At Sun, 6 Nov 2005 22:52:10 -0600,
Ben Kaduk wrote:
> lying around. I know that the darwin part of os X is based on FreeBSD, but
> is it close enough
> to justify putting "powered by FreeBSD" stickers on it? What do you all
> think?
>
> Ben Kaduk
Depends, but I think it's a grey area, but I think
>
> On 8/20/05, Gary W. Swearingen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Diane Bruce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > I personally can't be bothered wasting my time putting a bsd userland
> > > on top of a linux kernel, but I would like to see RMS scream. There goes
> > > his claim to "Gnu/linux",
At Sat, 20 Aug 2005 16:18:47 -0500,
Nikolas Britton wrote:
>
> On 8/20/05, Jeremy C. Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, 20 Aug 2005, Nikolas Britton wrote:
> >
> > > What defines Berkeley UNIX from SysV style UNIX and Linux?... What
> > > makes BSD BSD and SysV SysV. We have the lineage
At Sat, 20 Aug 2005 11:38:33 +0100,
Ross Kendall Axe wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Timothy Beyer wrote:
>
> > Actually I have followed tutorials for setting up pkgsrc on Slackware
> > in the past and I was quite happy with the syst
At Sat, 20 Aug 2005 09:32:55 +0100,
David Richards wrote:
>
> if you want a linux os that acts like freebsd, try debian or gentoo.
> They are as close as you are going to get with a freebsdlinux-os
I don't consider Gentoo to be very similar to FreeBSD. The
similarities are at best superficial.
> I am enjoying this thread ... but it kind of feels like watching a slow
> motion train wreck. :)
Couldn't have said it better myself... Emphasis on the "slow motion
train wreck"
--Tim
___
freebsd-chat@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.o
