On Sun, 16 Aug 2009, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Just thought I would let you know...
http://www.malcolmgroves.com/blog/?p=476
Hm
Website not accessible. Can you give us the gist of what is so interesting ?
Michael.
___
fpc-devel maillist -
In our previous episode, Michael Van Canneyt said:
Just thought I would let you know...
http://www.malcolmgroves.com/blog/?p=476
Hm
Website not accessible. Can you give us the gist of what is so interesting ?
Has been hinted at several times, so I can make an educated guess:
The
2009/8/16 Michael Van Canneyt mich...@freepascal.org:
Website not accessible. Can you give us the gist of what is so interesting ?
Weird. Anyway, I placed the web page content in a OpenDocument Text
format available at:
http://opensoft.homeip.net/~graemeg/rtti_and_attributes.odt
Hope that
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Just thought I would let you know...
http://www.malcolmgroves.com/blog/?p=476
This reminds me our previos discussion about property attributes:
http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Property_attributes
Best regards,
Paul Ishenin.
In our previous episode, Michael Van Canneyt said:
Just thought I would let you know...
http://www.malcolmgroves.com/blog/?p=476
Hm
Website not accessible. Can you give us the gist of what is so interesting ?
I had that too, but later it worked. Now I've also seen the syntax, and I
2009/8/16 Marco van de Voort mar...@stack.nl:
I had that too, but later it worked. Now I've also seen the syntax, and I
think sb should explain those Delphi devels that in C-like languages
function modifiers come BEFORE the declaration, and in Pascal AFTER :-)
Very true! Now lets see what
On Sun, 16 Aug 2009, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
2009/8/16 Michael Van Canneyt mich...@freepascal.org:
Website not accessible. Can you give us the gist of what is so interesting ?
Weird. Anyway, I placed the web page content in a OpenDocument Text
format available at:
In our previous episode, Michael Van Canneyt said:
It does, thank you.
However, it's not so spectacular:
Attributes are simply old .NET stuff they ported to Win32.
Seems they had to use a workaround through an attribute class.
I never understood the need for it. RTTI is more than
2009/8/16 Michael Van Canneyt mich...@freepascal.org:
I never understood the need for it. RTTI is more than enough
for 99.99% of the cases.
I agree 100%.
Regards,
- Graeme -
___
fpGUI - a cross-platform Free Pascal GUI toolkit
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
I never understood the need for it. RTTI is more than enough
for 99.99% of the cases.
Imagine you have a db framework which maps delphi classes to database
tables. It reads class properties from the rtti and creates db tables
automatically.
For example:
TStudent =
Does anyone have an idea why the call to DoneKeyboard was previously
commented? It leaves the keyboard in a bad state if the IDE crashes.
Index: packages/fv/src/drivers.pas
===
--- packages/fv/src/drivers.pas (revision 13526)
+++
On 16 Aug 2009, at 12:15, Nikolay Nikolov wrote:
Does anyone have an idea why the call to DoneKeyboard was previously
commented? It leaves the keyboard in a bad state if the IDE crashes.
It was changed in revision 3443, whose log message says:
r3443 | daniel | 2006-05-07 00:57:20 +0200
In our previous episode, Paul Ishenin said:
I never understood the need for it. RTTI is more than enough
for 99.99% of the cases.
Imagine you have a db framework which maps delphi classes to database
tables. It reads class properties from the rtti and creates db tables
automatically.
On Sun, 16 Aug 2009, Paul Ishenin wrote:
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
I never understood the need for it. RTTI is more than enough
for 99.99% of the cases.
Imagine you have a db framework which maps delphi classes to database tables.
It reads class properties from the rtti and creates db
2009/8/16 Paul Ishenin webpi...@mail.ru:
Imagine you have a db framework which maps delphi classes to database
tables. It reads class properties from the rtti and creates db tables
automatically.
tiOPF has metadata classes to do just this, but in both cases they
work only well if you have
2009/8/16 Michael Van Canneyt mich...@freepascal.org:
But that needs to be registered separately anyway, because this varies on
the storage back-end. The object-db mapping should never be in the object
itself, that is bad design.
+1
And what about classes that can be stored in various
Marco van de Voort wrote:
I know what .NET uses it for, but that was not the question.
The question is why does this have to be solved using a language construct?
Why can't you simply register the Object-Relation mapping somewhere else?
Because it is a more natural way. I want to give full
Op Sun, 16 Aug 2009, schreef Jonas Maebe:
On 16 Aug 2009, at 12:15, Nikolay Nikolov wrote:
Does anyone have an idea why the call to DoneKeyboard was previously
commented? It leaves the keyboard in a bad state if the IDE crashes.
It was changed in revision 3443, whose log message says:
On Sun, 16 Aug 2009, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
2009/8/16 Michael Van Canneyt mich...@freepascal.org:
But that needs to be registered separately anyway, because this varies on
the storage back-end. The object-db mapping should never be in the object
itself, that is bad design.
+1
And what
On 08/16/2009 03:22 PM, Daniël Mantione wrote:
Op Sun, 16 Aug 2009, schreef Jonas Maebe:
On 16 Aug 2009, at 12:15, Nikolay Nikolov wrote:
Does anyone have an idea why the call to DoneKeyboard was previously
commented? It leaves the keyboard in a bad state if the IDE crashes.
It was
Op Sun, 16 Aug 2009, schreef Nikolay Nikolov:
On 08/16/2009 03:22 PM, Daniël Mantione wrote:
Op Sun, 16 Aug 2009, schreef Jonas Maebe:
On 16 Aug 2009, at 12:15, Nikolay Nikolov wrote:
Does anyone have an idea why the call to DoneKeyboard was previously
commented? It leaves the
Op zaterdag 08-08-2009 om 19:03 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Graeme
Geldenhuys:
1..)
In the function TPQConnection.GetSchemaInfoSQL(..) there is the following SQL
statements.
* First off, this statement doesn't return a single row when I run it
directly in psql or pgAdmin III.
* Why are
Paul Ishenin wrote:
Martin wrote:
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=14364 saving frames with
anchorsides (or rather the inability of doing so)
Either we do something wrong with csInline flag or it is a but in the FPC.
Best regards,
Paul Ishenin.
Yes it is strange.
I
2009/8/16 Joost van der Sluis jo...@cnoc.nl:
But it's this way because nobody looked at it before, and all those
things like column_datatype are effectively used by no-body, afaik. But
patches are welcome. (The only reason this function is implemented at
all is that it is used by
2009/8/16 Michael Van Canneyt mich...@freepascal.org:
That's what I meant with 'this varies on the storage back-end.'... :-)
I was agreeing with you. I simple wanted to explain it a bit clearer
to other readers. Many always assume RDBMS are used - which is not
always the case.
Regards,
-
2009/8/16 Paul Ishenin webpi...@mail.ru:
Currently RTTI is very limited - using it you can only enumerate published
members, learn their types and default values (for properties). Attributes
completely eliminates limitations.
Explain limitations? Surely you do not want any foreign class to
26 matches
Mail list logo
