Sorry, wasn't online yesterday but for me this is a good idea.
On 6 nov 2008, at 01:17, Andreas Zeidler wrote:
danny, raphael, and also steve and jon,
would that work for you? that's to say, realistically, like in
being able to do all necessary reviews etc on time? :) if not,
please
On Oct 29, 2008, at 8:51 AM, Raphael Ritz wrote:
Now on to the real work - the reviewing.
How do we distribute that across the team?
since we didn't talk about it or made any changes, i'd say the same
rules still apply: each PLIP should be reviewed in depth by at
least two people.
I'd like to nominate myself for the 4x framework team. I think I know
plones code in-depth. Also I know the community well (since 2004) and
also know how community works. I've been release-manager of Archetypes,
contributed a bunch of code to the whole stack.
I'am a pragmatic person: I would
Andreas Zeidler wrote:
danny, raphael, and also steve and jon,
would that work for you? that's to say, realistically, like in being
able to do all necessary reviews etc on time? :)
I hope so.
At least I'll try to plan for it to the extend possible.
What I can say today already, however,
No problems here.
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 4:17 PM, Andreas Zeidler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
danny, raphael, and also steve and jon,
would that work for you? that's to say, realistically, like in being able
to do all necessary reviews etc on time? :) if not, please tell us now so
we can
