On 11 July 2013 23:07, Benito van der Zander ben...@benibela.de wrote:
Annotations like in Java would be nice...
On 07/11/2013 10:22 PM, vfclists . wrote:
Should TObject or TComponent have a Comment property?
I think they should. One for the design itself and one for describing the
On Fri, 12 Jul 2013 07:07:05 +0100
vfclists . vfcli...@gmail.com wrote:
This attitude which exists in the Pascal community needs to end.
Not really.
R.
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
On 2013-07-11 20:20, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Is it so hard to google fpc jvm language limitations ?
Yes, especially if your internet has been down for 3/4 of the day [2
days in a row].
G.
___
fpc-pascal maillist -
On 2013-07-11 22:35, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
Why not use 2.6.2? It is free. No update fee, full version, with source.
I think maybe he is getting confused with FPC and Lazarus versions.
Maybe he is referring to Lazarus 1.0.6 release?
Regards,
- Graeme -
On Thu, 11 Jul 2013, vfclists . wrote:
Should TObject or TComponent have a Comment property?
I think they should. One for the design itself and one for describing the usage
at design or runtime.
No.
It takes memory and needs management. Putting this in a basic class such as TComponent is
In our previous episode, leledumbo said:
Older versions are never free of bugs (that's one of the reason why the next
version appears), and even worse, it looks like there's no trace of bug
reports for version as old as 1.0.6 (10 years). Just try everything
yourself, and if something is wrong,
Enough digression - if considered carefully a comment about the
purpose of an object belongs in the object definition itself.
I use Pasdoc for that
On 07/12/2013 08:07 AM, vfclists . wrote:
On 11 July 2013 23:07, Benito van der Zander ben...@benibela.de
mailto:ben...@benibela.de wrote:
On 2013-07-12 07:07, vfclists . wrote:
Coding time is the best
time for documentation because that is when the intent of the code is clear
and fresh in the developers mind, and incurs minimal additional cost.
And you just said it yourself. If the developer of the code doesn't even
have the
On 07/11/2013 07:06 PM, waldo kitty wrote:
i like the what links here links but have never seen a this links
where one that shows the other pages the current one links to... you
gotta already be on the page to find out what links to it but ya can't
go the other way around...
Funny that the
On 12 July 2013 09:09, Graeme Geldenhuys gra...@geldenhuys.co.uk wrote:
On 2013-07-12 07:07, vfclists . wrote:
Coding time is the best
time for documentation because that is when the intent of the code is
clear
and fresh in the developers mind, and incurs minimal additional cost.
And
On 2013-07-12 10:48, vfclists . wrote:
Anyway I am not talking about documentation as such, just a property that
an object can be queried about on its role,
ie: class documentation :)
Regards,
G.
___
fpc-pascal maillist -
Hi,
I need to knew who to create a window under OSX and handle menu. Also it would
be nice to init OpenGL. No GLUT, NSGL would be fine.
need a complete example! no snippets! I'm complitly new on OSX, so sorry for
lameness :)
thx for Help.
- Kirill
No I really mean free pascal 1.0.6.
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Marco van de Voort mar...@stack.nl wrote:
In our previous episode, leledumbo said:
Older versions are never free of bugs (that's one of the reason why the
next
version appears), and even worse, it looks like there's no
I want to know if there are some stability problems with this version and
all of its parts(IDE, compiler, debugger). I mean problems like crashing,
freezing,
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Matúš Kudláč matus.kud...@gmail.comwrote:
No I really mean free pascal 1.0.6.
On Fri, Jul 12,
On 12-7-2013 5:29, Matúš Kudláč wrote:
I want to know if there are some stability problems with this version
and all of its parts(IDE, compiler, debugger). I mean problems like
crashing, freezing,
I think people have been trying to tell you that there may well be
stability problems etc.
On Fri, July 12, 2013 17:29, Matúš Kudláč wrote:
I want to know if there are some stability problems with this version and
all of its parts(IDE, compiler, debugger). I mean problems like crashing,
freezing,
Well, you haven't mentioned anything about the platform you plan to use,
etc. In
Am 11.07.2013 23:44, schrieb Graeme Geldenhuys:
On 2013-07-11 20:20, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Is it so hard to google fpc jvm language limitations ?
Yes, especially if your internet has been down for 3/4 of the day [2
days in a row].
So there is an offline wiki?
I plan to use windows xp professional 32bit.
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 6:55 PM, Tomas Hajny xhaj...@hajny.biz wrote:
On Fri, July 12, 2013 17:29, Matúš Kudláč wrote:
I want to know if there are some stability problems with this version and
all of its parts(IDE, compiler, debugger). I mean
On Fri, July 12, 2013 18:59, Matúš Kudláč wrote:
I plan to use windows xp professional 32bit.
I.e. you plan to use the Win32 release and compile for the Win32 target,
right? Just to make sure that you didn't have different plans like
compiling for the GO32v2 target as an example...
Tomas
Yes, I plan to use the Win32 release and compile for the Win32 target.
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 7:15 PM, Tomas Hajny xhaj...@hajny.biz wrote:
On Fri, July 12, 2013 18:59, Matúš Kudláč wrote:
I plan to use windows xp professional 32bit.
I.e. you plan to use the Win32 release and compile for
In our previous episode, Tomas Hajny said:
I want to know if there are some stability problems with this version and
all of its parts(IDE, compiler, debugger). I mean problems like crashing,
freezing,
Well, you haven't mentioned anything about the platform you plan to use,
etc. In
On 11.07.2013 22:14, Matúš Kudláč wrote:
Hi,
I want to use Free Pascal 1.0.6 in windows XP Professional 32bit. I
know to ask some questions about that. Are there some stability problems
with that version(compiler, IDE, debugger, ...)? If there are can I make
some changes to make it
On Fri, July 12, 2013 20:33, Sven Barth wrote:
On 11.07.2013 22:14, Matúš Kudláč wrote:
Hi,
I want to use Free Pascal 1.0.6 in windows XP Professional 32bit. I
know to ask some questions about that. Are there some stability problems
with that version(compiler, IDE, debugger, ...)? If
23 matches
Mail list logo
