every year
:)
Best,
Lodewijk
No dia 4 de Abril de 2012 05:53, Pharos escreveu:
> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Samuel Klein
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:38 AM, David Gerard wrote:
> >> On 3 April 2012 07:47, Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote:
> >>
>
I don't know if this makes sense, so I beg your patience for my ignorance.
But would it be an option to duplicate the archive? Then both the old and
the new links will work. It would be a Great Pity if the new list would not
contain the archive of the old list.
Best,
Lodewijk
No dia 4 de
And if memory serves me well 2007 was co-hosted by the Academica Sinica and
2008 by the Bibliotheca Alexandrina (which probably can be categorized
as academic albeit not university).
Kind regards,
Lodewijk
No dia 26 de Março de 2012 11:04, Ray Saintonge escreveu:
> On 03/25/12 12:34 PM, Ja
parties are involved. We would be delighted to help you out in any
way possible to pull off this event.
Best,
Lodewijk
(on behalf of the international coordinating team)
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://li
eating the cake would damage the moral rights of the logo author. Since he
cannot give general permission to violate moral rights, eating the cake
would be illegal.
No dia 5 de Março de 2012 23:08, David Gerard escreveu:
> On 5 March 2012 22:07, geni wrote:
> > On 5 March 2012 20:40, Chris Keat
clause to make things complicated). That way everyone with permission of
the WMF can reuse the design if wanted.
Lodewijk
No dia 5 de Março de 2012 15:54, Richard Symonds <
richard.symo...@wikimedia.org.uk> escreveu:
> Silly question for you all:
>
> Is
> http://commons.wi
Hi Castelo,
just to make the discussion clearer: could you just give say 5 or 10
examples of topics where you believe oral citations are unavoidable? Then I
hope that Ziko in his turn can explain how we can write about those
examples without using them.
Best regards,
Lodewijk
No dia 25 de
s, and consider its
impact rather than its source.
Best,
Lodewijk
No dia 14 de Fevereiro de 2012 14:23, Ziko van Dijk
escreveu:
> Lodewijk,
> I remember the session in Haifa very well. The audience found it
> extremely difficult to understand the texts and do anything with them
> - t
that whole learning
process all over again.
So yes, lets be critical, and constructive as much as possible.
best,
Lodewijk
No dia 14 de Fevereiro de 2012 00:57, Ziko van Dijk
escreveu:
> Hello,
>
> I am afraid that the letter takes over the "results" of the MR group
> that w
, the details and what solutions
do not work in their case.
Warmly,
Lodewijk
No dia 13 de Fevereiro de 2012 15:29, marcos escreveu:
> There is a simpler solution: to dissolve the current structure of chapters
> and to leave everything in hands of the magnificent professionals of San
> Fr
ecome what you pick it to become. I can't suggest
changes to team or actions if I am unable to grasp behind the very broadly
stated goals. Right now it is clear who is in the team, but honestly I
don't know you guys well enough to derive from that what you should be
doing.
Lodewijk
No dia 10 d
too that this wouldn't hold back people from keeping
asking for a 'real' volunteer council.
Best,
Lodewijk
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
Wikimedia
Foundation? Will you be working on guiding the community involvement
processes Geoff handled so well with the Terms of Use?
Thanks,
Lodewijk
No dia 10 de Fevereiro de 2012 07:46, Theo10011 escreveu:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 12:07 PM, Erik Moeller wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Feb 9,
decision
would be made, but rather an inventory, which would allow for a real life
discussion in Paris/Berlin with other stakeholders.
Lodewijk
No dia 9 de Fevereiro de 2012 09:11, Ting Chen escreveu:
> The Board approves the following letter to be sent to the community:
>
> Dear membe
,
Lodewijk
No dia 1 de Fevereiro de 2012 17:32, Andrea Zanni
escreveu:
> I don't know if it's the case,
> but it would be very interesting to have the Foundation
> support officialy the campaign (single scholars can do decide to boycott,
> of course).
> But "universal acc
Apparently the ambassador of the Netherlands did not get permission in time
to sign the agreement. It seems nobody really knows yet why that was, but
it is expected that the signature will follow. Also the signature of Spain,
Slovenia and Cyprus seems to be missing yet. Source:
http://webwereld.nl/
Hi Ziko,
I appreciate your email, but it seems you forgot the link. Also, I
personally strongly prefer it if you could include the actual reports in
the email. It makes searching & finding much easier, as well as offline
reading.
Best regards,
Lodewijk
No dia 22 de Janeiro de 2012 22:32,
as explained in another email: it was actually sent today, with the wrong
datestamp.
L
No dia 18 de Janeiro de 2012 16:35, Huib Laurens escreveu:
> gmail is having troubles the last few weeks... I miss e-mails daily that
> arrive much later...
>
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Thomas Dalton
This is just cruel... "read the rest" yeah right :P
-- Mensagem encaminhada --
De: English Wikipedia Article of the Day <
daily-articl...@lists.wikimedia.org>
Data: 18 de Janeiro de 2012 01:05
Assunto: [Daily article] January 18: Nick Drake
Para: daily-articl...@lists.wikimedia.org
We should be careful to start calling all copyright related laws evil (at
least you seem to suggest that) because then that would devaluate very
quickly. At least what I see quickly (but IANALawyer and IANASpaniard) this
law is not thát evil: the government can ask to close a website that is
actual
Hi Jürgen,
I didn't mean to specify a format, but rather how I would like to use it.
If the same can be achieved in a way that is also open source etc (an can
be used on multiple platforms) that deserved of course preference. Hence
the "some kind of" :)
Best,
Lodewijk
No dia 22
Hi Steven,
is there some kind of Google Agenda of this type of meetings that I could
load into my own? Then I could use that as a reminder as well.
Best,
Lodewijk
No dia 22 de Dezembro de 2011 00:29, Steven Walling
escreveu:
> This is happening in about 30 minutes.
>
> --
is * What are the best practices and the
coolest ideas * Whether physical or online methods are used primarily Thank
you for your help! Lodewijk
ps: oh yes, of course: you can share this with everybody you like. I hope
someone can send this to the cha
rst place. It is no attack, it has mainly been a set of questions
which have gotten answered in many different ways throughout this
discussion. That alone leaves me to believe that there are ways to improve.
Best regards,
Lodewijk
No dia 16 de Novembro de 2011 04:08, Bishakha Datta escreveu
eers are brave enough
to step up and out this criticism, I become even more careful.
Best regards,
Lodewijk
No dia Sábado, 12 de Novembro de 2011, Liam Wyattliamwyatt@gmail.comescreveu:
> On 12 November 2011 06:53, Bishakha Datta wrote:
>
> > This thread started out with questions abou
the
chapter and the trust be competing with each other or collaborating?
Thanks for helping me seeing the situation more clearly,
Lodewijk
No dia 11 de Novembro de 2011 09:29, Gautam John escreveu:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Liam Wyatt wrote:
>
> > Can you elaborate on the
I don't, and if you disagree, you are trolling and I'll block you!
Lodewijk
No dia 2 de Novembro de 2011 21:52, Kim Bruning
escreveu:
>
> In reference to people wanting to be nicer to newbies, (and next to the
> obvious step of us really needing
> to make it more frellin
pect to happen at this moment,
and it could change every day/week.
Best,
Lodewijk
No dia 24 de Outubro de 2011 09:04, Till Mletzko
escreveu:
>
> http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Fundraising_2011#When_does_the_fundraiser_start.3F
>
> Best,
> Till
>
>
> Am 1
Why is it that after reading such a message, I only get more curious who
this actress is ;)
No dia 19 de Outubro de 2011 14:49, Yaroslav M. Blanter
escreveu:
> On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 12:40:18 +0100, Thomas Dalton
>
> wrote:
> > http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-15360864
> >
> > I'm not sure
Hi Charles, all,
maybe I'm missing it - but I don't seem to be able to find an actual
timeline (or planned timeline) for this year's fundraiser. Could you please
point me to it? Thanks a lot,
Lodewijk
No dia 18 de Outubro de 2011 22:45, Charles A. Barr
escreveu:
> The glob
the random article button?
Best,
lodewijk
No dia 18 de Outubro de 2011 16:00, Fae escreveu:
> Rather than filtering the unreferenced, I had in mind articles such as
> [[Human penis]] and [[Vagina]] where the lead may be NSFW (Tom's main
> thrust) or unstable articles that are cu
I assume that you, before sending this email to a mailing list that is not
exactly technical in nature, have submitted bug reports about this on
bugzilla so that the technical magicians can actually fix it? I'm confident
they would appreciate any constructive input.
Best regards,
Lodewij
some discussions, it
seems some people are all too eager to steer into that direction, hoping
that 'the others' will steer away first. Perhaps we should just slow down a
bit and map the situation a bit better.
Best regards,
Lodewijk
No dia 9 de Outubro de 2011 19:05, Nathan
The WIki is back online already. But the village pump page was (at least for
the last day) available.
Lodewijk
No dia 6 de Outubro de 2011 18:17, teun spaans escreveu:
> As I understand, the change has only been proposed.
>
> Possibly another interesting issue will develop: the italian
point, so perhaps another statement by someone else clarifies better.
Thanks a lot,
Lodewijk
No dia 6 de Outubro de 2011 15:20, Federico Leva (Nemo)
escreveu:
> Lodewijk, 06/10/2011 14:24:
> > No dia 6 de Outubro de 2011 14:01, Federico Leva (Nemo)
> > escreveu:
> >
> &
s of
> the proposed law for a long time before.
>
it's not that I dont trust you - but several people have asked me for such
opinions. Is there somewhere an overview of legal experts interpreting
this?
Lodewijk
___
foundation-l mailing list
fo
ball parks here.
Lodewijk
No dia 5 de Outubro de 2011 10:53, Thomas Morton <
morton.tho...@googlemail.com> escreveu:
> On 5 October 2011 09:26, Jalo wrote:
>
> > >
> > > If you don't even think that is a comparable situation, then you
> clearly
> > >
If you even think that is a comparable situation, then you clearly don't
understand at all what this law is all about.
Lodewijk
No dia 5 de Outubro de 2011 09:39, emijrp escreveu:
> "The Wikimedia Foundation supports the rights of all people to access our
> free knowledge conte
The WMF has not taken a stance even at this - individuals at the WMF did,
and the WMF did decide so far that it will not break the strike. That is
something else than the WMF taking an active stance. Which it maybe should,
maybe shouldn't (that depends on the wordings etc).
Lodewijk
No dia
, for all those foreigners who might be visiting
it.wikipedia as well.
An alternative could be to use a really huge sitenotice, so that people are
forced to scroll down a lot every time - which is very frustrating, but
doesn't deprive you of the actual contents.
Best,
Lodewijk
No dia 4 de
ut not just for themselves?
Hoping for a constructive discussion and more data on what our 'readers'
actually want and/or need...
Lodewijk
No dia 30 de Setembro de 2011 11:40, Béria Lima escreveu:
> I'll go by pieces in your mail Erik.
>
> *The intro and footer of
rther, categorization of images will be happening likely on Commons (my
guess) - so even if you opt out as German Wikipedia (although personally I
think it would be more interesting to do a reader survey inside the German
langauge visitors before deciding on that) it would not help that specific
scenario.
Lod
the linked bylaws (which is what is defining the entity) explicitely state
the legal name, even in the link. There is no confusion possible therefore,
also from a very formal point of view.
Best regards,
Lodewijk
Am 13. September 2011 15:17 schrieb Béria Lima :
> Tomasz,
>
> Some chapters
e same time it might bring the
apparently needed changes for some, and make them work - I do hope though
that both communities will quickly figure out what methods work best, and
join together again to make it more likely to pass this threshold of
activity.
Lodewijk
__
Yes, there is (thanks Béria for linking) - however I think I speak for many
on that list that it would be appreciated if you can hold off the more
general 2012 discussions until October :) Just to state the obvious.
Best regards,
Lodewijk
Am 13. September 2011 12:28 schrieb Béria Lima
utes :)
Thanks,
Lodewijk
Am 12. September 2011 19:27 schrieb phoebe ayers :
> FYI: the minutes from the August 3rd, 2011 Board meeting in Haifa (the
> Wikimania meeting) are now posted:
> http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Minutes/2011-08-03
>
> Regards,
> Phoebe Ayers
>
>
ut most likely unused,
because the monument is not clearly identified etc.
Anyway, lets have this discussion more in depth later on, after we can see
some more clearly the final results of the 2011 edition in all countries.
Best regards,
Lodewijk
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
rding improvements for next years in our post-mortem after September.
Best regards,
Lodewijk
Am 12. September 2011 07:49 schrieb Yaroslav M. Blanter :
> On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 10:51:33 +0900, KIZU Naoko wrote:
> > Off topic alert:
> >
> > I haven't given a closer look to yo
Hi,
just to be clear: was this submitted /on behalf/ of the wmf? or as a
community effort?
lodewijk
Am 9. September 2011 22:44 schrieb Daniel Mietchen <
daniel.mietc...@googlemail.com>:
> The Wikimedia response has been submitted, based on
>
> http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/
bias.
You could even argue that forcing people to look at pictures and make them
feel uncomfortable gives them in their specific interpretation a larger bias
about the topic than you can ever induce by leaving the pictures out for
that same group.
Lodewijk
Am 7. September 2011 20:38 schrieb Kim
that. And the board
clearly said yes.
Lodewijk
Am 6. September 2011 22:45 schrieb Béria Lima :
> >
> > *My boss (...) can't open the pregnancy article at work because the intro
> > is NSFW our workplace.
> > *
>
>
> I'm sorry but i don't find the
and when they would want to?
The board clearly answered that question with yes. Do you think it is better
to force people to choose between watching an article with an image they do
not want to see, and not seeing the article at all?
Lodewijk
Am 6. September 2011 16:44 schrieb Dan Rosenthal :
&
Hi all,
Several of you may have noted Wiki Loves Monuments - you can also find an
article about it in the Signpost of this week. Please find below our
International press release.
Best,
Lodewijk
*
*
*== PRESS RELEASE ==*
*
*
*Wikimedians team up to make European Cultural Heritage Accessible to
plemented (it seems dewp isn't too excited about it for example, others
might be). Let us focus on having a good implementation rather than the
things that (whether we like it or not) already seem to have been decided
for us.
Lodewijk
Am 5. September 2011 18:00 schrieb Andre Engels :
>
2011/8/30 Ray Saintonge
> On 08/29/11 1:55 AM, Lodewijk wrote:
> >
> > It may be a logical consequence for the WMF giving out these grants (I
> don't
> > know but wouldn't be surprised if i.e. Ford Foundation has similar
> > requirements), but it clearly
ing important voices). Is the reason really
transparency? Is it about transferring money? Because that is important, but
(sometimes easily) fixable. Or is the reasoning you don't like the projects
the chapters work on? Because *then* we should have a discussion about that,
and not hide behind non-r
sible. That organization is more likely to
develop itself professionally.
That does not leave out that there are many problems with the current
distribution system (50/50 etc) but that is a whole other discussion.
Lodewijk
2011/8/11 Jimmy Wales
> On 8/10/11 8:51 PM, birgitte...@yahoo.com wrot
t they should change
their filter, and choose other categories to hide/show.
The only truely non-neutral part could be where we suggest which categories
someone might want to hide. Or packages of categories.
Lodewijk
2011/8/26 Kim Bruning
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 01:25:32PM +0530, Bishakha
wikilovesmonuments.org (registered by WMDE) but
didn't register the .com - we had to draw a line somewhere.
For a possible intercontinental contest, we would have to rely on the .org
domain.
Lodewijk
2011/8/26 billy joel
>
> Yes, I understood that.
> But I think its kind of stupid that
Maybe we could catch this discussion on wiki - it is an ever returning
issue, and the lessons could be valuable for other campaigns too.
Lodewijk
2011/8/20 Milos Rancic
> (It seems that mail server is not functioning properly. I've got
> "local delivery failed". Try
Of course there's the infamous @wikipedia_mk and @itwikiquote :)
2011/8/18 Andrew Gray
> On 18 August 2011 17:39, Tom Morris wrote:
> > More useful for smaller wikis. Tweeting new pages or recent changes
> > for enwiki would probably destroy Twitter very quickly.
> >
> > When I was more involve
r or (long distance) volunteer) or another non-chapter
organizational group inside the movement.
With kind regards,
Lodewijk
2011/8/17 Teofilo
> Wikimedia chapters are not only an example of what should not be seen
> in Wikimedia projects (an "institution[...], of any kind, [...]
> cla
easy to
say that you're trying and will try even harder - but that won't be good
enough.
Lodewijk
-- Forwarded message --
From: Dan Rosenthal
Date: 2011/8/11
Subject: Re: [Internal-l] Board letter about fundraising and chapters
To: "Local Chapters, board and officers c
it similarly good. But that is the idea of a chapter
- it is not a fanclub organizing beer events only to have fun.
Best regards,
Lodewijk
2011/8/9 Yaroslav M. Blanter
> On Tue, 9 Aug 2011 10:11:49 -0500, birgitte...@yahoo.com wrote:
> >> And just to add to the argument, the projects
n't accept any presentation format
(.ppt, .pptx, .odp) so the layers within the slides are not visible. If you
would like to see those too, just email me offlist and I'll send you the
.odp
I would like to encourage people to make any derivatives from it they think
interesting.
With kin
privacy policy, the
Ombudsman commission should be the right way to go.
This list might be a proper forum if you identify that the ombudsman
commission does not function at all though, but as I understand it, you have
not yet explored the options there.
With kind regards,
Lodewijk
2011/7/19 Huib
d you consider this to be similar to Wikimedian groups who want to have
a slightly more formal relationship with the Movement?
Lodewijk
2011/7/13 Samuel Klein
> We're discussing setting up an "Affiliation committee" to oversee
> simple, low-overhead wikimedia affiliate
Sure it would reduce the amount of private data considered, but also the
name&address could (should) be considered private, and hence it wouldn't
take away the fundamental concerns as they are stated by several people.
Best,
Lodewijk
2011/7/12 Birgitte SB
> A notarized statement w
I assume you mean Argentinian chapter, and not arabic?
Best,
Lodewijk
2011/7/12 Milos Rancic
> We've got four new wikis: two for content and two for chapters:
> * Mingrelian Wikipedia: http://xmf.wikipedia.org
> * Argentinian Wikiveristy: http://ar.wikiversity.org
> * Ara
I am not sure if that would solve any of the problems that some people have
with the current situation. Still the notarized statement (which includes
all personal data) would end up with an individual if I understand
correctly. It would only add quite a lot of costs...
2011/7/11 Peter Gervai
> O
robably be, that
people who currently can choose to use this clause, would simply be blocked
forever without a way of getting unblocked.
Still not taking any stand or opinion,
Lodewijk
2011/7/10 David Gerard
> On 10 July 2011 10:55, Huib Laurens wrote:
>
> > Is mentioned in a offiic
active on OTRS too, but it was explicitely chosen to make this a snail mail
process.
Just to state it once again: I do not intend to take *any* position on this,
but rather to explain the facts as I understand them.
With kind regards,
Lodewijk
2011/7/9 Federico Leva (Nemo)
> David Gerard, 09
Perhaps one of the list admins could at least build in a filter for the
linked in emails :) Possibly file a request with LinkedIn for change of the
account details too?
Best,
Lodewijk
2011/6/28 Mohamed Ibrahim
> basically, how can someone register on linkedIn with foundation-l address?
&
2011/6/25 Milos Rancic
> On 06/25/2011 11:20 AM, Lodewijk wrote:
> > could someone perhaps explain why the board delegated closing policy to
> > *individual language committee members*? Because as I read it, this
> advice
> > to the board is given by one individual,
-person-call). Also, I do not understand why the *language* committee has
a role in this in the first place. Is closing projects often about whether
or not it actually is a language (the expertise field of langcom)?
Lodewijk
2011/6/25 Milos Rancic
> Board has decided to make Closing projects
o was there on the board at the time could clarify?
Thanks a lot,
Lodewijk
2011/6/25 Milos Rancic
> On 06/24/2011 07:57 PM, birgitte...@yahoo.com wrote:
> > I also sat on NomCom during this time period. I cannot agree that Matt's
> appointment was more problematic than Stu'
much work that would be. Maybe
someone with a better technical background and insight in what already
exists (maybe other parties have developed something similar?) can give a
fair estimate on that.
Best,
Lodewijk
2011/6/24 Milos Rancic
> On 06/24/2011 01:42 PM, Lodewijk wrote:
> > Let
tor.
Best,
Lodewijk
2011/6/24 Milos Rancic
> On 06/24/2011 11:40 AM, Ray Saintonge wrote:
> > On 06/22/11 1:46 PM, Milos Rancic wrote:
> >> I have a friendly advice for you (and I hope that Michael and Gerard
> >> wouldn't kill me because of that): If you are able to c
But... back to the original question: would you (yes, you who is reading
this. No, don't look behind you, I really mean you!) see benifit & community
potential for this? Are there people out there who would find it *fun* to
write articles in a simple way explaining the
Thank you for sharing! This potentially has a big impact indeed, and the
support of the WMF seems more than appropriate.
Is this something the WMF will do more often in the future (or has done in
the past) or is this an extreme exception due to its importance?
With kind regards,
Lodewijk
2011
have to come up with artificial routes and explanations
to allow our communities the creation of such wonderful projects.
Best regards,
Lodewijk
2011/6/21 Milos Rancic
> On 06/21/2011 12:25 AM, MZMcBride wrote:
> > Thanks for the detailed response. :-)
> >
> > Milos Rancic wrote:
&
aybe that helps people answering your question.
Best,
Lodewijk
2011/6/17 Strainu
> 2011/6/17 Strainu :
> > Think about a CC-BY-NC-ND wiki. Theoretically, one
> > could only add content to that wiki, not edit what has already been
> > written.
>
> Actually, I'm
2011/6/10 Andrew Garrett
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 10:06 PM, Amir E. Aharoni
> wrote:
> > There are several technical issues with it:
> >
> > 1. I already voted. It may be a good idea to send this only to people
> > who didn't.
>
> I don't think this is possible.
>
The list of accounts which ha
://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Board_elections/2011#Email
Best regards,
Lodewijk
2011/6/10 Strainu
> I think the system did NOT work for you :) It seems strange to send
> the same email in several languages. I only received it in Romanian. I
> think this is taken based on your language preferences
long times
about "unimportant" thinks around the color of the bikeshed, and I think one
of your helps has been that you have been able to keep thát to a minimum.
With kind regards,
Lodewijk
2011/5/19 Sean Whitton
> I’m not a very active Wikimedian at the moment (though hopefully some
also because they simply devaluate.
Lodewijk
2011/5/19 church.of.emacs.ml
> Hi all,
>
> Do we have any guidelines limiting the use of CentralNotices? I noticed
> there are a lot lately (fundraising, wikimania and most recently board
> elections and commons POTY), some of which
Maybe I should rephrase that into "a way to redirect nicely to..." because
with the current layout I would not be very tempted to use it since it
suggests one made an error. (maybe with good reason, but still)
Lodewijk
2011/5/17 Casey Brown
> On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 9:24 AM, Lode
someone finds a way to redirect en.wikipedia.org/Example to
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Example .
Best,
Lodewijk
2011/5/11 Neil Harris
> On 11/05/11 11:32, HW wrote:
> >
> > I think the advantage is that it would allow us to generalize the concept
> > behind enwp.org, which is th
I'm not sure... is this supposed to be a real email or does everybody see a
random string of characters?
Lodewijk
2011/4/27 widiyanto
> "
> Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 01:52:57 +
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1
ffers.
Lodewijk
2011/4/3 Sarah
> On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 11:51, Isabell Long wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 06:33:32PM +0100, Phil Nash wrote:
> >> We've not had SUL (Single User Login) for that long, and my impression
> is
> >> that this will tend to inflate the
I did a preliminary measure, and it actually showed a decline, starting the
exact week it was implemented on nlwiki :( However, this preliminary measure
was unscientific, not precise and would need better testing/measuring.
Lodewijk
2011/3/31 Amir E. Aharoni
> The Vector skin, the main prod
This is already somewhat outdated - at least 2009. I wonder how it would
look like nowadays.
Lodewijk
2011/3/31 David Richfield
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 7:42 AM, teun spaans
> wrote:
> > If i interpret the link correctly, these are only featured articles?
>
> Exactly: I was
Wow Adrienne,
thanks a lot for the helpful overview. It is very enlighting for
understanding what WMFR has been doing!
Best,
Lodewijk
2011/3/23 Adrienne Alix
> Dear Chapters,
>
> Please find below the chapter report of Wikimédia France for July, August,
> September, October,
want others to understand you ;-)
Lodewijk
2011/3/15 :
>
>
>> Fra: Milos Rancic
>> Til: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List
>>
>> Dato: Tir, 15. mar 2011 04:19
>> Emne: Re: [Foundation-l] multilingual mailing list
>>
>> 2011/3/14 Lodewijk lode
Het enige lastige van meertalige lijsten is dat spelfouten ineens veel
grotere consequenties hebben.
Met vriendelijke groet,
Lodewijk
2011/3/12 Thomas Dalton :
> On 12 March 2011 14:53, Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote:
>> A really (and not only formally) multilingual list is the new ibe
pedia" ?
Thanks!
Lodewijk
2011/3/8 J. G. Góngora
> Dear fellows,
>
> The following message is just to keep you informed about the activities
> developed during the last three months by Amical.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> J. Gustavo Góngora
> (As a member of Amical)
&g
Mi ne havas kontraŭstaron pri Esperanto en ĉi tiu specifa temo. Bedaŭrinde
mankas Google traduki en ĉi tiu lingvo!
2011/3/9 Domas Mituzas
> > if this is true, then we should
> > implement a better solution for foundation-level discussions in other
> > major language families.
>
> I nominate SJ t
chatting and talking with current and former board members and
exchanging information and experiences.
Best,
Lodewijk
2011/3/5 Juan de Vojníkov
> Hey Lodewijk,
>
> it is interesting, I haven't red about Wiki Loves Monuments yet so I hope,
> I'll get it in Wroclaw!
>
&g
anonymous people - you can't run for the board without
giving that up either, for example. But to make that decision you would need
more information.
Lodewijk
2011/2/26 Pronoein
> Hello,
>
> I'm wondering one thing about this new policy applied with some haste,
> but
kind regards,
Lodewijk
2011/2/25 Birgitte SB
> I was looking for something unrelated in the archives and came across an
> email
> [1] that I believe people might find informative wrt to the Identification
> Policy which I believe has had discussion tabled for the moment. It seems
>
1 - 100 of 166 matches
Mail list logo
