The clock on my ASUS P5A still runs at double speed unless I have
debug.acpi.disable="timer" in loader.conf (as it has for as long as
we've had ACPI support). Do any ACPI wizards have any suggestions as
to how I could track down the cause of this bug, and hopefully fix it?
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smor
On Mon, 17 Feb 2003, Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Feb 2003, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
> > In addupc_intr, if the increment cannot be done immediatly, the addres
> > to increment the count for is stored and the increment is done later at
> > ast or userret() time...
>
> Note that "cannot be d
Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
>
> --cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Disposition: inline
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 10:24:57AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 07:55:49PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wro
--En cette belle journée du lundi 17 février 2003 01:21 -0600
-- Juli Mallett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> écrivait :
| * De: Mathieu Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2003-02-17 ]
| [ Subjecte: Re: Local repo: Perforce/CVS integration ]
|> --En cette belle journée du dimanche 16 février 2003 16:
* De: Mathieu Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2003-02-17 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: Local repo: Perforce/CVS integration ]
> --En cette belle journée du dimanche 16 février 2003 16:08 -0600
> -- Juli Mallett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> écrivait :
> | FreeBSD has special great evil triggers which will im
--En cette belle journée du dimanche 16 février 2003 16:08 -0600
-- Juli Mallett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> écrivait :
| FreeBSD has special great evil triggers which will import things into
| //depot/vendor/freebsd/src/... for example, and then we just branch off
| of there, and integ -b as needed.
|
Apparently, On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 05:35:09PM +1100,
Bruce Evans said words to the effect of;
> On Sun, 16 Feb 2003, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
> > In addupc_intr, if the increment cannot be done immediatly, the addres
> > to increment the count for is stored and the increment is done late
"M. Warner Losh" wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Takahashi Yoshihiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : I have made the cbus driver for pc98 based on i386 isa driver. This
> : completely removes that PC98 depends on isa driver and also corrects
> : directory layouts (pc98/i386
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Takahashi Yoshihiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: I have made the cbus driver for pc98 based on i386 isa driver. This
: completely removes that PC98 depends on isa driver and also corrects
: directory layouts (pc98/i386 -> pc98/pc98 and pc98/pc98 -> pc98
On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 10:31:25PM -0800, David Schultz wrote:
> > Note that I was only suggesting this patch be committed to -current
> > for purposes of finding out what these applications are, and fixing
> > them as appropriate.
>
> Then how about wrapping the warning in an #ifdef, so people w
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 08:53:09AM +0300, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 16:40:48 +1100, Tim Robbins wrote:
>
> > I don't think rand()
> > needs a warning message like gets() &c. because it's not as dangerous.
>
> Wait, what kind of warning __warn_references() produce? I was
On Sun, 16 Feb 2003, Julian Elischer wrote:
> In addupc_intr, if the increment cannot be done immediatly, the addres
> to increment the count for is stored and the increment is done later at
> ast or userret() time...
Note that "cannot be done immediatly" is "always except on sparc64's"
under Fre
Thus spake Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 04:40:48PM +1100, Tim Robbins wrote:
>
> > I disagree. It's safe to use rand() in games and in certain kinds of
> > simulations when you don't care that the distribution isn't quite
> > uniform, or when you prefer speed over q
One thing: you don't need to move the allocation of the interrupt,
just the turning it on. However, if you move the location that you
turn it on be careful that the driver doesn't do something silly in
its attach routine. I was wrong a while ago when I said that the
attach routines typically turn
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Marcel Moolenaar writes:
>> This patch changes the API so that rather than pass a "dev_t" to the
>> console functions, the "struct consdev *" is passed:
>>
>> -typedefvoidcn_putc_t(dev_t, int);
>> +typedefvoidcn_putc_t(struct consd
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: * Does each device that uses miibus need to explicitly call
: device_delete_child when it is detaching? Should it do it also in its
: attach routine if it encounters an error? I assume all drivers need to do
: t
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bruce Evans writes:
>The
>piix timecounter has a lower frequency than the TSC, but for some
>reason we mask it to 24 bits (16M cycles @ 3.5+ MHz = 4+ seconds).
We do this because the spec defines it as either 32 or 24 bit and some
24 bit implementations claim to ha
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 04:40:48PM +1100, Tim Robbins wrote:
> I disagree. It's safe to use rand() in games and in certain kinds of
> simulations when you don't care that the distribution isn't quite
> uniform, or when you prefer speed over quality. I don't think rand()
> needs a warning message l
Thus spake Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I think we should commit this patch (to -current) and fix all the
> problems that pop up. For example, it's used in awk (which started
> this set of changes), and in some of the XFree86 libraries.
...
> +__warn_references(rand_r,
> + "warning: ra
* De: "Andrey A. Chernov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2003-02-16 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libc/stdlib rand.c ]
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 16:40:48 +1100, Tim Robbins wrote:
>
> > I don't think rand()
> > needs a warning message like gets() &c. because it's not as dangerous.
>
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 16:40:48 +1100, Tim Robbins wrote:
> I don't think rand()
> needs a warning message like gets() &c. because it's not as dangerous.
Wait, what kind of warning __warn_references() produce? I was under
impression that it is compile-time only.
> What I suggest instead is to
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Matthew N. Dodd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, Nate Lawson wrote:
: > Also, except for xl, all drivers have a common cleanup on error in
: > attach that backs out allocated resources with no assumptions about the
: > order they were
On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 12:20:46 +0100, Thomas Quinot wrote:
> Le 2003-02-15, Kenneth D. Merry écrivait :
>
> > - Automatically detect CDROM drives that can't handle 6 byte mode
> >sense and mode select, and adjust our command size accordingly.
> >More information on that below.
> >
> >
On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 08:57:29PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 07:52:35PM -0800, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
>
> > So, monotonically increased seed->first value correlation problem remains...
>
> I think we should commit this patch (to -current) and fix all the
> problem
On Sun, 16 Feb 2003, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> Is it an expected feature that the system clock is not updated when
> the system is sitting in DDB?
Yes. Interrupts must be disabled while ddb is running, so the time
cannot be updated normally. Timecounting can mostly work if it is
driven by a timeco
On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 20:57:29 -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 07:52:35PM -0800, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
>
> > So, monotonically increased seed->first value correlation problem remains...
>
> I think we should commit this patch (to -current) and fix all the
> problems t
Hi,
I've seen the following come up here and there. A quick search of the
archive didn't come with anything:
lock order reversal
1st 0xc65de7dc inp (inp) @ ../../../netinet/tcp_input.c:636
2nd 0xc035eccc tcp (tcp) @ ../../../netinet/tcp_usrreq.c:621
Stack backtrace:
backtrace(c032cd1d,c035eccc,
On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 07:52:35PM -0800, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
> So, monotonically increased seed->first value correlation problem remains...
I think we should commit this patch (to -current) and fix all the
problems that pop up. For example, it's used in awk (which started
this set of cha
Dear Hackers,
I need an expert's advice on the small locking/WITNESS problem
(if this is a real problem of course). It basically boils down
to the following:
Consider three (3) MTX_DEF mutexes: A, B1 and B2. Mutex A has a
name "mutex_A" and type "type_A". Mutex B1 has a name "mutex_B1"
and mutex
I've been trying to move the installed OSes around on my hard disk, but
am having a huge amount of trouble doing so.
The task involves dd'ing the slices off the disk for safe-keeping,
modifying the on-disk slice table, then dd'ing the slices back onto the
disk in their new locations. However,
On Sun, 16 Feb 2003, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 02:08:35PM -0700, Scott Long wrote:
> +> Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> +>
> +> >On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 08:28:43PM -0800, Sam Leffler wrote:
> +> >+> This can quickly turn into a bikeshed, but suggest ones. We're
> +> >looki
My apologies to the list for not looking in /sys/conf/NOTES before
posting. I wasn't aware of the "split". :)
A.
msg52522/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 2003-02-16 18:05, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it an expected feature that the system clock is not updated when
> the system is sitting in DDB? I just had 8 machines sitting in DDB
> for about 20 minutes at boot (because of that &^@%&^ sysctl LOR),
> and ntpd refused to time-sy
I can't seem to find atapicam in NOTES. Is this voluntary? On the
atapicam website, it says that it's been integrated into current.
I can build a 5.0-release kernel with it, so has it just been forgotten
from NOTES? :)
Thanks
A.
anarcat@lenny[~/dump/c/src/sys/i386/conf]% cvs -R status NOTES
===
In addupc_intr, if the increment cannot be done immediatly, the addres
to increment the count for is stored and the increment is done later at
ast or userret() time...
is there any reason that the address of the PC needs to be stored?
why is the address from the frame at that time not useable?
Is it an expected feature that the system clock is not updated when
the system is sitting in DDB? I just had 8 machines sitting in DDB
for about 20 minutes at boot (because of that &^@%&^ sysctl LOR), and
ntpd refused to time-sync them when I continued, because the clock had
fallen too far behind:
On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 20:16:43 -0500, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
>
> to indicate localhost. Andrey provided a patch which allows OPIE
> to keep that standard (to OPIE) meaning. Could people try his
> patch and then explain why it does not solve the problem they are
> trying to solve?
The problem
On Mon, 17 Feb 2003, Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Feb 2003, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
> > 3/ would 64 bits be enough? We are getting both bigger and faster
> > 64000 times faster and 64000 times bigger and we are back at seven
> > seconds. 640 times faster and 640 times bigger and we are stil
On Sun, 16 Feb 2003, Julian Elischer wrote:
> In the resource usage we have teh following values calculated..
>
> longru_ixrss; /* integral shared memory size */
> longru_idrss; /* integral unshared data " */
> longru_isrss;
At 3:48 PM + 2/16/03, Mark Murray wrote:
"Andrey A. Chernov" writes:
> On Sun, Feb 16, 2003, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> > "Andrey A. Chernov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Admins with no /etc/opieaccess AFFECTED!
>
> Admins with no /etc/opieaccess IDIOTS for not running mergemaster!
Title: ¼ºÀå È£¸£¸óÀÇ ³î¶ó¿î È¿°ú¸¦ °æÇè Çϼ¼¿ä!
At 2:48 PM -0800 2/16/03, Julian Elischer wrote:
I think I could make a case for these figures being extended
to 64 bits but:
1/ is it worth it? what uses them? Easier to drop them.
2/ are these mandated by any standard? would making them
64 bits break anything?
3/ would 64 bits be enough? We
On Mon, 17 Feb 2003, leafy wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 10:28:25AM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > > these apply to both world and ports. and the strange ld-elf.so.1 error
> > > still ocurs.
> > >
> >
> > I just built mozilla with gcc 3.2.2 without a problem.
> >
> > --
> > Steve
> Mine does wi
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 08:28:58AM +0800, leafy wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 10:28:25AM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > > these apply to both world and ports. and the strange ld-elf.so.1 error
> > > still ocurs.
> > >
> >
> > I just built mozilla with gcc 3.2.2 without a problem.
> >
> Mine doe
On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 10:28:25AM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > these apply to both world and ports. and the strange ld-elf.so.1 error
> > still ocurs.
> >
>
> I just built mozilla with gcc 3.2.2 without a problem.
>
> --
> Steve
Mine does without any problem too. It's only uic which causes the
On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 07:44:40PM +0100, Jens Rehsack wrote:
> I'm not sure, but isn't the '-f' parameter required, if the portversion
> didn't change but an upgrade should be forced?
>
> Jens
Yes, I did a 'portupgrade -fra' several times. But it hits the same spot with the same
error everytime.
On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 09:45:28PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
> I am trying to do some weird things with some custom console code and
> got stuck on the fact that our console code belives all consoles have
> a dev_t.
>
> This patch changes the API so that rather than pass a "dev_t" to the
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 01:51:20 +0300, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
> properly). If you tune opiezed+pamified apps to work as you need, pure
> opized stops working and vice versa.
In this phrase I mean documented OPIE tuning of OPIE config files (old
way), without any new additions and requirements,
On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 15:39:51 -0600, Juli Mallett wrote:
>
> Can you explain how this stops purely opieized apps from working? I was
> under the impression the implicit case was still there, we just have a
> more explicit contract with the OPIE system.
This is not pure situation but mix with
In the resource usage we have teh following values calculated..
longru_ixrss; /* integral shared memory size */
longru_idrss; /* integral unshared data " */
longru_isrss; /* integral unshared stack " */
in statclock
[developers@ removed from CC list]
On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 07:55:49PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 11:50:46AM +, Paul Richards wrote:
> > Don't cross post current and developers.
> >
> > The developers charter says it's for internal management i.e. how we
> > manage
* De: Chris BeHanna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2003-02-16 ]
[ Subjecte: Local repo: Perforce/CVS integration ]
> For those of you doing development with Perforce, could you talk a
> little bit about how this is done?
>
> Do you do a cvsup nightly and import that on a vendor branc
On Fri, 7 Feb 2003, Victor Ponomarev wrote:
> Thanks to all!
>
> As I wrote it's a my mistake with kernel installing. I should pay more
> attention on upper part of dmesg ouput to
> see that new kernel didn't install.
>
> By the way does anyone compare heavy load multiprocessor performance
> 5.0-
For those of you doing development with Perforce, could you talk a
little bit about how this is done?
Do you do a cvsup nightly and import that on a vendor branch, then
integrate it into your working tree? (That sounds like it would work.)
Do you use cvs2p4? How about going in the other
"David O'Brien" writes:
> On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 07:11:49PM +, Mark Murray wrote:
> > In the case where an application is OPIEised and not PAMised, we
> > need to figure out something; PAMizing such apps is not terribly
> > hard. If any of them are in the base system, then this situation
> > i
On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 02:08:35PM -0700, Scott Long wrote:
+> Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
+>
+> >On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 08:28:43PM -0800, Sam Leffler wrote:
+> >+> This can quickly turn into a bikeshed, but suggest ones. We're
+> >looking for
+> >+> good benchmarks. [...]
+> >
+> >Look at:
+> >
* De: "Andrey A. Chernov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2003-02-16 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: OPIE breakage: backout & patch for review ]
> On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 19:11:49 +, Mark Murray wrote:
> >
> > In the case where an application is OPIEised and not PAMised, we
> > need to figure out someth
On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 10:24:57AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 07:55:49PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > > Don't cross post current and developers.
> > >
> > > The developers charter says it's for internal management i.e. how we
> > > manage the project and not for disc
On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 07:11:49PM +, Mark Murray wrote:
> In the case where an application is OPIEised and not PAMised, we
> need to figure out something; PAMizing such apps is not terribly
> hard. If any of them are in the base system, then this situation
> is a bug in its own right. If they
Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 08:28:43PM -0800, Sam Leffler wrote:
+> This can quickly turn into a bikeshed, but suggest ones. We're
looking for
+> good benchmarks. [...]
Look at:
http://www.web-polygraph.org
It provides tests for www-cache/proxy stuff.
We can test many
On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 19:11:49 +, Mark Murray wrote:
>
> In the case where an application is OPIEised and not PAMised, we
> need to figure out something; PAMizing such apps is not terribly
> hard. If any of them are in the base system, then this situation
We are not in the situation to forc
I am trying to do some weird things with some custom console code and
got stuck on the fact that our console code belives all consoles have
a dev_t.
This patch changes the API so that rather than pass a "dev_t" to the
console functions, the "struct consdev *" is passed:
-typedefv
Hello.
My question is very simple.
Does FreeBSD, either 4.7/4.8 or 5.0 support SecureRPC, especially SecureNFS?
I found the keyserv facility, installed the databases and read some note
in mknetid(8):
-n netid_file
Specify the location of the netid information file. The com-
piled-in
On 14-Feb-2003 Kris Kennaway wrote:
| On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 03:37:49PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
|> On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 03:34:06PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
|> > Since upgrading bento to running 5.0, it appears that I can no longer
|> > download multiple files from a FTP server by specif
"David O'Brien" writes:
> > With a suitable "HEADS UP!" and appropriate changes to the documentation,
> > might is be possible to move _all_ policy control into PAM, instead of
> > having it split between OPIE and PAM?
>
> Nope. What about opieized, but not pamized applications?
> OPIE needs to a
Hi,
I already tried some weeks ago to find (at [EMAIL PROTECTED]) someone who
can review and commit this code, but nobody replied, so I try it again:
I made the radius integration for mpd. During this work I missed some
functions in libradius.
Here is a short changelog:
- added rad_demangle fo
On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 03:48:20PM +, Mark Murray wrote:
> "Andrey A. Chernov" writes:
> > On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 12:06:36 +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> > > "Andrey A. Chernov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > Admins with no /etc/opieaccess AFFECTED!
> > >
> > > Admins with no /etc/o
On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 08:29:21PM +0900, Makoto Matsushita wrote:
>
> It seems that our kenrel for kern.flp does not fit again :-(
Why oh why, doesn't the tenderbox do "make release" instead of just "make
buildworld"???
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-cu
leafy wrote:
> I rebuilt and installed world on Friday and reinstalled ALL my ports with
>'portupgrade -ra'. I have found the exact line that will trigger the ld "undefined
>symbol" error.
>
> /usr/X11R6/bin/uic -nounload -tr tr2i18n -i htmlpageinfo.h ./htmlpageinfo.ui >
>htmlpageinfo.cc.temp
On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 08:28:43PM -0800, Sam Leffler wrote:
+> This can quickly turn into a bikeshed, but suggest ones. We're looking for
+> good benchmarks. [...]
Look at:
http://www.web-polygraph.org
It provides tests for www-cache/proxy stuff.
We can test many things with it:
[root@southcross root]# fsck /dev/ad0s1e
** /dev/ad0s1e (NO WRITE)
** Last Mounted on /usr
** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes
** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames
MISSING '.' I=667872 OWNER=root MODE=40755
SIZE=512 MTIME=Feb 10 16:54 2003
DIR=/ports/cad/gwave
UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY
CANNO
from my dmesg:
[snip]
acpi0: on motherboard
ACPI-0625: *** Info: GPE Block0 defined as GPE0 to GPE15
ACPI-0625: *** Info: GPE Block1 defined as GPE16 to GPE31
Using $PIR table, 6 entries at 0xc00f1a70
acpi0: power button is handled as a fixed feature programming model.
Timecounter "ACPI-
On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 01:04:33PM +0800, leafy wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 02:09:24AM +0800, leafy wrote:
> > Grepping the corresponding library:
> > leafy@leafy:/usr/X11R6/plugins/designer$ nm libwizards.so |grep Z22
> > 000256f0 T _Z22qCleanupImages_wizardsv
> >
> > So ld is not finding a
On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 07:55:49PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > Don't cross post current and developers.
> >
> > The developers charter says it's for internal management i.e. how we
> > manage the project and not for discussing code issues. It's badly named,
> > we should have called it someth
Maybe anyone will enlighten me:
I am working with the port lang/gnat (Ada compiler)
and it links with nonexistent libaddr2line
(symbol convert_addresses) to find the line numbers
from executables.
Where to look for the correct way to resolve addresses
to line numbers in FreeBSD ?
Thanx,
Yuri.
T
On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 11:50:46AM +, Paul Richards wrote:
> Don't cross post current and developers.
>
> The developers charter says it's for internal management i.e. how we
> manage the project and not for discussing code issues. It's badly named,
> we should have called it something like "m
On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 05:45:42PM +0100, Wiktor Niesiobedzki wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 11:16:12PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > Me being dumb. Forgot to comment out the apm "disabled" hint
> > in /boot/device.hints. Still, scary things happen after
> > resuming from zzz(8). "ata1: res
Hello David, hello list!
According to a thread about lukemftpd several months ago, there are
several points speaking against lukemftpd in the base system,
- missing PAM
- missing login_cap
were the main arguments against lukemftpd, as far I can remember.
In the meantime, David has incorporated
On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 08:27:45PM -0600, Mike Silbersack wrote the words in effect of:
>
> On Sat, 15 Feb 2003, Martin Blapp wrote:
>
> > Feb 13 17:41:05 ibm-01 kernel: ACPI-0625: *** Info: GPE Block0 defined as GPE0
> > to GPE31
> > Feb 13 17:41:05 ibm-01 kernel: ACPI-0625: *** Info: GPE Block1
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
> fstab: /etc/fstab:0: No such file or directory
> /dev/md1c: 1.4MB (2880 sectors) block size 4096, fragment size 512
> using 1 cylinder groups of 1.41MB, 360 blks, 32 inodes.
> super-block backups (for fsck -b #) at:
> 32
> + mount /dev/md1c /mnt
> + [ -d /R/stage/image.kern ]
> + set -e
On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 11:16:12PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> Me being dumb. Forgot to comment out the apm "disabled" hint
> in /boot/device.hints. Still, scary things happen after
> resuming from zzz(8). "ata1: resetting devices..." forever.
>
Did you happen to have:
options AUTO_EOI_1
in
"Andrey A. Chernov" writes:
> On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 12:06:36 +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> > "Andrey A. Chernov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Admins with no /etc/opieaccess AFFECTED!
> >
> > Admins with no /etc/opieaccess IDIOTS for not running mergemaster!
>
> Moreover, admins WITH
On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 02:28:52PM +0800, leafy wrote:
> /usr/X11R6/bin/uic -i htmlpageinfo.h ./htmlpageinfo.ui
>
In my attemp to 'truss' the above line, I get a truss.core instead. backtrace as
follows:
Core was generated by `truss'.
Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
Readin
On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 03:37:50PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote the words in effect of:
> "local.freebsd.current" wrote:
> > I've been hanging on for a production-ready FreeBSD which
> > supports ACLs so I can replace an NFS server and an NT
> > fileserver with one box which can do both.
> >
> > Cha
I decided to test the 5.0 ISO today. It turned out bad.
I have a dual PIII 800MHz with an Advansys SCSI controller with two Plextor
CD drives. The reader drive is device 0,6,0 and the writer drive is device 0,4,0.
I can boot the CD from the reader drive but when it gets to the part where
it's goin
I've had a weird problem since installing 5-CURRENT on my gateway,
traffic originating from the gateway is fine, as is UDP from the
unregistered network behind it, however, TCP traffic from the
unregistered network is dropped.
It seems that natd/libalias is corrupting the tcp header.
The firewall
Sorry for spamming again.
matusita> Ok, we have to shrink at least 7kbytes of kernel on kern.flp.
If you are serious about this, attached below is a current kernel
configuration file for kern.flp kernel named BOOTMFS (attention: it is
only just for boot floppy, not GENERIC nor default installed
On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 12:06:36 +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> "Andrey A. Chernov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Admins with no /etc/opieaccess AFFECTED!
>
> Admins with no /etc/opieaccess IDIOTS for not running mergemaster!
Moreover, admins WITH old /etc/opieaccess (i.e. without your lin
Don't cross post current and developers.
The developers charter says it's for internal management i.e. how we
manage the project and not for discussing code issues. It's badly named,
we should have called it something like "members" or "admin".
On Sat, 2003-02-15 at 02:49, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
>
On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 12:16:27 +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
>
> My message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dated 2003-02-16
> 00:46:27 CET contained all the information you needed.
If you mean that quote from it:
"This behaviour was very surprising to people who wanted to prevent OPIE
users from usi
Ouch..
matusita> % gzip loader
I've forgotten that this loader is already kgzip(8)ed, ignore me. Sorry.
Ok, we have to shrink at least 7kbytes of kernel on kern.flp.
-- -
Makoto `MAR' Matsushita
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Andrey A. Chernov" writes:
>> Please take this to private email.
>
>I not see enough good will from des side for it.
Then please just stop.
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer
On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 11:21:15 +, Mark Murray wrote:
>
> Does the ""-as-localhost-alias break other PAM modules?
No, it is local variable for that module.
> In what way does "localhost" or NULL break OPIE?
Look into any pre-PAM code which use OPIE, like login code. Host (rhost)
is only s
It seems that our kenrel for kern.flp does not fit again :-(
(Quote from "make release" logfile)
+ mdconfig -a -t vnode -f /R/stage/floppies/kern.flp
+ MDDEVICE=md1
+ [ ! -c /dev/md1 ]
+ disklabel -w -B -b /R/stage/trees/base/boot/boot md1 fd1440
+ newfs -i 8 -o space -m 0 /dev/md1c
fstab: /e
"Andrey A. Chernov" writes:
> On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 11:01:43 +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> > "Andrey A. Chernov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > [...]
> >
> > Please disregard. Andrey does not know what he's talking about and
> > ignores any attempt at explaining what the real issue is
Dag-Erling Smorgrav writes:
> "Andrey A. Chernov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Admins with no /etc/opieaccess AFFECTED!
>
> Admins with no /etc/opieaccess IDIOTS for not running mergemaster!
POLA. We don't want to burn our user/admins.
M
--
Mark Murray
iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH
To Unsubscribe:
On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 12:06:36 +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> "Andrey A. Chernov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Admins with no /etc/opieaccess AFFECTED!
>
> Admins with no /etc/opieaccess IDIOTS for not running mergemaster!
First of all, there are many years of existen OPIE administratio
"Andrey A. Chernov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> But... Nonsense from my side happens only because
> 1) I see the breakage.
> 2) Seen breakage, I try to guess what des means, when he made it,
> having no information from des.
> 3) If I guess it (with no information) incorrectly, it not means
> th
On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 11:58:57 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Andrey A. Chernov" writes:
> >On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 13:27:38 +0300, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
> >>
> >> Unless you specify exact details of what I ignore, I'll be forced to
> >> treat your reply a
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
