sep 2016 19:32:13 -0700: > stash-fixes -- FIX: Seems relatively straightforward? I think this one is pretty much ready, but if someone wants to take a look to make sure the SQL is right, that might be good. I believe it passes all the test cases.

Re: [fossil-dev] Request for code review, "autosetupAndJimTcl" branch...

2016-09-21 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said "Joe Mistachkin" on Tue, 20 Sep 2016 09:44:08 -0700: > Please review the changes on the "autosetupAndJimTcl" branch, which > updates the included autosetup and Jim with the latest code from > upstream. I took a look at the changes, which were many, and noticed a lot more use

Re: [fossil-dev] Timeline graph rendering anomaly

2016-03-19 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Stephan Beal on Fri, 18 Mar 2016 15:53:38 +0100: > i actually like the www2 one better, as it clearly shows that two > branches (green/teal) are still opened but have not been edited > "recently". I think I still prefer the old style as well, but I'm not sure if that is ju

Re: [fossil-dev] Branches in need of merging...

2016-03-10 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said "Joe Mistachkin" on Thu, 10 Mar 2016 19:52:08 -0800: > I've briefly looked over the changes; however, it would be good if > others could review and/or provide feedback on them as well. After some discussion with Ross, I think there may be some improvements that could be made in th

Re: [fossil-dev] Merge stash-fixes?

2016-03-02 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Ross Berteig on Wed, 02 Mar 2016 19:24:55 -0800: > Yes, apparently it has. In isValidLocalDb() in src/db.c ca. line 1099, > there are two if blocks that test for some feature of the local db > schema, and to the needed ALTER TABLE commands to fix things up. The ALTER TABLE commands

Re: [fossil-dev] Merge stash-fixes?

2016-03-02 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Ross Berteig on Wed, 02 Mar 2016 15:20:52 -0800: > One of the changes was to the schema of the table used by the stash in > the local (per checkout) database, which was going to require that > every open checkout be re-opened. This is only if they want to be able to stash a rename i

[fossil-dev] Merge stash-fixes?

2016-03-02 Thread Andy Bradford
Hello, Are there any other issues that could be addressed in the stash-fixes branch? If not, I would like to merge it. Basically it cleans up the ability to stash a rename. Thanks, Andy -- TAI64 timestamp: 400056d70a74 ___ fossil-dev mail

Re: [fossil-dev] For review: /foo?name=xyz ==> /foo/xyz

2016-02-20 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Stephan Beal on Sat, 20 Feb 2016 14:24:31 +0100: > My proposal is that we standardize on the /foo/x form for all > generated links. Justification: they simply look better :/. I don't see a problem with this, and as long as old generated links which include ?name= still w

Re: [fossil-dev] Code coverage experiment

2016-02-06 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Stephan Beal on Sat, 06 Feb 2016 20:12:04 +0100: > But this did the trick: > > tclsh $PWD/../fossil/test/tester.tcl $PWD/../fossil/fossil And now you shouldn't even need that trick: http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/25f7d3c1030fa4aa By the way, I no longer seem to be able

Re: [fossil-dev] Code coverage experiment

2016-02-06 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Stephan Beal on Sat, 06 Feb 2016 20:12:04 +0100: > > couldn't open "../fossil-src/test/fossil_prompt_answer": no such > > file or directory > > > > where did 'fossil-src' come from? That's just the name of my test repository for running tests. In your case it was just ../fossil, bu

Re: [fossil-dev] Code coverage experiment

2016-02-06 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Stephan Beal on Sat, 06 Feb 2016 18:46:04 +0100: > [stephan@host:~/cvs/fossil/ftest]$ tclsh ../fossil/test/tester.tcl > ../fossil/fossil That's the ticket! Apparently calling it with a relative path doesn't work very well and I now see: ... couldn't open "../fossil-src/test/fossil_

Re: [fossil-dev] Code coverage experiment

2016-02-06 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Stephan Beal on Sat, 06 Feb 2016 18:25:03 +0100: > [stephan@host:~/cvs/fossil/ftest]$ tclsh --version > % [stephan@host:~/cvs/fossil/ftest]$ tclsh -? > % [stephan@host:~/cvs/fossil/ftest]$ tclsh --help > % [stephan@host:~/cvs/fossil/ftest]$ > > i give up... I don't think it's actually r

Re: [fossil-dev] Code coverage experiment

2016-02-06 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said "Andy Bradford" on 06 Feb 2016 10:06:58 -0700: > > couldn't open "../fossil/test/fossil_prompt_answer": no such file or > > directory while executing > > Seems that something changed the behavior of how fossil_prompt_answer > is found.

Re: [fossil-dev] Code coverage experiment

2016-02-06 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Stephan Beal on Sat, 06 Feb 2016 14:38:05 +0100: > couldn't open "../fossil/test/fossil_prompt_answer": no such file or > directory > while executing By the way, I'm unable to reproduce this error. It works fine with: $ /tmp/fossil-src/fossil ver This is fossil version 1.35 [626276

Re: [fossil-dev] Code coverage experiment

2016-02-06 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Stephan Beal on Sat, 06 Feb 2016 14:38:05 +0100: > couldn't open "../fossil/test/fossil_prompt_answer": no such file or > directory > while executing Seems that something changed the behavior of how fossil_prompt_answer is found. fossil_prompt_answer is a Tcl proc, but this error w

Re: [fossil-dev] tester.tcl sometimes stops with a SQLITE_NOTICE during calls to repo_init

2016-01-23 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Ross Berteig on Sat, 23 Jan 2016 16:48:45 -0800: > I should add that it is not unique to my new file json.test. I've seen > it happen other calls to repo_init when all tests are run. Since it is > treated as an exception by Tcl, the tests halt at that point. I have not seen this at all

Re: [fossil-dev] XSS vulnerability alleged

2016-01-15 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Richard Hipp on Fri, 15 Jan 2016 07:46:17 -0500: > I received email alerting me to the following: > https://www.xssposed.org/incidents/124372/ There are free tools that could be run to check their claims... These folks might have one: https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Cross-site_Scripti

Re: [fossil-dev] Test suite on Windows

2016-01-14 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Ross Berteig on Wed, 13 Jan 2016 12:47:56 -0800: > Even if we do this, which in daylight still seems like a good idea for > portability, amend.test probably ought to defend against a global > setting for "editor". For now, instead of relying on environment variables which have l

Re: [fossil-dev] Test suite on Windows

2016-01-12 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Ross Berteig on Tue, 12 Jan 2016 15:53:08 -0800: > * amend-comment-5.1 > * amend-comment-5.2 > * amend-comment-5.3 > * amend-comment-5.4 These are due to "ed" missing in your environment. Is there a similar tool that exists for Windows that could be used to autom

Re: [fossil-dev] Curious relationship with trunk

2016-01-08 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Richard Hipp on Fri, 08 Jan 2016 06:00:43 -0500: > There is no logic for "merge" to detect no-op merges and refuse to > record them. But I suppose we could add that. Would that affect this kind of merge? http://core.tcl.tk/tcl/info/1b40769a10057805 Thanks, Andy -- TAI64 timestam

Re: [fossil-dev] Current status of make test?

2016-01-08 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Ross Berteig on Thu, 07 Jan 2016 23:55:12 -0800: > Exactly. And I think it is a good idea for the test suite to run from > a folder outside of all checkouts for a lot of reasons. Perhaps we should update the test: make target to create a temporary directory, cd to it and run tests

Re: [fossil-dev] Current status of make test?

2016-01-07 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Ross Berteig on Thu, 07 Jan 2016 11:54:03 -0800: > Letting the full test suite run in-tree fails almost immediately > because amend.test called repo_init which cannot be run inside a > checkout. Any tests that require their own repository will fail if you run it from within

Re: [fossil-dev] Current status of make test?

2016-01-06 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Ross Berteig on Wed, 06 Jan 2016 12:37:28 -0800: > Because of that comment and Richard's advice to test out of tree to > avoid that issue, I haven't run a test in tree. I suppose I should > pull a fresh clone and try it to better understand the issue. What I do is in my main chec

[fossil-dev] Need to crosslink clusters?

2015-12-03 Thread Andy Bradford
Hello, Due to recent discussions about possible sync failures I started looking at the cluster code again and noticed that Fossil does not crosslink in clusters. I noticed that it causes at least these 2 problems: 1) fossil test-clusters returns that all artifacts are unreachable, because t

[fossil-dev] autosync pull-only broken with [5853fcf132800f90]

2015-11-21 Thread Andy Bradford
Hello, This recent commit broke autosync pull-only/pullonly settings: http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/5853fcf132800f90 I went ahead and restored the historical behavior here: http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/acc0200a4ab9b4c5 Thanks, Andy -- TAI64 timestamp: 40005651539

Re: [fossil-dev] Fixed segfault in th_lang.c

2015-11-21 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said "Joe Mistachkin" on Sat, 21 Nov 2015 10:38:46 -0800: > Apparently, a fix was done on a branch, but never made it to trunk? That would explain why I didn't see the previous fix. I actually did look through annotations to see how it slipped by since 2008, but didn't notice that it was

[fossil-dev] Fixed segfault in th_lang.c

2015-11-21 Thread Andy Bradford
Hello, I ran into a segfault: (gdb) bt #0 0x1a710bd7 in proc_command (interp=0x83592c20, ctx=0x0, argc=4, argv=0x802ba400, argl=0x802ba410) at ./src/th_lang.c:500 #1 0x1a70f295 in thEvalLocal (interp=0x83592c20, zProgram=Variable "zProgram" is not available. ) at ./src/th.c:917 #2 0x1a70

Re: [fossil-dev] Can't clone

2015-08-26 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Baruch Burstein on Wed, 26 Aug 2015 11:33:09 +0300: > When I try to clone the fossil repo from https://fossil-scm.org, I get > an error that the SSL certificate is for sqlite.org. I also get this > error when browsing to https://fossil-scm.org. Is this a configuration > error? I get n

Re: [fossil-dev] Sorry if I bother some of you about this

2015-08-18 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said "K. Fossil user" on Mon, 17 Aug 2015 22:21:09 -: > 2) ... When I do reply then it is the guy mail that is in my "to" > field which may bother some people. Someone was a bit angry when I do > respond to his personal email : I wasn't aware about the issue. I am > NOT bothered

[fossil-dev] Comments on Check-in [2d714a4e]?

2015-08-05 Thread Andy Bradford
Hello, I sent this out earlier, but it seems to have been lost (perhaps spam filters didn't like something in it; maybe they won't like this one either). Basically, I encountered a segfault because I incorrectly passed in a NULL pointer to blob_append. I thought that blob_append shou

Re: [fossil-dev] Regarding assert() in blob_append [2d714a4e48251549]

2015-08-01 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said "Andy Bradford" on 01 Aug 2015 23:17:52 -0600: > Specifically, where I ran into it, was with: Sorry, I meant: http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/artifact/c56f142d0d8ec1514d3b586cf3fdf628a9d50523?txt=1&ln=2745 If this ends up being NULL it causes a segfault. Or sho

[fossil-dev] Regarding assert() in blob_append [2d714a4e48251549]

2015-08-01 Thread Andy Bradford
Hello, Just a quick note regarding this commit: http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/2d714a4e48251549 I ran into a segfault while testing some of the amend command changes. Specifically, where I ran into it, was with: http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/artifact/212114657df8d3ccf84ec056

Re: [fossil-dev] Running tests with tester.tcl.

2015-07-29 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said "Joe Mistachkin" on Wed, 29 Jul 2015 20:01:33 -0700: > Another good (and recent) example test file is "mv-rm.test", which > shows how to setup and start munging a dedicated test repository > during the tests. Thanks, I'll have a look at that. I guess these tests are failing

[fossil-dev] Running tests with tester.tcl.

2015-07-29 Thread Andy Bradford
Hello, To be able to add tests for the new command I've been familiarizing myself with tester.tcl and the tests. The instructions for using it say: From a private directory (not the source tree) run "tclsh $SRC/test/tester.tcl $FOSSIL" where $FOSSIL is the name of the ex

Re: [fossil-dev] fossil server segfault with core.

2015-07-13 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Richard Hipp on Mon, 13 Jul 2015 15:34:28 -0400: > Let's hope it was the "make clean" and not the "fossil rebuild" that > cleared the problem It's very likely the make clean. However, last week I had been rebuilding while tracking down a different problem which required crossin

Re: [fossil-dev] fossil server segfault with core.

2015-07-13 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said "Andy Bradford" on 13 Jul 2015 13:10:41 -0600: > $ fossil ver > This is fossil version 1.33 [501f35e50a] 2015-07-11 23:13:28 UTC Well, after make clean and a rebuild, I cannot seem to reproduce it again. Never mind. Andy -- TAI64 timestamp:

[fossil-dev] fossil server segfault with core.

2015-07-13 Thread Andy Bradford
Hello, Today, I fired up ``fossil server'' in my clone of the Fossil repository, opened a browser and clicked on a link to generate a vdiff, specifically: http://localhost:8080/vdiff?from=b9447b0ec60ab6050fca75d767757654c3cf2613&to=2821e284c5337529e8c9f07b26d18f18f676ffcb&sbs=1 The b

[fossil-dev] link problems on OpenBSD (i386) introduced by [0fc8b9df0c4e27b6]

2015-07-03 Thread Andy Bradford
Hello, It looks like [0fc8b9df0c4e27b6] introduced a link-time problem; after running make clean and then trying to build, I get this error: ... iwyg.o bld/xfer.o bld/xfersetup.o bld/zip.o bld/sqlite3.obld/linenoise.o bld/shell.o bld/th.o bld/th_lang.o bld/th_tcl.o bld/cson_amalgam

Re: [fossil-dev] The various andygoth-* branches

2015-05-20 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Andy Goth on Wed, 20 May 2015 18:30:24 -0500: > Which browser? In my experience (mostly Firefox), starting the > selection above the text captures all the way from the start of the > line. Selecting from below gets the end of the line. Yes, it's Firefox, and I can select just

Re: [fossil-dev] Fwd: The various andygoth-* branches

2015-05-20 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Andy Goth on Wed, 20 May 2015 12:45:12 -0500: > In typical browsers, it's not possible to start a selection in the > middle of hyperlink text. Attempting to do so is instead interpreted > as a drag-and-drop operation. That's not entirely true, it's just difficult. Especially

Re: [fossil-dev] Fwd: The various andygoth-* branches

2015-05-20 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Andy Goth on Wed, 20 May 2015 12:45:12 -0500: > In typical browsers, it's not possible to start a selection in the > middle of hyperlink text. Attempting to do so is instead interpreted > as a drag-and-drop operation. [Resending becausethe previous message gotheld

[fossil-dev] Color propagation bug?

2015-05-09 Thread Andy Bradford
Hello, While testing color popagation on branches due to recent discussion on the Fossil Users mailing list, I discovered something that apperas to be a bug. See the branch here. http://fossil.bradfords.org:8080/timeline The color of the branch was initially chosen by Fossil with checkin

Re: [fossil-dev] bug report: merge commits don't show added files

2015-05-05 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Richard Hipp on Tue, 05 May 2015 12:16:46 -0400: > I've got to work on some other things (getting the SQLite 3.8.10 > release out). Could y'all please check the following links and let me > know if you see any surplus or missing "added by merge" files? What does that involve?

Re: [fossil-dev] Confirm removal of an empty directory?

2015-04-28 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Richard Hipp on Tue, 28 Apr 2015 13:00:13 -0400: > Why does "fossil clean --emptydirs" prompt for confirmation before > removing an *empty* directory? If the directory is exempted in the empty-dirs setting, should it just ignore the empty directory? Seems if --emptydirs is set a

Re: [fossil-dev] Circular timeline nodes

2015-03-19 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Scott Robison on Thu, 19 Mar 2015 14:26:47 -0600: > The additional problem with color vision deficiency is that even if we > found a set of colors that I could always differentiate and always > rely on, who knows if other color deficient people would see it the > same way I do. H

Re: [fossil-dev] Circular timeline nodes

2015-03-19 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said James Moger on Thu, 19 Mar 2015 08:09:50 -0400: > It surprises me that IceWeasel has trouble with border-radius. Being > Debian can I assume it is an older IceWeasel? Yes, it's a bit older---so take it with a grain of salt, but, I was pleasantly surprised that I saw no circles (

[fossil-dev] SERVERCODE (was: The --docker option)

2015-03-19 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Richard Hipp on Wed, 18 Mar 2015 13:41:31 -0400: > (The SERVERCODE is an historical artifact that is no longer used for > anything and can be safely ignored.) I did not realize that it was no longer used; does sync.wiki need an update? Currently it says: The servercode argume

Re: [fossil-dev] Circular timeline nodes

2015-03-18 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Stephan Beal on Thu, 19 Mar 2015 01:20:01 +0100: > Not true - branch point leaves have lines going out. Oh yes, I too had forgotten about those. By the way, welcome back. :-) Andy -- TAI64 timestamp: 4000550a19e7 ___ fossil-dev mailin

Re: [fossil-dev] Circular timeline nodes

2015-03-18 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Stephan Beal on Wed, 18 Mar 2015 23:13:56 +0100: > How about one for leaves and the other for non-leaves? Isn't a leaf easily identified by the fact that it has no descendents (as indicated by no edges leaving the node)? Andy -- TAI64 timestamp: 4000550a06c1

Re: [fossil-dev] Circular timeline nodes

2015-03-18 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Richard Hipp on Wed, 18 Mar 2015 16:56:24 -0400: > Maybe circles should be used in all cases? Or maybe the use of circles > versus squares should be a skin-selectable option? I prefer boxes over circles, so definitely if there is a strong desire to use circles instead of boxes, then

Re: [fossil-dev] Circular timeline nodes

2015-03-18 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Jan Danielsson on Wed, 18 Mar 2015 19:21:02 +0100: > No problems rendering on this system; it Just Works(tm). It doesn't render on my Debian system which uses Iceweasel (same code base for Firefox, with policy infringing things removed I believe). Andy -- TAI64 timestamp: 400055

Re: [fossil-dev] Circular timeline nodes

2015-03-18 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Scott Robison on Wed, 18 Mar 2015 12:03:49 -0600: > Or hearts & spades & clubs. Maybe pacman & qbert. Or maybe, hopefully, this can be controlled via CSS... Andy -- TAI64 timestamp: 40005509d65b ___ fossil-dev mailing list fossil-dev@mail

Re: [fossil-dev] Circular timeline nodes

2015-03-18 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Richard Hipp on Wed, 18 Mar 2015 13:53:14 -0400: > https://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/timeline?y=ci I've found that in some browsers, all nodes look like squares, not sure why. That being said, I prefer a blocky thing with edges to a no-corners thing when line oriented data is

Re: [fossil-dev] dev list archives not working?

2015-03-09 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Stephan Beal on Sun, 08 Mar 2015 10:55:52 +0100: > http://www.mail-archive.com/fossil-dev@lists.fossil-scm.org/maillist.html mail-archive.com uses the mailing list address for uniquely identifying the list. This changed from fossil-...@lists.fossil-scm.org to fossil-dev@maili

Re: [fossil-dev] Fwd: finde ich nicht?

2015-03-07 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Stephan Beal on Wed, 04 Mar 2015 18:35:56 +0100: > For every "round-trip" the credentials of the remote repository are > checked. If no key exchange has been done, the password has to be > entered over and over again. What version of Fossil are they using? Starting with Fos

[fossil-dev] Extend ln= highlighting to multiple blocks?

2015-03-06 Thread Andy Bradford
Hello, I just committed some changes that will allow multiple blocks to be highlighted when using ln= as a query parameter: http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/timeline?r=multi-block-highlight&nd&c=2015-03-06+07%3A39%3A09&n=200 Will someone review the changes and provide feedback? Make

Re: [fossil-dev] [OT] mailing list configuration change?

2015-02-25 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Richard Hipp on Sat, 21 Feb 2015 13:07:46 -0500: > Yes. We moved the mailing list server to a different IP address > (because it wants to use Apache and we are running a different web > server on port 80 of the machine that was hosting the mailing list.) > This involved givi

Re: [fossil-dev] Timeline dates in the wrong place?

2015-02-25 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Vikrant Chaudhary on Thu, 26 Feb 2015 10:21:33 +0530: > I do wonder though if it could display time in local time-zone instead > of UTC. There is a setting in your Fossil repository for that. You can disable the display of UTC in Admin->Timeline. Andy -- TAI64 timestamp: 400054e

Re: [fossil-dev] Timeline dates in the wrong place?

2015-02-25 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Richard Hipp on Wed, 25 Feb 2015 10:04:54 -0500: > The dates on timelines (the -MM-DD) could be seen as being in the > wrong place. The dates are positioned at a point on the timeline where > the HH:MM:SS for the date is 23:59:59.999. But since the HH:MM:SS is > not shown, that im

Re: [fossil-dev] [OT] mailing list configuration change?

2015-02-21 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Richard Hipp on Sat, 21 Feb 2015 13:07:46 -0500: > The change has fixed a lot of problems that we were previously having > due to running Apache on port 8080. I'm sorry to hear that it caused > some confusion for you. Don't worry about it. I just wanted to confirm that the chan

[fossil-dev] [OT] mailing list configuration change?

2015-02-21 Thread Andy Bradford
Hello, Has there been a mailing list change? I notice that the List-id has changed and is no longer fossil-dev.lists.fossil-scm.org. I used to filter on the List-post header which has always been fossil-...@lists.fossil-scm.org but appears to have changed recently to

  1   2   >