Re: [fossil-users] Fossil vs. Git/Mercurial/etc.?

2013-01-07 Thread Marc Laporte
Hi! On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 11:56 PM, Nico Williams wrote: "I happen to think that Fossil has a superior architecture and design. I'd like to use Fossil, but I can't, and I've explained why. I've also explained why I'm unlikely to be the only user who needs this one feature." Thank you Nico for

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil vs. Git/Mercurial/etc.?

2013-01-07 Thread Matt Welland
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 4:32 AM, Alaric Snell-Pym wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 01/03/2013 05:12 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > > Might that be a useful approach for Fossil, too? > > > > > >> If I understand you correctly, I believe this is what happens if you do > >>

[fossil-users] 'fossil server' fails to chroot

2013-01-07 Thread Michai Ramakers
Hello, when I open ('fossil open') a repository located in the root ('/'), where the current work dir is one below the root (say, '/mydir'), 'fossil server' results in an error message in my browser, when I view 'http://localhost:8080': Status: 200 OK X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN Cache-cont

Re: [fossil-users] Possible rename/revert bug?

2013-01-07 Thread Richard Hipp
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 4:22 AM, Stephan Beal wrote: > On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Joel Bruick wrote: > >> This should be easy to reproduce. Just create a repo and commit a file >> into it. Then change that file's name and run 'fossil mv'. Finally, run >> 'fossil revert' and you should see t

[fossil-users] Diff summary when clicking on timeline box (feature request)

2013-01-07 Thread Martin Gagnon
Hi list, I like very much the new feature where we can click on 2 versions directly on the timeline. But there's a little thing missing when diffing that way, there's no way to see a compact list of files that change, all files diff are already expanded. Sometimes, there's a lot of files with dif

Re: [fossil-users] [VB.Net] Ignoring .suo safe?

2013-01-07 Thread Konstantin Khomoutov
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 12:32:43PM +0100, Gilles wrote: > >Yes, it's safe. > >Basically, the only set of files really needed for maintaining a .NET > >project by the Microsoft IDE are those containing XML in them. > >The `msbuild` tool which does actual heavy lifting consumes files ending > >in '*

Re: [fossil-users] [VB.Net] Ignoring .suo safe?

2013-01-07 Thread Gilles
On Mon, 7 Jan 2013 15:12:19 +0400, Konstantin Khomoutov wrote: >Yes, it's safe. >Basically, the only set of files really needed for maintaining a .NET >project by the Microsoft IDE are those containing XML in them. >The `msbuild` tool which does actual heavy lifting consumes files ending >in '*.pr

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil vs. Git/Mercurial/etc.?

2013-01-07 Thread Alaric Snell-Pym
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/03/2013 05:12 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > Might that be a useful approach for Fossil, too? > > >> If I understand you correctly, I believe this is what happens if you do >> your lots of tiny commits into a --private branch, then merge that >> priv

Re: [fossil-users] [VB.Net] Ignoring .suo safe?

2013-01-07 Thread Konstantin Khomoutov
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 11:49:52AM +0100, Gilles wrote: > I just ran the following two commands: > > fossil add ./MyVBNetProject > fossil commit -m "Original files" > > ... and fossil complains with: > > "./MyVBNetProject/WindowsApplication1/WindowsApplication1.suo contains > binary data. comm

Re: [fossil-users] [revert] Shortcut to go back to n-1 revision?

2013-01-07 Thread Gilles
On Mon, 7 Jan 2013 11:43:01 +0100, Stephan Beal wrote: >There's no strict reason to - if your current model works for you then by >all means use it. i keep mine separated, but that's just personal >preference. Thanks. ___ fossil-users mailing list foss

[fossil-users] [VB.Net] Ignoring .suo safe?

2013-01-07 Thread Gilles
Hello I just ran the following two commands: fossil add ./MyVBNetProject fossil commit -m "Original files" ... and fossil complains with: "./MyVBNetProject/WindowsApplication1/WindowsApplication1.suo contains binary data. commit anyhow (a=all/y/N)?" My global ignore-glob contains: "*.exe,*.pd

Re: [fossil-users] [revert] Shortcut to go back to n-1 revision?

2013-01-07 Thread Stephan Beal
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Gilles wrote: > >[stephan@host:~/cvs/fossil]$ ls -1 *.fsl | wc -l > >38 > > I guess I'll move to one "project" = one repo. There's no strict reason to - if your current model works for you then by all means use it. i keep mine separated, but that's just personal

Re: [fossil-users] [revert] Shortcut to go back to n-1 revision?

2013-01-07 Thread Gilles
On Mon, 7 Jan 2013 11:20:20 +0100, Stephan Beal wrote: >So far there is no shortcut for that. If you don't mind, please open up a >feature request for that. IIRC that request has come up a few times before. Thanks for the info. >[stephan@host:~/cvs/fossil]$ ls -1 *.fsl | wc -l >38 I guess I'll m

Re: [fossil-users] [revert] Shortcut to go back to n-1 revision?

2013-01-07 Thread Stephan Beal
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Gilles wrote: > "fossil revert beforelast" > www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/help?cmd=revert So far there is no shortcut for that. If you don't mind, please open up a feature request for that. IIRC that request has come up a few times before. Also, and more gener

[fossil-users] [revert] Shortcut to go back to n-1 revision?

2013-01-07 Thread Gilles
Hello I often want to try something new, commit the change even if it didn't work (just to keep track of things I tried), and go back to the n-1 revision from the repository. I checked the page for "revert", but it doesn't mention it: Is there a shortcut like... "fossil revert beforelast

Re: [fossil-users] Possible rename/revert bug?

2013-01-07 Thread Stephan Beal
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Joel Bruick wrote: > This should be easy to reproduce. Just create a repo and commit a file > into it. Then change that file's name and run 'fossil mv'. Finally, run > 'fossil revert' and you should see the behavior I've described. > FWIW, here's a reproduction:

[fossil-users] Possible rename/revert bug?

2013-01-07 Thread Joel Bruick
Hello all! I ran into some odd behavior with running revert on a checkout in which a rename has just been performed. The renamed file gets deleted, but the original file doesn't get restored. No changes are reported by 'fossil changes', although the checkout is certainly not in its original st