Original Message
Subject: Re: GRSec is vital to Linux security
Date: 2019-01-24 16:25
From: Boris Lukashev
To: linuxgpl...@redchan.it
You've never heard of VMware, I take it? Its a proprietary half Linux
which beats GPL suits with strong arm tactics and technical
On 2019-01-24 15:31, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult wrote:
Do you have some actual proposals / patches ?
Sue Open Source Security / Bradly Spengler for copyright infringement.
Seek his profits as damages. I doubt you'll be able to get specific
performance since the GPL is not a contact in t
On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 22:28:45 +, linuxgpl...@redchan.it wrote:
>This man speaks the truth.
It doesn't matter, if it is the truth or not. Whining doesn't solve
anything. Security isn't mine concern. I'm using computers to make
music, this means that I need to use Linux to get rid of Apple issues
On Thu, 24 Jan 2019 03:01:49 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 22:28:45 +, linuxgpl...@redchan.it wrote:
>>This man speaks the truth.
>
>It doesn't matter, if it is the truth or not. Whining doesn't solve
>anything. Security isn't mine concern. I'm using computers to make
>music
On 2019-01-23 20:46, Ivan Ivanov wrote:
Interesting point of view. Well, to be honest it seems to me that
Linux kernel sacrifices the security for the sake of progress, so it
is quite bloated at the moment and I am not sure that even GRSecurity
could fix it. Linux really needs to stop adding new
There are two iron laws when it comes to the linux-kernel and it's
facing towards the larger world.
1) The grsecurity-pax patch is absolutely vital if one wishes to not be
hacked by chinese(TM). (And has been vital for the last 15+ years.)
2) GRSecurity is _blatantly_ violating the GPL by adding