Define Many ? I personally support FSF's ethics in principle, please
don't speak for all of us.
I think it's somewhat split, but sort of having everyone in the foundation
state their stance on it, I don't know how 'many' could be defined.
There are people who are in a position to state
On Jan 10, 2015, at 6:35 AM, Magdalen Berns m.be...@thismagpie.com wrote:
Perhaps some might be seeing Richard as the FSF too quickly and not giving
due regard what he is actually saying about this in the reactions to what
he's putting forward. How he's defined dodgy links really does not
On Jan 9, 2015, at 8:33 PM, Mathieu Duponchelle mduponchel...@gmail.com wrote:
Define Many ? I personally support FSF's ethics in principle, please don't
speak for all of us.
However you define “many”, it doesn’t mean “all”, Mathieu, so don’t speak for —
or over — those of us who aren’t in
Generally I think that the people who are not on board understand what is
being discussed and simply disagree with certain aspects of it. I know that
is the case with me. I contribute to FOSS, etc, but I do not always share
the same ethics as the FSF. My impression is that that is common. We
It’s frankly pretty difficult for me at least to distinguish between
Richard-speaking-as-Richard-alone and Richard-speaking-as-the-FSF, and he
never makes the distinction himself. Does he hold some viewpoint that the
FSF does not, or vice versa? That would actually be news to me.
Define Many ? I personally support FSF's ethics in principle, please
don't speak for all of us.
I think it's somewhat split, but sort of having everyone in the foundation
state their stance on it, I don't know how 'many' could be defined.
The elected members of the Board of Directors
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 8:35 AM, Magdalen Berns m.be...@thismagpie.com
wrote:
Perhaps some might be seeing Richard as the FSF too quickly and not
giving due regard what he is actually saying about this in the reactions to
what he's putting forward. How he's defined dodgy links really does not
Define Many ? I personally support FSF's ethics in principle, please
don't speak for all of us.
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 2:58 AM, Nimit Shah nimit.sv...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Magdalen,
I agree with Meg. Many of us don't share the same ethics as FSF and that
is the reason why we don't have much
Hi Magdalen,
I agree with Meg. Many of us don't share the same ethics as FSF and that is
the reason why we don't have much to contribute to over here.
Nimit Shah
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 12:44 AM, meg ford meg...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Magdalen,
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Magdalen Berns
Hi Magdalen,
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Magdalen Berns m.be...@thismagpie.com
wrote:
This makes perfect sense to me. At the moment I am not totally convinced
that the rest of the community are on board with what you have said though.
It is not clear whether or not people understand the
Hi,
At this stage, I regretfully have urge anyone who would preference lashing
out on twitter with their frustrations about the existence of this thread,
to consider engaging in a reasoned way on this dedicated thread about their
concerns. Whist throwing bigotry at me may seem like the easiest
Hi Richard,
I believe it is possible to view many Facebook pages without running
JS. (I am about to verify that.)
According to the libreJS plugin you pointed us to earlier on in the
discussion, all javascript that facebook tries to run, is offending. When
LibreJS blocks the scripts it
I think you have defined it well.
I would expect that these potential problem cases occur rarely.
Can you recall any others besides this one?
Some others have mentioned social networking site links e.g. facebook et
al. Though I am not sure this would apply to all of the ones listed because
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
Some others have mentioned social networking site links e.g. facebook et
al.
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
Whist I don't disagree with what you are saying. There are only so many
hours
15 matches
Mail list logo
