On 6/19/06, Frank Laszlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What does this entire thread have to do with freebsd user groups? Just
because the allege copyright infringement is against such a group,
doesn't mean everyone else has to hear about it. Please remove it from
future CC's. Thanks.
Regards,
On 6/19/06, John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sunday 18 June 2006 19:49, David Hoffman wrote:
> * *It appears the page at
> http://www.houfug.org/help/install_freebsd.htmconstitutes a serious
> breach of copyright. The article, which was
> originally written and post
, the notice doesn't make that at all clear. This should be changed.
On 6/19/06, Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"David Hoffman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It'll certainly be less confusing that what HouFUG is
publishing. They've
> now
-- Forwarded message --
From: David Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Jun 18, 2006 10:27 PM
Subject: Re: Serious breach of copyright -- First post
To: Dennis Olvany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
While your mocking post is certainly intended to bolster your point, it
instead b
On 6/18/06, David Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/18/06, Dennis Olvany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> ...facts are not eligible for copyright.
>
> > I'm afraid you're incorrect. The work in question is indeed
> copyrightable
> > unde
Net 713-477-6161
3910 Fairmont Parkway #264
Pasadena, TX 77504-3076
**http://www.cityscope.net* <http://www.cityscope.net/>
--
*From:* David Hoffman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Sent:* Sunday, June 18, 2006 8:20 PM
*To:* Dennis Olvany
*Cc:* freebsd-chat@freebsd.org; free
On 6/18/06, Dennis Olvany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I had a look at http://www.houfug.org/help/install_freebsd.htm and I am
afraid that you will find this article is not eligible for copyright. It
constitutes neither an artistic nor literary work. The article conveys
only facts and facts are no
proud of. Why steal other people's stuff?
On 6/18/06, David Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It'll certainly be less confusing that what HouFUG is publishing. They've
now noted on their site that it was written by you. However, they STILL
claim they own the copyright. H
It'll certainly be less confusing that what HouFUG is publishing. They've
now noted on their site that it was written by you. However, they STILL
claim they own the copyright. Have you waived any of your exclusive rights
to the work?
On 6/18/06, Brett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello
I hope
a URL to a DMCA
takedown notice hosted in his webspace. This is sufficient.
*It seems this David Hoffman is directly attacking our group. Because there
are no references to HOUFUG being a part of an organized group to adopt
English as the official language. HOUFUG does not have any political ties
-- Forwarded message --
From: David Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Jun 18, 2006 8:38 PM
Subject: Re: Serious breach of copyright -- First post
To: Brett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I think a formal apology should be issued by the infringers.
Hasn't this gone on long
* *It appears the page at
http://www.houfug.org/help/install_freebsd.htmconstitutes a serious
breach of copyright. The article, which was
originally written and posted to the Internet by the owner of the account
[EMAIL PROTECTED], is falsely attributed to the Houston FUG, whose members
maliciousl
12 matches
Mail list logo
