[fossil-users] limited ticketing system

2013-06-28 Thread reverse
Hi, In reply to the discussion on http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/pipermail/fossil-users/2011-November/007571.html I managed to configure a read only my tickets Fossil repository. Please see http://snowflakejoins.com/fossil/private.html for implementation details Please see

Re: [fossil-users] limited ticketing system

2013-06-28 Thread Stephan Beal
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 8:18 PM, reverse reve...@snowflakejoins.com wrote: I managed to configure a read only my tickets Fossil repository. Please see http://snowflakejoins.com/**fossil/private.htmlhttp://snowflakejoins.com/fossil/private.htmlfor implementation details Please don't take

Re: [fossil-users] limited ticketing

2011-11-20 Thread ST
I agree. One of the strengths of the fossil ticketing system is it's integration with the scm history, which is not what you would not want for a customer-facing ticketing systems. I suggest using one of the other support management systems for that and keep fossil for internal, development

Re: [fossil-users] limited ticketing

2011-11-18 Thread Stephan Beal
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 10:55 PM, Ron Wilson ronw.m...@gmail.com wrote: if {$login eq $submitter} { things that only the submitter is allowed to do } You could do similar with an assignedto field, as well. Yes, but... then the JSON API would also have to support th1, which it doesn't

Re: [fossil-users] limited ticketing

2011-11-18 Thread Remigiusz Modrzejewski
On Nov 18, 2011, at 3:41 AM, Tomek Kott wrote: If we have granular permissions for tickets, then we should probably also have it for the wiki (view attachments, view history), we should also separate attach and delete for wiki and tickets, and maybe even throw in permissions related to the

Re: [fossil-users] limited ticketing

2011-11-18 Thread Ron Wilson
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 5:28 AM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 10:55 PM, Ron Wilson ronw.m...@gmail.com wrote: if {$login eq $submitter} {      things that only the submitter is allowed to do } You could do similar with an assignedto field, as well.

Re: [fossil-users] limited ticketing

2011-11-18 Thread Ron Wilson
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 5:36 AM, Remigiusz Modrzejewski l...@maxnet.org.pl wrote: You know that by similar funny implications we can prove that most of Fossil is actually redundant...  Actually, why do we even have a permission system, if Fossil is an internal development tool? Last I

Re: [fossil-users] limited ticketing

2011-11-18 Thread Stephan Beal
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Ron Wilson ronw.m...@gmail.com wrote: In most work environments, I would not expect users outside of the software team to be knowledgeble enough to use a JSON based front end not served by either Fossil or another company server. Yes, but security via

Re: [fossil-users] limited ticketing

2011-11-18 Thread Ron Wilson
We are not using the limitations the original request suggested, though I did put in some TH1 code for the purpose of encouraging following the process flow. This was mostly to make the non-software people more comfortable. (Fossil's ticket system is quite good. The only people I personaly know

[fossil-users] limited ticketing

2011-11-17 Thread ST
Hi, is it possible to configure fossil server so, that some clients will be able only submit tickets (and even not see other tickets or maybe see only tickets that they have submitted)? This mode would be useful for customers whom you want to submit bug reports without being able to observe the

Re: [fossil-users] limited ticketing

2011-11-17 Thread Remigiusz Modrzejewski
On Nov 17, 2011, at 11:01 AM, ST wrote: is it possible to configure fossil server so, that some clients will be able only submit tickets (and even not see other tickets or maybe see only tickets that they have submitted)? This mode would be useful for customers whom you want to submit bug

Re: [fossil-users] limited ticketing

2011-11-17 Thread ST
On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 14:34 +0100, Remigiusz Modrzejewski wrote: On Nov 17, 2011, at 11:01 AM, ST wrote: is it possible to configure fossil server so, that some clients will be able only submit tickets (and even not see other tickets or maybe see only tickets that they have submitted)?

Re: [fossil-users] limited ticketing

2011-11-17 Thread Stephan Beal
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 6:02 PM, ST smn...@gmail.com wrote: as far as I understand one can enable/disable ticket viewing completely, but I don't see a way for a user to be able to see/comment/append _only_ to tickets submitted by him... Fossil doesn't offer that level of granularity. --

Re: [fossil-users] limited ticketing

2011-11-17 Thread Ron Wilson
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 6:02 PM, ST smn...@gmail.com wrote: as far as I understand one can enable/disable ticket viewing completely, but I don't see a way for a user to be able to see/comment/append _only_ to tickets

Re: [fossil-users] limited ticketing

2011-11-17 Thread Remigiusz Modrzejewski
On Nov 17, 2011, at 6:28 PM, Stephan Beal wrote: On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 6:02 PM, ST smn...@gmail.com wrote: as far as I understand one can enable/disable ticket viewing completely, but I don't see a way for a user to be able to see/comment/append _only_ to tickets submitted by him...

Re: [fossil-users] limited ticketing

2011-11-17 Thread Tomek Kott
If we have granular permissions for tickets, then we should probably also have it for the wiki (view attachments, view history), we should also separate attach and delete for wiki and tickets, and maybe even throw in permissions related to the timeline and files (such as view newest view hitsory,