: Ken Poshedly poshe...@bellsouth.net
To: Shlomo Perets shlo...@microtype.com
Cc: framers@lists.frameusers.com
Sent: Thu, March 22, 2012 11:40:07 AM
Subject: Re: best use of graphics in FM
First, thanks to all who have written to me both on-list and off-list. It’s
certainly good to have a support
vity, but it's just boiling over.
-- Ken, in hell
From: Ken Poshedly <poshe...@bellsouth.net>
To: Shlomo Perets
Cc: framers at lists.frameusers.com
Sent: Thu, March 22, 2012 11:40:07 AM
Subject: Re: best use of graphics in FM
First, thanks to all who have written to me both on-list an
in Atlanta
From: Shlomo Perets shlo...@microtype.com
To: Ken Poshedly poshe...@bellsouth.net
Cc: framers@lists.frameusers.com
Sent: Thu, March 22, 2012 6:49:03 AM
Subject: Re: best use of graphics in FM
Ken,
You wrote:
First, I very much appreciate the various
.)
-- Ken in Atlanta
From: Shlomo Perets <shlo...@microtype.com>
To: Ken Poshedly
Cc: framers at lists.frameusers.com
Sent: Thu, March 22, 2012 6:49:03 AM
Subject: Re: best use of graphics in FM
Ken,
You wrote:
>First, I very much appreciate the variou
file, specifically line 4
(Error: typecheck . . .) and what follows it?
-- Kenpo in a hellish place
From: Ken Poshedly poshe...@bellsouth.net
To: FrameMaker Users List framers@lists.frameusers.com
Sent: Tue, March 20, 2012 9:59:00 PM
Subject: best use
Rogers
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 12:52 PM
To: framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: Re: best use of graphics in FM
On 21/03/2012 3:21 PM, David Spreadbury wrote:
First, SnagIt used to have a plugin for FrameMaker. It is no longer
supported.
Secondly, if you source are coming as Word files
4:57:39 PM
Subject: Re: best use of graphics in FM
First, I very much appreciate the various on-list and off-list replies. I'll
try
a few things myself this evening after getting home (61 miles each way)
regarding the graphics to see what I can do as a speed test.
Second, I just did some minor
Ken,
You wrote:
First, I very much appreciate the various on-list and off-list replies.
I'll try a few things myself this evening after getting home (61 miles
each way) regarding the graphics to see what I can do as a speed test.
Second, I just did some minor edits to a series of FM files
-Technical
Documentation Consultant
Message: 6
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 18:59:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ken Poshedly poshe...@bellsouth.net
To: FrameMaker Users List framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: best use of graphics in FM
Message-ID
Keith,
Your signature contains a definition of a racist. I wonder what you call
someone who makes blanket statements about unions, big business, and
republicans. I will be kind and call it stereotyping. It takes some effort
and intelligence to research issues and discuss them on their merits
: Re: best use of graphics in FM
Ken,
You wrote:
First, I very much appreciate the various on-list and off-list replies.
I'll try a few things myself this evening after getting home (61 miles
each way) regarding the graphics to see what I can do as a speed test.
Second, I just did some minor
Ken,
You wrote:
>First, I very much appreciate the various on-list and off-list replies.
>I'll try a few things myself this evening after getting home (61 miles
>each way) regarding the graphics to see what I can do as a speed test.
>
>Second, I just did some minor edits to a series of FM
e they are black.
Beware an intrusive government.
GOD BLESS THE UNITED STATES
-Technical
Documentation Consultant
Message: 6
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 18:59:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ken Poshedly <poshe...@bellsouth.net>
To: FrameM
Keith,
Your signature contains a definition of a racist. I wonder what you call
someone who makes blanket statements about unions, "big business", and
"republicans". I will be kind and call it stereotyping. It takes some effort
and intelligence to research issues and discuss them on their
afternoon. It worked. (Specifically, I unchecked the box for
?Generate
Acrobat Data?.)
-- Ken in Atlanta
From: Shlomo Perets <shlo...@microtype.com>
To: Ken Poshedly
Cc: framers at lists.frameusers.com
Sent: Thu, March 22, 2012 6:49:03 AM
Subject: Re: be
My take on your questions:
1. SnagIt from TechSmith, which is integrated into the FM interface. 15-30
seconds or so if you use automated naming.
2. No, you should take the time to do it right the first time.
3. Quality of the document has a direct relationship both to how customers
view the
My take on your questions:
1. SnagIt from TechSmith, which is integrated into the FM interface. 15-30
seconds or so if you use automated naming.
2. No, you should take the time to do it right the first time.
3. Quality of the document has a direct relationship both to how customers
view the
So the questions are:
* Does anybody here have a fast way of saving screenshots as legit
graphics for later reuse, and if so, what is your method and how many
seconds would you say it takes?
SnagIt is the most recommended screen capture program. It is easy to use
and very feature rich. It
Ken Poshedly wrote:
Unfortunately, at his prior location, another FM user (more
knowledgeable than my coworker) showed my coworker what I call a hack
to get a document done in a fraction of the time that it would
ordinarily take. Specifically, he uses PrintScreen32 to take screen
shots of
://www.linkedin.com/in/sharonvburton
-Original Message-
From: framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com
[mailto:framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of Combs, Richard
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 6:56 AM
To: Ken Poshedly; FrameMaker Users List
Subject: RE: best use of graphics in FM
Responding from Digest land
1. I, too, use SnagIt. I've never timed myself but I'm sure that by using
keyboard shortcuts as much as possible I can select, save, and import by
reference in less than a minute.
2. You are not being too controlling.
3. The best argument I can
How is SnagIT integrated into the Frame interface?
-Gillian
- Original Message -
From: Art Campbell
To: Ken Poshedly
Cc: FrameMaker Users List
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 5:29 AM
Subject: Re: best use of graphics in FM
My take on your questions:
1. SnagIt from
to embed them is not right in the head. Import by
reference is the only way to go.
--- On Wed, 3/21/12, Gillian gill6...@comcast.net wrote:
From: Gillian gill6...@comcast.net
Subject: Re: best use of graphics in FM
To: Art Campbell art.campb...@gmail.com, Ken Poshedly
poshe...@bellsouth.net
Cc
On 3/21/2012 11:55 AM, Gillian wrote:
*How is SnagIT integrated into the Frame interface?*
*-Gillian*
It creates a SnagIt menu on the main menu at the top of the FrameMaker
window for easy access to the SnagIt program.
Mike Wickham
___
You
On 21/03/2012 3:21 PM, David Spreadbury wrote:
First, SnagIt used to have a plugin for FrameMaker. It is no longer
supported.
Secondly, if you source are coming as Word files, you should be able to
save some time capturing the graphics by exporting the Word, or PDF,
file. Export the Word as
David Spreadbury wrote:
Secondly, if you source are coming as Word files, you should be able to
save some time capturing the graphics by exporting the Word, or PDF,
file. Export the Word as HTML. This creates a separate subfolder of all
of the graphics.
I suspect that Stuart's suggestion
conversion tools out there.
--- On Wed, 3/21/12, Combs, Richard richard.co...@polycom.com wrote:
From: Combs, Richard richard.co...@polycom.com
Subject: RE: best use of graphics in FM
To: David Spreadbury dspre...@yahoo.com
Cc: FrameMaker Users List framers@lists.frameusers.com
Date: Wednesday
On 3/21/2012 4:13 PM, Combs, Richard wrote:
I suspect that Stuart's suggestion (assuming the Word docs are .docx)
is a better idea because it should preserve the original size (and
format) of the graphics, even if they've been resized in Word. I don't
think HTML export does that. snip If
-boun...@lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of Art Campbell
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 5:29 AM
To: Ken Poshedly
Cc: FrameMaker Users List
Subject: Re: best use of graphics in FM
My take on your questions:
1. SnagIt from TechSmith, which is integrated into the FM interface. 15-30
seconds or so if you
My take on your questions:
1. SnagIt from TechSmith, which is integrated into the FM interface. 15-30
seconds or so if you use automated naming.
2. No, you should take the time to do it right the first time.
3. Quality of the document has a direct relationship both to how customers
view the
>My take on your questions:
>1. SnagIt from TechSmith, which is integrated into the FM interface. 15-30
>seconds or so if you use automated naming.
>2. No, you should take the time to do it right the first time.
>3. Quality of the document has a direct relationship both to how customers
>view
> So the questions are:
> * Does anybody here have a fast way of saving screenshots as legit
> graphics for later reuse, and if so, what is your method and how many
> seconds would you say it takes?
SnagIt is the most recommended screen capture program. It is easy to use
and very feature rich.
Ken Poshedly wrote:
> Unfortunately, at his prior location, another FM user (more
> knowledgeable than my coworker) showed my coworker what I call a "hack"
> to get a document done in a fraction of the time that it would
> ordinarily take. Specifically, he uses "PrintScreen32" to take screen
>
aronburton
http://www.linkedin.com/in/sharonvburton
-Original Message-
From: framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com
[mailto:framers-bounces at lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of Combs, Richard
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 6:56 AM
To: Ken Poshedly; FrameMaker Users List
Subject: RE: best use o
Responding from Digest land
1. I, too, use SnagIt. I've never timed myself but I'm sure that by using
keyboard shortcuts as much as possible I can select, save, and import by
reference in less than a minute.
2. You are not being too controlling.
3. The best argument I can
How is SnagIT integrated into the Frame interface?
-Gillian
- Original Message -
From: Art Campbell
To: Ken Poshedly
Cc: FrameMaker Users List
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 5:29 AM
Subject: Re: best use of graphics in FM
My take on your questions:
1. SnagIt from
to embed them is not right in the head. Import by
reference is the only way to go.
--- On Wed, 3/21/12, Gillian wrote:
From: Gillian <gill6...@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: best use of graphics in FM
To: "Art Campbell" , "Ken Poshedly"
Cc: "FrameMaker Users List"
On 3/21/2012 11:55 AM, Gillian wrote:
> *How is SnagIT integrated into the Frame interface?*
> *-Gillian*
It creates a SnagIt menu on the main menu at the top of the FrameMaker
window for easy access to the SnagIt program.
Mike Wickham
-- next part --
An HTML
On 21/03/2012 3:21 PM, David Spreadbury wrote:
> First, SnagIt used to have a plugin for FrameMaker. It is no longer
> supported.
>
> Secondly, if you source are coming as Word files, you should be able to
> save some time capturing the graphics by exporting the Word, or PDF,
> file. Export the
David Spreadbury wrote:
> Secondly, if you source are coming as Word files, you should be able to
> save some time capturing the graphics by exporting the Word, or PDF,
> file. Export the Word as HTML. This creates a separate subfolder of all
> of the graphics.
I suspect that Stuart's
hic conversion tools out there.
--- On Wed, 3/21/12, Combs, Richard wrote:
From: Combs, Richard <richard.co...@polycom.com>
Subject: RE: best use of graphics in FM
To: "David Spreadbury"
Cc: "FrameMaker Users List"
Date: Wednesday, March 21, 2012, 3:13 PM
David Spreadbu
On 3/21/2012 4:13 PM, Combs, Richard wrote:
> I suspect that Stuart's suggestion (assuming the Word docs are .docx)
> is a better idea because it should preserve the original size (and
> format) of the graphics, even if they've been resized in Word. I don't
> think HTML export does that. If
[mailto:framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of Art Campbell
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 5:29 AM
To: Ken Poshedly
Cc: FrameMaker Users List
Subject: Re: best use of graphics in FM
My take on your questions:
1. SnagIt from TechSmith, which is integrated into the FM interface. 15-30
seconds or so
file, specifically line 4
(Error: typecheck . . .) and what follows it?
-- Kenpo in a hellish place
From: Ken Poshedly <poshe...@bellsouth.net>
To: FrameMaker Users List
Sent: Tue, March 20, 2012 9:59:00 PM
Subject: best use of graphics in FM
Fram
Behalf Of Stuart Rogers
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 12:52 PM
To: framers at lists.frameusers.com
Subject: Re: best use of graphics in FM
On 21/03/2012 3:21 PM, David Spreadbury wrote:
> First, SnagIt used to have a plugin for FrameMaker. It is no longer
> supported.
>
> Secondly, if you
ct: Re: best use of graphics in FM
First, I very much appreciate the various on-list and off-list replies. I'll
try
a few things myself this evening after getting home (61 miles each way)
regarding the graphics to see what I can do as a speed test.
Second, I just did some minor edits to a series
FrameMaker 8.0 on a PC with Windows XP Professional
Except for bloated file sizes, in the long run, does it really matter if you
reference graphics or if you embed them inside your publications?
My coworker is a guy who was tech pubs manager at another heavy equipment
company but was convinced
FrameMaker 8.0 on a PC with Windows XP Professional
Except for bloated file sizes, in the long run, does it really matter if you
reference graphics or if you embed them inside your publications?
My coworker is a guy who was tech pubs manager at another heavy equipment
company but was convinced
48 matches
Mail list logo
