Re: [Frameworks] Film-Video Transfer: DIY Super 8 telecine, Costco, and the Pros

Re: someone's mention of yesvideo... do yourself a favor and don't send your work there. I used to work there, so some insider info. Film is cleaned without actual cleaner, film is constantly scratched by going through poorly maintained projectors, and once film is transferred, a team of editors

Re: [Frameworks] Film-Video Transfer: DIY Super 8 telecine, Costco, and the Pros

I'm not sure how many Frameworks' folks have seen Matthew Epler's open source "film scanner" . It's still pretty new and definitely not for everyone. If you have access to a 3D printer and have some old DSLR's to spare (same shutter life problem), it may be worth a DIY attempt

Re: [Frameworks] Film-Video Transfer: DIY Super 8 telecine, Costco, and the Pros

One thing to be concerned with when scanning reversal originals and prints is to be sure that you can fully capture the entire dynamic range on the film, without sacrificing shadows or highlights. Most telecines can not do this. On Jul 23, 2014, at 7:26 PM, Dave Tetzlaff wrote: > Movette in

[Frameworks] Film-Video Transfer: DIY Super 8 telecine, Costco, and the Pros

Since so many Frameworkers continue to use photochemical film 'acquisition' (sic), and distribution/exhibition opportunities are just getting ever more digital, it would seem that telecine/scan techniques and services are ever more important to our little community. I think it would valuable fo

[Frameworks] Super 8 capture NYC

Anyone in the NYC or long island area have a setup I could use to capture my super 8 film like an optical printer with a dslr or somethin? I dont have a good video camera so im kinda stuck on the shooting the projection idea. Ill be willing to pay for your time and resources. thanks _

Re: [Frameworks] super 8 viewer telecine??

Hi Ben, As Jeff wrote, do not use a viewer/editor. The much better cheap way is to project the film and shoot it off the wall/screen with a video camera. Jeff's idea of shooting frame-by-frame with a still camera will produce better results, much more slowly. Be warned however if you are using a D

Re: [Frameworks] FrameWorks Digest, Vol 50, Issue 22

The old fashioned way to telecine is cheapest: project film on to a wall and shoot with your video camera---did it that way for years and still do with student films. Find the shutter speed on your video camera that minimizes the flicker. OR Costco (yes, the big discount chain) offers film tran

Re: [Frameworks] super 8 viewer telecine??

On Jul 23, 2014, at 2:07 PM, wrote: > Hey I was thinkin about buying a super 8 viewer and using a DSLR to take a > photo of each frame. Any suggestions on viewers with the sharpest and > brightest image quality? Has anyone done this before? thanks It’s a terrible idea. Viewers usually

[Frameworks] super 8 viewer telecine??

Hey I was thinkin about buying a super 8 viewer and using a DSLR to take a photo of each frame. Any suggestions on viewers with the sharpest and brightest image quality? Has anyone done this before? thanks ___ FrameWorks mailing list FrameWorks@jonas

Re: [Frameworks] The Hand-Processing Chemistry Scheme.

Lindsay, I've not worked with Orwo (but have two rolls sitting before me) and I would just use D-19 for the first developer if thats what you have available, if you want to do a custom mix then D-94A is what Kodak officially recommends for B&W reversal 1st developer. But maybe there are some E

Re: [Frameworks] The Hand-Processing Chemistry Scheme.

Hey Ben, My two cents: I usually use Recipes for Disaster (p. 53-55) as a basic guide for processing times and procedure. Unless you have access to a G3 processing tank (or equivalent) I find that I can do 60ft at a time in 5gal buckets--if i am careful. Unless you are pushing the film in the f

[Frameworks] Fw: confirm 2e042252406aa718ae05afee416cd23d4e6ba7a9

getting this again ...   moiratierney.net vimeo.com/moiratierney On Sunday, July 20, 2014 7:03 PM, "frameworks-requ...@jonasmekasfilms.com" wrote: Your membership in the mailing list FrameWorks has been disabled due to excessive bounces The last bounce received from you was dated 20-Jul-

Re: [Frameworks] The Hand-Processing Chemistry Scheme.

I'll be shooting some Orwo 35mm UN54 as reversal and am currently looking for the Kodak/Ilford equivalents to the chemistry required in "Instruction 4185". I'm hoping I don't have to mix it all from scratch. I assume any strong developer like D-19 would work for the 2nd developer but does anyone k

Re: [Frameworks] The Hand-Processing Chemistry Scheme.

Please don’t put chemistry inside a Bolex – even the clockwind ones aren’t that robust. Peter (Perth) From: Matilda Thomas mailto:matilda.lily.tho...@gmail.com>> Reply-To: Experimental Film Discussion List mailto:frameworks@jonasmekasfilms.com>> Date: Wednesday, 23 July 2014 10:00 pm To: John W

Re: [Frameworks] The Hand-Processing Chemistry Scheme.

Also was wondering what the avail abilities of the bolex were in the coming weeks? Thanks again matilda Sent from my iPhone > On 23 Jul 2014, at 05:35, John Woods wrote: > > Generally I've always found 400ft of 16mm per 2 litres of developer is a good > ballpark number that hasn't let me dow

Re: [Frameworks] Super 8 prices!!!! WTF

Niagara film labs in Toronto is pretty reasonable. Their telecine is about 20.00 USD per roll, and the transfer is excellent. Dwayne's photo in Parsons, Kansas has a relatively cheaper per roll charge, about12.00, but the quality is so low that I only use it for making demonstration material. Dwayn