On 01/09/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you didn't instruct it to play a movie, why it does that?
You did: by putting the disc in.
Bad logic. Putting the disc in != requesting (or wanting) to play a movie.
How is that bad logic?
I may sometimes
want it mounted as /opt instead.
SVR4 cruftiness in BSD?! I'm shocked! :-P
___
freebsd-chat@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 01/09/06, Gilbert Fernandes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a dream.
A dream of unification.
Having one BSD. Merging the three projects and, why not, keeping
incompatible stuff as options that would be either one or another.
But when you tell yourself that it cannot be done, you don't
On 31/08/06, Rahul Siddharthan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/31/06, dereck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Linux] are copying known work, shooting for a target
that has already been hit.
Hit by Mac OS X, perhaps. Which I can't install on my
computer even if I wanted to: Apple won't let me. The
On 31/08/06, Paul Saab [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeff Rollin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
If Yahoo (to pick the one big vendor I remember making a big thing of
using
a BSD) don't reincorporate their changes, perhaps that's because the
license
allows them not to?
If you think that Yahoo! has
On 31/08/06, John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 31 August 2006 14:47, Jeff Rollin wrote:
On 31/08/06, Paul Saab [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeff Rollin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
If Yahoo (to pick the one big vendor I remember making a big thing
of
using
a BSD) don't
On 31/08/06, Gilles Gravier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andy Ruhl wrote:
The reason why apache and perl shouldn't be included is because they
are moving, 3rd party targets. They are better suited to pkgsrc.
And of course, GCC isn't... a moving 3rd party target?
Gilles.
Good point. It's
On 31/08/06, Andy Ruhl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/31/06, Charles M. Hannum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, defining (poorly) the OS to include so much else has been a
liability for NetBSD in many ways. It has massively slowed the adoption
of new software versions (e.g. GCC), for one.
On 01/09/06, Jeff Rollin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 01/09/06, Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
so, should I then switch to Linux because they do welcome
'vendor written drivers'?
If by 'vendor-written drivers' you mean binary-only drivers, then no, the
linux kernel developers
On 31/08/06, Charles M. Hannum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The NetBSD Project has stagnated to the point of irrelevance.
If true, unfortunate. A sad day.
Jeff.
___
freebsd-chat@freebsd.org mailing list
10 matches
Mail list logo
