Graeme R Forbes wrote:
I have a proof consisting in a sequence of lines across a page, each
a paragraph, and each line separated from the next by a shallow
anchored frame that contains a separator line. Each line/para is set
to keep with the next one since the whole proof must display on
Stuart Rogers wrote:
Graeme R Forbes wrote:
I have a proof consisting in a sequence of lines across a
page, each a
paragraph, and each line separated from the next by a shallow
anchored frame that contains a separator line. Each
line/para is set
to keep with the next one since
I knew there had to be a simple solution. You prevent a page break
occurring at a soft return by putting a sufficiently large number (I
used 4) in the Widow/Orphan control box on the Pagination page of the
Para Designer. Thanks to Stuart Rogers for suggesting this.
Graeme Forbes
Graeme R Forbes wrote:
> I have a proof consisting in a sequence of lines across a page, each
> a paragraph, and each line separated from the next by a shallow
> anchored frame that contains a separator line. Each line/para is set
> to keep with the next one since the whole proof must display
Stuart Rogers wrote:
> Graeme R Forbes wrote:
> > I have a proof consisting in a sequence of lines across a
> page, each a
> > paragraph, and each line separated from the next by a shallow
> > anchored frame that contains a separator line. Each
> line/para is set
> > to keep with the next
: Re: oldie (was: keep with next para)
Graeme R Forbes wrote:
Um, just an FYI, Graeme has been on this list for at least 5 years that I
know of.
This made me wonder. I find in my archives a message dated 10/28/93
that referred to my previous postings complaining about FM's footnote
handling
To: framers at lists.frameusers.com
Subject: Re: oldie (was: keep with next para)
Graeme R Forbes wrote:
>
>>Um, just an FYI, Graeme has been on this list for at least 5 years that I
>>know of.
>
> This made me wonder. I find in my archives a message dated 10/28/93
] Behalf Of Alan
Litchfield
Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2008 11:59 AM
To: Framers
Subject: Re: keep with next para
On 2/02/2008, at 11:08 PM, Diane Gaskill wrote:
Alan,
Um, just an FYI, Graeme has been on this list for at least 5 years
that I
know of. I kinda sorta think he knows how to use FM
To: framers@lists.frameusers.com
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: oldie (was: keep with next para)
Diane:
Thanks for the suggestion about using the reference page -- hadn't
thought of that, I'll see if I can make it work.
Um, just an FYI, Graeme has been on this list for at least 5 years that I
On Mon, 4 Feb 2008 03:51:08 -0800, Diane Gaskill
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wonder how many of us there are still on the list from those
olden days.
raises hand I've been on it since it was hosted on uunet;
I forget what year. After that I recall three volunteer admins
at different
Graeme R Forbes wrote:
>
>>Um, just an FYI, Graeme has been on this list for at least 5 years that I
>>know of.
>
> This made me wonder. I find in my archives a message dated 10/28/93
> that referred to my previous postings complaining about FM's footnote
> handling and the failure to fix the
[mailto:framers-bounces at lists.frameusers.com]On Behalf Of Alan
Litchfield
Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2008 11:59 AM
To: Framers
Subject: Re: keep with next para
On 2/02/2008, at 11:08 PM, Diane Gaskill wrote:
> Alan,
>
> Um, just an FYI, Graeme has been on this list for at least 5 years
ebruary 03, 2008 1:07 AM
To: framers at lists.frameusers.com
Cc: dgcaller at earthlink.net
Subject: oldie (was: keep with next para)
Diane:
Thanks for the suggestion about using the reference page -- hadn't
thought of that, I'll see if I can make it work.
>Um, just an FYI, Graeme has been
On Mon, 4 Feb 2008 03:51:08 -0800, "Diane Gaskill"
wrote:
>I wonder how many of us there are still on the list from those
>"olden" days.
I've been on it since it was hosted on uunet;
I forget what year. After that I recall three volunteer admins
at different universities before Brad came
Diane:
Thanks for the suggestion about using the reference page -- hadn't
thought of that, I'll see if I can make it work.
Um, just an FYI, Graeme has been on this list for at least 5 years that I
know of.
This made me wonder. I find in my archives a message dated 10/28/93
that referred to
Graeme R Forbes wrote:
Um, just an FYI, Graeme has been on this list for at least 5 years that I
know of.
This made me wonder. I find in my archives a message dated 10/28/93
that referred to my previous postings complaining about FM's footnote
handling and the failure to fix the problem in
On 2/02/2008, at 11:08 PM, Diane Gaskill wrote:
> Alan,
>
> Um, just an FYI, Graeme has been on this list for at least 5 years
> that I
> know of. I kinda sorta think he knows how to use FM pretty
> well... :-)
>
Alright Diane, pulling my head in now.
Cheers
Alan
Diane:
Thanks for the suggestion about using the reference page -- hadn't
thought of that, I'll see if I can make it work.
>Um, just an FYI, Graeme has been on this list for at least 5 years that I
>know of.
This made me wonder. I find in my archives a message dated 10/28/93
that referred to
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Alan
Litchfield
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2008 7:03 PM
To: framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: Re: keep with next para
Hi Graeme,
I'm not certain why you are using an anchored frame to separate your
paragraphs. Why not just add space between them, then you can
On 2/02/2008, at 11:08 PM, Diane Gaskill wrote:
Alan,
Um, just an FYI, Graeme has been on this list for at least 5 years
that I
know of. I kinda sorta think he knows how to use FM pretty
well... :-)
Alright Diane, pulling my head in now.
Cheers
Alan
Hi Graeme,
I'm not certain why you are using an anchored frame to separate your
paragraphs. Why not just add space between them, then you can specify
which paragraphs need to a "keep with next" setting. This does away
with the extra paragraph between each text paragraph.
These setting are
...@lists.frameusers.com
[mailto:framers-bounces at lists.frameusers.com]On Behalf Of Alan
Litchfield
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2008 7:03 PM
To: framers at lists.frameusers.com
Subject: Re: keep with next para
Hi Graeme,
I'm not certain why you are using an anchored frame to separate your
paragraphs
I have a proof consisting in a sequence of lines across a page, each
a paragraph, and each line separated from the next by a shallow
anchored frame that contains a separator line. Each line/para is set
to keep with the next one since the whole proof must display on the
same page. However, in
Hi Graeme,
I'm not certain why you are using an anchored frame to separate your
paragraphs. Why not just add space between them, then you can specify
which paragraphs need to a keep with next setting. This does away
with the extra paragraph between each text paragraph.
These setting are in
I have a proof consisting in a sequence of lines across a page, each
a paragraph, and each line separated from the next by a shallow
anchored frame that contains a separator line. Each line/para is set
to keep with the next one since the whole proof must display on the
same page. However, in
25 matches
Mail list logo
