Re: mail-usenet gateway / web-forum (was Re: FreeBSD's problems as seen by the BSDForen.de community)

2008-01-13 Thread Marc G. Fournier
lists through it is only the signal, no noise at all ... I'd definitely prefer to read freebsd.* newsgroups then deal with mailing lists ... - Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL

Re: The future of NetBSD

2006-09-09 Thread Marc G. Fournier
'jitter' ... :) Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664 ___ freebsd

Re: The future of NetBSD

2006-09-01 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Fri, 1 Sep 2006, Jeff Rollin wrote: On 01/09/06, Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: so, should I then switch to Linux because they do welcome 'vendor written drivers'? If by 'vendor-written drivers' you mean binary-only drivers, then no, the linux kernel developers emphatically

Re: The future of NetBSD

2006-08-31 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006, Harpalus a Como wrote: I'm just a lurker on the OpenBSD list, but I think Charles is right about Linux. The code is better then people give it credit for, and considering it's vast popularity and what all it's accomplished, the bazaar model has worked wonders. I'm not

Re: The future of NetBSD

2006-08-31 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Fri, 1 Sep 2006, Gilles Chehade wrote: Marc G. Fournier wrote: I doubt that'll be productive -- NetBSD, FreeBSD and OpenBSD have all different goals... Even at the kernel level? Look at device drivers and vendors as one example ... companies like adaptec have to write *one* device

Re: The future of NetBSD

2006-08-31 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006, Pedro Martelletto wrote: On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 06:50:00PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote: Even at the kernel level? Look at device drivers and vendors as one example ... companies like adaptec have to write *one* device driver, for, what, 50+ distributions of linux

Re: The future of NetBSD

2006-08-31 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006, Miod Vallat wrote: I'd rather have Adaptec provide a source code driver for their cards directly, then have Scott Long have to fight with unavailability of documentation itself ... if the driver works, what do we need documentation for? To fix the driver. If the vendor

Re: The future of NetBSD

2006-08-31 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006, Miod Vallat wrote: If the vendor is supporting the driver, and working with the community, then one would hope that they would also fix the driver as bug reports come in about it ... That's too many ifs to be realworld-compatible. And actually the only vendors I can

Re: The future of NetBSD

2006-08-31 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006, Jason Dixon wrote: If everyone had your attitude, there would be no *BSD. Settling for good enough means never making progress. Who ever said settling for good enough? I know I didn't ... if I settled for good enough, I would have stuck it out with Linux years ago

Re: The future of NetBSD

2006-08-31 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Fri, 1 Sep 2006, Gilles Chehade wrote: mmmh ... you've got a point ... you just opened my eyes ... documentation is pointless when I have a blackbox doing the work. Maybe I'm missing something, and if so, I do apologize to those on these lists that I may have offended ... but ... having

Re: The future of NetBSD

2006-08-31 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Thu, 1 Jan 1970, Gilles Chehade wrote: Marc G. Fournier wrote: On Fri, 1 Sep 2006, Gilles Chehade wrote: mmmh ... you've got a point ... you just opened my eyes ... documentation is pointless when I have a blackbox doing the work. Maybe I'm missing something, and if so, I do apologize

Re: The future of NetBSD

2006-08-31 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006, davide zanon wrote: The reason why merging is impossible or stupid has been said some million times... Different goals. I'm curious here, but why did the *kernel* diverge for each project? Like, I understand (or think I do) the philosophy of the OpenBSD project, and

Re: is FreeBSD popularity decreasing ??

2006-06-03 Thread Marc G. Fournier
/freebsd-chat To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664

Re: What ever happened to Terasolutions?

2006-04-20 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Thu, 20 Apr 2006, Francisco Reyes wrote: Marc G. Fournier writes: I'm running AMD64 on HP Proliant G4p server with Dual 64bit Xeon CPUs ... How much Ram Marc? 6G of RAM ... again, note that these are 64bit servers, and I believe these servers max out at 24G (6x4G DIMMs

Re: LOCALE, Ltd.?

2006-04-04 Thread Marc G. Fournier
be sexy to have. sexy locales never hurt, but locale bloat is distinctly spurious. The last I checked, the reason why PostgreSQL implimented UNICODE support was to avoid having to add every locale under the sun ... is there something UNICODE *doesn't* handle? Marc G. Fournier