Re: page fault panic -CURRENT

2003-12-03 Thread Anish Mistry
I'm still able to reproduce this panic today. As well as general flakyness on the CD drive on -CURRENT. Had my first bad burn with this drive today. Can't mount some cds that I just burned with the drive, yet mounts fine in my 4.9 system. Can't seem to burn multisession disks, etc. Anyone e

Re: FreeBSD 5.x and "Bad File Descriptor" errors. Why?

2003-12-03 Thread Dan Naumov
Doug White wrote: Maxtor has a diag tool that goes onto a floppy that you could run. I have this exact disk in my sparc64 here and the first time I used it, it kept running over bad sectors and generally causing mayhem. Running the full scan with the tool, it prompted to fix some problems, then th

Re: 5.2-RELEASE TODO

2003-12-03 Thread Sten
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, Tom wrote: > > On Tue, 2 Dec 2003, Eric Anderson wrote: > > > Tom wrote: > > > > > Just to be complete, there are already a whole bunch of machines that > > >will not boot 5.x, irregardless of the ACPI issues. I've never been able > > >to boot 5.x with ACPI on or off, on any

Re: PXE Boot with Beastie Menu

2003-12-03 Thread Doug White
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, Lawrence Farr wrote: > Has anyone got a working loader.rc for PXE booting Current > with the Beastie menu etc. included? The one on freebsd.org > is for 4.x machines, which works, but doesn't give you the > ACPI options etc. eh? The beastie menu ships by default on 5.X. -- D

Re: FreeBSD 5.x and "Bad File Descriptor" errors. Why?

2003-12-03 Thread Doug White
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, Dan Naumov wrote: > causing this bizarre behavior ? If this is of any help, the exact model > number of the HD is "MAXTOR 4K040H2" and I was using UFS2 on both > drives. Thanks in advance. Maxtor has a diag tool that goes onto a floppy that you could run. I have this exact dis

Re: vm_fault on umass transfers

2003-12-03 Thread John-Mark Gurney
Alastair G. Hogge wrote this message on Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 20:02 +1100: > I've had an Olympus camera which I've been able to access under -CURRENT for > some time until recently. I can mount_msdosfs the device (da0s1) OK, but when > I try to copy or move files from the device to my hard disk dr

5.2-BETA: IA32 SMP: atkbd gone, lock order reversal swap_pager/uma_core

2003-12-03 Thread Matthias Andree
I have made some experiences on a Fujitsu-Siemens Primergy RX300 (Serverworks, Xeon with HyperThreading, MegaRAID) today. I was able to boot the 5.2-BETA ISO from CD-RW after being unsuccessful with floppies yesterday (not that I'd particularly trust floppies...) Here's what I've found so far: 1.

Re: Strange pcm/network problem

2003-12-03 Thread Peter Hofer
>Good news, please supply a dmesg before and after. I've attached them. Both are GENERIC kernels, one booted with ACPI ENABLED [default] and the other with ACPI DISABLED. Thanks for your help, Peter Hofer Copyright (c) 1992-2003 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988,

Re: ATAPI CD still not detected, verbose boot logs available

2003-12-03 Thread Pav Lucistnik
V st, 03. 12. 2003 v 22:39, Christoph Sold píše: > On Wednesday 03 December 2003 09:55, Soren Schmidt wrote: > > Could you try this simple patch and see if that helps? > > Works for me. No problems so far during three reboots. "Me too!" My second Seagate drive is back and running. -- Pav Lucis

Re: FreeBSD 5.x and "Bad File Descriptor" errors. Why?

2003-12-03 Thread Klaus-J. Wolf
Dan Naumov wrote: What follows is a description of a problem I used to have when running FreeBSD 5.0 and 5.1. [...] After the installation of the OS (usually about 8-12 days of running non-stop) I start getting "Bad File Descriptor" errors on random files all around the Maxtor drive and I have

Re: ATAPI CD still not detected, verbose boot logs available

2003-12-03 Thread Christoph Sold
On Wednesday 03 December 2003 09:55, Soren Schmidt wrote: > Could you try this simple patch and see if that helps? Works for me. No problems so far during three reboots. Log files available at http://cheasy.dyndns.org/bootlogs/5.1-2003-11-30-patched/ Thanks for the good work! -Christoph Sold

Re: Intel SE7500WV2 not working with ACPI

2003-12-03 Thread Nate Lawson
Brooks Davis wrote: >> Since acpi0 failed to probe, ACPI isn't used to route interrupts. However, >> the apic code expects ACPI to do that since it enumerated CPUs and I/O >> APICs. You are just going to have to disable ACPI for now. >> >> > acpi0: on motherboard >> > ACPI-1287: *** Error: M

Re: A page fault in subr_turnstile.c:propogate_priority()

2003-12-03 Thread John Baldwin
On 03-Dec-2003 Igor Sysoev wrote: > On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, John Baldwin wrote: > >> > With a patch from http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/patches/turnstile.patch >> > I can not even rebuild kernel. Can I add MPASS to sources from >> > 2003.11.28.00.00.00 ? >> >> Ok, I've just updated turnstile.patch agai

Re: Strange pcm/network problem

2003-12-03 Thread Mathew Kanner
On Dec 03, Peter Hofer wrote: > Mathew Kanner wrote: > > > I notice that your network cards, sound card and sio use IRQ > >4, I also note that your aren't using acpi, what happens when you > >enable it? > > > You're right, it was because of ACPI ;) > > I just compiled a GENERIC kernel and boo

Re: Strange pcm/network problem

2003-12-03 Thread Peter Hofer
Mathew Kanner wrote: I notice that your network cards, sound card and sio use IRQ 4, I also note that your aren't using acpi, what happens when you enable it? You're right, it was because of ACPI ;) I just compiled a GENERIC kernel and booted it with ACPI ENABLED. The problem didn't occur

Re: Strange pcm/network problem

2003-12-03 Thread Dylan Wylie
A quick tought; perhaps you need to remove irq 5 from pccard.conf But... > The problem also persists when I'm using my rl nic instead of the > onboard bfe chip. ..maybe not. Try it. Dylan On 3 Dec 2003 at 20:04, Peter Hofer wrote: > Hi there, > > since I installed 5.2-BETA, I've got a very st

Re: ACPI problem, my VAIO won't come back from suspension

2003-12-03 Thread Melvyn Sopacua
On Wednesday 03 December 2003 21:57, Nate Lawson wrote: > On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, Melvyn Sopacua wrote: > > On Tuesday 02 December 2003 23:34, Nate Lawson wrote: > > > Try other states (acpiconf -s 1, 2, 4). If one works, use it. If not, > > > try disabling acpi and using apm(4) to suspend and resume

Re: /usr/ports/xll/XFree86-4

2003-12-03 Thread Jamie Bowden
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, Dan Nelson wrote: > In the last episode (Dec 03), Mike Hunter said: > > On Dec 02, "Jamie Bowden" wrote: > > > I have a new machine that I've just installed 5.1-R on, and cvsup'd > > > to -C. I'm attempting to build X, and am getting a core dump from > > > rman during the proce

Re: ACPI problem, my VAIO won't come back from suspension

2003-12-03 Thread Nate Lawson
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, Melvyn Sopacua wrote: > On Tuesday 02 December 2003 23:34, Nate Lawson wrote: > > Try other states (acpiconf -s 1, 2, 4). If one works, use it. If not, > > try disabling acpi and using apm(4) to suspend and resume. > > Normally that would be grand, but now that I've not compil

Re: ACPI problem, my VAIO won't come back from suspension

2003-12-03 Thread Melvyn Sopacua
Hi Nate, On Tuesday 02 December 2003 23:34, Nate Lawson wrote: > Try other states (acpiconf -s 1, 2, 4). If one works, use it. If not, > try disabling acpi and using apm(4) to suspend and resume. Normally that would be grand, but now that I've not compiled acpi into the kernel, I have no /dev

Re: A page fault in subr_turnstile.c:propogate_priority()

2003-12-03 Thread Igor Sysoev
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, John Baldwin wrote: > > With a patch from http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/patches/turnstile.patch > > I can not even rebuild kernel. Can I add MPASS to sources from > > 2003.11.28.00.00.00 ? > > Ok, I've just updated turnstile.patch again. I was testing a bogus > condition in my

Re: A page fault in subr_turnstile.c:propogate_priority()

2003-12-03 Thread John Baldwin
On 03-Dec-2003 Igor Sysoev wrote: > On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, John Baldwin wrote: > >> On 03-Dec-2003 Igor Sysoev wrote: >> > On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, John Baldwin wrote: >> > >> >> >> >> On 03-Dec-2003 Igor Sysoev wrote: >> >> > On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, John Baldwin wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> On 03-Dec-2003 Bri

Re: A page fault in subr_turnstile.c:propogate_priority()

2003-12-03 Thread John Baldwin
On 03-Dec-2003 Igor Sysoev wrote: > On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, John Baldwin wrote: > >> On 03-Dec-2003 Igor Sysoev wrote: >> > On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, John Baldwin wrote: >> > >> >> >> >> On 03-Dec-2003 Igor Sysoev wrote: >> >> > On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, John Baldwin wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> On 03-Dec-2003 Bri

Re: "The World" and MIT krb5

2003-12-03 Thread Tillman Hodgson
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 11:52:27AM -0800, Galen Sampson wrote: > Hello all, [Note: I'm not sure that this should be in current@ rather than [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 1) Are the worlds daemons written to link against kerberos (as apposed to the >heimdal replacements replacing their traditional coun

"The World" and MIT krb5

2003-12-03 Thread Galen Sampson
Hello all, I have installed the MIT krb5 port. I installed this port and left KRB5_HOME=/usr/local (this is where I installed the port) in make.conf. I assumed that building the world would use this variable and link the world (ssh[d], telnet[d], login, ...) against the libraries installed by th

Re: How to disable devices in -current / 5.2-BETA?

2003-12-03 Thread Mathew Kanner
On Dec 02, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Scott Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > : However, having a general mechanism for disabling newbus devices would be > : really nice. > > Agreed. But today and 5.2 you lose. However, it isn't easy. What > does disa

Re: ath0 lost connection

2003-12-03 Thread Marcos Biscaysaqu
Hi Kelley. The lasts update made a big different on the driver but still with problems, I have incoming errors and Oerrs and encaptulation erros and that make me loss connection with the clients, Im testing with 34 linux clients, but when I change the wireless card on the AP for a simple p

Re: panic: initiate_write_inodeblock_ufs2: already started

2003-12-03 Thread Kirk McKusick
This error happens if things are not properly locked. As per my previous message, I am not able to look at it now, but am hoping that resolving some of the other races will solve this as well. Kirk McKusick ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http

[current tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

2003-12-03 Thread Tinderbox
TB --- /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/i386/i386/lock: flock(): Resource temporarily unavailable TB --- ERROR: unable to lock sandbox ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail

Re: -current lockup (how to diagnose?)

2003-12-03 Thread Kirk McKusick
I am guessing that some of the recent locking changes are causing the problem. Unfortunately I am on the road now through Jan 4th, so will not be in a position to look at it. Hopefully one of the folks working on getting the SMP pushed down through the filesystem (Jeff Roberson, John Baldwin, or A

Re: Strange pcm/network problem

2003-12-03 Thread Mathew Kanner
Peter, I'm afraid I haven't a clue why this happens to you but please see my notes below. On Dec 03, Peter Hofer wrote: > since I installed 5.2-BETA, I've got a very strange problem. Always > when I'm listening to some music and start a network transfer, both > the music and the tr

Re: 5.2-RELEASE TODO

2003-12-03 Thread Eric Anderson
Tom wrote: On Tue, 2 Dec 2003, Eric Anderson wrote: Tom wrote: Just to be complete, there are already a whole bunch of machines that will not boot 5.x, irregardless of the ACPI issues. I've never been able to boot 5.x with ACPI on or off, on any of the 5 Dell PowerEdge 6350 servers I ha

Re: /usr/ports/xll/XFree86-4

2003-12-03 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Dec 03), Mike Hunter said: > On Dec 02, "Jamie Bowden" wrote: > > I have a new machine that I've just installed 5.1-R on, and cvsup'd > > to -C. I'm attempting to build X, and am getting a core dump from > > rman during the process. > > I had this happen too. I did something

Re: 5.2-RELEASE TODO

2003-12-03 Thread Tom
On Tue, 2 Dec 2003, Eric Anderson wrote: > Tom wrote: > > > Just to be complete, there are already a whole bunch of machines that > >will not boot 5.x, irregardless of the ACPI issues. I've never been able > >to boot 5.x with ACPI on or off, on any of the 5 Dell PowerEdge 6350 > >servers I have

Re: /usr/ports/xll/XFree86-4

2003-12-03 Thread Mike Hunter
On Dec 02, "Jamie Bowden" wrote: > I have a new machine that I've just installed 5.1-R on, and cvsup'd to -C. > I'm attempting to build X, and am getting a core dump from rman during the > process. I had this happen too. I did something really hack-ish to get around it (like delete that document

Strange pcm/network problem

2003-12-03 Thread Peter Hofer
Hi there, since I installed 5.2-BETA, I've got a very strange problem. Always when I'm listening to some music and start a network transfer, both the music and the transfer stop after some time. Nothing is being received or sent any more, and the following message appears a few times: bfe0: watchd

Re: FreeBSD 5.x and "Bad File Descriptor" errors. Why?

2003-12-03 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 05:55:29PM +0200, Dan Naumov wrote: > Kris Kennaway wrote > > >You get that error from what command(s)? Have you tried with 5.2, > >which has a new ATA driver? > > > >Kris > > > > > I usually "discover" that I am having data corruption when trying to > update ports. A fi

Re: A page fault in subr_turnstile.c:propogate_priority()

2003-12-03 Thread Igor Sysoev
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, John Baldwin wrote: > On 03-Dec-2003 Igor Sysoev wrote: > > On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, John Baldwin wrote: > > > >> > >> On 03-Dec-2003 Igor Sysoev wrote: > >> > On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, John Baldwin wrote: > >> > > >> >> On 03-Dec-2003 Brian F. Feldman wrote: > >> >> > Igor Sysoev <[EM

Re: ServeRAID semi show stopper (was Re: lots of "exclusive sleep mutex")

2003-12-03 Thread Clive Lin
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 10:29:19AM -0700, Scott Long wrote: > Clive Lin wrote: > >Hi, > > > >Here comes more helpful ServeRAID related warnings: > > > >Bad malloc flags: 0 > >Stack backtrace: > >malloc() of "16" with the following non-sleepable locks held: > >exclusive sleep mutex g_xdown r = 0

Re: A page fault in subr_turnstile.c:propogate_priority()

2003-12-03 Thread John Baldwin
On 03-Dec-2003 Igor Sysoev wrote: > On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, John Baldwin wrote: > >> >> On 03-Dec-2003 Igor Sysoev wrote: >> > On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, John Baldwin wrote: >> > >> >> On 03-Dec-2003 Brian F. Feldman wrote: >> >> > Igor Sysoev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> I'd cvsup'ed 5.1-CURRENT f

Re: A page fault in subr_turnstile.c:propogate_priority()

2003-12-03 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 05:43:13PM +0300, Igor Sysoev wrote: > panic: page fault > panic messages: > --- > Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode > cpuid = 2; apic id = 02 > fault virtual address = 0xe5 > fault code = supervisor read, page not present > instruction pointer

Re: ServeRAID semi show stopper (was Re: lots of "exclusive sleep mutex")

2003-12-03 Thread Scott Long
Clive Lin wrote: Hi, Here comes more helpful ServeRAID related warnings: Bad malloc flags: 0 Stack backtrace: malloc() of "16" with the following non-sleepable locks held: exclusive sleep mutex g_xdown r = 0 (0xe1f31cbc) locked @ /usr/src/sys/geom/geom_io.c:355 Bad uma_zalloc flags: 0 Stack

PXE Boot with Beastie Menu

2003-12-03 Thread Lawrence Farr
Has anyone got a working loader.rc for PXE booting Current with the Beastie menu etc. included? The one on freebsd.org is for 4.x machines, which works, but doesn't give you the ACPI options etc. Lawrence Farr EPC Direct Limited ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: jail and emulators/linux_base

2003-12-03 Thread Niklas Saers
Hi, > "jail where I trust users not to try to take over my system" = "chroot". Thank you and Pawel Jakub Dawidek for pointing that out that possibility. Been living with jail-only thoughts for a little too long. ;) This solves my problem, although I don't totally agree as jail in addtion has an i

Re: please test pcm channel patch

2003-12-03 Thread Mathew Kanner
On Dec 03, Sean Chittenden wrote: > > > Hello All, > > > Please test this PCM patch. It creates seperate locking > > > classes for PCM channels and should prevent the warning where > > > multiple mutexes from the same class are held (as reported > > > recently). I believe this to be a good stra

ServeRAID semi show stopper (was Re: lots of "exclusive sleep mutex")

2003-12-03 Thread Clive Lin
Hi, Here comes more helpful ServeRAID related warnings: Bad malloc flags: 0 Stack backtrace: malloc() of "16" with the following non-sleepable locks held: exclusive sleep mutex g_xdown r = 0 (0xe1f31cbc) locked @ /usr/src/sys/geom/geom_io.c:355 Bad uma_zalloc flags: 0 Stack backtrace: malloc

Re: User mounts could not use character conversions (libkiconv is just for roots)

2003-12-03 Thread R. Imura
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 12:08:52PM +0600, Boris Popov wrote: > Probably it is not a good idea to allow users to load kernel iconv > tables because one can waste a lot of memory by loading of all possible > conversion schemes. The better solution is to add some kind of preload > ability which

Re: please test pcm channel patch

2003-12-03 Thread Mathew Kanner
On Dec 03, Sean Chittenden wrote: > > > Hello All, > > > Please test this PCM patch. It creates seperate locking > > > classes for PCM channels and should prevent the warning where > > > multiple mutexes from the same class are held (as reported > > > recently). I believe this to be a good stra

Re: A page fault in subr_turnstile.c:propogate_priority()

2003-12-03 Thread Igor Sysoev
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, Igor Sysoev wrote: > On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, John Baldwin wrote: > > > > > On 03-Dec-2003 Igor Sysoev wrote: > > > On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, John Baldwin wrote: > > > > > >> On 03-Dec-2003 Brian F. Feldman wrote: > > >> > Igor Sysoev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> >> I'd cvsup'ed 5

Re: A page fault in subr_turnstile.c:propogate_priority()

2003-12-03 Thread Igor Sysoev
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, John Baldwin wrote: > > On 03-Dec-2003 Igor Sysoev wrote: > > On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, John Baldwin wrote: > > > >> On 03-Dec-2003 Brian F. Feldman wrote: > >> > Igor Sysoev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> I'd cvsup'ed 5.1-CURRENT from 2003.11.04.02.02.00 up to > >> >> 2003.11.

Re: 5.0 boot beastie animation?

2003-12-03 Thread Olev
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Olev writes: Just do not make it the default or people installing on serial consoles will hate you more than you imagine... Ofcourse, just like you need to set loader_color="YES" in loader.conf for colors, off by default. Olev ___

Re: 5.0 boot beastie animation?

2003-12-03 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Olev writes: >Just discovered a nice added leetness feature that makes the boot >beastie be drawn in full color (loader_color="YES" in loader.conf) ... >ok seems leet ... but wouldn't it be even more leet when it would be >drawn with the fork moving? One second wi

Re: A page fault in subr_turnstile.c:propogate_priority()

2003-12-03 Thread John Baldwin
On 03-Dec-2003 Igor Sysoev wrote: > On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, John Baldwin wrote: > >> On 03-Dec-2003 Brian F. Feldman wrote: >> > Igor Sysoev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> I'd cvsup'ed 5.1-CURRENT from 2003.11.04.02.02.00 up to >> >> 2003.11.28.00.00.00 with the turnstile support and it can still >

5.0 boot beastie animation?

2003-12-03 Thread Olev
Just discovered a nice added leetness feature that makes the boot beastie be drawn in full color (loader_color="YES" in loader.conf) ... ok seems leet ... but wouldn't it be even more leet when it would be drawn with the fork moving? One second with the fork 1 char space to left and then after

Re: A page fault in subr_turnstile.c:propogate_priority()

2003-12-03 Thread Igor Sysoev
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, John Baldwin wrote: > On 03-Dec-2003 Brian F. Feldman wrote: > > Igor Sysoev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I'd cvsup'ed 5.1-CURRENT from 2003.11.04.02.02.00 up to > >> 2003.11.28.00.00.00 with the turnstile support and it can still > >> causes sometimes a page fault in propog

Re: A page fault in subr_turnstile.c:propogate_priority()

2003-12-03 Thread Igor Sysoev
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, Brian F. Feldman wrote: > Igor Sysoev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'd cvsup'ed 5.1-CURRENT from 2003.11.04.02.02.00 up to > > 2003.11.28.00.00.00 with the turnstile support and it can still > > causes sometimes a page fault in propogate_priority(). > > I have core dump and c

Re: A page fault in subr_turnstile.c:propogate_priority()

2003-12-03 Thread Igor Sysoev
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, John Baldwin wrote: > On 03-Dec-2003 Brian F. Feldman wrote: > > Igor Sysoev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I'd cvsup'ed 5.1-CURRENT from 2003.11.04.02.02.00 up to > >> 2003.11.28.00.00.00 with the turnstile support and it can still > >> causes sometimes a page fault in propog

Re: FreeBSD 5.x and "Bad File Descriptor" errors. Why?

2003-12-03 Thread Dan Naumov
Kris Kennaway wrote You get that error from what command(s)? Have you tried with 5.2, which has a new ATA driver? Kris I usually "discover" that I am having data corruption when trying to update ports. A file that has a "Bad File Descriptor" refuses to let cvsup overwrite and/or remove itsel

Re: 40% slowdown with dynamic /bin/sh

2003-12-03 Thread Leo Bicknell
In a message written on Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 06:05:40PM -0200, Daniel C. Sobral wrote: > And if you are using FreeBSD on desktop you should use bash or some > other ports-shell, instead of slowing down _the_ shell for shell > scripts. But that's IMHO, so I didn't pipe this in until now. But it's

Re: A page fault in subr_turnstile.c:propogate_priority()

2003-12-03 Thread John Baldwin
On 03-Dec-2003 Brian F. Feldman wrote: > Igor Sysoev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I'd cvsup'ed 5.1-CURRENT from 2003.11.04.02.02.00 up to >> 2003.11.28.00.00.00 with the turnstile support and it can still >> causes sometimes a page fault in propogate_priority(). >> I have core dump and can send d

Re: Intel SE7500WV2 not working with ACPI

2003-12-03 Thread John Baldwin
On 02-Dec-2003 Brooks Davis wrote: > On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 05:50:27PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: >> >> On 25-Nov-2003 Brooks Davis wrote: >> > Since the interrupt changes, my dual Xeons based on the SE7500WV2 board >> > don't work with ACPI. Specificly, the onboard nics (em0 and em1) >> > appe

Re: [ATAng?] ad1 disappeared again

2003-12-03 Thread Chris Faulhaber
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 09:55:56AM +0100, Soren Schmidt wrote: > It seems Chris Faulhaber wrote: > > I have been seeing the same issue since August with a different, > > but similiar, set of drives: > > > > ad0: 57241MB [116301/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA100 > > ad1: 57241MB [116301/16/63] at ata

Re: -current lockup (how to diagnose?)

2003-12-03 Thread Sławek Żak
Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, 2 Dec 2003, Jun Kuriyama wrote: > >> At Mon, 1 Dec 2003 09:23:21 -0500 (EST), >> Robert Watson wrote: >> > This could be a sign of a VM or VFS lock leak or deadlock. I'd advise >> > hooking up a serial console, dropping to DDB over serial line,

Re: FreeBSD 5.x and "Bad File Descriptor" errors. Why?

2003-12-03 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 01:43:57PM +0200, Dan Naumov wrote: > Hello > > What follows is a description of a problem I used to have when running > FreeBSD 5.0 and 5.1. I am not running FreeBSD right now, but I am > considering going back to it but I need to figure out how to prevent > this issue

Re: A page fault in subr_turnstile.c:propogate_priority()

2003-12-03 Thread Brian F. Feldman
Igor Sysoev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd cvsup'ed 5.1-CURRENT from 2003.11.04.02.02.00 up to > 2003.11.28.00.00.00 with the turnstile support and it can still > causes sometimes a page fault in propogate_priority(). > I have core dump and can send debug output. Go ahead and load up kernel.debu

Re: jail and emulators/linux_base

2003-12-03 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
Niklas Saers Mailinglistaccount <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > ===> Installing for linux_base-7.1_5 > Un-mounting linprocfs... > umount: retrying using path instead of file system ID > ===> Generating temporary packing list > ===> Checking if emulators/linux_base already installed > mknod: /compat/

Re: 40% slowdown with dynamic /bin/sh

2003-12-03 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 07:44:16AM -0600, Bob Willcox wrote: > Nothing specific. I suppose it's just a space-time tradeoff from my > point of view. With disk sizes what they are today (most of my systems > have a system disk size of 40 GB or more), in my environment reducing > the root filesystem

Re: jail and emulators/linux_base

2003-12-03 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 10:22:16AM +0100, Niklas Saers Mailinglistaccount wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm running CURRENT and set up a jail where I want to install SUN JDK > 1.4.2. In the process, linux emulation needs to be installed. While > installing emulators/linux_base, I get the following: > > ==

Re: licq & KSE - resolved

2003-12-03 Thread Daniel Eischen
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, Alexander Motin wrote: > Daniel Eischen wrote: > > > >>From which system is this? The nvidia or the ATI? We know nvidia > > I try to use same HDD on two systems. On system with ATI video I only > disable nvidia kernel module loading and change X driver. Right, it's not onl

Re: 40% slowdown with dynamic /bin/sh

2003-12-03 Thread Bob Willcox
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 04:48:27PM -0800, Tim Kientzle wrote: > Bob Willcox wrote: > > > >What impact, if any, will this have on those of us that use NIS and > >still want a statically linked root? I have been using NIS for years ... > > First, let me clarify that I'm advocating moving NIS out of

panic: initiate_write_inodeblock_ufs2: already started

2003-12-03 Thread Robert Watson
Ran into this on a box with -CURRENT from yesterday, running with MAC (although in this case I suspect it doesn't make a difference, I'm not using the multilabel/extattr code in UFS2). I have a core on disk, so please let me know what further information would be useful. This machine spends a lo

Re: PANIC: PAGE FAULT

2003-12-03 Thread Robert Watson
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, Ganbaa wrote: > I'm trying to install FreeBSD-5.1 on the PC with PIII,512MB SDRAM, 30GB > Barracuda II Model ST330630A. But following error has occured. We're in the throes of preparing FreeBSD 5.2 for release, which includes a large number of bug fixes (although potentially

Re: jail and emulators/linux_base

2003-12-03 Thread Pawel Jakub Dawidek
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 10:22:16AM +0100, Niklas Saers Mailinglistaccount wrote: +> I'm running CURRENT and set up a jail where I want to install SUN JDK +> 1.4.2. In the process, linux emulation needs to be installed. While +> installing emulators/linux_base, I get the following: +> +> ===> Insta

FreeBSD 5.x and "Bad File Descriptor" errors. Why?

2003-12-03 Thread Dan Naumov
Hello What follows is a description of a problem I used to have when running FreeBSD 5.0 and 5.1. I am not running FreeBSD right now, but I am considering going back to it but I need to figure out how to prevent this issue from happening again. My system has 2 harddrives, a 16 GB Seagate that

Re: licq & KSE - resolved

2003-12-03 Thread Alexander Motin
Daniel Eischen wrote: If I use libkse I get: kernel: Warning: pid 25341 used static ldt allocation. kernel: See the i386_set_ldt man page for more info in my messages. When I use libc_r I do not get this messages. I'm sorry. Messages seems to be independent from library. I get messages with both l

RE: problem with kerberos startup and LDAP

2003-12-03 Thread Andrey Beresovsky
Hello All, I have the same problem. See also PR58680. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=58680 Guys who work on RCNG please consider the proposed solution. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sean McNeil Sent: Monday, December 01,

jail and emulators/linux_base

2003-12-03 Thread Niklas Saers Mailinglistaccount
Hi all, I'm running CURRENT and set up a jail where I want to install SUN JDK 1.4.2. In the process, linux emulation needs to be installed. While installing emulators/linux_base, I get the following: ===> Installing for linux_base-7.1_5 Un-mounting linprocfs... umount: retrying using path instead

Re: please test pcm channel patch

2003-12-03 Thread Sean Chittenden
> > Hello All, > > Please test this PCM patch. It creates seperate locking > > classes for PCM channels and should prevent the warning where > > multiple mutexes from the same class are held (as reported > > recently). I believe this to be a good strategy as it masks fewer > > errors. > > I

Re: please test pcm channel patch

2003-12-03 Thread Sean Chittenden
> Hello All, > Please test this PCM patch. It creates seperate locking > classes for PCM channels and should prevent the warning where > multiple mutexes from the same class are held (as reported > recently). I believe this to be a good strategy as it masks fewer > errors. I can confirm th

Re: [ATAng?] ad1 disappeared again

2003-12-03 Thread Soren Schmidt
It seems Chris Faulhaber wrote: > I have been seeing the same issue since August with a different, > but similiar, set of drives: > > ad0: 57241MB [116301/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA100 > ad1: 57241MB [116301/16/63] at ata0-slave UDMA100 > > Under -CURRENT only the first drive is seen; RELENG_4

Re: ATAPI CD still not detected, verbose boot logs available

2003-12-03 Thread Soren Schmidt
Could you try this simple patch and see if that helps? Index: ata-lowlevel.c === RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/dev/ata/ata-lowlevel.c,v retrieving revision 1.23 diff -u -r1.23 ata-lowlevel.c --- ata-lowlevel.c 2 Nov 2003 22:04:53

Re: psmintr not attached w/ acpi

2003-12-03 Thread Russell Jackson
Has anyone looked into pr i386/54781? It sounds very similar, and it doesn't happen only on intel laptops. It also happens on my athlon laptop. -- Russell A. Jackson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) The irony is, if you're willing to kill a perpetrator, you probably won't have to. -- Massad Ayoob ___

Re: Thinkpad T40p and panic during boot...;O

2003-12-03 Thread Finnur Guðmundsson
Just in case anyone didnt know already ;) Jeffrey Katcher wrote: You have to set: hw.pci.allow_unsupported_io_range="1" at startup initially and then in /boot/loader.conf for subsequent boots I had the same problem, now I'm happily running 5.1-Current/5.2-Beta. Finnur Guðmundsson wrote: Hi th

[current tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

2003-12-03 Thread Tinderbox
TB --- /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/i386/i386/lock: flock(): Resource temporarily unavailable TB --- ERROR: unable to lock sandbox ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail

Re: Is booting/installing from USB CDROM considered supported?

2003-12-03 Thread Martin Nilsson
Martin Nilsson wrote: I tried to install our CD/FDD-less servers from a CD-RW drive connected on the USB port, I'll try with a fresh 5.2-BETA later today and see what happens with it. in the meantime I just want to ask: The 5.2-BETA CDROM hangs, it prints something like found /BOOT/LOADER ...