On 02/24/2012 01:16 AM, deeptec...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 11:41 PM, deeptec...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>> X11R6 is actually a symlink to /usr/local, and not usr/local or
>> .usr/local! Also, /home is a symlink to /usr/home, and not usr/home or
>> ./usr/home
> I meant to say that X11
I'm currently trying to boot an intel evaluation board (D2700) with
10-CURRENT.
Installation was
make installworld DESTDIR=/mnt/disk
make installkernel DESTDIR=/mnt/disk
make distribution DESTDIR=/mnt/disk
vi /mnt/disk/fstab (added lines for root, swap)
unmount /mnt/disk
Boot goes fine until the
TB --- 2012-02-24 02:33:19 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-02-24 02:33:19 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc64/powerpc
TB --- 2012-02-24 02:33:19 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2012-02-24 02:33:19 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2012-02-24 02:33:19 - /u
On Thursday 23 February 2012 06:14 pm, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
> BTW, the temperature reading goes up when the system is loaded and
> goes down when it is idle, right? Just making sure...
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jung-uk Kim
>
> yes that is correct I tested this patch on 2 FX series Processors
> a 6 core a
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 11:41 PM, deeptec...@gmail.com
wrote:
> X11R6 is actually a symlink to /usr/local, and not usr/local or
> .usr/local! Also, /home is a symlink to /usr/home, and not usr/home or
> ./usr/home
I meant to say that X11R6 should be a symlink to local or ./local.
About /home: I'v
>
> BTW, the temperature reading goes up when the system is loaded and
> goes down when it is idle, right? Just making sure...
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jung-uk Kim
>
yes that is correct I tested this patch on 2 FX series Processors a 6 core
and 8 core, both work fine.
any chance you could commit this pat
On Thursday 23 February 2012 05:08 pm, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
> > Can you please try this patch?
> >
> > http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/amdtemp3.diff
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jung-uk Kim
>
> After that patch temp appears to work, but the value seems low not
> sure why
--- >8 --- SNIP! --- >8 ---
Well, I did not actually get a full membership to the "rm -rf /"
fanclub, but I managed to remove all installed ports, basically
requiring a full reinstall. Here's how it happened:
Once upon a time, I did a full reinstall (not because of "rm -rf
/"-like things). I kept the old installation's full
>
>
> Can you please try this patch?
>
> http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/amdtemp3.diff
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jung-uk Kim
>
After that patch temp appears to work, but the value seems low not sure why
Titan# sysctl dev.cpu
dev.cpu.0.%desc: ACPI CPU
dev.cpu.0.%driver: cpu
dev.cpu.0.%location: handle=\_PR
On 11.02.12 11:20, Gleb Kurtsou wrote:
> On (10/02/2012 22:41), Florian Smeets wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> if you set WRKDIRPREFIX to a tmpfs mountpoint and try to build audio/gsm
>> from ports one of the mv processes gets stuck in state tmpfs quite
>> often. Traces from a kernel with WITTNESS and DEBUG_VF
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 21:11:13 -0800
Tim Kientzle wrote:
>
> On Feb 21, 2012, at 3:39 PM, Daniel Eischen wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 21 Feb 2012, Steve Kargl wrote:
> >
> >> 3) Add a new option to ldconfig to prepend new libraries to
> >> the hints files and fix the ports to use this option instead
>
I don't disagree. I was disagreeing with the notion that Unix is an IDE.
From: Quentin Schwerkolt
To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Sent: Thu, February 23, 2012 9:44:50 AM
Subject: Re: No working IDE in FreeBSD!
Ok, but I think an IDE that can easily compile p
Ok, but I think an IDE that can easily compile projects with clang is
not a bad idea.
On 02/23/12 15:38, Dan Daley wrote:
The I in IDE stands for Integrated. An IDE is an "editor with more general
niftiness" by definition. Unix can be a development environment, but is not an
IDE.
Dan.
__
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 08:28:47AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> Hmm, can you see what 'dev->nameunit' is? Maybe just do 'p *dev' actually
> and reply with that.
(kgdb) p *dev
$1 = {ops = 0xc50de000, link = {tqe_next = 0xc5271380, tqe_prev =
0xc5271184},
devlink = {tqe_next = 0xc5271380, tqe_pre
The I in IDE stands for Integrated. An IDE is an "editor with more general
niftiness" by definition. Unix can be a development environment, but is not an
IDE.
Dan.
From: Jan Mikkelsen
To: O. Hartmann
Cc: Current FreeBSD
Sent: Thu, February 23, 2012 7:47
On Thursday, February 23, 2012 1:44:49 am Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 08:14:19AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Wednesday, January 19, 2011 5:08:10 am Bruce Cran wrote:
> > > On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 11:25:38 -0500
> > > John Baldwin wrote:
> > >
> > > > Oh, the uart[01] devic
Unix is the original IDE. FreeBSD is a good modern implementation.
If you don't think that's enough, you need to say what you're really looking
for, rather than just an IDE. It sounds like you're after an editor with more
general niftiness. Visual Slickedit?
On 23/02/2012, at 10:22 PM, O. Hartm
I use both Netbeans (7.1 beta and 7.0.1) and Eclipse for Java development on
FreeBSD 8.2. I haven't used either for doing development in other languages,
but both work great for Java. I highly prefer Netbeans over Eclipse, but have
to use Eclipse for some things.
If you want to try Netbeans
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/23/12 12:22, O. Hartmann wrote:
> CLANG. ECLIPSE is to large and it does not fit my purpose. I tried
You could try NetBeans, but its size is comparable to Eclipse.
- --
Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (FreeBSD)
Comm
At 12:22 23/02/2012, O. Hartmann wrote:
Several time ago I tried to do some development within an IDE, not even
for lectural and educational purposes. Since most of our software is
written in C/C++ and OpenCL, I highly prefered ANJUTA, since this IDE
was highly customizable, flexible and even Fre
At 00:07 22/02/2012, Devin Teske wrote:
9. Enables SU+J on /tmp /var and /usr
None of these customizations should have any effect on system
performance whatsoever.
Sorry for going off-topic, but currently there is a problem with SU+J
and using snapshots, but may be other problems as well. Yo
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 3:22 PM, O. Hartmann <
ohart...@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> wrote:
> devel/anjuta is broken, so no chance. I also tried KDevelop, since many
> of our Linux based scientists feel good having this very popular IDE,
> but it is marked "broken" on FreeBSD.
>
I'm using kdevelop-kd
I don't know how well it would suit your purpose, but you could always
try emacs-ide (at http://gna.org/projects/emacs-ide/ )
--
Igor M. :-)
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsu
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 6:22 AM, O. Hartmann <
ohart...@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> wrote:
> Several time ago I tried to do some development within an IDE, not even
> for lectural and educational purposes. Since most of our software is
> written in C/C++ and OpenCL, I highly prefered ANJUTA, since th
On 23-02-2012 12:22, O. Hartmann wrote:
> Before I waste more time on searching for a suitable IDE apart ANJUTA,
> I'd like to ask people here what alternative they would suggest if the
> focus is devel/anjuta. Eclipse is no way, KDevelop is broken, CodeBlocks
> is incapable of being easily adapted
Several time ago I tried to do some development within an IDE, not even
for lectural and educational purposes. Since most of our software is
written in C/C++ and OpenCL, I highly prefered ANJUTA, since this IDE
was highly customizable, flexible and even FreeBSD's ancient outdated
version in the por
on 23/02/2012 07:38 Erich Dollansky said the following:
> Hi,
>
> my sound just stopped working. Dmesg says:
>
> pcm0: chn_write(): pcm0:virtual:dsp0.vp0: play interrupt timeout, channel dead
>
> I am used to this. I unload the sound module and load it again and the
> problem is solved. As the
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 09:18:08AM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> Quoting "Bjoern A. Zeeb" (from Wed,
> 22 Feb 2012 22:31:36 +):
>
> > On 21. Feb 2012, at 13:35 , Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> >
> >> You can download from
> >> http://www.Leidinger.net/FreeBSD/current-patches/
> >> The
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 03:56:56PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > is there a specific reason that the following NICs are not (or shall
> > not be) in GENERIC (at least on i386)?
>
> No specific reason for these two:
>
> > - if_cxgb
> > - if_cxgbe
>
> But I do prefer to
Quoting Scott Long (from Wed, 22 Feb 2012 08:42:39 -0700):
On Feb 22, 2012, at 1:22 AM, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Quoting Scott Long (from Tue, 21 Feb 2012
17:45:04 -0700):
On Feb 21, 2012, at 7:56 AM, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Hi,
is there a specific reason that the following NICs
Quoting "Bjoern A. Zeeb" (from Wed,
22 Feb 2012 22:31:36 +):
On 21. Feb 2012, at 13:35 , Alexander Leidinger wrote:
You can download from
http://www.Leidinger.net/FreeBSD/current-patches/
The files are
- i386_SMALL
- i386_SMALL_loader.conf
- amd64_SMALL
- amd64_SMALL_loader.conf
31 matches
Mail list logo
