On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 8:42 AM, Joe Mistachkin
wrote:
> Stephan Beal wrote:
> >
> > th1 is extremely limited. libfossil is developing more powerful script
> bindings:
> >
>
> I'm growing more than a bit tired of this "meme".
>
No offense intended, but try developing a 1000-lins script which fai
Stephan Beal wrote:
>
> th1 is extremely limited. libfossil is developing more powerful script
bindings:
>
I'm growing more than a bit tired of this "meme".
TH1 been enhanced, extended, and it can integrate seamlessly with full Tcl
rather
easily (i.e. when the right compile-time and runtime opt
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 4:59 AM, Timothy Beyer wrote:
> There are some limitations that we worked around, such as the fact that
> the "%"
> symbol has a lot of bugs when used in JSON SQL queries (thus making most
> wildcard matches with LIKE useless), so I use GLOB with a regular
> expression
> f
At Thu, 28 Aug 2014 11:42:58 -0400,
Todd Niec wrote:
>
> [1 ]
> [1.1 ]
>
> [1.2 ]
> Hi,
>
> I am new to fossil as well as this list, so I apologize if this posting is
> off-topic, answered
> elsewhere, or inappropriate in any way.
>
> I am looking at using fossil as a low-footprint, "off-li
Thanx for the info. Adding the check out permission did the trick but it does
seem a little counterintuitive that a user would have permission to check out
but not to clone ;}
I also apologize for the second question, I had left a sentence out and ending
up asking the wrong question. But any
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 7:02 PM, Ron W wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 6:46 PM, Paul Higham wrote:
>
>> With the developer permissions set the attachments can be downloaded (a
>> .pdf will open directly in the browser, but an Excel document is actually
>> downloaded) but with all the permission
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 6:46 PM, Paul Higham wrote:
>
> I plan on updating the cloud version of Fossil but I do have the latest on
> my own machine. However, I cannot find any specific instructions even on
> the Fossil website as to how to do this. Is it possible or not?
>
>
(1) Put the new fo
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 6:46 PM, Paul Higham wrote:
> With the developer permissions set the attachments can be downloaded (a
> .pdf will open directly in the browser, but an Excel document is actually
> downloaded) but with all the permissions that I gave below even the .pdf is
> inaccessible.
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Warren Young wrote:
> On 8/28/2014 14:32, Ron W wrote:
>
>> I wonder if it would make sense for Fossil to spawn a separate program
>> to create symlinks.
>>
>
> You'd need a Windows equivalent of setuid root. I imagine if such a thing
> exists, it involves poking
With the developer permissions set the attachments can be downloaded (a .pdf
will open directly in the browser, but an Excel document is actually
downloaded) but with all the permissions that I gave below even the .pdf is
inaccessible. The project manager that I mentioned does not need a local
On 8/28/2014 14:32, Ron W wrote:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 2:01 PM, Warren Young mailto:war...@etr-usa.com>> wrote:
2. If you *are* running as an Administrator user, you can't create
symlinks from a process that isn't "Run as Administrator".
If issue #1 is resolved in a given user's envir
On 8/28/2014 13:34, Thomas Schnurrenberger wrote:
Fossil can be run as a Windows service.
Thanks for the tip!
> Please take a look at the 'winsrv' command.
Alas, I do not keep a native Windows binary of fossil.exe on my Windows
boxes. As you can guess from my prior message, I only run Fossi
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 2:01 PM, Warren Young wrote:
> While Windows Vista+ technically can make symlinks on NTFS, it has
> restrictions that make it unworkable for Fossil:
>
> 1. If you aren't running as a member of the Administrators group, you
> cannot create symlinks, at all, ever.
>
At leas
On 28.08.2014 20:01, Warren Young wrote:
3. If your program is running as a Windows service (which Fossil can't
do yet, but may one day be able to) it can't call this function at all,
regardless of permission. Only programs running under the interactive
desktop can create symlinks.
Fossil can
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 7:42 PM, Paul Higham wrote:
>
>- I want to grant permission to a project manager here to be able to
>create, edit and view tickets and their attachments, but I don’t want him
>to be able to clone, check in or check out.
>
> i don't believe that complete combo i
On 8/28/2014 09:23, Scott Robison wrote:
Would there be any interest in adding symlink support to Windows (where
available [Vista & later], leaving the text file approach where it is not)?
While Windows Vista+ technically can make symlinks on NTFS, it has
restrictions that make it unworkable
-Original Message-
From: Joe Mistachkin [mailto:sql...@mistachkin.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 10:17 AM
To: 'fossil-...@lists.fossil-scm.org'
Subject: v1.30 (was RE: [fossil-dev] miniz revisited)
Stephan Beal wrote:
>
> i've been using it in two other repos of mine since Baruch
I have questions regarding two subjects that have been mentioned in this thread:
I want to grant permission to a project manager here to be able to create, edit
and view tickets and their attachments, but I don’t want him to be able to
clone, check in or check out. I have given him all the foll
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 11:42 AM, Todd Niec wrote:
>
> It seems to fit the bill almost perfectly, but I cannot enter formatted
> descriptions in the tickets. I am losing my whitespace formatting, for
> example. I see there is a drop-down list with choices like "wiki", and
> HTML but that does no
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Scott Robison
wrote:
> That was my idea (unless mentioning it motivated a dev to do it and commit
> in 15 minutes or less, as often seems to happen around here). :)
>
It would be nice.
I used to be one of the people, here, trying to encourage symlink support
on
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 11:42 AM, Todd Niec wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I am new to fossil as well as this list, so I apologize if this posting is
> off-topic, answered elsewhere, or inappropriate in any way.
>
>
>
> I am looking at using fossil as a low-footprint, "off-line"
> bug-tracking/ticketing sy
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 5:46 PM, Stephan Beal wrote:
> That sounds like a but to me. i'll see if i can reproduce it here, but i
> don't do much with the ticket system and don't have an immediate suspect in
> mind.
>
i can't reproduce that using the current trunk (or very close to it):
http://fo
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 5:42 PM, Todd Niec wrote:
> I am new to fossil as well as this list, so I apologize if this posting is
> off-topic, answered elsewhere, or inappropriate in any way.
>
Welcome aboard!
> I am looking at using fossil as a low-footprint, "off-line"
> bug-tracking/ticketing
Hi,
I am new to fossil as well as this list, so I apologize if this posting
is off-topic, answered elsewhere, or inappropriate in any way.
I am looking at using fossil as a low-footprint, "off-line"
bug-tracking/ticketing system.
It seems to fit the bill almost perfectly, but I cannot
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Scott Robison
wrote:
> That was my idea (unless mentioning it motivated a dev to do it and commit
> in 15 minutes or less, as often seems to happen around here). :)
>
Oh, Scott, have you not learned? You haven't offered us any cookies yet ;).
(BTW: Windows isn't
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 9:26 AM, Richard Hipp wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Scott Robison
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Richard Hipp wrote:
>>>
>>> D'oh. I had searched the forum + google and found threads in which
the devs described why there was no support
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 9:26 AM, Richard Hipp wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Scott Robison
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Richard Hipp wrote:
>>>
>>> D'oh. I had searched the forum + google and found threads in which
the devs described why there was no s
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 5:03 PM, Eric Rubin-Smith wrote:
> D'oh. I had searched the forum + google and found threads in which the
> devs described why there was no support, and then tested to see if there
> was support by just checking in a symlink (which didn't work by default).
> So I missed t
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Scott Robison
wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Richard Hipp wrote:
>>
>> D'oh. I had searched the forum + google and found threads in which the
>>> devs described why there was no support, and then tested to see if there
>>> was support by just checki
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Richard Hipp wrote:
>
> D'oh. I had searched the forum + google and found threads in which the
>> devs described why there was no support, and then tested to see if there
>> was support by just checking in a symlink (which didn't work by default).
>> So I missed t
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 5:04 PM, Richard Hipp wrote:
> Not noise. This is signal that means we need to improve the
> documentation
>
@Eric: feel free to suggest docs and where you think they belong.
Tomorrow's a half-day for me, so i could get them in tomorrow evening if
you're quick ;).
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Eric Rubin-Smith
wrote:
>
>
> D'oh. I had searched the forum + google and found threads in which the
> devs described why there was no support, and then tested to see if there
> was support by just checking in a symlink (which didn't work by default).
> So I mis
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 5:03 PM, Eric Rubin-Smith wrote:
> D'oh. I had searched the forum + google and found threads in which the
> devs described why there was no support, and then tested to see if there
> was support by just checking in a symlink (which didn't work by default).
> So I missed t
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Stephan Beal
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 4:51 PM, Eric Rubin-Smith
> wrote:
>
>> Any plan to support symlinks any time soon?
>>
>>
> ???
>
> [stephan@host:~]$ f help set | grep -C3 sym
>access-log If enabled, record successful and failed login a
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 4:51 PM, Eric Rubin-Smith wrote:
> Any plan to support symlinks any time soon?
>
>
???
[stephan@host:~]$ f help set | grep -C3 sym
access-log If enabled, record successful and failed login attempts
in the "accesslog" table. Default: off
a
Any plan to support symlinks any time soon?
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
36 matches
Mail list logo