Re: [FOSSology] Black duck Software Competitor

Hello Himanshu, FOSSology is an open source application that focuses on license scanning, categorization and copyright. The application is free for you to download, install & use from the project website at http://fossology.org. For additional information about FOSSology

Re: [FOSSology] Drop support for RHEL5 in FOSSology 2.0?

Good to know. Thanks for your timely response. From: Fay Michael T [mailto:faymicha...@johndeere.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 2:00 PM To: Laser, Mary; fossology@fossology.org Subject: RE: Drop support for RHEL5 in FOSSology 2.0? We wouldn't be able to upgrade any time soon. O

[FOSSology] Drop support for RHEL5 in FOSSology 2.0?

Hello FOSSologists, We are deep into development & test of FOSSology version 2.0 and making good progress. A large part of 2.0 is a complete rewrite of the scheduler with a new dependency on libglib2.0-dev, version 2.23.0 or greater. We recently discovered the ne

Re: [FOSSology] Nomos missing BSD reference?

Good to know. Thanks Pete. BTW, the bug can be viewed at http://bugs.linux-foundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=924 > -Original Message- > From: Peter Jalajas, GigaLock Backup Services > > FWIW, from my viewpoint, to be clear, it is _very_ important to > indicate such "less interesting" lic

Re: [FOSSology] Nomos missing BSD reference?

Hi Pete, Based on your email, I see you're using a (older?) version of FOSSology which includes the (deprecated) bsam analyzer. Your first question below refers to a table generated using bsam. Since we're no longer supporting bsam, I don't have the means to reproduce your result in order to

Re: [FOSSology] DBaccess(7): ERROR: more than one row returned by a subquery used as an expression

See inline responses... > -Original Message- > Subject: Re: [FOSSology] DBaccess(7): ERROR: more than one row returned > by a subquery used as an expression > > Thanks, Mary and Bob. > > Perhaps my problem was, more specifically, that I deleted the Uploaded > file _while_ the Agents were

Re: [FOSSology] DBaccess(7): ERROR: more than one row returned by a subquery used as an expression

> -Original Message- > From: fossology-boun...@fossology.org [mailto:fossology- > boun...@fossology.org] On Behalf Of Peter Jalajas, GigaLock Backup > Services > Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 8:22 PM > To: fossology@fossology.org > Subject: [FOSSology] DBaccess(7): ERROR: more than one r

Re: [FOSSology] 1.2.0 Inconsistency detected by ld.so; bad 1.4.0 svn url

Hi Pete, Welcome to FOSSology! Thank you for the feedback on your attempts to install 1.2.0, 1.3 and 1.4.0 FOSSology. I'm sorry you were advised to install 1.2.0. This is a very old version and had known critical defects that were addressed in a 1.2.1 release in September 2010. Our most rece

[FOSSology] Recall: v2.0 tasks & code complete milestone

Laser, Mary would like to recall the message, "v2.0 tasks & code complete milestone". ___ fossology mailing list fossology@fossology.org http://fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology

[FOSSology] v2.0 tasks & code complete milestone

Hi Everyone, Thank you all for providing time estimates for each of your tasks. I've entered everything into ms project to get a projected date for our code complete milestone (as we agreed :) code complete INCLUDES all tests for checked-in code). The code complete milestone is set at October

Re: [FOSSology] License highlighting (Bob Gobeille)

Hello FOSSologists! Thank you all for your votes. It's very important for us to hear from our users so we know how to prioritize the many features and requests we have on our "to-do" list. We REALY do listen and value your feedback. Keep it coming! The FOSSology Project http://fossology.org

[FOSSology] Standards for reporting FOSSology test results

Hi All, FOSSology has established test frameworks and standard reports. The reporting standard is the unit report format. This varies depending on what is being tested: * c code: CUnit * PHP code: phpunit, or simpletest, phpunit is preferred for straight unit tests. By itse

[FOSSology] SPDX licences in FOSSology

Greetings FOSSologists! As you may (or may not) know, The Linux Foundation's Open Compliance Program has a workgroup dedicated to defining a standardized, adopted format for a software Bill of Materials or Software Package Data eXchange (SPDX). SPDX enables partners in a software supply chain

Re: [FOSSology] Failed to insert upload record...

ossy" is being added (or is already added) and the fossology database is being built (or is already built). Please capture the output and send it to me for review. Thanks, Mary From: Yiling Tsai [mailto:tyle2...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2011 1:57 AM To: Laser, Mary Subject: Re

Re: [FOSSology] Failed to insert upload record...

Hi Yiling, I need a little more information before I can address your error... 1. What version of fossology are you using? 2. Did you install from package or from source? 3. Was the installation successful? 4. Can you connect to you fossology db via "psql -U fossy -d fo

Re: [FOSSology] Database connection error

er. 4. Please send us your solution for our troubleshooting page (http://fossology.org/troubleshooting). Mary From: Dave McLoughlin [mailto:dave.mclough...@openlogic.com] Sent: Friday, July 08, 2011 10:40 AM To: Laser, Mary; fossology@fossology.org Subject: RE: Database connection error Mary,

Re: [FOSSology] Database connection error

This usually is a symptom of a mis-configured postgres file; typically /etc/postgresql/8.3/main/pg_hba.conf Look in the postgres log file (/var/log/postgresql/postgresql-8.3-main.log) for additional clues to your error. Mary From: fossology-boun...@fossology.org [mailto:fossology-boun...@fosso

Re: [FOSSology] Deb install on Ubuntu

instructions. Setting up fossology (1.4.1) ... laser@squeezevm:~$ From: Gobeille, Robert Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 10:36 AM To: Laser, Mary Cc: Dave McLoughlin; fossology@fossology.org Subject: Re: [FOSSology] Deb install on Ubuntu Hi Mary, How is a user supposed to know this? Was there

Re: [FOSSology] Deb install on Ubuntu

File locations are listed here: http://fossology.org/file_locations The debian install instructions are here: http://fossology.org/debian_install Please refer to the INSTALL file for Apache Config. http://fossology.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/fossology/tags/1.4.0~rc7/INSTALL?revision=4199&view=

[FOSSology] FOSSology release 1.4.1 now available

Greetings FOSSologists! The FOSSology Project is pleased to announce the release FOSSology 1.4.1. This is a bug fix release. The list of bugs addressed in this release are here

Re: [FOSSology] Viewing the contents of individual files in Synergy package fails

;s wrong? Did you install from source or packages? A fresh install or upgrade? You may want to re-run /usr/lib/fossology/fo-postinstall and see if it complains about anything. Mary From: Laser, Mary Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 9:31 AM To: 'Antti Luoto'; 'fossology@fossology.

Re: [FOSSology] Viewing the contents of individual files in Synergy package fails

Hi Antti, Thanks for filing the bug report. I will download your package and attempt to reproduce the error. I'll send an update later today. Mary From: fossology-boun...@fossology.org [mailto:fossology-boun...@fossology.org] On Behalf Of Antti Luoto Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 6:13 AM To:

Re: [FOSSology] Move Folder Contents

Oops! You're right. I should have said "Organize -> Uploads -> Move" From: Westphal, Raymond W [mailto:raymond.w.westp...@ehi.com] Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2011 9:34 AM To: Laser, Mary; 'fossology@fossology.org' Subject: RE: Move Folder Contents Oh - I thoug

Re: [FOSSology] Move Folder Contents

Yes, use the "Organize -> Folders -> Move" menu. Mary From: fossology-boun...@fossology.org [mailto:fossology-boun...@fossology.org] On Behalf Of Westphal, Raymond W Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2011 5:30 AM To: 'fossology@fossology.org' Subject: [FOSSology] Move Folder Contents Importance: High Go

[FOSSology] Announcing availability of Release Candidate 1 for 1.4.1

Greetings FOSSologists! The FOSSology Project is pleased to announce RC1 packages for FOSSology 1.4.1. This is a bug fix release. The list of bugs addressed in this release are here

Re: [FOSSology] 1.2.1 to 1.4?

Hi Michael, We have not tested this. To be safe, I would do as this fossology (rpm) user proposed: I'll backup the database (filesystem level backup plus a dump of the database. Then can I simply perform an rpm -Uvh fossology-1.3.0-1.el5.x86_64.rpm followed by a rpm -Uvh fossology-1.4.0-1.el5.x

Re: [FOSSology] Cygwin Analysis causing scheduler restarts

se_481" already exists Regarding the upgrade: I'll backup the database (filesystem level backup plus a dump of the database. Then can I simply perform an rpm -Uvh fossology-1.3.0-1.el5.x86_64.rpm followed by a rpm -Uvh fossology-1.4.0-1.el5.x86_64.rpm ? Thanks, Ray W. __

Re: [FOSSology] Cygwin Analysis causing scheduler restarts

Hi Ray, Thanks for telling us about the missing RHEL5 packages. They're there now :) When I've seen this type of behavior & log file messaging, it usually means the unpack was not responding to the scheduler because it was having trouble unpacking a particular file OR the db was having difficu

Re: [FOSSology] Cygwin Analysis causing scheduler restarts

Did your disk fill up? Take a look at the log file to see if you can identify what was being processed when the scheduler died. Mary From: fossology-boun...@fossology.org [mailto:fossology-boun...@fossology.org] On Behalf Of Westphal, Raymond W Sent: Monday, May 23, 2011 6:32 AM To: fossology@f

[FOSSology] FW: FOSSology 1.4.0 release announcement

Please note corrections to yum configuration. Thanks Vincent! From: Ma, Dong (Vincent, ES-Best-Shore-Services-China-BJ) Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2011 5:20 PM To: Laser, Mary Subject: RE: FOSSology 1.4.0 release announcement Hi Mary, The yum repository should not use the testing repo, use the

[FOSSology] FOSSology 1.4.0 release announcement

Greetings FOSSologists! The FOSSology Project is pleased to announce the release of FOSSology 1.4.0. Unofficial install packages on the following platforms & distros are now available for download and install: · Debian/Ubuntu Packages (amd64 & i386) http://fossology.org/debian/1.4.0/

Re: [FOSSology] Scheduler not responding ...

1) You need to do some cleanup and figure out why the job died 2) Yes, the analysis is trying to restart 3) There is a fossology watchdog restarting you scheduler. Kill it (as root) Send us an update. Mary From: fossology-boun...@fossology.org [mailto:fossology-boun...@fossolo

[FOSSology] FOSSology 1.4.0 Release Candidate 7

Greetings FOSSologists! The FOSSology Project is pleased to announce RC7 packages for FOSSology 1.4.0. Unofficial install packages on the following platforms & distros are now available for download and testing: § Debian/Ubuntu Packages (amd64 & i386) http://fossology.org/debian/1.4.0/ For deb

[FOSSology] FW: New rpm packages for 1.4.0rc7 avaiable

Thank You Vincent! From: Ma, Dong (Vincent, ES-Best-Shore-Services-China-BJ) Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2011 7:04 PM To: Laser, Mary Subject: New rpm packages for 1.4.0rc7 avaiable Hi Mary, The 1.4.0 rc7 packages for rhel5/centos5 rhel6 fedora12/13/14 i386 and x86_64 platform are built. You can

Re: [FOSSology] RHEL 5 rpms?

Thanks for asking! We are in the process of stress testing our stable top of trunk to see if it's ready to become our next release candidate (RC7). So far, the tests look good. We have a developers meeting scheduled in a few hours. As long as the tests remain error free, I will ask our Beijing

[FOSSology] FOSSology 1.4.0 Release Candidate 5

Greetings FOSSologists! The FOSSology Project is pleased to announce RC5 deb packages for FOSSology 1.4.0. Unofficial install packages on the following platforms & distros are now available for download and testing: § Debian/Ubuntu Packages (amd64 & i386) http://fossology.org/debian/1.4.0/ F

Re: [FOSSology] Documentation Updates for Fossology Release 1.4.0

Behalf Of Laser, Mary Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2011 5:54 PM To: fossology-de...@fossology.org; fossology@fossology.org Subject: [FOSSology-devel] Documentation Updates for Fossology Release 1.4.0 Hi FOSSologists, I 'm reviewing our pages on the fossology.org website to determine where we

[FOSSology] Documentation Updates for Fossology Release 1.4.0

Hi FOSSologists, I 'm reviewing our pages on the fossology.org website to determine where we need to add new content, update pages and reorganize pages. I'd love to hear your thoughts and feedback on this subject, too. Is there something we're missing? Do you know of an out of date page that

[FOSSology] Review release notes for 1.4.0

Please review & comment. Thanks, The FOSSology Project http://fossology.org Release Notes for 1.4.0 § New Comparison tool. This allows one to focus on the differences between two file trees. For example, you might want to compar

[FOSSology] FOSSology 1.4.0 Release Candidate 4

We are backing out the changes in RC3 and replacing all Debian/Ubuntu packages with a new RC4. RC4 is a source equivalent to RC2. We will have at least one more release candidate (RC5) next week. The FOSSology Project http://fossology.org Greetings! Additional testi

[FOSSology] FOSSology 1.4.0 Release Candidate 3

Greetings! Additional testing with RC2 turned up one more bug that is addressed in RC3. Barring any other critical bugs, we feel RC3 has a strong probability of becoming our Final 1.4.0 release. As always, please report bugs using our bug reporting system hosted by The Linux Foundation at htt

[FOSSology] FOSSology 1.4.0 Release Candidate 1

Greetings! The FOSSology Project is pleased to announce RC1 packages for FOSSology 1.4.0. Unofficial install packages on the following platforms & distros are now available for download and testing: § RPM Packages (rhel5/centos5, rhel6/centos6, fedora12, fedora13, fedora14 for i386 and x86_64

Re: [FOSSology] NOMOS - how to find differences compared to license templates?

Thanks for answering this email Raino. You are right on the mark. Mary > -Original Message- > From: fossology-boun...@fossology.org [mailto:fossology- > boun...@fossology.org] On Behalf Of Raino Lintulampi > Sent: Friday, April 15, 2011 5:25 AM > To: Dabrowski, Ivo > Cc: fossology@fossol

Re: [FOSSology] swap space

Hi Ray, There are at least 2 reasons why swap usage is going up over time; 1. there is a memory leak - in this case, restarting the scheduler will free up the space. However, we are not aware of any memory leaks in the version you're running. 2. Prior to 1.3.0, the method for proce

Re: [FOSSology] License Identifiers - FOSSology & SPDX

Yes! We are closely following evolution of the SPDX standard. We will eventually align FOSSology to adopt the standard. Mary Mary Laser The FOSSology Project http://fossology.org > -Original Message- > From: fossology-boun...@fossology.org [mailto:fossology- > boun...@fossology.org

Re: [FOSSology] Next Version?

Hi Ray, The next FOSSology release (1.4.0) is being functionally tested by the development team now. After this, we will begin package and install/update testing. Typically, our update testing consists of updating from the previous version to the new version. For this next release, that woul

Re: [FOSSology] Help Deciphering Report

;Info" micromenu.) You should see something like Meta Data Item Meta Data Value 1 Unpacked file type application/x-gzip From: fossology-boun...@fossology.org [mailto:fossology-boun...@fossology.org] On Behalf Of Laser, Mary Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2011 1:17 PM To: valerie duncan;

Re: [FOSSology] Help Deciphering Report

Hi SpottedOtter, It looks like the downloaded file was not unpacked. Did you see any errors in the log file (/var/log/fossology/fossology.log) indicating problems with unpack? I will try it on a 1.3.0 system (from http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/nagios/nagios-3.2.3.tar.gz) and

Re: [FOSSology] dutch language file

This is wonderful Jeroen. Dank je wel! Mary > -Original Message- > From: fossology-boun...@fossology.org [mailto:fossology- > boun...@fossology.org] On Behalf Of Jeroen Baten > Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2011 3:14 AM > To: fossology@fossology.org > Subject: [FOSSology] dutch language fil

Re: [FOSSology] Weird scan of fossology-1.3.0.tar.gz fails Package Scan

, 2011 7:23 AM > To: Jeroen Baten; Laser, Mary > Cc: fossology@fossology.org > Subject: Re: [FOSSology] Weird scan of fossology-1.3.0.tar.gz fails > Package Scan > > This was supposed to be fixed on January 13. > http://bugs.linux-foundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=596 > > 1.3.

Re: [FOSSology] Wondering which are OSI approved licenses

Yes, I 2nd that suggestion. http://fossology.org/task:buckets Mary > -Original Message- > From: fossology-boun...@fossology.org [mailto:fossology- > boun...@fossology.org] On Behalf Of Raino Lintulampi > Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2011 11:36 AM > To: Jeroen Baten > Cc: fossology@fossolo

Re: [FOSSology] Can fossology 1.3 be installed on RHEL5 64 bit Linux?

Thanks SpottedOtter, that would be great! From: Edward Judge [mailto:eju...@us.ibm.com] Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2011 5:03 AM To: vdunca...@gmail.com Cc: fossology@fossology.org; Laser, Mary; vdunca...@gmail.com Subject: Re: RE: Re: [FOSSology] Can fossology 1.3 be installed on RHEL5 64 bit

Re: [FOSSology] Can fossology 1.3 be installed on RHEL5 64 bit Linux?

l.com [mailto:vdunca...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2011 5:26 PM To: Laser, Mary Cc: Edward Judge; fossology@fossology.org Subject: Re: Re: [FOSSology] Can fossology 1.3 be installed on RHEL5 64 bit Linux? Libextractor and libmagic are not the issue. Looking at the outp

Re: [FOSSology] Can fossology 1.3 be installed on RHEL5 64 bit Linux?

Hi Edward, I have not done a RHEL5 install. However, I did find this note in the support matrix indicating it is "in progress" http://fossology.org/download#supported_distro_s: RHEL 5.X in progress for 1.3.0, in general need to get some rpms from other sources see Installing FOSSolo

Re: [FOSSology] Fossology 1.3.0 RHEL5 64-bit Dependency Question

Maybe this? http://rpmfusion.org/ From: fossology-boun...@fossology.org [mailto:fossology-boun...@fossology.org] On Behalf Of vdunca...@gmail.com Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2011 4:42 PM To: Donohoe, Mark Cc: fossology@fossology.org Subject: Re: [FOSSology] Fossology 1.3.0 RHEL5 64-bit Dependenc

Re: [FOSSology] Fossology 1.3.0 RHEL5 64-bit Dependency Question

I've been under the impression all dependencies are included with the packages we build. However, the install page (http://fossology.org/installing_fossology_with_rpm_s) doesn't say that explicitly. I know this was NOT the case with the previous release (as documented here: http://fossology.

Re: [FOSSology] 1.3.0 Install issues

Hi Dave, You will need to remove or rename the directory below to get around this error. /usr/bin/install: cannot overwrite directory `/usr/local/lib/fossology/agents/copyright' with non-directory make[2]: *** [install] Error 1 Mary From: fossology-boun...@fossology.org [mailto:fossology-boun..

[FOSSology] Notes from our weekly FO team meeting posted...

http://fossology.org/2011.02.04 ___ fossology mailing list fossology@fossology.org http://fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology

[FOSSology] RFC: Bug 235 - compare license text for packages that change version

Hello FOSSology users & developers, I've been updating and closing FOSSOlogy bugs in our bugzilla tracking tool (hosted by The Linux Foundation at http://bugs.linux-foundation.org/) and came across this very old enhancement request to "compare license text for packages that change version", http

Re: [FOSSology] Fossology on a Mac

Hi Dave, I've never heard of any attempts. If you do it, please write to the list about your experience. Thanks, Mary From: fossology-boun...@fossology.org [mailto:fossology-boun...@fossology.org] On Behalf Of Dave McLoughlin Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 1:55 PM To: fossology@fossology.org

[FOSSology] Announcing FOSSology 1.3.0 Release

The FOSSology Project is pleased to announce the release of FOSSology 1.3.0. New in version 1.3.0: 1. Groups. Implemented user groups inside of fossology as an indirect but critical requirement for 1.3 because tagging (the real 1.3 requirement) is dependent on having groups to administer tag

[FOSSology] New release candidate for FO 1.3.0 now available

Greetings! The FOSSology Project is pleased to announce RC2 packages for FOSSology 1.3.0. Per the attachments, unofficial install packages on the following platforms & distros are available for download: * RPM Packages (rhel5/centos5 fedora12 fedora13 i386 and x86_64) http://fossolog

Re: [FOSSology] Undefined Variables

Hi Ray, Release notes for version 1.2.1 are on our project website at http://fossology.org/release_notes. We typically don't include every single code change in the notes, but try to highlight the big changes. You can look at every subversion checkin on the sourceforge site at http://fossolog

Re: [FOSSology] Removal of bSAM (Was: Undefined Variables)

(Hi Bob - I'm also surprised at the lack of response regarding the removal of bsam. Maybe "no news is good news"?) Just in case you missed it, I've attached the email announcing the removal of bsam. Please reply with feedback - good or bad ;-) Mary From: fossology-boun...@fossology.org [mail

[FOSSology] Test packages for FO 1.3.0 now available

Greetings & Happy New Year! The FOSSology Project is pleased to announce availability of test packages for FOSSology 1.3.0. Per the attachments, unofficial install packages for testing on the following platforms & distros are available for download: * Debian Packages (amd64 & i386) h

Re: [FOSSology] Detection of new license on FOSSology UI

> -Original Message- > From: fossology-boun...@fossology.org [mailto:fossology- > boun...@fossology.org] On Behalf Of Hitoshi Yoshida > Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2010 7:12 PM > To: fossology@fossology.org > Subject: Re: [FOSSology] Detection of new license on FOSSology UI > > Hello, M

Re: [FOSSology] Something weird with buckets/pkgagent agent with src.rpm

Thanks for reporting the initial errors and verifying the fixes. Mary > -Original Message- > From: fossology-boun...@fossology.org [mailto:fossology- > boun...@fossology.org] On Behalf Of Raino Lintulampi > Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2010 12:50 AM > To: Gobeille, Robert > Cc: fossology@fo

Re: [FOSSology] Fossology install

esday, November 30, 2010 5:02 AM To: Laser, Mary Subject: RE: [FOSSology] Fossology install Hi Mary Yes I went through with some rigour. I still haven`t resolved the issues but will continue trying Regards Jeff From: Laser, Mary [mailto:mary.la...@hp.com] Sent: 29 November 2010 19:59 To: Mcavoy,JG

Re: [FOSSology] Fossology install

returning the same login page Regards Jeff From: jeff.mca...@bt.com [mailto:jeff.mca...@bt.com] Sent: Thursday, November 25, 2010 7:45 AM To: Laser, Mary Subject: RE: OEL Fossology install Mary I have done the following 1. Checked postgresql.conf 2. Checked pg_hba.conf 3. Resta

Re: [FOSSology] OEL Fossology install

Hi Jeff, It looks as though your postgresql db server configuration is incomplete/incorrect. You must to edit the postgresql.conf and pg_hba.conf config files to have a fully functional db for FOSSology BEFORE you try to install & configure FO. There is a brief description of this in the INS

Re: [FOSSology] Issue Installing fossology-1.2.0-1.el5.i386.rpm

Hi Valerie, Unfortunately, the dependency error you're getting is because the FO rpm expects a SPECIFIC version (5.1.6) of php-pear. From my limited research (google for php-pear 5.1.6 rhel; http://shinon0049.tumblr.com/post/707310077/install-php-5-3-2-1-on-rhel5-5), this is an old version of

[FOSSology] Removal of bSAM analyzer from FOSSology

Hello FOSSologists, As you may recall, we have been making noises about removing the bSAM license analyzer from FOSSOlogy for several months. In preparation for that, a new license analyzer (nomos) was introduced in release 1.2.0. The bSAM menus and functionality have remained in FOSSology, bu

Re: [FOSSology] Installing Fossology

Hi Jeff, Bob is out of the office today and he’s asked me to reply to your email. Yes, in general, you need to install all dependencies (everything you listed below & more), tune the kernel, configure the applications (Postgres, apache, php). For dependencies, there is a utility packaged with F

Re: [FOSSology] FOSSology on SuSE

Good Morning Stephan, It is most likely possible. Once the dependencies are met, the next challenge will be differences in pathnames. Fossology has been successfully installed and used with Fedora, RedHat, Debian and, Ubuntu distros. I see no reason why Suse could not be done, too. That said

Re: [FOSSology] Installing fossology on a Ubuntu karmic koala (9.10) machine

> -Original Message- > From: m...@lackof.org [mailto:m...@lackof.org] On Behalf Of Matt > Taggart > Subject: Re: [FOSSology] Installing fossology on a Ubuntu karmic koala > (9.10) machine > > I just > edited a little to explain that just rebuilding the packages is enough > if > people wa

Re: [FOSSology] how to contribute

Hi Wolfgang, Just to be sure we fixed the right typos, please check the pages where you saw the errors. Thanks, Mary > -Original Message- > From: fossology-boun...@fossology.org [mailto:fossology- > boun...@fossology.org] On Behalf Of Donohoe, Mark > Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2010 2:0

Re: [FOSSology] Installing fossology on a Ubuntu karmic koala (9.10) machine

Hi Matt, Thanks for your clarifications and feedback. It's always good to have different perspectives and explanations on the mailing list. See more below... > -Original Message- > From: m...@lackof.org [mailto:m...@lackof.org] On Behalf Of Matt > Taggart > Subject: Re: [FOSSology] Inst

Re: [FOSSology] Installing fossology on a Ubuntu karmic koala (9.10) machine

remove successfully removes the 1.1.0 version before you try to install 1.2.1 from source. Mary > -Original Message- > From: Deol, Gurbax [mailto:gur...@ti.com] > Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2010 4:12 PM > To: Donohoe, Mark; Laser, Mary > Cc: Causey, William; fossology@fossolog

[FOSSology] Project update and packaging requests

Hello FOSSologists! The entire FOSSology development team is feverishly working to finish up coding and test writing for our 1.3 release. We are scheduled to ramp up functional and integration testing next month, addressing bugs as we find them. We'll bui

Re: [FOSSology] Installing fossology on a Ubuntu karmic koala (9.10) machine

Oops! I meant to say "1.1.x" below (not 1.1.1) From: fossology-boun...@fossology.org [mailto:fossology-boun...@fossology.org] On Behalf Of Laser, Mary Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2010 11:38 AM To: Causey, William; Donohoe, Mark Cc: fossology@fossology.org Subject: Re: [FOSSology]

Re: [FOSSology] Installing fossology on a Ubuntu karmic koala (9.10) machine

gt;. Mark - Please confirm or make corrections, as necessary. If these instructions are correct, let's post them to the website for future reference. Mary From: Causey, William [mailto:w-caus...@ti.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2010 11:09 AM To: Laser, Mary; Donohoe, Mark Cc: fossolog

Re: [FOSSology] Installing fossology on a Ubuntu karmic koala (9.10) machine

Hi William, I apologize for the miscommunication on our website. The page was out of date and should not have stated that the latest version of fossology was available for ubuntu 9.10. :( (I have made the correction.) We do not have 1.2.1 packages for Ubuntu at this time. The instruction

Re: [FOSSology] Fossology tabs are not working

Just to be clear... you must reinstall with FOSSology 1.2.1 (rather than upgrade from your old 1.0 version). Mary From: fossology-boun...@fossology.org [mailto:fossology-boun...@fossology.org] On Behalf Of Laser, Mary Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2010 9:57 AM To: kmohamed; fossology

Re: [FOSSology] Fossology tabs are not working

Hello Khammer, FOSSology 1.0 is a VERY old version which is no longer supported. The problem you described below and many others, along with new enhancements & performance improvements are available with the latest release, FOSSology 1.2.1. Please use this version.

Re: [FOSSology] License Listing

Mary From: Kothandaraman, Seshadrinathan [mailto:seshadrinathan.kothandara...@deshawresearch.com] Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 10:02 PM To: Laser, Mary Subject: RE: License Listing Hi Mary, Yes. However, given that I have something like 200+ packages, I was looking at some scripting o

Re: [FOSSology] License Listing

Hi Sesh, I think you are asking for a list of packages & associated licenses for each(?) You can obtain such a list by clicking on the "Nomos License List Download" mini menu while browsing your upload. Mary From: fossology-boun...@fossology.org [mailto:fossology-boun...@fossology.org] On Beha

Re: [FOSSology] Need help in analyzing the files.

Hi Khammer, FOSSology 1.0 is no longer supported and was replaced by the nomos analyzer in 1.2.0. The latest supported release is 1.2.1 (http://fossology.org/release_notes#critical_bug_fix_release_for_1.2). Please update to the latest supported release. BTW, you may not have your Proxy set co

Re: [FOSSology] How to reschedule nomos license analysis?

Hi Tom, To rerun your analysis, please follow the directions posted at http://fossology.org/how_to_add_a_license_template_or_license_phrase_and_re-analyze_licenses#step_2re-analyzing_licenses Please let me know how this worked for you. Thanks, Mary ___

Re: [FOSSology] How to reschedule nomos license analysis?

Lintulampi [mailto:raino.lintula...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 8:35 AM > To: Mike Kinghan > Cc: Laser, Mary; fossology@fossology.org > Subject: Re: [FOSSology] How to reschedule nomos license analysis? > > Hi Mike, > those instructions are for BSAM license agent.

[FOSSology] Announcing FOSSology 1.2.1 (Critical bug fix release for 1.2.0)

Hello FOSSologists! We are making this special point release available to address some critical bugs in the 1.2.0 release. The following bugs are fixed in 1.2.1: . 7zip unpack fix to cleanup temp files: http://fossology.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/fossology?view=revision&revision=3338 . copyrig

Re: [FOSSology] How to reschedule nomos license analysis?

ter today. Mary From: Mike Kinghan [mailto:mi...@symbian.org] Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 1:29 AM To: Laser, Mary Cc: fossology@fossology.org Subject: Re: [FOSSology] How to reschedule nomos license analysis? Hi Mary, These instructions work fine. However I don't seem to have succeed in ad

Re: [FOSSology] How to reschedule nomos license analysis?

Hi Mike, Yes, that page is out of date. Here is the correct click-by-click process for rescheduling an agent for analysis: 1. Click on the main "Browse" tab. 2. Navigate using the left navigation bar till you see your upload in the right hand window. 3. Click on the "jobs"

Re: [FOSSology] Database-related test failures on fossology 1.2

Hi Mike, This bug was discovered shortly after the 1.2.0 release and was addressed in svn 3348 (http://fossology.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/fossology?view=revision&revision=3348). We have recently created a new 1.2.1 branch to address this and other critical bugs found in 1.2.0. We are in the

Re: [FOSSology] Fossology Installation Issues - Please suggest

> -Original Message- > From: fossology-boun...@fossology.org [mailto:fossology- > boun...@fossology.org] On Behalf Of Matt Taggart > Sent: Monday, September 27, 2010 11:04 AM > To: kmohamed > Cc: fossology@fossology.org > Subject: Re: [FOSSology] Fossology Installation Issues - Please sug

Re: [FOSSology] Fossology Install

After you make the one line edit, you need to rebuild & re-run fo_postinstall: make clean make sudo make install /usr/.../fo_postinstall From: Mikko-Pekka Partanen [mailto:mikko-pekka.parta...@hhpartners.fi] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 2:34 AM To: Laser, Mary; Donohoe, Mark Cc: Martin

Re: [FOSSology] Fossology Install

oject with files a,b & c and user2 then scans a project containing a,b,c & d, then only file d will be analyzed in the subsequent scan. HTH! Mary From: Deol, Gurbax [mailto:gur...@ti.com] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 10:24 AM To: Gobeille, Robert; Donohoe, Mark; Laser, Mary

Re: [FOSSology] 1.2 RC2 debs have broken dependencies on Ubuntu 10.4

> -Original Message- > From: fossology-boun...@fossology.org [mailto:fossology- > boun...@fossology.org] On Behalf Of Donohoe, Mark > Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 9:30 AM > To: Mike Kinghan > Cc: fossology@fossology.org > Subject: Re: [FOSSology] 1.2 RC2 debs have broken dependencie

Re: [FOSSology] Fossology Install

Hi Mikko-Pekka, This issue has been reported and addressed. Please see the email thread discussion and fix here: http://fossology.org/pipermail/fossology/2010-August/001731.html Mary From: fossology-boun...@fossology.org [mailto:fossology-boun...@fossology.org] On Behalf Of Mikko-Pekka Partan

Re: [FOSSology] FOSSology on Fedora 13

Yes, I agree. Vincent has used Project-Builder with some success but, has a run into a few problems, too. He will be attending your presentation next week. Thanks Bruno! Mary > -Original Message- > From: fossology-boun...@fossology.org [mailto:fossology- > boun...@fossology.org] On Beh

Re: [FOSSology] Uploading files over 1MB

Also, if you are using "Upload from File", take note of the message, "...Many browsers, including Microsoft's Internet Explorer, have trouble uploading file larger than 650 Megabytes (a standard-size CD-ROM image). If your file is larger than 650 Megabytes, then choose one of the other upload op

  1   2   3   >