On Sat, 2 Feb 2008, KAYVEN RIESE wrote:
On Fri, 1 Feb 2008, Brett Glass wrote:
At 07:19 PM 2/1/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been through many MA deals. MS will be able to successfully argue
that the MS+Yahoo! combo does not constitute a monopoly, since:
1) the share of search of the
On Fri, 1 Feb 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been through many MA deals. MS will be able to successfully argue
that the MS+Yahoo! combo does not constitute a monopoly, since:
1) the share of search of the combined companies does not equal that of
it's competitor, Google (source:
On Fri, 1 Feb 2008, Brett Glass wrote:
At 07:19 PM 2/1/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been through many MA deals. MS will be able to successfully argue
that the MS+Yahoo! combo does not constitute a monopoly, since:
1) the share of search of the combined companies does not equal that
On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 01:23:08PM +, Jayton Garnett wrote:
Hi,
Search for Microsoft Yahoo on Google ;-) and you will see MS offered
$44.6B :-o late yesterday after the big boss of Yahoo resigned.
The keyword is offered to buy, not bought for.
--
David Kelly N4HHE, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
since two or three minutes, Yahoo also has this news.
This does not reflect very well.
Erich
Jayton Garnett wrote:
Hi,
Search for Microsoft Yahoo on Google ;-) and you will see MS offered
$44.6B :-o late yesterday after the big boss of Yahoo resigned.
Jayton
On Feb 1, 2008 12:18 PM,
Hi,
Search for Microsoft Yahoo on Google ;-) and you will see MS offered
$44.6B :-o late yesterday after the big boss of Yahoo resigned.
Jayton
On Feb 1, 2008 12:18 PM, Erich Dollansky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I just heard rumours like this on German websites.
What impact could this
Hi,
KAYVEN RIESE wrote:
On Fri, 1 Feb 2008, Erich Dollansky wrote:
I just heard rumours like this on German websites.
What impact could this have to the FreeBSD project?
it was a news story on the san francisco news. they said
that a federal investigation was going to decide if there
were
On Feb 1, 2008, at 4:18 AM, Erich Dollansky wrote:
It could be anything from more support for FreeBSD to no support
from Yahoo's side at all anymore.
I like to think that MS learned their lesson on pulling FreeBSD from
production use when they bought Hotmail. Perhaps not.
Eat your own
Hi,
KAYVEN RIESE wrote:
On Sat, 2 Feb 2008, Erich Dollansky wrote:
KAYVEN RIESE wrote:
On Fri, 1 Feb 2008, Erich Dollansky wrote:
I just heard rumours like this on German websites.
What impact could this have to the FreeBSD project?
it was a news story on the san francisco news. they
umm.. Uncle Bill is the one doing the buying.. so.. umm.. i read that
as the courts viewing microsoft as becoming the monopoly.
google made a run for the desktop a while back, right? so google is
trying to compete with microsoft on a certain level. you can't exactly
call these things
Erich said:
I also wonder how Google earns so much monez with its search engine. Is
it just the adds? Is it reallz this simple?
On the other side, Google must be so much better than other search
engines to get so much more hits to earn money with this free service
via the adds.
The problem
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Erich said:
I also wonder how Google earns so much monez with its search engine. Is
it just the adds? Is it reallz this simple?
On the other side, Google must be so much better than other search
engines to get so much more hits to earn money with this free service
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Sat, 2 Feb 2008 12:23:36 +1100
Greg 'groggy' Lehey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday, 1 February 2008 at 16:58:31 -0800, johan beisser wrote:
[...]
Eat your own dogfood doesn't come pleasant when your dogfood is
crap.
Sure, but
Nikola Lečić wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Sat, 2 Feb 2008 12:23:36 +1100
Greg 'groggy' Lehey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday, 1 February 2008 at 16:58:31 -0800, johan beisser wrote:
[...]
Eat your own dogfood doesn't come pleasant when your dogfood is
At 07:19 PM 2/1/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been through many MA deals. MS will be able to successfully argue
that the MS+Yahoo! combo does not constitute a monopoly, since:
1) the share of search of the combined companies does not equal that of
it's competitor, Google (source:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 22:48:54 -0500
Dan Langille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nikola Lečić wrote:
Whatever be the case, I've always been wondering why people say that
Yahoo! is a supporter of FreeBSD. Maybe someone can explain this,
but what
16 matches
Mail list logo