The $360-per-year FrameMaker subscription includes upgrades, so that's
significantly cheaper than Flare.
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 12:03 PM, Robert Lauriston wrote:
> Comparing Flare and standalone FrameMaker, HTML output is more customizable
> and it's probably a better single-sourcing tool,
Comparing Flare and standalone FrameMaker, HTML output is more customizable
and it's probably a better single-sourcing tool, except as regards PDF
targets.
Comparing Flare and FrameMaker plus RoboHelp or WebWorks ePublisher Pro,
hard to say. I'd probably take unstructured FrameMaker and WebWorks
It seems that the benefits of Flare over Frame are:
- More customizable/better HTML output
- Better support
- Better single sourcing than unstructured Frame
- They don't charge an arm and a leg to pay for upgrades
The benefits of Frame over Flare are:
- Better PDFs
- Less of learning curve for
