On Sun, 2 Jan 2000, Jun Kuriyama wrote:
!>
!>I don't know what I did at that time, but my box is panic'ed with this
!>message.
!>
!>-
!>Jan 1 16:19:21 leda kernel: panic: sbflush: cc 0 || mb 0xc05a7400 || mbcnt 256
!>-
!>
!>It seems that this message is created by sbflush() in
!>kern/
I don't know what I did at that time, but my box is panic'ed with this
message.
-
Jan 1 16:19:21 leda kernel: panic: sbflush: cc 0 || mb 0xc05a7400 || mbcnt 256
-
It seems that this message is created by sbflush() in
kern/uipc_socket2.c.
Should I add some hooks into this function to
> "Leif" == Leif Neland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> The reason for this is that some gcc optimizations stages takes
>> exponentially more memory when compiling big functions.
>> bison produces one big function for the grammar parsing and its
>> this that takes a long time to compile; To c
On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 01:41:08AM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Rodney W. Grimes" writes
> :
>
> >Does it help in the 3.4-stable version to set the second value in ntpdrift
> >to 1?
>
> Yes, although I have never checked all the boundary conditions
> to make
On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 01:31:25AM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Karl Denninger writes:
>
> >Yes, and my driftfile had that parameter in there. Uhm, Poul, remember I've
> >been at this for just a LITTLE while. Xntpd is something I had deployed
> >back in my *
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Rodney W. Grimes" writes
> :
>
> >Does it help in the 3.4-stable version to set the second value in ntpdrift
> >to 1?
>
> Yes, although I have never checked all the boundary conditions
> to make sure the kernel-pll is stable over the entire envelope.
>
> I'm d
According to Poul-Henning Kamp:
> Hm, I actually thought I managed to get somebody to solve that somehow,
> maybe I didn't quite succeed :-)
I tried to get that patch in but Harlan didn't liked it...
--
Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD keltia.freenix
Hi,
On a FreeBSD 4.0-19991223-SNAP system...
I just ran into a situation that caused me to have to reboot
the machine before understanding what had really happenned...
The problems comes down to:
kern.maxfiles: 4136
kern.maxfilesperproc: 4136
Thus, because I had a root uid server
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Rodney W. Grimes" writes
:
>Does it help in the 3.4-stable version to set the second value in ntpdrift
>to 1?
Yes, although I have never checked all the boundary conditions
to make sure the kernel-pll is stable over the entire envelope.
I'm doing that for the NT
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Karl Denninger writes:
>Yes, and my driftfile had that parameter in there. Uhm, Poul, remember I've
>been at this for just a LITTLE while. Xntpd is something I had deployed
>back in my *Sun* days (back when FreeBSD was, well, non-existent)
Karl, remember who was
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Karl Denninger writes:
> >On Sat, Jan 01, 2000 at 11:11:51AM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> >> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Karl Denninger writes:
> >>
> >> >This is not a port, its part of the RELEASE!
> >> >
> >> >Its several YEARS old, and doesn't work r
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Karl Denninger writes:
>> >options "P1003_1B"
>> >options "_KPOSIX_PRIORITY_SCHEDULING"
>> >options "_KPOSIX_VERSION=199309L"
>> >
>> >Current versions of ntpd use these features if they're available. I
>> >think "_KPOSIX_VERSION=199309L"
On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 01:15:13AM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Karl Denninger writes:
> >On Sat, Jan 01, 2000 at 11:11:51AM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> >> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Karl Denninger writes:
> >>
> >> >This is not a port, its part of
On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 01:17:15AM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, John Polstra writes:
> >In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> >Karl Denninger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> It looks like ntpd (the new one) works correctly; I grabbed the latest
> >> from the
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, John Polstra writes:
>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>Karl Denninger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> It looks like ntpd (the new one) works correctly; I grabbed the latest
>> from the official site last night and by this morning the dispersion
>> and offsets we
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Karl Denninger writes:
>On Sat, Jan 01, 2000 at 11:11:51AM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Karl Denninger writes:
>>
>> >This is not a port, its part of the RELEASE!
>> >
>> >Its several YEARS old, and doesn't work right - you get
I wrote:
>Last time I checked (I haven't moved to the latest gcc, so I can't
>confirm it there), one significant difference between 'cc -E' and
>/usr/libexec/cpp was that the latter would read from a pipe, whilst
>the former wouldn't.
It seems I was wrong. As several people have pointed out, bot
> The reason for this is that some gcc optimizations stages takes
> exponentially more memory when compiling big functions.
> bison produces one big function for the grammar parsing and its
> this that takes a long time to compile; To compile sql_yacc.cc quickly
> on Intel, you nead at least 160M
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Karl Denninger writes:
>This is not a port, its part of the RELEASE!
>
>Its several YEARS old, and doesn't work right - you get lots of STEP changes
>instead of what you SHOULD get, which is a slew on the system clock.
Remember to get the kernel code involved. To
On Fri, Dec 31, 1999 at 01:45:31AM -0500, a little birdie told me
that Brian Fundakowski Feldman remarked
> The way certain devices, like cd with its monotonically increasing counter
> where devices are probed in order and assigned device based on precedence
> and not hardwiring/controller connect
Hi all,
on two 4.0-CURRENT boxes (cvsuped today) I got the following response when
trying to rlogin to it:
# rlogin indiana
assword:
A typed-in password is echoed in cleartext.
The only thing that helps is to comment out the second-last line in
/etc/pam.conf:
# other authrequired
On Fri, Dec 31, 1999 at 03:15:02PM -0500, Chuck Robey wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Dec 1999, Wilko Bulte wrote:
>
> > > > Why are "certain" devices wildly different than all other ones? I've
> > > > never encountered that kind of syntax before, and I can't see that it's
> > > > documented anywhere at all
Well folks, Happy New Years... :-)
It looks like 'make world && make release' run ok today...
---> Sat Jan 1 02:32:28 EST 2000 - Nightly build attempt for 4.0-2101-SNAP
---> Sat Jan 1 02:32:28 EST 2000 - make world
... Many Many lines deleted...
---> S
According to Karl Denninger:
> This is not a port, its part of the RELEASE!
Part of 3.4-R yes. I removed xntpd (3.4e) from current a month ago and put
ntpd (4.0.98f, soon to be 4.1.0) in its place.
> What does (someone) need to do to get this changed out/updated? I can't
> send it in as a port
On Sat, Jan 01, 2000 at 11:11:51AM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Karl Denninger writes:
>
> >This is not a port, its part of the RELEASE!
> >
> >Its several YEARS old, and doesn't work right - you get lots of STEP changes
> >instead of what you SHOULD get, whic
[ moved to freebsd-ports ]
On 01-Jan-00 Leif Neland wrote:
> So far it has been taking 2 hours to compile sql_yacc.cc from mysql3.22.
This is an indication that something is SERIOUSLY wrong! MySQL has never taken
my PII-450 w/ 128MB RAM more than, say, 10-15 minutes to build/install.
It would b
So far it has been taking 2 hours to compile sql_yacc.cc from mysql3.22.
I had to find an old disk for swap, and it's swapping all the time.
top shows 156M size and 46M res., run time 20min's for cc1plus.
That probably means it's been waiting for swapping in 1h40m...
The box is a 333MHz PII, wi
> > i wonder what is happening to the ida driver for comapq's smart array
> > controller series.
>
> Work on this driver is stalled owing to the fact that nobody that can and
> wants to work on it has access to the Compaq hardware required. You
> can't use these controllers except in Compaq sy
Oliver Schonefeld wrote: [all snipped]
Here we go:
Sat, 1 Jan 100 17:16:30 +0100 (MET)
The first "millenium" bug on our mailing lists!
Oliver, how old is your PC?
--
Andre
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Everything that sysinstall does WRT devs is abstracted by libdisk.
> On Fri, Dec 31, 1999 at 03:15:02PM -0500, Chuck Robey wrote:
> > On Fri, 31 Dec 1999, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> >
> > > > > Why are "certain" devices wildly different than all other ones? I've
> > > > > never encountered that kind
On Sat, Jan 01, 2000 at 09:33:31AM -0800, John Polstra wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Karl Denninger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > What does (someone) need to do to get this changed out/updated? I can't
> > send it in as a port, since its part of the base package (setting
> > i
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Karl Denninger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It looks like ntpd (the new one) works correctly; I grabbed the latest
> from the official site last night and by this morning the dispersion
> and offsets were stable.
BTW, you might want to add these lines (from LI
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Karl Denninger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> What does (someone) need to do to get this changed out/updated? I can't
> send it in as a port, since its part of the base package (setting
> it up as a port would be pretty trivial from what I can see)
There already
Warner Losh wrote:
>
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Andre Oppermann writes:
> : Sat, 1 Jan 100 17:16:30 +0100 (MET)
> : Oliver, how old is your PC?
>
> It isn't a pc bug, but rather a bug in his mail transfer agent.
Hmm... His MTA looks fine:
Received: by frizzantino.TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Andre Oppermann writes:
: Sat, 1 Jan 100 17:16:30 +0100 (MET)
: Oliver, how old is your PC?
It isn't a pc bug, but rather a bug in his mail transfer agent.
Someone thought that tm_year was the last two digits of the year
rather than year - 1900.
Warner
To Unsubs
Eines schoenen Tages schrieb Andre Oppermann:
>
> Warner Losh wrote:
> >
> > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Andre Oppermann writes:
> > : Sat, 1 Jan 100 17:16:30 +0100 (MET)
> > : Oliver, how old is your PC?
it's not a pc ... it's a sun ultra 1 ... and unfortunatly it's not mine. it
belongs to
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Andre Oppermann writes:
: Hmm... His MTA looks fine:
MUA.
: > Someone thought that tm_year was the last two digits of the year
: > rather than year - 1900.
:
: Is ELM [version 2.4 PL25 PGP6] that much broken?
Looks that way...
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Ollivier Robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> According to John Polstra:
> > Current versions of ntpd use these features if they're available. I
>
> The ntpd daemon in -CURRENT doesn't use these as we cannot be sure the user
> has enabled them.
I don't understand
Eines schoenen Tages schrieb Warner Losh:
> : > Someone thought that tm_year was the last two digits of the year
> : > rather than year - 1900.
> :
> : Is ELM [version 2.4 PL25 PGP6] that much broken?
>
> Looks that way...
just compiled elm 2.5.2 ... looks to me, that is fixes my
"problem" ... b
In the last episode (Jan 01), Leif Neland said:
> So far it has been taking 2 hours to compile sql_yacc.cc from
> mysql3.22.
>
> I had to find an old disk for swap, and it's swapping all the time.
>
> top shows 156M size and 46M res., run time 20min's for cc1plus. That
> probably means it's been
According to John Polstra:
> Current versions of ntpd use these features if they're available. I
The ntpd daemon in -CURRENT doesn't use these as we cannot be sure the user
has enabled them. We should make them standard IMO.
> I'm sure we'll get there eventually. Things move at a stately
> pac
At 04:52 AM 1/1/00 +, Cameron Grant wrote:
> > Donn> "ba ba ba ba ba ba ba ba ba ba ba ba ba ba". I have the ESS
> > Donn> 1868, of course. Well, I (wisely) saved my old kernel as
> > Donn> /kernel.good and just booted into that.
> >
> > Donn> Could you also say what was fixed if you get aro
Hi All,
To celebrate the last year of the millenium (*), I built a new package
set for 4-current. You can find it at
ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-4-current/
Since this is the first build with the signal changes, there have
been many changes to 4-current and thus many
I wrote:
> > Date: Fri, 31 Dec 1999 22:55:35 +875400
> > X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93.2i
>
> Methinks this version of Mutt may have a Y2K problem, as 875400 hours is
> roughly (very roughly) a century
My brain has a Y2K problem ... make that "one year" instead of "a
century". ;-(
--
Karl Denninger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted a message with the headers:
> Date: Fri, 31 Dec 1999 22:55:35 +875400
> X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93.2i
Methinks this version of Mutt may have a Y2K problem, as 875400 hours is
roughly (very roughly) a century
--
Darryl Okahata
[EMAIL PROTEC
Joy and Happiness to All on this New Millenium !!
Amancio & Bettina
--
Amancio Hasty
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
46 matches
Mail list logo
