-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Murray Stokely wrote:
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Chuck Robey chu...@telenix.org wrote:
You said that most written things are hierarchical. Sorry, I strongly
disagree,
I disagree also. Nobody on this thread said that except you. Your
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Chuck Robey chu...@telenix.org wrote:
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Chuck Robey chu...@telenix.org wrote:
You said that most written things are hierarchical. Sorry, I strongly
disagree,
I disagree also. Nobody on this thread said that except you. Your
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Murray Stokely wrote:
Yea, that is a good point. The one last thing I meant to add was that
in general I think we have plenty of people in the doc project that
can work to render the documentation and work on the stylesheets and
presentation and
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Chuck Robey chu...@telenix.org wrote:
You said that most written things are hierarchical. Sorry, I strongly
disagree,
I disagree also. Nobody on this thread said that except you. Your
entire response is based on this significant mis-quote.
What I did say,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Just felt like venting my own opinions on what's the current best toolset for
writing documents. I think that this opinion isn't a popular one, but that's
what this list is for. I'll give you all of my reasons, so at least you'll know
what to argue
Yea, that is a good point. The one last thing I meant to add was that
in general I think we have plenty of people in the doc project that
can work to render the documentation and work on the stylesheets and
presentation and such. What we really need is simply more authors.
Text can be submitted
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 01:53:38PM -0800, Murray Stokely wrote:
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Chuck Robey chu...@telenix.org wrote:
big snip
Another advantage of XML is greater familiarity with the toolset
amongst the target authorship.
I dare say a number of people have tackled the
