On 12/29/2014 04:27 PM, Marco van de Voort wrote:
In our previous episode, Joost van der Sluis said:
On 12/29/2014 05:28 AM, Gennady Agranov wrote:
Yes, it should. As Marco also wrote.
But last night I remembered that the system to resolve those
dependencies has been changed. A few weeks back,
In our previous episode, Joost van der Sluis said:
> On 12/29/2014 05:28 AM, Gennady Agranov wrote:
> Yes, it should. As Marco also wrote.
>
> But last night I remembered that the system to resolve those
> dependencies has been changed. A few weeks back, files called
> 'fpmkunit.cfg' were used t
> M utils/pas2jni/fpmake.pp
> M utils/pas2ut/fpmake.pp
> M utils/unicode/fpmake.pp
>
> I was adding dependencies one by one - after compilation error about
> unresolved used "unit" I was looking for the package that contains this
> unit and adding the missing dependency - for e
On 12/29/2014 05:28 AM, Gennady Agranov wrote:
>>> 1. Sounds like fpmake doesn't recursively add dependencies? e.g.
rtl-objpas should come as dep of fcl-base.
I am not familar at all with fpmake design - if "fcl-base" depends on
"rtl-objpas" - does it mean that "rtl-objpas" dependency is export
>>> 1. Sounds like fpmake doesn't recursively add dependencies? e.g.
rtl-objpas should come as dep of fcl-base.
I am not familar at all with fpmake design - if "fcl-base" depends on
"rtl-objpas" - does it mean that "rtl-objpas" dependency is exported -
i.e. -Fu to "rtl-objpas" will be added if
>>> 1. Sounds like fpmake doesn't recursively add dependencies? e.g.
rtl-objpas should come as dep of fcl-base.
>>> 2. if the patch just adds ALL those dependencies to all those
packages, are they really tested as being really required for all of those?
I knew that I should be more verbose in m
>>> No, you do not have enough permissions to commit. But can you send
the patch, so that I can see what you've changed?
output of "svn diff" attached :)
Thanks,
Gennady
Regards,
Joost.
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
ht
In our previous episode, Joost van der Sluis said:
> > What I do not understand is the following - why these missing
> > dependencies were not required for linux_x64?
>
> What I do not understand is why you needed theses changes in the first
> place? Can you send the commands you used to compile
On 12/28/2014 06:35 PM, Gennady Agranov wrote:
I have built FPC from trunk - thanks to fpcup!!!
For linux_x64 it built as is - great!
For linux_x86 I had to add dependencies for rtl-objpas, rtl-extras,
rtl-console and fcl-base to the following packages:
M ide/fpmake.pp
M utils/fpdo
Hi,
I have built FPC from trunk - thanks to fpcup!!!
For linux_x64 it built as is - great!
For linux_x86 I had to add dependencies for rtl-objpas, rtl-extras,
rtl-console and fcl-base to the following packages:
M ide/fpmake.pp
M utils/fpdoc/fpmake.pp
M utils/fpmake.pp
M
10 matches
Mail list logo
