Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 04 May 2010, at 19:40, Vincent Snijders wrote:
I don't know where to add this exactly in this thread, but the win64 version of
Lazarus includes a native win64 version of the compiler. It is done because I
think that to make sure it can compile Lazarus correctly, it has
r12101 in FIXES breaks ide on ubuntu 8.04 due to libgdb.a at:
http://www.hu.freepascal.org/fpcircbot/cgipastebin?msgid=4413
Attempted build from revision 12102M
i386 linux
make[4]: Entering directory `/home/brad/devel/fpc/svn/fixes/fpc/ide'
Makefile:287: Using system sefault libgdb file
Martin Friebe wrote:
Hi,
I do not have myself a power-pc, nor mac. But I have several reports
like the below.
I know from one instance (where this happened during cross-compiling
from a linux box) that the error disappeared, when inlining was disabled
(The units explicitly marks a lot of
Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 30 Sep 2008, at 17:06, Brad Campbell wrote:
These additions/changes make serial.pp work for me on MacOS X 10.4 and
10.5, both PPC and Intel.
Comments?
Do you also know why these changes are necessary? Adding special cases
from a particular platform without any
These additions/changes make serial.pp work for me on MacOS X 10.4 and 10.5,
both PPC and Intel.
Comments?
Regards,
Brad
--
Dolphins are so intelligent that within a few weeks they can
train Americans to stand at the edge of the pool and throw them
fish.
Index: rtl/unix/serial.pp
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Hi,
Does FPC take any advantage of dual core or quad core processors? Intel
or AMD?
Also I'm developing mostly under Linux, but all our products get
released for Windows and Linux. Would it make a difference which OS I
use?
I'm using it on a Core Duo here. The
G'day all,
Another little quirk in the build process
I have to manually create the link in bin/ as fpc can't find ppc386
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tracks/devel/fpc/bin$ ln -s ../lib/fpc/2.3.1/ppc386
I did check the latest release version and that is what the link looked like, so I'm just assuming
Jonas Maebe wrote:
I did check the latest release version and that is what the link
looked like, so I'm just assuming the install process fails to create it.
This is indeed only done if you do
make installsymlink
inside the compiler directory. I don't know the history behind this
G'day all,
Be gentle, this is my first time back with fpc since pre 1.0 quite a few years
ago. :)
Without this, the build halts as fpmake never gets built.
Index: packages/base/Makefile.fpc
===
--- packages/base/Makefile.fpc
Marco van de Voort wrote:
Err, Marco, I guess this is not part of his change?
Yes. And my point is that it should :)
Ok, I missed that point entirely. I don't even own an X86_64 machine, I simply noted that fpmake was
not getting built and the build was choking on that. I don't know if it
10 matches
Mail list logo
