On Sat, Oct 12, 2002 at 09:55:00AM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
There are quite a number of these gadgets on eBay right now, they would
probably make a cheap entry-level platform for powerpc work:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=2059912083
Be careful buying one. I got
On Sat, Oct 12, 2002 at 10:40:01AM -0700, Juli Mallett wrote:
They're nice little toys. Mine is Ethernet. You can run NetBSD on them,
...
There are *many* different varieties. Some of them FreeBSD would *NEVER*
want to target. Others would be great. The one PHK points to looks to
be one
I've ended up hosing world with the Binutils upgrade.
It is best you don't try to install a world right now.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 07:37:53AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote:
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 02:42:34AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 01:04:23AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
I've ended up hosing world with the Binutils upgrade.
I think world is OK now.
Looks
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 01:25:29PM +, Mike Barcroft wrote:
--
=== gnu/usr.bin/binutils/libbfd
In file included from /tinderbox/sparc64/src/contrib/binutils/bfd/elf32.c:22:
...
On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 08:38:58PM -0400, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
Could you please try to compile libmsun with with GCC 3.3 snapshot David
just committed and see if that changes anything?
It doesn't compile on -current. Mike and the standards guys are suspose
to undo the breakage that crept
On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 04:23:54PM -0600, Colin Harford wrote:
Any ideas? Is this just a newbie error or something more. I have gone
into the archives on MARC and have not found anything about it
Something is wrong with your sources.
cat /usr/src/usr.bin/file/../../contrib/file/Header
On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 08:47:15PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Are these suitable for importing as a regression suite?
We could just import the GCC testsuite... it would add 25 MB (checked
out, more w/in /home/ncvs/src :-( )
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe
On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 11:29:08AM +0100, Mark Murray wrote:
I would like to make a port out of these and remove them from the base
distribution.
I think this is a fine idea. However, patch please so we know exactly
what we are talking about. Some of the games are used in 'make world'.
To
On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 02:16:09PM +0100, Mark Murray wrote:
I've had a patch in the system (bin/12727) since 1999/07/20 that does
just this for the NetBSD patches. I've tried a few times to get it
committed. See the patch for details...
This is good to have, but it doesn't change the
On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 09:47:12AM -0400, Stephen J. Roznowski wrote:
On 9 Oct, Mark Murray wrote:
I've had a patch in the system (bin/12727) since 1999/07/20 that does
just this for the NetBSD patches. I've tried a few times to get it
committed. See the patch for details...
This is
On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 04:09:58PM +0100, Mark Murray wrote:
Index: Makefile.inc1
===
RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/Makefile.inc1,v
retrieving revision 1.304
diff -u -d -r1.304 Makefile.inc1
--- Makefile.inc1 17 Sep 2002
On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 04:23:20PM +0100, Mark Murray wrote:
--- Makefile.inc1 17 Sep 2002 01:48:47 - 1.304
+++ Makefile.inc1 8 Oct 2002 21:40:05 -
@@ -601,10 +601,6 @@
#
# build-tools: Build special purpose build tools
#
-.if exists(${.CURDIR}/games)
On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 05:00:21PM +0100, Tony Finch wrote:
Below is my proposed patch to primes(6) and factor(6) which I plan
to commit in one go since the changes are somewhat inter-dependent.
Feedback is welcomed. I'm in the process of fixing the manual.
Merge changes from NetBSD and
On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 02:48:35PM -0700, Sam Leffler wrote:
Not sure if relevant but I was fighting a cpp0 SIGSEGV this morning. I
gdb'd cpp0 and tracked it down to data structure partly filled with garbage.
I couldn't tell if it was really a cpp0 bug or just memory getting trashed
There
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 03:55:36PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
Could you please just commit this on the vendor branch if it is the
vendor fix for now. Since the next vendor import will contain the
fix you don't need to worry about maintaining the local patch so
committing it onto the vendor
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 04:10:42PM -0700, Peter Wemm wrote:
David O'Brien wrote:
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 03:55:36PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
Could you please just commit this on the vendor branch if it is the
vendor fix for now. Since the next vendor import will contain the
fix you
On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 04:02:51PM +0930, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
It's been a while since we've used portmap(8) on -CURRENT systems. Is
it still needed, or can it be removed completely? At the very least,
the man page should stop claiming that it's necessary to run NFS.
Are you saying
On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 08:39:06AM -0600, Seth Hieronymus wrote:
afd0: 239MB IOMEGA ZIP 250 ATAPI [239/64/32] at ata1-slave PIO3
PHK had me
dd if=/dev/afd0 of=/dev/null
with no media in the drive. I get dd: /dev/afd0: Device busy, which is
what the problem is. Some where in /sys/dev/ata
On Sun, Oct 06, 2002 at 08:29:52AM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
The first c is part of the standard name for the whole of a (labelled)
disk device.
It's not any standard name. It is a convention used on a minority
of UNIX platforms out there, and it is certainly not standard even
for
On Sun, Oct 06, 2002 at 06:20:12PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
Can I get you to insert printfs like the one below all places
in vfs_mount.c and cd9660_vfsops.c where you see it using EINVAL
and try to find out which particular one it is ?
printf(EINVAL HERE %s %d\n, __FILE__,
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 12:44:30PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
No, it is established principal tha the importer of new features has the
responsibility to make older subsystems work.
So when is a KSE person going to fix the libc_r and releng4 binaries
problem?? That certainly is old
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 06:48:58AM +0400, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
The bug completely gone after I revert machdep.c to 1.538. This commit
cause bug:
revision 1.539
date: 2002/09/30 07:02:22; author: obrien; state: Exp;
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 07:20:38AM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Eric Hodel writes:
the bit that I cant figure out is that my CD-ROM won't mount the
CD I've got in it now, (an 80 minute CDR) but it has pre-geom.
Yes, there is a problem with SCSI-CD devices.
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 09:37:36AM -0400, Matthew Emmerton wrote:
Well, playing the devil's advocate -- isn't this the type of discussion the
preceeded the introduction of Perl into the base system, the introduction of
which created such a mess that we finally took Perl out of the base system
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 06:48:58AM +0400, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
The bug completely gone after I revert machdep.c to 1.538. This commit
cause bug:
revision 1.539
date: 2002/09/30 07:02:22; author: obrien; state: Exp;
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 12:49:05AM +0200, Ernst de Haan wrote:
I interpreted the same as you. But the fact that the base of a UNIX system
uses XML makes that UNIX system more attractive than other unices, IMO.
You would absolutely *love* Apple's MacOS-X then. It uses XML for many
low lever
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 01:57:59PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
David O'Brien wrote:
The created mess that caused us to take Perl out of the base system is
that it cannot be cross built. This library is C/C++ code; so we can
easily cross compile it.
I thought cross-building was a side
On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 04:46:48PM +1000, Tim Robbins wrote:
The best we can do to src/bin/sh is to do something like this:
#ifndef BOOTSTRAPPING
fmtstr(s, 64, [%td] , jp - jobtab + 1);
We know when this hit the tree, so please use:
#if defined(BOOTSTRAPPING)
On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 09:09:46PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
Provided nothing terminal pops up in the next 5 days, GEOM will
become default in -current on Saturday 5th of october.
Please test it now on _your_ configuration and tell me if it
fails to work.
I am unable to boot a GEOM
On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 09:09:46PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
Provided nothing terminal pops up in the next 5 days, GEOM will
become default in -current on Saturday 5th of october.
Please test it now on _your_ configuration and tell me if it
fails to work.
What are the exact steps you
On Sat, Sep 28, 2002 at 08:23:55PM +0200, Arjan van Leeuwen wrote:
Does anyone know how to fix this?
Backing out the the kernel ucontext_t changes and mcontext_t commits.
If you do that, please post a patch to the list. :-)
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 09:13:41PM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Yes, bg-fsck isn't really usable at the moment.
They work fine for me for quite a while. The last buildworld on my
server was Sept 15th.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the
On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 11:39:50AM +0200, Robert Suetterlin wrote:
Hello!
I currently upgraded my 4.4 to 4.7-PRE and now tried to get from
there to -CURRENT.
Unfortunately ``make buildworld'' fails during stage 2 when building
``usr.bin/file'':
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 10:16:40PM -0500, Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Sep 11), David O'Brien said:
I'd like to make this commit to get better performance on today's
streaming tape drives. It seems my DLT drive doesn't stream well
with the default block size of '10'.
Only
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 01:27:50PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
How are you supposed to disable -Werror in kernel builds? Setting
NO_WERROR in the env or passing it to 'make buildkernel' via -D
doesn't work; neither does putting -Wno-error in COPTFLAGS. I get the
following fatal warning when
I'd like to make this commit to get better performance on today's
streaming tape drives. It seems my DLT drive doesn't stream well with
the default block size of '10'.
Index: include/protocols/dumprestore.h
===
RCS file:
On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 11:50:17PM -0400, Garrett Wollman wrote:
GCC used to define a macro __STRICT_ANSI__ when `-ansi' was given on
the command line. The current version does not do this,
It seems to work for me:
$ cat foo.c
#ifdef __STRICT_ANSI__
#error __STRICT_ANSI__
On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 11:50:17PM -0400, Garrett Wollman wrote:
Rather than trying to deduce whether `long long' is supported from
other macros, I simply modified the compiler driver to tell us.
Looking at GCC on other platforms, _LONGLONG seems to be the most
preferred symbol. How does this
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 11:59:08PM +1000, Stephen McKay wrote:
This driver represents a counterintuitive state of affairs. I was impressed
when Bill Paul managed to support so many clone cards with one driver. But
now nobody has enough hardware on hand to test any change properly. There's
On Sat, Sep 07, 2002 at 11:55:08PM -0400, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
Hi,
As I am fixing some of the C++ ports for GCC 3.2, I found a problem with lex.
The following patch is required for lex to generate code which
can compile with GCC 3.2. It applies to /usr/src/usr.bin/lex
Committed.
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 09:28:28PM -0400, Kenneth Culver wrote:
Note that you'll need to have 'options CPU_ENABLE_SSE' in your kernel
configuration file if you have a SSE-capable CPU, otherwise you'll get
SIGILL from certain applications (e.g. ncurses)
What if you don't want to do this
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 12:42:47PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 01:24:19PM -0400, Matthew Emmerton wrote:
I thought it was part of the plan to drop all traces of a.out support in
5.x. Am I wrong?
We should be *very* careful to accurately describe what is
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 02:17:25AM -0700, Lamont Granquist wrote:
On Sun, 1 Sep 2002, David O'Brien wrote:
On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 12:37:14PM -0700, Lamont Granquist wrote:
It sounds like gcc-3.1 or gcc-3.2 will be archaic and buggy
by the time that 5.2 and 5.3 come out.
How would
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 12:08:41PM -0400, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
BTW, the bug is present in official 3.2 release too.
What about 3.1.1 release?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 10:21:13PM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
Actually, if 3.2 doesn't use thunks, it's likely to break Mozilla again.
This is really not that big of a deal. I'll just need to alter a patch,
and update the Mozilla people.
My understanding from watching the
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 09:29:05AM -0700, Gordon Tetlow wrote:
I think it should be turned off now. That will help shake out any issues
and people complaining that it is gone. The sooner the better.
It isn't a simple knob to turn it off. It requires several source
changes.
To Unsubscribe:
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 01:24:19PM -0400, Matthew Emmerton wrote:
I thought it was part of the plan to drop all traces of a.out support in
5.x. Am I wrong?
We should be *very* careful to accurately describe what is being
suggested.
I believe it is that 5.x a.out binaries not be supported.
On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 07:41:24AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought it was the general consensus that the 3.1 version of
the compiler was broken, and generated bad code, and that the 3.2
compiler had a lot of these problems corrected, but destroyed
binary compatability with 3.1.
On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 02:34:12PM -0700, Matthew Jacob wrote:
So, what is it about gcc 3.2 that's so important, considering that we
wanted to do a real 5.0 release within 2 months?
This is really 3.1.1 -- so it is a minor point release. 3.2 fixes a bug
that changes the API so it couldn't be
On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 02:50:50PM -0700, Matthew Jacob wrote:
I'm just a bit startled that this appears out of nowhere (I sure don't
recall it being discussed) and just happens, with 10 minutes warning.
This update has been *DEMANDED* in both -current and -ports for months now.
To
On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 03:00:34PM -0700, Will Andrews wrote:
On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 02:56:26PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
This update has been *DEMANDED* in both -current and -ports for months now.
Yes, GCC 3.1 prerelease bites, big time, k thx. Better to fix
it now than later, when
On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 12:37:14PM -0700, Lamont Granquist wrote:
It sounds like gcc-3.1 or gcc-3.2 will be archaic and buggy
by the time that 5.2 and 5.3 come out.
How would gcc-3.2 get more buggy over time than it is today??
archaic does apply however.
Why the fsck can't people come up to
On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 06:43:51PM -0700, Andrew P. Lentvorski wrote:
I wanted to download via cvsup a snapshot of -current which I had a decent
chance of compiling (I need to look at some atacontrol RAID stuff). So I
tried to find a -current which had a recent tag, the comment was made that
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 09:28:20AM -0400, Bosko Milekic wrote:
I think we're on our way to stabilizing -CURRENT enough for a DP2
soon. I would sit and wait it out just a tad longer. :-)
A 5.0 DP2 branch was created just yesterday. So how ever good
yesterday's -current was will affect
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 09:41:05PM +0200, Jens Schweikhardt wrote:
20020827:
Our /etc/termcap now has all the entries from the XFree86 xterm
almost unchanged. This means xterm now supports color by default.
If you used TERM=xterm-color in the past you now should use
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 07:06:40PM +0200, Jens Schweikhardt wrote:
# Mutt shows this when I start vi as my editor or run fetchmail:
#
# TERMCAP, line 0, terminal 'xterm-color': enter_alt_charset_mode but no acs_chars
#
# My centericq window ends up using pipe signs (|), minus signs (-) and
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 02:06:54PM -0500, Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Aug 28), Jens Schweikhardt said:
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 07:35:32PM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
# On (2002/08/28 19:04), Jens Schweikhardt wrote:
# Yes, use plain TERM=xterm. It's got color now as it should.
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 05:55:18PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
In general, though, the answer is that 3.1 sucks and 2.9x
does not. 8-).
Feh. 3.1's optimizer is less buggy in my experience.
Use at least GCC 3.2, if you feel compelled to use a buggy
non-maintenance release level GCC;
On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 03:06:08PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
David O'Brien wrote:
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 05:55:18PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
In general, though, the answer is that 3.1 sucks and 2.9x
does not. 8-).
Feh. 3.1's optimizer is less buggy in my experience
On Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 11:34:01AM -0400, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
If I do:
pkg_add
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-5-current/All/lynx-ssl-2.8.4.1b_1.tbz
Please give the output of ``ident /usr/sbin/pkg_add''.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
On Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 12:15:50PM -0400, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
On Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 08:40:32AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
On Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 11:34:01AM -0400, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
Please give the output of ``ident /usr/sbin/pkg_add''.
/usr/sbin/pkg_add:
$FreeBSD: src
On Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 07:03:30PM -0400, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
On Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 12:55:07PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
As always, cvsup and rebuilt the piece of software in question before
reporting a problem:
OK, I've cvsup'd, and rebuilt pkg_add, but I still get the same
On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 03:47:47PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
And we all know how successful that was, right?
On the other side, we all know how successfull we were trying to get GCC
2.95.x bugs fixed for us, right? Do you really want to repeat this
deeply satisfying experiment
On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 01:04:55PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
Blah Terry, TOTALLY 110% INCORRECT. The situation was the same as our
FreeBSD 3.x users that still post PR's against RELENG_3 and want us to
fix things. Even where there was complete patches against 2.94.3
available; the
I have gotten 3 ffs_blkfree() panics today (2 while background fsck'ing).
The most detail I've been able to get is:
dev=ad0s2a bno=544437089 bsize=16384 size=16384
panic: ffs_blkfree: bad size
cpuid=1, lapic.id=
a traceback shows:
ffs_blkfree()
indir_trunc()
On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 09:21:31PM +0400, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 03:15:02 +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
Anyway, it has one blatant style bug (not 1TBS) and no explanation of
the bug, so it should not have been committed verbatim. See another
reply for an analysis
On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 12:23:19PM -0700, Eric Melville wrote:
Since pkg-comment contains only a single line, wouldn't it be more subtile
to put it in a COMMENT field as does NetBSD, instead of using a file? I think
it would speed up updates.
On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 09:41:19PM +0200, Szilveszter Adam wrote:
This is known problem, straight updates by simply make world do not
work from -STABLE. Therefore, one has to very carefully follow the
procedure described in the UPDATING file even though normally not so
many steps would be
On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 08:13:55AM +0200, Marc Recht wrote:
Because chances are good that the bugs still aren't fixed. I reported a
bug related to optimization with -march=athlon recently and the reply
If you've got a newer Athlon (XP) then you could compile it with -march=athlon-xp.
I've
On Mon, Aug 05, 2002 at 12:58:03AM -0400, Alp ATICI wrote:
I guess that is never going to be the case. Since ATI does not produce
drivers for linux (or any other UNIX) and has no such plans (AFAIK).
I don't know why you think that. I sent a week in Germany with ATI's
FireGL Linux driver
On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 09:26:32PM +0200, Marc Recht wrote:
IMO going to 3.3 would be much better -- we can actually get our needs
better addressed as the compiler is still in development, but about to
head into code slush. We cannot affect GCC 3.2.1 too much due to it
being on a release
On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 08:27:15PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
+CD9660 cd9660 3 options ISO 9660 Filesystem
+MSDOSFSmsdosfs 3 options MSDOS filsystem
+NFSCLIENT nfsclient 3 options Network Filesystem Client
SYSVSHMsysvshm 2
On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 08:15:18PM -0600, Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
Given what they're evidently trying to do with the code (make it available
on an evaluation basis, and then sell licenses to use it in products), it
makes no sense that they would want to release it for use in FreeBSD. To
On Wed, Aug 07, 2002 at 03:59:47PM +0200, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See URL:http://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/bugs.html for instructions.
*** Error code 1
Stop in
On Sun, Aug 04, 2002 at 08:01:10PM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
sorry, but some time ago I read here that gcc -O2 breaks our printf() in
libc. I haven't find any assembler code in /usr/src/lib/libc/stdio/vfprintf.c,
...
If someone could find the small segment of code where the optimizer
On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 04:20:53AM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
I wouldn't trust -O2 for releases without lots of testing in -current
(and not updating the compiler after testing).
The rest of the GCC using world can use -O2 on their code. We are the
only ones that have so much trouble with it.
On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 11:09:23AM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
Huh?! Read the first posting in this thread. I suggest that you do
forced commits to contrib/gcc/config/i386/*.h (probably other arches
too) that were surgered.
I already did 2 forced committs. See some of Peter's email on the
On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 03:16:35PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
I have stumbled to this too, and thought I'm getting crazy. After
some hours of investigation, I have found that O'Brien did some
repo-surgery there, removed some revisions, and later replaced
them with the new stuff (well, new
On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 10:14:34PM +0900, Mitsuru IWASAKI wrote:
Hmmm, I don't think so. How about typing
unset acpi_load
in loader prompt, and see if this panic disappear or still happen?
Where is it documented what to do to stop the autoloading of acpi.ko?
To Unsubscribe: send mail
On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 02:57:44AM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
I'm surprised -Os [-falign...] isn't already the default for crunches.
-Os is -O2 except for those optimizations which bloat. We don't trust
-O2 and thus maybe should not -Os. Hopefully we have found all our bad
in-line ASM and -O2
On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 02:28:46PM +0100, Mark Murray wrote:
/usr/bin/catman John Rochester [EMAIL PROTECTED] - redo - done
The catman C implimentation is VERY hard to read and I find totally
unmaintainable. I have emailed John about some functionality I was
trying to add --
telnet -X sra currentbox
Trying --
Connected to curentbox
Escape character is '^]'.
FreeBSD/i386 (currentbox) (ttypq)
login: obrien
otp-md5 16 dr8821 ext
Password:
otp-md5 16 dr8821 ext
Password [echo on]:
What I type for the password is not
On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 10:02:35AM +0200, Martin Blapp wrote:
sjlj and dwarf2 work. But the problem with CURRENT is that this patch seems
to be needed. (Patch from Alexander Kabaev)
This patch is wrong. I committed a correct one from Alxander.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 04:28:06PM +0200, Jeremy Lea wrote:
http://people.freebsd.org/~reg/x11.patch
Would someone PLEASE commit these!?!?!?!?!?!!
Before I get totally sick and tired of the main in my inbox and do it
myself.
I _truely_ fail to see what is so hard about fixing X to compile with
On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 09:32:55PM -0700, Peter Wemm wrote:
Are the ftp paths equivalent? I seem to recall that current.freebsd.org
is referenced in sysinstall. Will just a CNAME work?
ENOCLUE. But does it matter? Either today or w/the CNAME sysinstall is
referenced. The delay in waiting
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 01:48:04PM +0900, Makoto Matsushita wrote:
snapshots.jp.FreeBSD.org is now becoming too busy ftp site, many
connections are rejected because of max connection limit. I'm now
seeking donors of network bandwidth and PCs (but I don't know I can
find or not). Anyway,
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 08:37:37PM -0500, Erik Greenwald wrote:
This may be a stupid question, but is gdbreplay currently broken? I just
cvsup'd today (2002-07-08, 18:42 CST (GMT-6))
*shrug* I can't reproduce this.
cc -O -pipe -D_GNU_SOURCE -I. -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/gdbreplay
On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 12:27:31PM +0100, Ian Dowse wrote:
I'll commit your printf format changes first anyway - thanks!
Just to make sure, you're not going to fix the problem dump problem; just
fix the bad screen output. Correct? Since I've got a very reproduceable
test case; I wanted to
On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 11:28:30PM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote:
is that machine dead?
It's dead Jim. I've asked [EMAIL PROTECTED] to CNAME current and
releng4 to the .jp snap server. Perhaps a reminder to hostmaster by
someone else would help.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
On Thu, Jul 04, 2002 at 01:34:42PM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote:
The K7 had a broken on-board usb (the AMD
chipset had a PCI contention bug for the usb port, so the tin back panel
of the board blocked out the usb, and the K7 came with a PCI usb card,
which ate up one of your PCI slots.
On Fri, Jul 05, 2002 at 06:48:56PM +0200, Georg-W. Koltermann wrote:
Am Mi, 2002-07-03 um 17.31 schrieb David O'Brien:
On a 27-June-2002 23:02:00 UTC system (just before ipfw2 went in,
pre-KSE3), dump will not complete dumping more than 5GB. At that point
it stops responding properly
I can rlogin to a -CURRENT box as root. However `rsh box id' comes back
with:
Jul 3 00:11:33 box rshd[4916]: root@dragon as rootk: permission denied
(authentication error). cmd='id'
Is PAM getting in the way here or something?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 11:01:14PM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote:
(csh built with GCC2, -O3)
test3:/home/dillon time ./x.csh
0.832u 0.848s 0:01.68 99.4% 881+645k 0+0io 0pf+0w
test3:/home/dillon time ./x.csh
0.926u 0.755s 0:01.68 99.4% 889+654k 0+0io 0pf+0w
On a 27-June-2002 23:02:00 UTC system (just before ipfw2 went in,
pre-KSE3), dump will not complete dumping more than 5GB. At that point
it stops responding properly to ^T, which should give DUMP: 47.52% done,
finished in 1:19. At the 5GB mark, ^T gives:
load: 0.00 cmd: dump 3981
On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 05:26:50PM +0300, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to upgrade installed XFree86-4-Server package, but found that
a new gcc can't compile it. Following is relevant error output:
...
In file included from translate.c:779:
../../../../extras/Mesa/src/trans_tmp.h:
On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 11:45:19AM -0400, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
which has been seeing sporadic messages over the past week
or two. Sheldon has a few informative messages which include
some patches to test. (although I don't think the patches
are a complete fix for the problems we're
On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 08:56:02PM +0200, Jeremy Lea wrote:
I can build x11/XFree86-4 with the following patches, which I harvested
from various email's since the gcc 3.1 import. Which ones are really
needed, and why the X11 libraries are built four times during the build
of the meta port,
On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 08:08:28PM +0300, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
In file included from translate.c:779:
../../../../extras/Mesa/src/trans_tmp.h: In function `trans_1_GLdouble_1ub_elt':
../../../../extras/Mesa/src/trans_tmp.h:124: could not find a spill register
(insn 96 94 97 (set
On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 07:43:22PM -0700, George V. Neville-Neil wrote:
I know everyone says they all work but i'd like some recommendations on
MP machines for -CURRENT work. I'll be ordering one this week.
There is but _1_ dual system to get -- Tyan Thunder K7 (code name Guinness).
301 - 400 of 1574 matches
Mail list logo
