In a message dated 11/22/2009 10:48:52 PM Pacific Standard Time,
smole...@eunet.rs writes:
Digitize them and publish them on the Internet, but
insure them, so that if heirs ever appear a reasonable royalty may be
paid to them.
Heirs do not necessarily get any benefit from copyrighted
2009/11/22 Ray Saintonge sainto...@telus.net:
Tomasz Ganicz wrote:
The
idea is to create a Staging Area - a wiki (or non-wiki) project
which is not public and can be used for media and meta-data mass
storage before sending the stuff to public projects. The idea is that
all permissions and
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 5:05 AM, Tomasz Ganicz polime...@gmail.com wrote:
Very simply. If an organisation is going to make a project it will get
their own space on Staging Area and will upload their stuff there
without any legal problems. Then, one or more editors must examine
this stuff
2009/11/22 Judson Dunn cohes...@sleepyhead.org:
And in defense of the bureaucratic morons, you might be surprised the
number of super positive generous people that want their work on
Wikipedia that are completely unwilling to allow 3rd parties to use
their work. I don't personally make people
To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Sent: Sun, November 22, 2009 3:05:02 AM
Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Building The Great Monument of Bureaucracy
2009/11/22 Ray Saintonge sainto...@telus.net:
Tomasz Ganicz wrote:
The
idea is to create a Staging Area - a wiki (or non
2009/11/22 Geoffrey Plourde geo.p...@yahoo.com:
I see a lot of well meaning people responding here, but maybe its time to go
back to the basics. No non free pictures, period. No more bureaucracy plus
cost savings on not having to run the permissions systems.
I submit that you aren't
On 11/22/2009 05:57 PM, David Gerard wrote:
2009/11/22 Judson Dunn cohes...@sleepyhead.org:
And in defense of the bureaucratic morons, you might be surprised the
number of super positive generous people that want their work on
Wikipedia that are completely unwilling to allow 3rd parties to
2009/11/22 Milos Rancic mill...@gmail.com:
Keep in mind that this is not about non-free content, this is not
about a possibility that professor didn't understand all consequences
of his approval; this is just about The Form. The Bureaucracy. Note,
also, that this cooperation exists for four
Geoffrey Plourde wrote:
I see a lot of well meaning people responding here, but maybe its time to go
back to the basics. No non free pictures, period. No more bureaucracy plus
cost savings on not having to run the permissions systems.
This is simplistic. No-one seriously here is opposed
Milos Rancic wrote:
But, during the couple of previous days I've got one more contribution
to our Monument. This kind of contributions make me to think that
Wikipedia in English (not just en.wp for sure) is becoming -- slowly
but surely -- the main problem in spreading free knowledge.
...
2009/11/22 Robert Rohde raro...@gmail.com:
For some applications (though not necessarily all), it might help if
the OTRS process was replaced by a standard online permission form
rather than having Wikimedians negotiate with outsiders in the hope of
getting them to say magic words.
I might
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Tomasz Ganicz polime...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
So, the replacing current ugly-copyvio-template - OTRS scheme for
something else must take into consideration various scenarios which
are currently handled by that scheme in quite often teribbly
unfriendly style
A year or so ago I realized that it is better to make an auxiliary
site to Wikipedia [in Serbian] than to spend a lot of time in
explaining to students that everyone has to send to me the sentence I
agree that all of my work is realized under It may be funny for
the first couple of times, it
Tomasz Ganicz wrote:
The
idea is to create a Staging Area - a wiki (or non-wiki) project
which is not public and can be used for media and meta-data mass
storage before sending the stuff to public projects. The idea is that
all permissions and other legal stuff would be carefully solved
14 matches
Mail list logo
