Hi
I have found that SysVIPC functions uses structure with short uid/gid types.
What is valid solution ?
Change types to uid_t/gid_t (but this will broke binary compatibility)
Change syscalls to old_* and add new with right structures,
or something else ?
struct ipc_perm {
ushort
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 11:26:39PM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2002-10-11 15:22, Andre Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That looks like the same error message I've been getting going from
4.6 to 4.7. I have one machine that went to through the build fine.
But the machine that I'm
On Sun, 13 Oct 2002, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 17:47:17 -0700
From: Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Michael Reifenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: FreeBSD-Current [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Still under -current: bwrite: buffer is not busy???
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at
Hi,
Oha!
Is the attached backtrace from the bwrite or the vm_fault panic then?
If from the wrong panic, how to get the real one?
kern.sync_on_panic=0 in /etc/sysctl.conf
Martin
Martin Blapp, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, Martin Blapp wrote:
...
kern.sync_on_panic=0 in /etc/sysctl.conf
Thanks!
Bye!
Michael Reifenberger
^.*Plaut.*$, IT, R/3 Basis, GPS
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
carl I fail to see how a reduction of hours (even just one) is
carl insignificant to someone on a dial-up connection. Time is money
carl for some people; even a meager three hours.
Don't you think 30+ hours of time to fetch an ISO image is _not_
wasting of money?
carl Again, I fail to see how
Yesterday I updated my notebook from 31th Aug -current to 3rd Oct.
Now pccardd complains there is no /dev/card0.
The probing looks fine.
August version:
pcic0: Intel i82365SL-A/B at port 0x3e0 iomem 0xd irq 10 on isa0
pcic0: management irq 10
pccard0: PC Card 16-bit bus (classic) on pcic0
After upgrading my 5-current box (as of late September 2002), the
kernel panics periodically with following message:
panic: kmem_malloc(4096): kmem_map too small: 107651072 total allocated
The number '4096' and '107651072' is always the same. What am I
missing something?
-- -
Makoto
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Bernd Walter さんいわく:
Yesterday I updated my notebook from 31th Aug -current to 3rd Oct.
Now pccardd complains there is no /dev/card0.
The probing looks fine.
That's no expected.
Newcard currently has no way to access PCCARD CIS and catch inseartion event
--
Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
Would the GEOM framework make it feasible to use a DOS-extended/logical
partition for a BSD filesystem? This would add a great deal of
flexibility for adding disk space to a full filesystem, just as one
example.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], walt writes:
Would the GEOM framework make it feasible to use a DOS-extended/logical
partition for a BSD filesystem? This would add a great deal of
flexibility for adding disk space to a full filesystem, just as one
example.
We already support that as far as I
[IPv6-only address above; strip the obvious for IPv4-only mail]
...That is, your kernel can mount the NetBSD partitions with their 16
partitions within, even if `disklabel' doesn't work yet...
Heh, I just mounted the NBSD partition using an un-patched FBSD kernel
with GEOM, even though
Hi,
Is anyone else seeing -CURRENT unable to boot on Sony VAIOs
running the newest -CURRENT? I get panics when it goes anywhere
near ACPI, and it drops into the debugger. Moving acpi.ko out of
the way allows it to go further, but then it hangs after it loads
the keyboard controller...
On Sun, 13 Oct 2002, Julian Elischer wrote:
ref3# make
linking kernel.debug
ld: target elf32-i386-freebsd not found
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/src/sys/i386/compile/REF3.
ref3#
having done a new cvsup and a new config..
UPDATING has nothing relevant that I can see.
Looks like you
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 05:49:31AM -0700, Will Andrews wrote:
The last time I tried to upgrade this machine (and it worked) is
apparently March 29, 2002. It badly needs an upgrade, and since
we need to make -current more usable for 5.0R, if any ACPI or
whatever hackers can tell me what they
Kris Kennaway writes:
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 11:28:51PM -0400, Wesley Morgan wrote:
I know there is some work being done on the recent signal changes to fix
some things, but are we sure this is the problem? I would hate to see
release schedules pushed back because these problems
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 10:31:13PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
ref3# make
linking kernel.debug
ld: target elf32-i386-freebsd not found
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/src/sys/i386/compile/REF3.
ref3#
Please explain exactly what you are trying to do. All I can guess is you
are trying
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Poul-Henning Kamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
phk 2002/10/05 08:49:39 PDT
Modified files:
sys/pc98/pc98wd.c wd_cd.c
Log:
Don't use dkunit() to find our softc when we can hang it off the dev_t.
This removes yet a dependency on the
On 13 Oct 2002 23:00:08 -0700
Eric Anholt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could anyone who is having stability issues with X please email me
privately if they are using either -current before September or
-stable? If not, without some sort of hints of where an issue really
is, I'm going to chalk
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 11:26:55PM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
On Sun, 13 Oct 2002, Julian Elischer wrote:
ref3# make
linking kernel.debug
ld: target elf32-i386-freebsd not found
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/src/sys/i386/compile/REF3.
ref3#
having done a new cvsup and a new
On 17:45+0400, Oct 14, 2002, David O'Brien wrote:
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 10:31:13PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
ref3# make
linking kernel.debug
ld: target elf32-i386-freebsd not found
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/src/sys/i386/compile/REF3.
ref3#
Please explain exactly what
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 11:08:04PM +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I got the same error trying to build a kernel from source code as of
2002-10-13(UTC) with world from 2002-10-06(UTC).
That is not supported if both the kernel sources and the build machine
are 5-CURRENT.
To Unsubscribe: send
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Takahashi Yoshihiro
writes:
Modified files:
sys/pc98/pc98wd.c wd_cd.c
Log:
Don't use dkunit() to find our softc when we can hang it off the dev_t.
This removes yet a dependency on the old disklabel stuff.
After this commit, the wd driver
Makoto Matsushita wrote:
carl 3.4 hours is a lot of time on a dial-up connection (granted it
carl is not a one size fits all period of time).
You forget that you still compressed image with about 30 hours (at
least, full 1 day or more), and it is not helpful for ordinal users,
not
walt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Would the GEOM framework make it feasible to use a DOS-extended/logical
partition for a BSD filesystem? This would add a great deal of
flexibility for adding disk space to a full filesystem, just as one
example.
You can also use md to do this, I mount my
Yeah, this is a Known Problem, and it's quite unfortunate, actually. I
looked at trying to solve it -- changing the types respectively to uid_t,
gid_t, and mode_t, but it involved a lot of ABI munging because the
structures are shared between the userland interface and the kernel
implementation.
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
Given that it (apparently) happens on X servers compiled months ago,
my gut feeling is that it is a bug in the kernel floating point
context save/restore in the presence of signals.
I still can't run X without crashing the *kernel* because of the
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 11:08:36AM +0200, Michael Reifenberger wrote:
FYI, the above line is the real panic message..the bwrite panic is
secondary and occurs when trying to sync disks.
?ha!
Is the attached backtrace from the bwrite or the vm_fault panic then?
If from the wrong panic,
Nate Lawson writes:
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
Given that it (apparently) happens on X servers compiled months ago,
my gut feeling is that it is a bug in the kernel floating point
context save/restore in the presence of signals.
I still can't run X without
Here's my final statement on the subject:
o It's ~20 hours, compressed, ~24 hours uncompressed.
o It's 15 minutes less, for a standard Pacific Bell DSL line,
assuming you get the 500K/second.
o It's 40 minutes out of ~6 hours, for EarthLink or Hughes
Satellite
I'm trying to upgrade from a 5.0 DP1 system to the latest -current
(as of last week sometime).
In the process of doing a 'make buildworld' I get the following error
message:
Bcc -O -pipe -mcpu=pentiumpro -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/sort
-I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/sort/../../../contrib/gnu-sort/lib
Makoto Matsushita wrote:
After upgrading my 5-current box (as of late September 2002), the
kernel panics periodically with following message:
panic: kmem_malloc(4096): kmem_map too small: 107651072 total allocated
The number '4096' and '107651072' is always the same. What am I
I also had good luck with OV511 based cameras. A
Google search for that should turn up a lot of good
results. (This includes cameras like Creative Labs'
WebCam 3, all USB)
On Sunday 13 October 2002 01:49 pm, Juli Mallett wrote:
* De: John Angelmo [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2002-10-13 ]
Will Andrews wrote:
Is anyone else seeing -CURRENT unable to boot on Sony VAIOs
running the newest -CURRENT? I get panics when it goes anywhere
near ACPI, and it drops into the debugger. Moving acpi.ko out of
the way allows it to go further, but then it hangs after it loads
the keyboard
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, David O'Brien wrote:
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 10:31:13PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
ref3# make
linking kernel.debug
ld: target elf32-i386-freebsd not found
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/src/sys/i386/compile/REF3.
ref3#
Please explain exactly what
I tried to build a new version of a -current kernel under -current a
whole 8 or so days old..
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, Bruce Evans wrote:
On Sun, 13 Oct 2002, Julian Elischer wrote:
ref3# make
linking kernel.debug
ld: target elf32-i386-freebsd not found
*** Error code 1
Stop in
On 14-Oct-2002 Terry Lambert wrote:
Will Andrews wrote:
Is anyone else seeing -CURRENT unable to boot on Sony VAIOs
running the newest -CURRENT? I get panics when it goes anywhere
near ACPI, and it drops into the debugger. Moving acpi.ko out of
the way allows it to go further, but then it
It would be good if the tools accepted both the new and old
names for a while as upgrading the kernel is usually my first step..
I usually do it first.
oh well I guess the probelem is solved..
I had a buildworld going.. I'll install it and then build a new kernel.
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, Maxim
David Francheski wrote:
I'm trying to upgrade from a 5.0 DP1 system to the latest -current
(as of last week sometime).
Do not use DP1 as the starting point.
Instead, use one of the snapshot ISO's that we've been discussing
in the thread with the Subject: of:
Re: HEADS UP: Old
John Baldwin wrote:
On 14-Oct-2002 Terry Lambert wrote:
Will Andrews wrote:
Is anyone else seeing -CURRENT unable to boot on Sony VAIOs
running the newest -CURRENT? I get panics when it goes anywhere
near ACPI, and it drops into the debugger. Moving acpi.ko out of
the way allows it
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, Julian Elischer wrote:
It would be good if the tools accepted both the new and old
names for a while as upgrading the kernel is usually my first step..
I usually do it first.
oh well I guess the probelem is solved..
I had a buildworld going.. I'll install it and
Linux solved the problem by introducing a new flag for {msg,shm,sem}ctl(3)
interfaces (IPC_64), which if set tells the kernel that user supplies
new version of the structure. The kernel itself internally keeps all
relevant information already in IPC_64 format, doing conversion before
returning it
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 02:40:18PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
*sigh*, this is not related to his problem. I think the ACPI PCI
link code has a bug in that it tries to free memory it has not
allocated (including actual error messages and a trace from ddb()
could help verify this) and has
Will Andrews wrote:
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 02:40:18PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
*sigh*, this is not related to his problem. I think the ACPI PCI
link code has a bug in that it tries to free memory it has not
allocated (including actual error messages and a trace from ddb()
could help
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 01:58:26PM -0400, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
Nate Lawson writes:
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
Given that it (apparently) happens on X servers compiled months ago,
my gut feeling is that it is a bug in the kernel floating point
context
On 14-Oct-2002 Will Andrews wrote:
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 02:40:18PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
*sigh*, this is not related to his problem. I think the ACPI PCI
link code has a bug in that it tries to free memory it has not
allocated (including actual error messages and a trace from ddb()
Juli Mallett wrote:
I was working on porting the Linux driver for this to freebsd's kernel
at one point. In general, your best shot is to find something that
gphoto supports.
Was that the QuickCam Express? I started doing that also, but John Hay
did it first. There were some issues with
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 04:08:59PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
DDB over a serial console and 'tr'?
You can also get the dmesg up to the point in question with the
serial console as well which would help. I'm assuming you can
setup the serial console since you are doing remote gdb. :)
Yes,
Michael Reifenberger schrieb:
Hi,
I still get the following panic (2 are attached) under -current
on my notebook when doing a 'portupgrade -R -f kdebase'.
Anyone else sees this?
Yes, I also do get these type of panics during heavy FS activity (vm
fault, double fault, etc.)
I can panic my
Hi,
perl-5.8 seems to be severely broken in current.
If I compile it with optimization enabled make test fails at t/op/pat,
test 640. Only with no optimization at all this test succeeded. I tried
the following options
make CPUTYPE=i386 CFLAGS=-g = success
make CPUTYPE=i386 CFLAGS=-O2=
On a related note...
I woulder if it might be a worthwhile project to start a FreeBSD
videoconference project..
i.e. using a set of tools that are definitly supported and a supported
videocam, we could say If you get this camera, and load the following
ports, you will be able to take part in
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 10:37:53PM +0200, Daniel Rock wrote:
If I compile it with optimization enabled make test fails at t/op/pat,
test 640. Only with no optimization at all this test succeeded. I tried
the following options
So turn off the optimizations?
gcc's code optimizations are
Kris Kennaway writes:
I think we're all waiting for Julian and Jonathan Mini to fix this..
It would probably help if they had some sort of a test program that
could duplicate the bug in a controlled setting without a lot of
confusing application software running..
Did anyone
On Sun, Oct 06, 2002 at 14:25:41 +0900, Mitsuru IWASAKI wrote:
Hi,
I tried the patches you checked in, and PCI bus 2 on my machine still isn't
probed. See the attached dmesg.
I'm a bit confused about just what sort of file the ACPI code expects to
load on boot.
I installed the
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 01:24:36PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
...
i.e. using a set of tools that are definitly supported and a supported
videocam, we could say If you get this camera, and load the following
ports, you will be able to take part in conferences
by attaching to the following
The new PT_IO ptrace(2) request doesn't work, since it doesn't release
a lock. Since PT_IO is similar to PT_READ_D/PT_WRITE_D, I copied the
PROC_UNLOCK from there and inserted in the same location. Patch,
against version 1.103 of sys_process.c, attached.
This patch is also available as:
Warning
Unable to process data:
multipart/mixed;boundary==_NextPart_000_00B2_18D37A1A.A6210E14
Alex Zepeda schrieb:
So turn off the optimizations?
gcc's code optimizations are broken, and should be avoided. If you want
to break perl 5.6 you can do so with -O3 -march=pentiumpro (somehow I
suspect -O2 would have the same effect).
Besides, that just goes to show, it's not perl that's
On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 12:03:54AM +0200, Daniel Rock wrote:
But why don't show the same optimization levels on another intel
platform (Solaris x86, gcc-3.2 release) no problem?
Because it's not the same compiler. -current is not using 3.2.
$gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
Configured with:
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
It'd have been nice if (for example) the KSE talk I did last week
at BAFUG could have been to a wider audience..
well in that specific case just audio would have sufficed :)
Uh, yeah.. we had no whiteboard :-(
but it'd be nice if FreeBSD could
On Sun, 13 Oct 2002, Steve Kargl wrote:
I haven't seen this type of panic before. What type
of memory are you using and can you change the clock
timing for refresh?
That's an interesting question. I just bought a new DIMM a few weeks ago,
to replace one that had gone bad. I now have two
but it'd be nice if FreeBSD could build it's own conference-net
so we could do that sort of thing..
i have a problem with the 'own' part. it would be nice if we could
conference with people who do not run freebsd too.
last i looked, vic did not support the hardware i had at the time.
and
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, Julian Elischer wrote:
but it'd be nice if FreeBSD could build it's own conference-net
so we could do that sort of thing..
I've used Vic, and wb, but we don't have a mbone to run it on any more
really..
uunet was charging for it last I looked.. We need to work
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, Randy Bush wrote:
i have a problem with the 'own' part. it would be nice if we could
conference with people who do not run freebsd too.
Nice but not crucial
last i looked, vic did not support the hardware i had at the time.
and just testing now i get a lot of
I
i have a problem with the 'own' part. it would be nice if we could
conference with people who do not run freebsd too.
Nice but not crucial
very true, if you only want to meet with to one percent of the
folk out there. i need tools i can use in real life, not just
in a clique club house.
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 03:39:00PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
last i looked, vic did not support the hardware i had at the time.
and just testing now i get a lot of
I haven't looked at it for a couple of years..
it did work for me then but it may not any more..
vic/vat work but are
--
Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
[moved to chat@]
On 14-Oct-2002 Carl Schmidt wrote:
The distance argument is probably not relevant. I remember a long time
ago some person from the UK complaining about having to use ISDN because
NTL did not provide cable at that distance, or something. I honestly do
not know about that.
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 01:44:07PM -0700, Alex Zepeda wrote:
So turn off the optimizations?
No in -CURRENT with GCC 3.2, we want to know when -O2 causes a problem.
gcc's code optimizations are broken, and should be avoided.
Not any more with GCC 3.2, unless you have a test case to prove it
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 03:12:25PM -0700, Alex Zepeda wrote:
On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 12:03:54AM +0200, Daniel Rock wrote:
But why don't show the same optimization levels on another intel
platform (Solaris x86, gcc-3.2 release) no problem?
Because it's not the same compiler. -current
* De: Craig Rodrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2002-10-14 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: Quickcam ]
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 03:39:00PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
last i looked, vic did not support the hardware i had at the time.
and just testing now i get a lot of
I haven't looked at
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, Makoto Matsushita wrote:
After upgrading my 5-current box (as of late September 2002), the
kernel panics periodically with following message:
panic: kmem_malloc(4096): kmem_map too small: 107651072 total allocated
The number '4096' and '107651072' is always the
I'm now trying Terry's patch (just rebuilding a kernel).
jroberson You are using 100mb of KVA for malloc(9)? Are you certain
jroberson that you don't have a memory leak?
Maybe there's a chance of a memory leakage by GLOBAL, but I don't sure.
jroberson How much memory is in this machine?
tlambert2 This was recently discussed on -current. I posted a dumb
tlambert2 patch that fixes the problem.
(stuff deleted)
tlambert2 See the archive of the posting, for more details:
Thank you, I'll try it right now.
-- -
Makoto `MAR' Matsushita
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 01:00:46PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
[...]
Did anyone test -current with the various FP test suites people posted
about last week?
Yes. I ran paranoia from http://cm.bell-labs.com/netlib/paranoia/ and
found that FP arithmethic is satisfactory when -O is not used, and
Attempts to build kernels today fail for me with:
h ../../../conf/newvers.sh MJCURRENT
cc -c -O -pipe -mcpu=pentiumpro -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs
-Wstric
t-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual
-fforma
t-extensions -ansi -g -nostdinc -I- -I.
On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 02:35:46AM +, Daniel Flickinger wrote:
A stale .depend file is anathema... as I said:
the whole issue begs the question as to why 'make
buildworld', which normally cleans up before it
takes off, does not handle this for an update, and
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 08:04:47PM -0700, Matthew Jacob wrote:
Attempts to build kernels today fail for me with:
h ../../../conf/newvers.sh MJCURRENT
cc -c -O -pipe -mcpu=pentiumpro -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs
-Wstric
t-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith
No, buildkernel is sort of fine- doesn't work for partial trees.
I just missed the UPDATING about a toolchain upgrade. I also figured out
how to get myself out of the partial tree mess I was in by dropping back
on the ldscript so I could ensure a new kernel prior to building world.
On Mon,
matusita Thank you, I'll try it right now.
Unfortunately, kernel panics soon after it wakes up... maybe I've
still missed something.
-- -
Makoto `MAR' Matsushita
Booting [/boot/kernel/kernel]...
Copyright (c) 1992-2002 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989,
On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 12:39:26PM +1000, Tim Robbins wrote:
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 01:00:46PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
[...]
Did anyone test -current with the various FP test suites people posted
about last week?
Yes. I ran paranoia from http://cm.bell-labs.com/netlib/paranoia/
In message: Pine.BSF.4.21.0210142003480.79278-10@beppo
Matthew Jacob [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: ld: target elf32-i386-freebsd not found
: And these are with i386 systems that are installworld'd within the last
: couple weeks.
This is a consequence of updating the build tools.
Sure- just asking/checking. Things sort surprised/astonished me.
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: Pine.BSF.4.21.0210142003480.79278-10@beppo
Matthew Jacob [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: ld: target elf32-i386-freebsd not found
: And these are with i386
My -current box is set up to use GRUB to allow me to either run FreeBSD
or Linux. A while back, I added a third option to allow me to boot
FreeBSD with a serial console and just happened to make this the
default. Once I had this working, I turned just turned the serial
console mode on and off
_
Looking to be employed? We have an ocean of employers and employees waiting to be
matched. Go to Maktoob Jobs NOW.
http://www.maktoob.com/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body
87 matches
Mail list logo
