Check youtube-dl, an Open Source command line utility that is highly
versatile and configurable:
http://rg3.github.com/youtube-dl
If you want to download a whole batch of YouTube videos, write each URL as
one line of a plain text file 'videos.txt' and simply run, on the
Unix/Linux/Mac OS X
This works, nothin' to it.
http://keepvid.com
owen
On Jan 2, 2012, at 9:26 PM, Jon Perez wrote:
Here's two different ways that work every time:
The first way sounds complicated but is very straightforward. If you're
working on a mac install a utility called Perian. Open the video you want
MIT's List Visual Arts Center recently held an exhibition of Otto Piene's work.
In conjunction there were numerous panels and screenings (though no Group Zero
public access episodes to my knowledge)
You might check the Nov. 17 listing on this calendar
http://listart.mit.edu/past_programs
J.
On Mac with Safari, I recently started using this:
http://www.verticalforest.com/2011/12/06/downloading-videos-with-
youtube5/
It seems to work very well, and despite what he says on the
website, I found it very easy to get the hang of.
Hope this helps:
Peter
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012, at 09:26 PM,
Thanks everyone - I'm going with the mpeg streamclip method and its
working great
-LJ
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 9:26 PM, Jon Perez jonmpe...@gmail.com wrote:
Here's two different ways that work every time:
The first way sounds complicated but is very straightforward. If you're
working on a mac
Mariah,
have you tried 35mm macro lens photography?
that way you could even take a quick picture and then crop the area you don't
want to print in the darkroom.
best wishes,pablo.
--- On Tue, 1/3/12, mariah garnett mariah.garn...@gmail.com wrote:
From: mariah garnett mariah.garn...@gmail.com
I am looking to purchase two Bolex cameras in LA. Reflex would be best.
Anyone selling one or two? Where can I get these cameras in good working
order? Thanks!
Best,
Stephanie
Stephanie Hutin
Director of Production
Intercollegiate Media Studies
Pitzer College
1050
The Cinelarger and Duplikin are total pieces of junk. Don't waste your time.
On Jan 3, 2012, at 12:07 PM, Myron Ort z...@sonic.net wrote:
http://www.ebay.com/sch/?
_nkw=cinelargerclk_rvr_id=304125622581mfe=search
On Jan 3, 2012, at 10:02 AM, mariah garnett wrote:
Hey guys
does
agreed.
unless fuzzy pictures work for you for some reason.
On Jan 3, 2012, at 10:14 AM, Jeff Kreines wrote:
The Cinelarger and Duplikin are total pieces of junk. Don't waste
your time.
On Jan 3, 2012, at 12:07 PM, Myron Ort z...@sonic.net wrote:
http://www.ebay.com/sch/?
Put your 16mm in the negative carrier of a photographic enlarger and mask
it as you like. Then you're ready to strike prints from it without any
digital intervention!
On Jan 3, 2012 1:20 PM, Myron Ort z...@sonic.net wrote:
agreed.
unless fuzzy pictures work for you for some reason.
On Jan 3,
If working with originals positive you'll have to contact print your results
On Jan 3, 2012 1:36 PM, Philippe Leonard optical...@gmail.com wrote:
Put your 16mm in the negative carrier of a photographic enlarger and mask
it as you like. Then you're ready to strike prints from it without any
David Bordwell has a simple but very effective setup for making stills from
prints with a 35mm camera, though I don't know its precise composition. He's
made an unreal amount of amazing looking stills over many many years, still
doing it in 35mm last I knew. Someone else on this list might
Hi!
I'm selling on on eBay right now.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/290652734318?ssPageName=STRK:MESELX:IT_trksid=p3984.m1555.l2649
Daina Krumins
http://www.dainakrumins.com
--- On Tue, 1/3/12, Stephanie Hutin stephanie_hu...@pitzer.edu wrote:
From: Stephanie Hutin stephanie_hu...@pitzer.edu
I used to put the 16mm film in an enlarger to make prints.
However, the quality is really not all that good because when film goes
through a projector the grain, which is different for each frame, kind of
vanishes because it's only on the screen for 1/2 of 1/24 of a second. The
viewers mind
Recipes for Disaster had a good sounding solution - photo enlarger pointed
at a 35mm camera with its lens taken off, use the internal light meter to
judge the correct shutter speed.
I tried it on my DSLR and it looked pretty good.
Allie
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Daina Krumins
Thanks Daina. Do I have to bid or is there a buy it now option?
Stephanie Hutin
Director of Production
Intercollegiate Media Studies
Pitzer College
1050 North Mills Ave
Claremont, CA 91711
909.607.3889
stephanie_hu...@pitzer.edu
On Jan 3, 2012, at 11:03 AM, Daina Krumins
Hello
My suggestion-
I use a slide duplicator lens. The lens is about 8 inches long and
screws into my slr camera. There is a slot for a slide/ I actually
have 16mm slide-holders (for 110 slides when presented in a 35mm slide
projector).
After selecting a 16mm frame- I hold it up to the sky
I do not have experience with a DSLR and slide duper- After some research-
a flatbed scanner seems to be the best choice for the digital route-
I have embraced the slide-duper technique as an alternative to digital-
and as an approach to enlarging 16mm stills in my darkroom.
Sales of silver or
18 matches
Mail list logo
