Re: [Frameworks] processing 16mm Tri X as negative in a bucket like a savage

EXCELLENT results tonight thanks to all you comrades. I only have one roll of Tri X in my fridge, which I will shoot and develop tomorrow. I do have some 2x and 4x rolls left though... Can I process those (as negative obviously) in Dektol? all the best, Mark Street www.markstreetfilms.com On Su

Re: [Frameworks] processing 16mm Tri X as negative in a bucket like a savage

Yes, ST8 will run nicely in dektol, it is intended to run in print chemistry. --scott ___ FrameWorks mailing list FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks

Re: [Frameworks] processing 16mm Tri X as negative in a bucket like a savage

I got nice results using Dektol with Agfa ST8 sound film. Nicky Envoyé à partir de mon smartphone Sony Xperia™ Scott Dorsey a écrit >Dektol is a very, very fast-working developer and very grainy. It is >intended for paper and print materials, not for film. It may be possible >to us

Re: [Frameworks] processing 16mm Tri X as negative in a bucket like a savage

treet Sent: Friday, July 31, 2015 3:12 PM Subject: Re: [Frameworks] processing 16mm Tri X as negative in a bucket like a savage To: Experimental Film Discussion List Hi Roger, Wonder if you have any experience using Dektol rather than D-76?  Am abo

Re: [Frameworks] processing 16mm Tri X as negative in a bucket like a savage

Dektol is a very, very fast-working developer and very grainy. It is intended for paper and print materials, not for film. It may be possible to use very diluted dektol but you will have to do some testing on short lengths, and the results will tend to be inconsistent because of the short times.

Re: [Frameworks] processing 16mm Tri X as negative in a bucket like a savage

> On Jul 31, 2015, at 2:12 PM, Mark Street wrote: > > Wonder if you have any experience using Dektol rather than D-76? It will be much more contrasty. Jeff Kreines Kinetta j...@kinetta.com kinetta.com ___ FrameWorks mailing list FrameWorks@jonas

Re: [Frameworks] processing 16mm Tri X as negative in a bucket like a savage

Hi Roger, Wonder if you have any experience using Dektol rather than D-76? Am about to jump in as soon as it gets dark here in Brooklyn tonight, and I bought Dektol all the best, Mark Street www.markstreetfilms.com On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 6:14 PM, Roger D. Wilson wrote: > This may help you

Re: [Frameworks] processing 16mm Tri X as negative in a bucket like a savage

Thanks so much, Roger. This is excellent. all the best, Mark Street On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 6:14 PM, Roger D. Wilson wrote: > This may help you out Mark, it's a post from my blog. > > Hand Processing 16mm black and white film > Materials for processing film as negative: > > Kodak D-76 Deve

Re: [Frameworks] processing 16mm Tri X as negative in a bucket like a savage

This may help you out Mark, it's a post from my blog. Hand Processing 16mm black and white filmMaterials for processing film as negative: Kodak D-76 Developer (powder)Kodak Rapid Fixer with Hardener (do not mix in hardener if you plan to tint and tone film)2 - 4 litre photographic chemical stor

[Frameworks] processing 16mm Tri X as negative in a bucket like a savage

ooops forgot to change the subject heading on this Hey Party Animals, I plan on processing some 16mm Tri X reversal (as negative) in a bucket in my basement next week. Haven't done this in years. Can someone point me to a fairly current guide to how to do so? Of course, I realize it'll be m