dual boot problems

1999-01-20 Thread David Green-Seed
Here's my problem: at 10:21pm PST (Jan 19th 1998) I cvsupped world, rebuilt, installed the new boot blocks, and did a first-time install of an ELF kernel. Unfortunately, I'm dual-booting with windows 95 using fbsdboot.exe - which I just discovered does not work with an ELF kernel. Has anyone

Re: dual boot problems

1999-01-20 Thread Robert Nordier
David Green-Seed wrote: Here's my problem: at 10:21pm PST (Jan 19th 1998) I cvsupped world, rebuilt, installed the new boot blocks, and did a first-time install of an ELF kernel. Unfortunately, I'm dual-booting with windows 95 using fbsdboot.exe - which I just discovered does not work

RE: Directory structure on current.freebsd.org

1999-01-20 Thread paul
-Original Message- From: Peter Jeremy [mailto:peter.jer...@auss2.alcatel.com.au] Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 1999 6:21 AM To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Directory structure on current.freebsd.org Oliver Fromme o...@dorifer.heim3.tu-clausthal.de wrote: In

RE: KLD naming

1999-01-20 Thread paul
-Original Message- From: Archie Cobbs [mailto:arc...@whistle.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 1999 6:13 AM To: d...@nlsystems.com Cc: gelde...@mediaport.org; curr...@freebsd.org Subject: Re: KLD naming Doug Rabson writes: Might it be a good idea to choose a consistent naming

Re: KLD naming

1999-01-20 Thread Jeroen C. van Gelderen
From: Archie Cobbs arc...@whistle.com Doug Rabson writes: Might it be a good idea to choose a consistent naming scheme for the modules? I'd think so because it would help blind loading at the boot prompt. If you choose names it the following format: type_name saver_warp saver_daemon

src/games turds after make buildworld

1999-01-20 Thread Sheldon Hearn
Hi folks, I'm finding turds in src/games/{advanture,hack,phantasia}/ and would like to prevent buildworld from producing them. Looks to me as though the turds are produced by a broken build-tools rule in their Makefiles. Anyone know wtf these games contribute to buildworld's bootstrapping? :-)

Re: panic: vinvalbuf: dirty bufs (during reboot, several times)

1999-01-20 Thread Bjoern Fischer
On Tue, Jan 19, 1999 at 11:00:55PM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote: [...] ::But there's still something wrong: When shutting down the server ::it still sometimes panics in vinvalbuf() complaining 'bout dirty ::pages. On the client side vi dies of SEGV (edited file and ::/var/tmp/vi.recover on nfs

Re: Booting -current with new loader

1999-01-20 Thread John Saunders
The next option is configuring my master drive on the secondary interface as wd1 instead of wd2. This works fine. I guess the real solution is to make the IDE disk scan the same as we do for SCSI, which also happens to be the same as the BIOS does. We possible need a config syntax like

/etc/nsswitch.conf

1999-01-20 Thread Mike Nguyen
I noticed that NetBSD is switching over to using /etc/nsswitch.conf (like Slowlaris, PH-UX, etc.). Would it be a good idea to do this for FreeBSD too (when I first started using FreeBSD, it took me a long time to figure out the analogous file for hostname lookups was /etc/host.conf) -- it seems

Re: HEADS UP: another syscons update

1999-01-20 Thread John Polstra
In article 199901191140.uaa23...@zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp, Kazutaka YOKOTA yok...@zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp wrote: I have committed another syscons update. Because one new file has been added to the source tree, and one file has changed location, I have to ask you to run config()

Re: HEADS UP: another syscons update

1999-01-20 Thread Sheldon Hearn
On Wed, 20 Jan 1999 07:21:23 PST, John Polstra wrote: Is make clean really necessary? A make depend ought to be sufficient, I would think. I think that's an attempt to protect people who've upgraded from STABLE and haven't gotten used to ``config -r''? Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send

Re: HEADS UP: another syscons update

1999-01-20 Thread Peter Wemm
Sheldon Hearn wrote: On Wed, 20 Jan 1999 07:21:23 PST, John Polstra wrote: Is make clean really necessary? A make depend ought to be sufficient, I would think. I think that's an attempt to protect people who've upgraded from STABLE and haven't gotten used to ``config -r''? config

Re: HEADS UP: another syscons update

1999-01-20 Thread Sheldon Hearn
On Thu, 21 Jan 1999 00:29:54 +0800, Peter Wemm wrote: 'make depend' really does work, and is quite safe. Cleaning the tree should be a very rare requirement. Perhaps the chap sitting next to me and I are just unlucky. Between the two of us, we've needed to use ``config -r'' three times

Re: HEADS UP: another syscons update

1999-01-20 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Peter Wemm pe...@netplex.com.au writes: config -r? I'd be highly suprised if this was needed at all for 99% of the time. The only time that I've been aware of it being needed was quite some time ago when there was an option that got removed - if people were using it, that option wouldn't

Re: /etc/nsswitch.conf

1999-01-20 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Mike Nguyen mikengu...@sprintmail.com writes: I noticed that NetBSD is switching over to using /etc/nsswitch.conf (like Slowlaris, PH-UX, etc.). Would it be a good idea to do this for FreeBSD too (when I first started using FreeBSD, it took me a long time to figure out the analogous file for

Re: HEADS UP: another syscons update

1999-01-20 Thread Peter Wemm
Sheldon Hearn wrote: On Thu, 21 Jan 1999 00:29:54 +0800, Peter Wemm wrote: 'make depend' really does work, and is quite safe. Cleaning the tree should be a very rare requirement. Perhaps the chap sitting next to me and I are just unlucky. Between the two of us, we've needed to use

Re: Directory structure on current.freebsd.org

1999-01-20 Thread Wilko Bulte
As p...@originative.co.uk wrote... -Original Message- From: Peter Jeremy [mailto:peter.jer...@auss2.alcatel.com.au] Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 1999 6:21 AM To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Directory structure on current.freebsd.org Oliver Fromme

Re: HEADS UP: another syscons update

1999-01-20 Thread Sheldon Hearn
On Thu, 21 Jan 1999 01:03:21 +0800, Peter Wemm wrote: The first machine has been doing 'config -n' since 1996 Don't get me wrong, config _usually_ works for us without ``-r''. But we got bitten once or twice and have since opted for ``config -r'', since that's what fixed things for us when we

Re: /etc/nsswitch.conf

1999-01-20 Thread Chris Tubutis
Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: Mike Nguyen mikengu...@sprintmail.com writes: I noticed that NetBSD is switching over to using /etc/nsswitch.conf (like Slowlaris, PH-UX, etc.). Would it be a good idea to do this for FreeBSD too (when I first started using FreeBSD, it took me a long time to

Cosmetic issues with ISDN startup

1999-01-20 Thread Blaz Zupan
I am experiencing two rather cosmetic issues with how the ISDN subsystem starts up. The first is, that when you enable isdnd, syslogd is not yet running. So isdnd outputs a whole lot of garbage (basically the whole configuration) to the console. This patch to /usr/src/usr.sbin/i4b/isdnd/log.c

Re: panic: vinvalbuf: dirty bufs (during reboot, several times)

1999-01-20 Thread Andreas Klemm
On Tue, Jan 19, 1999 at 11:00:55PM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote: Hmm. Interesting, it's dying trying to fsync an FFS vnode. Are you by any chance running NFS ( client *or* server ) on this box? No, no NFS compiled in and am not using it. See my kernel config. First, if either

Re: HEADS UP: another syscons update

1999-01-20 Thread John Hay
Is make clean really necessary? A make depend ought to be sufficient, I would think. I think that's an attempt to protect people who've upgraded from STABLE and haven't gotten used to ``config -r''? config -r? I'd be highly suprised if this was needed at all for 99% of the

Re: panic: vinvalbuf: dirty bufs (during reboot, several times)

1999-01-20 Thread Matthew Dillon
:ok, here are some instructions which -- I hope -- reproduce it :(I haven't found a *nice* way; this is the ridiculous way): : :NFS server and client are completely 3.0-CURRENT :(of CTM src-cur.3712.gz) with Luoqi's NFS fix. The server has all :(physical) file systems mounted with softupdates

Re: panic: vinvalbuf: dirty bufs (during reboot, several times)

1999-01-20 Thread Matthew Dillon
Try this. In nfs_bioread(), nfs/nfs_bio.c: Before, it was: if (getpages !(bp-b_flags B_VMIO)) { #ifdef DIAGNOSTIC printf(nfs_bioread: non vmio buf found, discarding\n); Try changin the if() to this: if (

Re: KLD naming

1999-01-20 Thread Mike Smith
When I first started writing KLD, I had a vague notion that there would be a simple directory structure under /modules, e.g.: /modules pci/ ncr.ko ... isa/

Re: panic: vinvalbuf: dirty bufs (during reboot, several times)

1999-01-20 Thread Matthew Dillon
(This is mainly for Luoqi, John, or David, or anyone who understands struct buf's and NFS). I see some other weirdness in bread() relating to NFS as well. int bread(struct vnode * vp, daddr_t blkno, int size, struct ucred * cred, struct buf ** bpp) { struct buf *bp;

Re: Booting -current with new loader

1999-01-20 Thread Mike Smith
I'm not sure about anybody else here, but to my mind a Winblows on C: drive and let's try out FreeBSD on the second disk configuration should really be supported seamlessly. You're more than welcome to propose a technical solution that solves the problem. The option of putting the second

Re: KLD naming

1999-01-20 Thread Archie Cobbs
Mike Smith writes: When I first started writing KLD, I had a vague notion that there would be a simple directory structure under /modules, e.g.: /modules pci/ ncr.ko ... isa/

Re: /etc/nsswitch.conf

1999-01-20 Thread Chris Csanady
I noticed that NetBSD is switching over to using /etc/nsswitch.conf (like Slowlaris, PH-UX, etc.). Would it be a good idea to do this for FreeBSD too (when I first started using FreeBSD, it took me a long time to figure out the analogous file for hostname lookups was /etc/host.conf) -- it seems

New tag for -STABLE?

1999-01-20 Thread oZZ!!!
Hello! What is new tag for -STABLE? RELENG_3_1 ? Rgdz, Осокин Сергей aka oZZ, o...@etrust.ru To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Truth to M_WAITOK?

1999-01-20 Thread Brian Feldman
Would someone PLEASE tell us all if malloc can really return NULL now with flags M_WAITOK? I've gotten contradictory answers... Brian Feldman_ __ ___ ___ ___ gr...@unixhelp.org _ __ ___ | _ ) __| \

Re: Truth to M_WAITOK?

1999-01-20 Thread Mike Smith
Would someone PLEASE tell us all if malloc can really return NULL now with flags M_WAITOK? I've gotten contradictory answers... I went back and looked at the code again. It looks like M_WAITOK will either return non-NULL or panic; it shouldn't be capable of returning NULL. Ideally, it

Re: KLD naming

1999-01-20 Thread Mike Smith
[KLD module file locations] I was just pointing out that having things in subdirectories is better than having a zillion files piled into a single directory. I'm torn between agreeing that it's tidier and disagreeing on the grounds that it's much more of a pain to administer. Where is that

Re: Truth to M_WAITOK?

1999-01-20 Thread Bruce Evans
It looks like M_WAITOK will either return non-NULL or panic; it shouldn't be capable of returning NULL. Ideally, it shouldn't panic either (why is it only that M_WAITOK can panic, and M_NOWAIT can't?). Because failures for M_NOWAIT are normal (all pages may be in use, and the caller is not

Re: Truth to M_WAITOK?

1999-01-20 Thread Mike Smith
It looks like M_WAITOK will either return non-NULL or panic; it shouldn't be capable of returning NULL. Ideally, it shouldn't panic either (why is it only that M_WAITOK can panic, and M_NOWAIT can't?). Because failures for M_NOWAIT are normal (all pages may be in use, and the caller is

Re: KLD naming

1999-01-20 Thread Andrzej Bialecki
On Wed, 20 Jan 1999, Archie Cobbs wrote: I like this idea (subdirectories) better.. it will last longer :-) It's a really bad idea, because it requires you to classify things. It also makes it much harder to administer. In addition, classifications are bad (witness the need to

Re: Truth to M_WAITOK?

1999-01-20 Thread Bruce Evans
Bear with the ignorance a moment; how is a full map any different to no more kmem space? I'd call them the same. The map is kmem_map for malloc(), and running out of space in that map is fatal. When the map fills up, it is usually not really full, it is just so fragmented that contiguous space

Re: Truth to M_WAITOK?

1999-01-20 Thread Dan Swartzendruber
At 03:46 PM 1/20/99 -0800, Mike Smith wrote: It looks like M_WAITOK will either return non-NULL or panic; it shouldn't be capable of returning NULL. Ideally, it shouldn't panic either (why is it only that M_WAITOK can panic, and M_NOWAIT can't?). Because failures for M_NOWAIT are normal

Re: Booting -current with new loader

1999-01-20 Thread John Saunders
On Wed, 20 Jan 1999, Mike Smith wrote: The option of putting the second drive as slave on the primary interface would work, however anybody that knows anything about IDE (read somebdy interested in trying FreeBSD) would put it on the second interface for speed reasons. Er, you want to

Experiences with aout-to-elf and new bootblocks

1999-01-20 Thread Peter Jeremy
I have been experimenting with moving a 2.2.6-RELEASE system to 3.0 (-current for now, but probably moving towards -stable). Not wanting to totally trash my current system until I have the new one working, I've been building 3.0 on a second disk [mounted as /3.0 on my 2.x system]. I'm using CTM

boot.flp versions

1999-01-20 Thread Richard J. Dawes
Hello! The boot.flp in 3.0.0-19990112-SNAP/floppies is 2880K, which of course won't work. [I think this was acknowledged earlier by JKH, but has gone unfixed.] I'm wondering if an earlier boot.flp, say from the 1/6/99 SNAP, will work just the same? Thanks. --Rich To Unsubscribe: send mail

RE: boot.flp versions

1999-01-20 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On 21-Jan-99 Richard J. Dawes wrote: The boot.flp in 3.0.0-19990112-SNAP/floppies is 2880K, which of course won't work. [I think this was acknowledged earlier by JKH, but has gone unfixed.] I'm wondering if an earlier boot.flp, say from the 1/6/99 SNAP, will work just the same? Thanks.

Re: KLD naming

1999-01-20 Thread Archie Cobbs
Mike Smith writes: A single directory holding module files. Blech :-) Put aside the aesthetics for a moment, and try to raise some real, practical objections. I'm continually battling my own temptation to make the whole module thing more complex, but if you've got really good

Re: panic: vinvalbuf: dirty bufs (during reboot, several times)

1999-01-20 Thread Greg Lehey
On Wednesday, 20 January 1999 at 19:33:54 +0100, Andreas Klemm wrote: On Tue, Jan 19, 1999 at 11:00:55PM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote: Hmm. Interesting, it's dying trying to fsync an FFS vnode. Are you by any chance running NFS ( client *or* server ) on this box? No, no NFS

RE: boot.flp versions

1999-01-20 Thread Matt Behrens
From 19990112? I had no such problems on three different systems. (System #3 had a lot of other unrelated problems, like a loose ethernet cable and mislabelled jumpers on drives, but none of them were 19990112-related.) :) On Thu, 21 Jan 1999, Daniel O'Connor wrote: : On 21-Jan-99 Richard J.

Re: boot.flp versions

1999-01-20 Thread Mike Smith
Hello! The boot.flp in 3.0.0-19990112-SNAP/floppies is 2880K, which of course won't work. [I think this was acknowledged earlier by JKH, but has gone unfixed.] I'm wondering if an earlier boot.flp, say from the 1/6/99 SNAP, will work just the same? Thanks. Use the two-floppy install

Re: /etc/nsswitch.conf

1999-01-20 Thread Joerg B. Micheel
On Wed, Jan 20, 1999 at 05:58:01PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: Mike Nguyen mikengu...@sprintmail.com writes: I noticed that NetBSD is switching over to using /etc/nsswitch.conf (like Slowlaris, PH-UX, etc.). Would it be a good idea to do this for FreeBSD too (when I first started

Re: boot.flp versions

1999-01-20 Thread David Wolfskill
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 1999 17:50:58 -0800 (PST) From: Richard J. Dawes rjda...@physics.ucsd.edu The boot.flp in 3.0.0-19990112-SNAP/floppies is 2880K, which of course won't work. [I think this was acknowledged earlier by JKH, but has gone unfixed.] I'm wondering if an earlier boot.flp, say from the

Re: boot.flp versions

1999-01-20 Thread Jordan K. Hubbard
All: Sorry the boot.flp has been broken for this long, but I've had other distractions lately. I will make it work once more, somehow or other, and just keep your eyes on current.freebsd.org over the next few days. When it returns to 1.44MB in size again, give it a try. :) - Jordan To

Re: KLD naming

1999-01-20 Thread Zach Heilig
On Wed, Jan 20, 1999 at 03:36:14PM -0800, Mike Smith wrote: [KLD module file locations] I was just pointing out that having things in subdirectories is better than having a zillion files piled into a single directory. I'm torn between agreeing that it's tidier and disagreeing on the

RE: boot.flp versions

1999-01-20 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On 21-Jan-99 Matt Behrens wrote: From 19990112? I had no such problems on three different systems. Hmm.. OK.. Maybe pilot error :) --- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them

Re: make release produces unbootable boot floppies, no boot loader, no /kernel

1999-01-20 Thread John W. DeBoskey
Well, FWIW, I've been modifying my local 'make release' to produce a 2.88M boot floppy, which I then use as the boot image when I burn a CD of the SNAP. Works like a champ. Thus, the isofs creation is a straight run of the code in examples/worm and cdrecord: sh

FreeBSD include paths

1999-01-20 Thread Marco van Hylckama Vlieg
Hello all, I got a nagging question... Very often when trying to compile packages I find myself editing makefiles and having to add really obvious include paths like /usr/local/include or /usr/X11R6/include in order to get the package installed. Now I wonder, why doesn't the system itself have

Re: make release produces unbootable boot floppies, no boot loader, no /kernel

1999-01-20 Thread Mike Smith
If I hop on my soapbox, I'd really like to see a single floppy network install which supports nfs(which I also re-enable on the normal boot.flp since it fits on the 2.88M image). The problem is that there are too many people standing on too many different soapboxes. Each and every one of

Re: FreeBSD include paths

1999-01-20 Thread Mike Smith
Hello all, I got a nagging question... Very often when trying to compile packages I find myself editing makefiles and having to add really obvious include paths like /usr/local/include or /usr/X11R6/include in order to get the package installed. Now I wonder, why doesn't the system itself

RE: boot.flp versions

1999-01-20 Thread Neal Westfall
I installed the 19990112 snap late last night with no problems using the 2 disk install. Worked great. Its now been upgraded to current. On Thu, 21 Jan 1999, Daniel O'Connor wrote: The boot.flp is broken.. Try the 2 disk install (ie kern.flp and mfsroot.flp) They boot, but when I got some

Re: boot.flp versions

1999-01-20 Thread David O'Brien
I'm wondering if an earlier boot.flp, say from the 1/6/99 SNAP, will work just the same? Thanks. Normally, a boot.flp of about the same time will work fine. You just need to go into the Options and change the release name string. The 1/6/99 boot.flp is broken. /boot/* can't be found. This

Re: KLD naming

1999-01-20 Thread David O'Brien
Perhaps something more along the lines of: /modules- empty, except for directories /console- console related modules blank_saver.ko, daemon_saver.ko, fade_saver.ko, green_saver.ko, Gross. What is wrong with: saver_*.ko device_*.ko linux_*.ko

HEADS UP: New version of Vinum

1999-01-20 Thread Greg Lehey
I've just committed a new version of Vinum with a large number of changes. It works fine here, much better than the old version, but there's just a possibility that things may go wrong. If you have trouble, please let me know immediately. One way you can shoot yourself in the foot: the `read'

ELF kernel make problem

1999-01-20 Thread Owen Barnett
I recently used make world to update make system to ELF. The make world finished successfully everything appears to function correctly except when I try to recompile my kernel. make depend works but once I get to 'make' it will compile for a while then stop when it gets to db_aout.o and say Not

Re: ELF kernel make problem

1999-01-20 Thread Kenneth Wayne Culver
I recently used make world to update make system to ELF. The make world finished successfully everything appears to function correctly except when I try to recompile my kernel. make depend works but once I get to 'make' it will compile for a while then stop when it gets to db_aout.o and

Re: KLD naming

1999-01-20 Thread Christian Kuhtz
Why not just follow the directory structure under /sys? Afterall, we are talking about kernel stuff here. On Wed, Jan 20, 1999 at 10:58:13AM -, p...@originative.co.uk wrote: [..] I don't think subdirectories based on bus type is a good idea, it doesn't really fit the granularity we're

make: don't know how to make vinumdaemon.c. Stop

1999-01-20 Thread Mike Tancsa
Am I the only one seeing this ? Current as a few hrs ago... /usr/src/sys/modules/mfs/../../ufs/mfs/mfs_vfsops.c:68: warning: `mfs_rootsize' defined but not used /usr/src/sys/modules/vinum/../../dev/vinum/vinum.c:324: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type

Re: KLD naming

1999-01-20 Thread Christian Kuhtz
On Wed, Jan 20, 1999 at 07:19:15PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote: [..] etc? This is what the original poster suggested, and nobody has really given a good response what is wrong with the grouping being expressed in the modules' name. Mike Smith and Andrzej Bialecki have given good reasons why

Re: make: don't know how to make vinumdaemon.c. Stop

1999-01-20 Thread Greg Lehey
On Wednesday, 20 January 1999 at 23:15:15 -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote: Am I the only one seeing this ? Yes, I think so. Current as a few hrs ago... /usr/src/sys/modules/mfs/../../ufs/mfs/mfs_vfsops.c:68: warning: `mfs_rootsize' defined but not used

Re: make: don't know how to make vinumdaemon.c. Stop

1999-01-20 Thread Mike Tancsa
At 02:51 PM 1/21/99 +1030, Greg Lehey wrote: On Wednesday, 20 January 1999 at 23:15:15 -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote: Am I the only one seeing this ? Yes, I think so. I would guess that you cvsupped in the window between 16:25:48 PST, when I committed the new Makefile, and 16:31:31 PST, when I

Re: make: don't know how to make vinumdaemon.c. Stop

1999-01-20 Thread Greg Lehey
On Wednesday, 20 January 1999 at 23:34:52 -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote: At 02:51 PM 1/21/99 +1030, Greg Lehey wrote: On Wednesday, 20 January 1999 at 23:15:15 -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote: Am I the only one seeing this ? Yes, I think so. I would guess that you cvsupped in the window between

Re: KLD naming

1999-01-20 Thread Robert Watson
On Wed, 20 Jan 1999, Mike Smith wrote: I was just pointing out that having things in subdirectories is better than having a zillion files piled into a single directory. I'm torn between agreeing that it's tidier and disagreeing on the grounds that it's much more of a pain to administer.

Heads up! New swapper and VM changes being committed to -4.x tonight.

1999-01-20 Thread Matthew Dillon
The new swapper and a bunch of VM stuff I've been sitting on is going to be committed into the new -current tree tonight. These changes also include the most recent NFS fix ( of two.. the one prior to this one has already been committed ). This fix and numerous other minor

Re: boot.flp versions

1999-01-20 Thread W Gerald Hicks
[snips] As to whether a boot.flp from an earlier SNAP will work just the same, I don't know. Cheers, david -- David Wolfskill UNIX System Administrator d...@whistle.com voice: (650) 577-7158 pager: (650) 371-4621 I used a 3.0-RELEASE boot.flp to load a

Re: make release produces unbootable boot floppies, no boot loader, no /kernel

1999-01-20 Thread John W. DeBoskey
hi, Hang on a second... I think you might be putting words in my mouth... I'm not saying that the nfs boot floppy is the One True Boot Floppy. I see no reason why we can't have a netboot.flp and a dskboot.flp created. If you really want to make things easier for the beginner, why not

Re: KLD naming

1999-01-20 Thread Mike Smith
On Wed, Jan 20, 1999 at 07:19:15PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote: [..] etc? This is what the original poster suggested, and nobody has really given a good response what is wrong with the grouping being expressed in the modules' name. Mike Smith and Andrzej Bialecki have given good reasons

Re: KLD naming

1999-01-20 Thread Jordan K. Hubbard
I guess it depends on how fancy we want to get. Here are some examples that I've been rolling around; some are fanciful, some practical) dev_generic device (eg. dev_sio) bus_bus support (eg. bus_pci) netif_ network interface (eg.

Re: C++ compliler unable to produce excutables

1999-01-20 Thread root
Do you have egcs or gcc-2.8 or anything else installaed that installs /usr/local/bin/g++? yes, that's the one I really recently installed I was suspecious about it, but now you confirmed it. Such extra compilers from ports tend to break. Make sure you use /usr/bin/g++. Thanks -- -

Re: make release produces unbootable boot floppies, no boot loader, no /kernel

1999-01-20 Thread Mike Smith
Hang on a second... I think you might be putting words in my mouth... I'm not saying that the nfs boot floppy is the One True Boot Floppy. I see no reason why we can't have a netboot.flp and a dskboot.flp created. The slicing that's being contemplated at the moment is actually install

Re: panic: vinvalbuf: dirty bufs (during reboot, several times)

1999-01-20 Thread Andreas Klemm
On Thu, Jan 21, 1999 at 12:09:00PM +1030, Greg Lehey wrote: On Wednesday, 20 January 1999 at 19:33:54 +0100, Andreas Klemm wrote: On Tue, Jan 19, 1999 at 11:00:55PM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote: Hmm. Interesting, it's dying trying to fsync an FFS vnode. Are you by any chance

Re: panic: vinvalbuf: dirty bufs (during reboot, several times)

1999-01-20 Thread Greg Lehey
On Thursday, 21 January 1999 at 7:19:39 +0100, Andreas Klemm wrote: On Thu, Jan 21, 1999 at 12:09:00PM +1030, Greg Lehey wrote: On Wednesday, 20 January 1999 at 19:33:54 +0100, Andreas Klemm wrote: On Tue, Jan 19, 1999 at 11:00:55PM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote: Hmm. Interesting, it's

Re: panic: vinvalbuf: dirty bufs (during reboot, several times)

1999-01-20 Thread Matthew Dillon
:Sorry, Matt, the patch in my previous email was fatally flawed. Try this one :below. The two printf() messages don't necessarily come out in pairs and :it's not just NFS bufs' B_CACHE bits are cleared, so my comment about :vm_page_is_valid() check in my previous message was wrong and the check is

Re: panic: vinvalbuf: dirty bufs (during reboot, several times)

1999-01-20 Thread Greg Lehey
On Wednesday, 20 January 1999 at 23:00:34 -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote: Sorry, Matt, the patch in my previous email was fatally flawed. Try this one below. The two printf() messages don't necessarily come out in pairs and it's not just NFS bufs' B_CACHE bits are cleared, so my comment about

Re: Booting -current with new loader

1999-01-20 Thread Mike Smith
I'm not sure about anybody else here, but to my mind a Winblows on C: drive and let's try out FreeBSD on the second disk configuration should really be supported seamlessly. You're more than welcome to propose a technical solution that solves the problem. OK, the technical

Re: panic: vinvalbuf: dirty bufs (during reboot, several times)

1999-01-20 Thread Matthew Dillon
:... : having to check for B_DELWRI in bread(), breadn(), and nfs_bioread() : by forcing getblk() to handle the B_DELWRI condition. : : Cool. I'll replace my nfs_bioread() patch with this one and test it : before committing all this stuff to the -4.x branch ( which I will also :

some guidance on forked cvsup please

1999-01-20 Thread Gregory Bond
Now we've gone and got forked, can someone please give us examples of cvsup files for those that want to follow 4-current and those that want to follow 3-stable. Thanks! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: panic: vinvalbuf: dirty bufs (during reboot, several times)

1999-01-20 Thread Matthew Dillon
:I said :Ah, excellent. If my tests of Luoqi's fix work, I'll commit it as :part of my big VM commit to -4.x, and also commit this and a few :other simple VM bug fixes to -3.x. Oops, there is still something broken. I think getblk() needs to be reorganized completely,

Re: some guidance on forked cvsup please

1999-01-20 Thread Matthew Dillon
:Now we've gone and got forked, can someone please give us examples of cvsup :files for those that want to follow 4-current and those that want to follow :3-stable. : :Thanks! It's real simple. The -stable is the 3.x branch. This is the branch that Jordan just created tonight. So,