On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 6:15 AM, Richard Ward wrote:
> --- This is a good idea. I would go further and suggest that some of the
> wiki pages be reorganized to make them easier to navigate and find things.
Here are some of the reason's I hate wiki's.
* You must edit pages while online. Not eve
Francisco Reyes wrote:
Trying my first unit and getting an error I can't figure out.
--- unit
unit debugprint;
Interface
function DebugPrint(ProgLevel, CallLevel:integer; MessageIn:
string):string;
Implementation
function DebugPrint(ProgLevel, CallLevel:integer; MessageIn:
string):string;
Francisco Reyes writes : (snipped)
>>The sample code in the ref document doesn't document the simplest
case, but goes over what I think is a more complex example of a unit
that uses another unit.
It also doesn't have any actual code to do anything, so it is kind of
an abstract example . I
Trying my first unit and getting an error I can't figure out.
--- unit
unit debugprint;
Interface
function DebugPrint(ProgLevel, CallLevel:integer; MessageIn: string):string;
Implementation
function DebugPrint(ProgLevel, CallLevel:integer; MessageIn: string):string;
begin
if ProgLevel>=
Hello FPC-Pascal,
If a virtual method of a class is not used at all in the programm will
the compiler remove it from the executable ?
I think that unused constants and functions will be removed by the
compiler or the linker but the methdos of a class... :-?
--
Best regards,
JoshyFun
_
Estimated programmers:
What is the diferent between the art and hand made program?
In my opinion don't have diferent. The code is poetry, this the expresion of
new problematic existencially. What is really problem? I think than the
problem resist on properly idea, or concept about supose the ac
On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 7:12 PM, Mattias Gaertner
wrote:
>
> A lazarus package helps to
> - write documentation for it,
> - handle translations,
> - simplifying integrating it into programs with different
> compiler settings
Plus
- Allows for much easier code reuse
- applies compiler paths and u
Jonas,
I can't reproduce it with a stand alone test (made many attempts).
I can however place my original unit, because it is a LGPL unit I'm creating
in the bug report, and see what is wrong there.
Will it be ok to do that in the bug report ?
Thanks,
Ido
On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 4:15 PM, Jonas
On Saturday 04 April 2009 11:40:03 Francisco Reyes wrote:
>
> I guess I could try one unit at a time until I find a simple one, but I
> figure if anyone knows of a simple unit that may be easy to read, that may
> be a better starting point.
Here's a simple unit that may help. I have occasion to a
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 03.04.2009, 12:39 +0200 schrieb Marco van de Voort:
> As Jonas said you first have to define that value in a multitasking
> environment.
Ok, I have allocate the memory at the program start and it runs fine.
It is quick enough yet with memory swaping.
But, if I allocate 2GB me
Am Samstag, 4. April 2009 18:52:44 schrieb Francisco Reyes:
> Any other place to look for free pascal libraries/units?
maybe http://www.pasports.org/
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listin
On Sat, 04 Apr 2009 12:56:51 -0400
Francisco Reyes wrote:
> Michael Van Canneyt writes:
>
> > I'll add more examples.
>
> Thanks.
> I will also go over the existing unit documentation and send you some
> thoughts and suggestions from a newbie's point of view. Often what is
> clear to an experi
On Sat, 04 Apr 2009 12:28:18 -0400
Francisco Reyes wrote:
> Mattias Gaertner writes:
>
> > Units is the right way.
> > And even better: create a lazarus package for the new units.
>
> Most of what I do is CLI, have not even installed lazarus.
Lazarus is an IDE for any kind of FPC program.
You
Michael Van Canneyt writes:
I'll add more examples.
Thanks.
I will also go over the existing unit documentation and send you some
thoughts and suggestions from a newbie's point of view. Often what is clear
to an experienced developer is not so clear for a newcomer.
All Free Pascal sources
I am finding many contributed units with broken links to both the code and
the homepage URL.
A few thoughts. We could clean all entries to which both the code and the
refering URL are broken. We could email the author and give them a week or
two, but if we get no replies then we should remove
On Sat, 4 Apr 2009, Marc Santhoff wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 03.04.2009, 11:24 +0200 schrieb Graeme Geldenhuys:
>
> > I currently use "Dia Diagram editor" to design UML diagrams, but as
> > far as I know it does generate any code. :-(
>
> http://dia2code.sourceforge.net/
Again no pascal :(
Mi
On Sat, 4 Apr 2009, Francisco Reyes wrote:
> Michael Van Canneyt writes:
>
> > What is not clear ?
>
> For starters I don't really follow the diagrams in the ref document. It
> probably is some type of formal definition, but I am neither familiar with it,
> nor seem to get it. Even when I look
Michael Van Canneyt writes:
What is not clear ?
For starters I don't really follow the diagrams in the ref document. It
probably is some type of formal definition, but I am neither familiar with
it, nor seem to get it. Even when I look at a simpler case like procedure
declaration I can't fo
Mattias Gaertner writes:
Units is the right way.
And even better: create a lazarus package for the new units.
Most of what I do is CLI, have not even installed lazarus.
Could someone doing CLI use a lazarus package?
What advantage of doing a lazarus package over just making it a unit?
Right
On Sat, 4 Apr 2009, Francisco Reyes wrote:
> Could anyone share sample code for a unit?
> Looking at the ref.pdf I don't really follow it.
> The examples included are not meaningful to this pascal newbie. :-(
What is not clear ?
>
> Alternative any unit package on the site that may be a good
Am Freitag, den 03.04.2009, 11:24 +0200 schrieb Graeme Geldenhuys:
> I currently use "Dia Diagram editor" to design UML diagrams, but as
> far as I know it does generate any code. :-(
http://dia2code.sourceforge.net/
--
Marc Santhoff
___
fpc-pascal
On Sat, 04 Apr 2009 12:10:30 -0400
Francisco Reyes wrote:
> What are my options for code reuse?
> Creating units for common code?
> Any other method?
Units is the right way.
And even better: create a lazarus package for the new units.
Mattias
___
fpc-
Could anyone share sample code for a unit?
Looking at the ref.pdf I don't really follow it.
The examples included are not meaningful to this pascal newbie. :-(
Alternative any unit package on the site that may be a good example would be
just as great.
As I work on a small program I find parts
What are my options for code reuse?
Creating units for common code?
Any other method?
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Hello ik,
Saturday, April 4, 2009, 3:07:58 PM, you wrote:
i> SetLength(Prefix, High(aPrefix));
i> SetLength(NumberLength, High(aNumberLength));
Discarding the compiler crash, this code seems buggy to me, unless you
know exactly the high/low of the arrays matches its length, I think it
On 04 Apr 2009, at 15:07, ik wrote:
Am I doing here something wrong (I think I can do better with coping
between
open and dynamic array) ?
An unhandled exception in the compiler is always a compiler bug.
Please submit a bug report with a compilable example that demonstrates
the problem.
Hello,
I'm using FPC from Arch Liunx.
I'm trying to do the following code:
...
TNumberValidationRecord = record
Name: String;
CreditType : CreditCardType;
Prefix : TCre
On 4/3/09, Doug Chamberlin wrote:
> Essentially, yes.
>
> However, you may create subtle, lurking bugs if you omit that call and
> later refactor your code. For example, if you later change
>
> type
> TFoo = class
>
> to
>
> type
> TFoo = class(TSomeClass)
>
> and TSomeClass has so
28 matches
Mail list logo
