Re: [fossil-users] The case for Markdown (yes, I rtfm)

Now to refute this. Keep in mind that if I had my 'druthers I'd have Markdown as well while you read this. Markdown is a non-trivial format to parse and implement. The resulting code is non-trivial in size as well. Not everybody universally accepts Markdown as the format they want. Others want

[fossil-users] The case for Markdown (yes, I rtfm)

On Sat, 2009-11-28 at 09:10 -0500, D. Richard Hipp wrote: > http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/wiki_rules I re-read this and noticed again the rationale for using the simple wiki rules included instead of an existing wiki language. Given the rationale, I think Markdown would be a better choice. > 1

Re: [fossil-users] More info on ticket 1e919e389b

Richard, That's what it is. I unintentionally forked the repository, and the working directory in which "fossil update" was doing nothing was on a different leaf. "fossil leaves" -- I shall remember this command. Thanks very much! Will On Nov 28, 2009, at 3:31 PM, D. Richard Hipp wrote:

Re: [fossil-users] Zip files won't unzip on OS X

Chi, Thanks for the word about the bug fix. I'll see about updating to the latest Fossil binary; I'd been putting it off until there was some compelling reason. :-) Snit is at SourceForge as part of Tcllib. Notebook is in Subversion; and I'm not doing much with it at present. I'd based N

Re: [fossil-users] Wiki Formatting?

I don't care if I type **bold** or bold. However, I dislike: Item One Item One.One Item One.Two Item Two Or worse yet, table structures. Isn't: * Item One ** Item One.One ** Item One.Two * Item Two or || Header 1 || Header 2 || | Column 1 | Column 2 | a bit easier? BTW... No one is asking

Re: [fossil-users] Zip files won't unzip on OS X

Will Duquette wrote: - hide quoted text - Hello Will, > I've got a fossil repository at > http://wjduquette.com/projects/robbie.cgi. If I download a Zip > Archive for a leaf, the OS X Archive Utility won't unzip it; it says > that it's corrupted. The command-line "unzip" command unzips it >

Re: [fossil-users] More info on ticket 1e919e389b

On Nov 28, 2009, at 4:49 PM, Will Duquette wrote: > Richard asked that I give more information on ticket 1e919e389b > here on the mailing list. > > What I was seeing, and reported in that ticket, was this: > > * I was running on Ubuntu Karmic Koala. > * I did a "fossil all sync" to sync a local r

Re: [fossil-users] More info on ticket 1e919e389b

On Nov 28, 2009, at 2:30 PM, Michael wrote: > On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 01:49:38PM -0800, Will Duquette wrote: >> Richard asked that I give more information on ticket 1e919e389b >> here on the mailing list. >> >> What I was seeing, and reported in that ticket, was this: >> >> * I was running on Ubu

Re: [fossil-users] More info on ticket 1e919e389b

I haven't; I'm not sure in fact that that's what happened. I think it must have been, but it wasn't something I was doing on purpose. In any event, the head of each of the two repositories now contains all of the changes I had wanted to make, so I'm not eager to experiment on them. Will

Re: [fossil-users] More info on ticket 1e919e389b

On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 01:49:38PM -0800, Will Duquette wrote: > Richard asked that I give more information on ticket 1e919e389b > here on the mailing list. > > What I was seeing, and reported in that ticket, was this: > > * I was running on Ubuntu Karmic Koala. > * I did a "fossil all sync" to s

Re: [fossil-users] Wiki Formatting?

Joshua Paine wrote: > But that's just it: any of the major wiki engines would be better. So > why not just use one? I'd rather write textile than fossil wiki. I > imagine most textile users would rather write markdown than fossil wiki. > > Just because we can't make everyone happy doesn't mean we h

Re: [fossil-users] More info on ticket 1e919e389b

Have you tried to do:? fossil merge A A is the name of the version that you commited in the other laptop 2009/11/28 Will Duquette : > Richard asked that I give more information on ticket 1e919e389b > here on the mailing list. > > What I was seeing, and reported in that ticket, was this: > > * I

Re: [fossil-users] Wiki Formatting?

On Sat, 2009-11-28 at 13:18 -0800, Michael wrote: > And, as I recall, there > have been some posts here that show how you can add your > own markup right into your own repositories, if that is > your wish. Someone showed how to integrate TinyMCE, which edits and produces HTML. (Like many progr

[fossil-users] More info on ticket 1e919e389b

Richard asked that I give more information on ticket 1e919e389b here on the mailing list. What I was seeing, and reported in that ticket, was this: * I was running on Ubuntu Karmic Koala. * I did a "fossil all sync" to sync a local repository with the one on my web server; I saw the "delta" an

Re: [fossil-users] Wiki Formatting?

On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 04:04:24PM -0500, Joshua Paine wrote: > On Sat, 2009-11-28 at 22:14 +0800, Michael Richter wrote: > > I think having the simple syntax we have now is fine, even if > > suboptimal compared to my poison (Markdown). > > But that's just it: any of the major wiki engines would b

[fossil-users] Zip files won't unzip on OS X

Howdy! I've got a fossil repository at http://wjduquette.com/projects/robbie.cgi . If I download a Zip Archive for a leaf, the OS X Archive Utility won't unzip it; it says that it's corrupted. The command-line "unzip" command unzips it just fine. ---

Re: [fossil-users] Wiki Formatting?

On Sat, 2009-11-28 at 22:14 +0800, Michael Richter wrote: > I think having the simple syntax we have now is fine, even if > suboptimal compared to my poison (Markdown). But that's just it: any of the major wiki engines would be better. So why not just use one? I'd rather write textile than fossil

Re: [fossil-users] Wiki Formatting?

Richard, if you get the inkling to power up the Wiki formatting rules, there is a C library for Markup (Discount) available which might plug in nicely. 2009/11/28 Jeremy Cowgar > That's good but it's pretty limited. As was mention, Markdown,

Re: [fossil-users] Wiki Formatting?

That's good but it's pretty limited. As was mention, Markdown, Textile or Creole formatting would handle just about any formatting you'd ever want to do. With the wiki, I was hoping to document the business rules, application functionality, design documentation, etc... but it's just way to cumbe

Re: [fossil-users] Wiki Formatting?

And this is the problem. Everybody wants something different in a wiki syntax. Some want Wikimedia-like syntax, some want Markdown (that's my poison too), some want Textile, some want ... you get the picture. Rather than having endless Wiki-format wars, a bloated core that tries to do everything

Re: [fossil-users] Wiki Formatting?

On Nov 28, 2009, at 8:56 AM, Jeremy Cowgar wrote: > Is Fossil going to have Wiki formatting? It's a real drag to use all > the standard HTML when there are formats that are easily human > readable and much easier to type/maintain. http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/wiki_rules D. Richard Hip

Re: [fossil-users] Wiki Formatting?

Surely would love to use markdown, myself. -- Joshua Paine LetterBlock: Web applications built with joy http://letterblock.com/ 301-576-1920 ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/

[fossil-users] Wiki Formatting?

Is Fossil going to have Wiki formatting? It's a real drag to use all the standard HTML when there are formats that are easily human readable and much easier to type/maintain. Jeremy ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http:/

Re: [fossil-users] Adding your own pages to fossil

Op Za, 28 november, 2009 04:50, schreef Stephan Beal: > On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Rene de Zwart wrote: > >> If you do this it is obviously not fossil anymore! Its a nice way to >> build >> a small application with a database and built in scm and wiki. with zero >> administration on windows