n List
Sent: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 18:58
Subject: Re: [Frameworks] Articles/essays on the history of flatbed
editors(Moviola, Steenbeck, etc)?
Pudovkin at work
2015-09-18 13:56 GMT-04:00 Francisco Torres :
Pudovkin-
http://sensesofcinema.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/Macovaz
Pudovkin at work
2015-09-18 13:56 GMT-04:00 Francisco Torres :
> Pudovkin-
>
>
> http://sensesofcinema.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/Macovaz-Image-8-copy-750x400.jpg
>
___
FrameWorks mailing list
FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
https://mailman-mail5.web
Pudovkin-
http://sensesofcinema.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/Macovaz-Image-8-copy-750x400.jpg
___
FrameWorks mailing list
FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
What were the little motorized desktop Moviolas, the LV or LY? The one
every college football coach had in his office, according to Hollywood?
Some serious film analysis happened on those.
Of course a lot of us used Steenbecks to edit films… and still do.
They were quite expensive
You might also inquire of the Film Study Center at The Museum of Modern Art.
They use two KEM flatbeds for study purposes. This is the machinery we at the
Warhol Film Project use to view the Warhol film collection. They may keep
statistics on scholarly use, or may have such histories as you are
Back in the 50s-80s there were some magazines geared to the audiovisual
educational field (like the one called Audio Visual instruction) that had
articles about equipment and its use, trends, resources, etc. They covered
things like flash cards ,slide projectors, tape recorders, 16mm projectors
et
The Pageant Analyst was by no means the first analysis projector. The use
of 16mm for motion analysis came about during WWII with the introduction
of gunsight cameras and there were a number of projectors like the hand-cranked
Devry and the Speco which were intended for screening gunsight films on
You might try to find articles about the Kodak Analyst 16 mm projector. It was
a mainstay in academic film studies. The projector allowed for frame by frame
viewing both forward and reverse. The downside was that the projector destroyed
film prints when over used.
Sherman
> On Sep 5, 2015, at
Always wondered what kind of machine is that S.E. is using in this photo
2015-09-05 20:21 GMT-04:00 Jeff Kreines :
> Of course a lot of us used Steenbecks to edit films… and still do.
>
> They were quite expensive so would not be commonly used by researchers not
> attached to institutions
Of course a lot of us used Steenbecks to edit films… and still do.
They were quite expensive so would not be commonly used by researchers not
attached to institutions (or with large grants).
> On Sep 5, 2015, at 6:09 PM, Watter, Seth wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'm wondering if people know of a
Hi all,
I'm wondering if people know of any texts that deal with the history of the
flatbed editor--more in its capacity as a viewing/analysis machine than as
an actual editing setup. I've found a few old articles on the Moviola in
journals like American Cinematographer, but they're strictly trade
11 matches
Mail list logo
