Re: FreeBSD 5.x and "Bad File Descriptor" errors. Why?

2003-12-03 Thread Dan Naumov
ut no errors were found. Sincerely, Dan Naumov ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: FreeBSD 5.x and "Bad File Descriptor" errors. Why?

2003-12-03 Thread Dan Naumov
damaged files completely, sometimes leaving the system in a severely broken state. And even if it did not, data corruption would happen again in 8-12 days. Sincerely, Dan Naumov ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/f

FreeBSD 5.x and "Bad File Descriptor" errors. Why?

2003-12-03 Thread Dan Naumov
unning for many weeks in a row. Now what exactly could be causing this bizarre behavior ? If this is of any help, the exact model number of the HD is "MAXTOR 4K040H2" and I was using UFS2 on both drives. Thanks in advance. Sincerely, Dan Naumov __

Re: SMBus / I2C h/w sensors and FreeBSD 5.1

2003-10-05 Thread Dan Naumov
dev/smb is still nowhere to be seen :( Sincerely, Dan Naumov ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: SMBus / I2C h/w sensors and FreeBSD 5.1

2003-10-04 Thread Dan Naumov
n my kernel config. I've also noticed a > > line saying "pci0: at device 7.4 (no driver > > attached)" in my dmesg. > > So it's no intpm hardware. What drivers should I be using then ? I had lm_sensors on Linux work with this hardware... Sincerely, Dan Naumov ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

SMBus / I2C h/w sensors and FreeBSD 5.1

2003-10-04 Thread Dan Naumov
ed to create /dev/smb by itself ? Does the error of "chm -S" mean that my kernel is not compiled with smbus support (would be weird) or that sysutils/consolehm is compiled with smbus support disabled (I don't see any appropriate make options in the port Makefile) ? Thank you for y

RE: Fixing -pthreads (Re: ports and -current)

2003-09-23 Thread Dan Naumov
On Tue, 2003-09-23 at 23:25, Dan Naumov wrote: > On Tue, 2003-09-23 at 23:13, Daniel Eischen wrote: > > I understand that folks want to wave their hands and say "just make > > -pthread work and do whatever it needs to". > > I am one of those folks as well. As an e

RE: Fixing -pthreads (Re: ports and -current)

2003-09-23 Thread Dan Naumov
pplications that use -pthread when compiling them from source myself. Not in the slightest. This is BAD BAD BAD for usability. Sincerely, Dan Naumov ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscrib

Strange system responsiveness issues with 5.1-CURRENT

2003-09-23 Thread Dan Naumov
webspace to post my dmesg and kernel config on, but if any of you people want them, I can send them attached to a private mail. Sincerely, Dan Naumov ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubsc

Re: Fixing -pthreads (Re: ports and -current)

2003-09-21 Thread Dan Naumov
On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 00:42, Daniel Eischen wrote: > We've already been over this before. The problem is not > as bad as you think, and there are other platforms that > don't have -pthread. And those platforms would be? Si

Re: ATAng no good for me/REQUEST_SENSE recovered from missing interrupt

2003-09-21 Thread Dan Naumov
boot which you saw in the dmesg output I sent you ? Sincerely, Dan Naumov ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: ATAng no good for me/REQUEST_SENSE recovered from missing interrupt

2003-09-21 Thread Dan Naumov
ent [818 x 2048 byte records] ======= Is this something I should worry about ? Sincerely, Dan Naumov ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: ports and -current

2003-09-20 Thread Dan Naumov
On Sun, 2003-09-21 at 04:09, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > : I'd really like to see this change backed out, at minimum until the > : ports freeze is over. My thoughts ex

Getting -pthread support back into local source tree

2003-09-20 Thread Dan Naumov
Hello Seeing as -pthread support has been removed from -CURRENT breaking _LOTS_ of ports, is it possible to "get it back" into a local source tree ? If so, how ? Thanks in advance. Sincerely, Dan Naumov ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing

Re: ATAng no good for me

2003-09-20 Thread Dan Naumov
On Sat, 2003-09-20 at 12:32, David R. Colyer wrote: > Is atapicam a kernel config option? [14:11]-[jago]-[~]: cat /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/JAGO | grep atapicam #device atapicam# BROKEN in -CURRENT !!! Hope this helps. Sincerely, Dan Nau

Re: ATAng still problematic

2003-09-19 Thread Dan Naumov
eport that if I have ATAPICAM enabled in my kernel and have my Lite-On DVD/CDRW Combo Drive attached to the system, today's -CURRENT fails to boot (both single- and multiuser). It gets stuck right after: acd0: CDRW at ata1-master PIO4 Disabling atapicam in th

Re: Random lockups and reboots on FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE

2003-09-19 Thread Dan Naumov
I forgot to add that excessive heat and faulty ram are ruled out, I've checked system temp and it seems to be OK, memtest has also passed all tests completely without giving any errors. It *COULD* theoretically be the HD going "bad", but how could I possibly check this? Sincer

Random lockups and reboots on FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE

2003-09-19 Thread Dan Naumov
oard (AMD761 chipset) Creative NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti4200 (I tried both avaible driver sets) Creative SB128 PCI Lite-On DVD/CDRW Combo Drive LTC-48161H Maxtor 40 GB HD Seagate 16 GB HD Thanks in advance. Sincerely, Dan Naumov ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing

Re: Removing Sendmail

2003-04-02 Thread Dan Naumov
eboot is one of the best features of Linux and actual advantages it has over FreeBSD. Sincerely, -- Dan Naumov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: Removing Sendmail

2003-04-02 Thread Dan Naumov
t CVS, BIND, g77, GDB, OpenSSL, SendMail, games and crypto out of base and making them avaible through ports. But that's all IMHO and not very likely to happen to FreeBSD in my lifetime ;) Sincerely, -- Dan Naumov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___

Re: Removing Sendmail

2003-04-02 Thread Dan Naumov
ot;none" are the options presented to the user during the installation of a NetBSD system. I think it's a good idea. Sincerely, -- Dan Naumov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/lis

Re: Removing Sendmail

2003-04-02 Thread Dan Naumov
logger. Would you rather just let things be as they are ? Sincerely, -- Dan Naumov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

-O2 breaks GCC 3.2.1-compiled code (seems OS specific)

2003-03-10 Thread Dan Naumov
and CFLAGS under Gentoo Linux with GCC 3.2.1 for a long time and everything compiled absolutely fine. This leads me to believe that there are not only arch-specific, but also OS-specific GCC issues. Can anyone else confirm this ? Sincerely, -- Dan Naumov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To Unsubsc