Hello All,
Just a little question. In
In https://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/prog/progap7.html , there is specified
that
CPUARM Free Pascal target is an ARM 32-bit processor.
What about ARM 64-bit processors like the ones in Raspberries ?
Something similar to CPUPOWERPC with two subcatagorie
Hello,
Ok for the records for internal calculations. But sometimes, records are used for reading/writing
structured files. Does "packed" in "packed array" and "packed record" always forbid the compiler to play
with alignments ?
Kindest regards, Ched'
Le 29.03.23 à 21:07, Jonas Maebe via f
Le 27.07.2022 à 17:41, DougC via fpc-pascal a écrit :
WRITELN(F: 'Hello');
is not proper Pascal.
Yes, Doug, I agree ; but it is compiled with no warning and runs perfectly. Now, why the compiler do not
complain... ?
Cheers, Ched'
___
fpc-pascal ma
Hello All,
I have a long code which include lines for writing stuffs into an assigned
writable text-file F.
WRITELN(F: 'Hello');
WRITELN(F, 'Hello');
The code can be compiled with 3.2.2 in i386/windows and i386/linux and runs both times at perfection.
But... i'm wondering if the first
Well, Writeln('{$I %DATEMONTH%}'+'/'); can be compiled, but the answer is...
{$I %DATEMONTH%} .
I think that my level of english is by far too low to make the correct sentence.
Cheers, James, Raoul
Le 25.12.21 à 21:06, James Richters a écrit :
I see what you mean... I thought it was an In
Helolo James,
Thank you for your comment and proposal. As there is no type associated with non-string results, would it
be better to say number instead of integer ? Or integer number ?
Season's greetings !
Cheers, Ched'
Le 24.12.2021 à 22:32, James Richters via fpc-pascal a écrit :
I woul
> Fade := Fade * Fade * Fade * Fade * Fade;
Why not Fade:=sqr(sqr(Fade))*fade ?
Cheers, Anthony, Ched
Le 15.10.21 à 22:18, Anthony Walter via fpc-pascal a écrit :
I've been working on writing Pascal bindings a friendly object orient interface to a few open source
projects. I have put toget
Well, well, understand.
OTOH, declaring a string of length 1 is sort of futile -- it uses
two bytes where a plain char declaration takes just one byte.
Not so futile as a string can be empty, not a char !
Regards, Dennis, Ched'
___
fpc-pascal mailli
Hello All,
In https://wiki.freepascal.org/Variables_and_Data_Types about Strings:
// where: 1 < length <= 255
is to read as
// where: 1 <= length <= 255
isn't it ?
Cheers, Ched
Le 15.10.21 à 18:44, James Richters via fpc-pascal a écrit :
The difference is because of the way floating point
Hello,
For one software I compile with fpc, Avast always complained. But only when
compiled for debugging.
That exe was sent to the false positive departement, and it toke about _one mounth_ to have a corrected
version of the AV. Afterwhat, he never complained even with reworked source code.
Dear All,
I have some difficulties using the crt unit.
For what I can see, https://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=32558 could well be the answer, specialy a
call like SetUseACP(False); . At the end of the bug report, it is said that the crt unit will be ugraded
in 3.1.1. I run 3.2.0 under bot
Hello James,
You'll find a source of happiness with unit fphttpclient .
Particularily with the simplget function:
TFPHTTPCLIENT.SIMPLEGET('http://192.168.1.4/3/00')
It is said that it works with https also, but under the Mageia7 distro, you probably encounter problems I
haven't yet solved.
Le 26.02.20 à 15:11, denisgolovan via fpc-pascal a écrit :
In theory yes, but it's not recommended, because Microsoft does not recommend
it (not to mention that it isn't even remotely tested as much as the normal
Win64 target).
Regards,
Sven
Got it. Thanks for the clarification.
-- Regards,
13 matches
Mail list logo